图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2020 , Vol. 64 >Issue 23: 141 - 150

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2020.23.014

综述述评

Altmetrics的形成与演进:理论假说、发展阶段及学科关系

  • 张洋 ,
  • 庞进京 ,
  • 母丹
展开
  • 中山大学资讯管理学院 广州 510006
张洋(ORCID:0000-0002-6442-3593),博士,教授;母丹(ORCID:0000-0001-9147-5009),本科生。

收稿日期: 2020-05-19

  修回日期: 2020-07-22

  网络出版日期: 2020-12-05

基金资助

本文系广东省软科学研究计划项目"面向粤港澳大湾区的科技评价机制、方法与应用研究"（项目编号：2018A070712016）、中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目"新型信息环境下科技综合评价体系研究"（项目编号：19wkzd28）和中山大学国家高等教育质量常态监测数据中心2020年高等教育质量研究项目（项目编号：M2003）研究成果之一。

收起

Formation and Evolution of Altmetrics: Theoretical Hypothesis, Developmental Stage and Disciplinary Relationship

  • Zhang Yang ,
  • Pang Jinjing ,
  • Mu Dan
Expand
  • School of Information Management, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510006

Received date: 2020-05-19

  Revised date: 2020-07-22

  Online published: 2020-12-05

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义] Altmetrics诞生十周年之际，对其前期发展情况进行总结，有助于推动其往积极方向发展。[方法/过程] 利用文献计量方法进行量化研究以展现Altmetrics领域的总体研究和发展情况；从术语变迁、定义等方面揭示其内涵；提出三种理论假说寻求Altmetrics存在合理性的理论支撑；划分不同阶段梳理其发展程度；分析它与其他学科的关系以明确学科属性及价值。[结果/结论] Altmetrics为计量学提供了一种新思维、新方法；开放科学假说、数字学术假说和学术传承假说符合新环境Altmetrics发展的新特点，有效支撑了Altmetrics的存在与发展；Altmetrics发展迅速，但现阶段处于发展初期，且国内外发展程度存在差异；在辨析与其密切相关学科之间关系的基础上，认为需推动Altmetrics自身学科纵深发展以及加强跨学科的合作研究。

关键词： Altmetrics; 替代计量学; "; 五计学"

本文引用格式

张洋 , 庞进京 , 母丹 . Altmetrics的形成与演进:理论假说、发展阶段及学科关系[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020 , 64(23) : 141 -150 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2020.23.014

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] As Altmetrics celebrates its 10th anniversary, this paper hopes to conduct a review of its early development and aims to help move it in the right direction. [Method/process] In this paper, quantitative research was conducted by bibliometrics to show the overall situation of Altmetrics. Revealed its connotation from the aspects of terms change and definition; Three theoretical hypotheses were proposed to find the theoretical support for the existence of Altmetrics; Divided different stages to define its development degree; The relationship between Altmetrics and other disciplines was analyzed to clarify its subject attributes and values. [Result/conclusion] This research shows that, Altmetrics provides a new way of thinking and methodology for metrology. The open science hypothesis, digital academic hypothesis and academic inheritance hypothesis are in line with the new characteristics of the development of Altmetrics in the new environment, which effectively supports the existence and development of Altmetrics. Altmetrics is developing rapidly, but it is still in its early stage of development, and there are differences in the development degree between home and abroad. Based on the analysis of the relationship between Altmetrics and closely related disciplines, it is believed that it is necessary to promote the in-depth development of Altmetrics' own discipline and strengthen interdisciplinary cooperative research.

Key words： Altmetrics; Alternative metrics; Five metrics

参考文献

[1] PRIEM J, TARABORELLI D, GROTH P, et al. Altmetrics:a manifesto[EB/OL].[2020-03-20]. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/.
[2] 余厚强.替代计量学:概念、指标与应用[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,2019:3.
[3] BOLLEN J, DE SOMPEL H V, SMITH J A, et al. Toward alternative metrics of journal impact:a comparison of download and citation data[J]. Information processing & management, 2005, 41(6):1419-1440.
[4] 余厚强,任全娥,张洋,等.Altmetrics的译名分歧:困扰、影响及其辨析[J].中国图书馆学报,2019,45(1):47-59.
[5] 刘春丽. Web 2.0环境下的科学计量学:选择性计量学[J].图书情报工作,2012, 56(14):52-56.
[6] 由庆斌,汤珊红.补充计量学及应用前景[J].情报理论与实践, 2013,36(12):6-10.
[7] 邱均平,余厚强.替代计量学的提出过程与研究进展[J].图书情报工作,2013,57(19):5-12.
[8] NISO.NISO alternative metrics (altmetrics) initiative phase 1 white paper[EB/OL].[2020-03-20].http//www.niso.org/apps/group_public/download.php/13809/Altmetrics_project_phase1_white_paper.pdf.
[9] PRIEM J. Altmetrics[M]//CRONIN B, SUGIMOTO C R. Beyond bibliometrics:harnessing multidimensional indicators of scholarly impact. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press, 2014,263-287.
[10] PIWOWAR H. Altmetrics:value all research products[J]. Nature,2013,493(7431),159-159.
[11] HAUSTEIN S,PETERS I,BAR-ILAN J,PRIEM J,et al. Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community[J]. Scientometrics,2014,101(2),1145-1163.
[12] WELLER K. Social media and altmetrics:an overview of current alternative approaches to measuring scholarly impact[M]//Incentives and Performance. Cham:Springer,2015:261-276.
[13] MINGERS J, Leydesdorff L. A review of theory and practice in scientometrics[J]. European journal of operational research,2015,246(1):1-19.
[14] BARBARO A, GENTILI D, REBUDDL C. Altmetrics as new indicators of scientific impact[J]. Journal of the european association for health information and libraries,2014,10(1):3-6.
[15] 刘春丽. altmetrics:从理论假说、术语提出到内涵的重新界定[J].图书情报工作,2015, 59(6):82-89.
[16] 刘桂锋,钱锦琳,田丽丽.开放科学:概念辨析、体系解析与理念探析[J].图书馆论坛,2018(11):1-9.
[17] 刘丽敏,王晴.国外Altmetrics理论研究与实践进展[J].情报理论与实践,2017,40(3):132-137.
[18] FOSTER[EB/OL].[2020-03-10].htps://www.fosteropen-science.eu/project.
[19] BOLLEN J, RODRIGUEZ M A, HERBERT V D S. Mesur:usage-based metrics of scholarly impact[C]//ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on digital libraries. Vancouver BC:ACM, 2007:474.
[20] TARABORELLI D. Soft peer review:social software and distributed scientific evaluation[EB/OL].[2020-03-10]. http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/8279/.
[21] PATTERSON M. Article-level metrics at PLoS-addition of usage data[EB/OL].[2020-03-10]. https://theplosblog.plos.org/2009/09/article-level-metrics-at-plos-addition-of-usage-data/.
[22] 赵蓉英, 汪少震, 陈志毅. 补充计量学及其分析工具之探究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2015, 38(6):29-34.
[23] ADIE E, ROE W. Altmetric:enriching scholarly content with article-level discussion and metrics[J]. Learned publishing, 2013, 26(1):11-17.
[24] PIWOWAR H. Introduction altmetrics:what, why and where?[J]. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 2013, 39(4):8-9.
[25] THELWALL M. A brief history of Altmetrics[J].Research trends,2014(37):3-4.
[26] MANDAVILLI A. Trial by Twitter[J].Nature,2011,469(7330):286-287.
[27] Proceedings of ISSI 2015[EB/OL].[2020-02-28]. http://www.issi-society.org/publications/issi-conference-proceedings/proceedings-of-issi-2015/.
[28] 邱均平,柴雯. 从第15届ISSI会议看全球科学计量学发展[J].情报理论与实践, 2016, 39(8):1-5.
[29] Proceedings of ISSI 2017[EB/OL].[2020-02-28]. http://www.issi-society.org/publications/issi-conference-proceedings/proceedings-of-issi-2017/.
[30] Proceedings of ISSI 2019[EB/OL].[2020-02-28]. http://www.issi-society.org/publications/issi-conference-proceedings/proceedings-of-issi-2019/.
[31] 特别策划:Altmetrics评价研究[J].图书与情报,2018(5):1.
[32] 王贤文.Altmetrics:大数据时代的科学计量学[J].图书情报知识,2019(2):4.
[33] 李长玲.专题研究:学术论文Altmetrics计量指标的特征及其应用研究主持人导语[J].情报资料工作,2019,40(6):5.
[34] 杨思洛. Altmetrics专题[J].农业图书情报,2019,31(5):4.
[35] 《图书情报工作》杂志社.《图书情报工作》2019年选题指南[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019,63(22):150.
[36] 赵蓉英,魏明坤,汪少震.Altmetrics的发展动态探析[J].情报科学,2017,35(2):171-176.
[37] 赵丹群.网络信息计量学研究与发展评述[J].情报理论与实践,2019,42(6):154-158,143.
[38] 张洋,庞进京,朱嘉麒,等.科学计量视角下替代计量学与网络计量学的关系研究[C]//第十五届中国科技政策与管理学术年会暨研究会理事会会议. 南昌:中国科学学与科技政策研究会, 2019.
[39] 余厚强, 木拉提.从ISSI2019会议解读替代计量学研究新进展[J].情报理论与实践,2020,43(7):157-164.
[40] 巴志超,李纲,周利琴,等. 数据科学及其对情报学变革的影响[J].情报学报, 2018,37(7):653-667.
[41] 任全娥.大数据背景下的文献计量学研究进展与学科融合[J].情报理论与实践,2019,42(1):48-52.
[42] 王芳,赵洪,马嘉悦,等. 数据科学视角下数据溯源研究与实践进展[J].中国图书馆学报,2019,45(243):79-100.
[43] 余厚强,曹雪婷. 替代计量数据质量评估体系构建研究[J].图书情报知识,2019(2):19-27,50.
[44] 李勇,邵钟钰,赵星. Altmetrics背景下的期刊多维度测评指标研究[J].情报学报, 2017,36(2):190-196.
[45] 王菲菲,刘家妤,贾晨冉. 基于替代计量学的高校科研人员学术影响力综合评价研究[J].科研管理,2019,40(4):264-276.
[46] 赵蓉英,郭凤娇. Altmetrics:学术影响力评价的新视角[J].情报科学,2017,35(1):14-18.
[47] 赵蓉英,张扬,陈婧.Altmetrics在论文影响力评价中的应用研究[J].情报科学,2018,36(6):3-8,39.
[48] 刘春丽,刘丽萍,马凤毛.Altmetrics指标评价科研产出社会影响力研究现状及应用挑战[J]. 农业图书情报,2019,31(5):13-21.
[49] 姜春林.学术评价学的学科体系及创建策略[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社科版),2018(2):225-232.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉