图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2020 , Vol. 64 >Issue 24: 57 - 62

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2020.24.007

纪念中国科学院文献情报中心成立70周年专辑

科研机构引进电子资源科技支撑绩效评价研究与发展——以中国科学院集团引进外文电子期刊为例

  • 朱学军 ,
  • 罗祺姗 ,
  • 赵艳
展开
  • 1. 中国科学院文献情报中心 北京 100190;
    2. 中国科学院大学经济与管理学院图书情报与档案管理系 北京 100190
朱学军(ORCID:0000-0002-1345-6141),馆员;赵艳(ORCID:0000-0002-0515-1954),研究馆员,博士,硕士生导师。

收稿日期: 2020-11-05

  修回日期: 2020-11-27

  网络出版日期: 2020-12-20

基金资助

本文系2019年中国科学院文献情报能力建设专项课题"分布式电子资源知识资源中心及服务平台规范建设"（项目编号：E0290204）研究成果之一，受"中国科学院文献情报中心成立七十周年主题论坛与纪念文集出版"项目资助出版。

收起

Study on Scientific Outcome Assessment of E-resources Subscribed by Research Institutions——A Case Study on CAS Consortium's Foreign E-journals

  • Zhu Xuejun ,
  • Luo Qishan ,
  • Zhao Yan
Expand
  • 1. National Science Library of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190;
    2. Department of Library, Information and Archives Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190

Received date: 2020-11-05

  Revised date: 2020-11-27

  Online published: 2020-12-20

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义] 介绍中国科学院文献情报中心在电子资源科技支撑绩效评价领域开展的工作以及取得的阶段性成果，为科研机构开展电子资源科技支撑绩效评价工作提供有益参考。[方法/过程] 结合国内外电子资源成效评估的理论与实践，构建以外文电子期刊为案例的电子资源科技支撑绩效评价指标体系，并进行实例评价；同时，根据研究所的科技支撑绩效评价需求，补充和完善面向研究所评价目的的电子资源科技支撑绩效评价指标体系。[结果/结论] 通过实例评价，构建的外文电子期刊科技支撑绩效指标体系具有可操作性；同时，融合研究所的评价需求，改造构建形成了满足集团牵头单位和研究所评价需求的外文电子期刊科技支撑评价指标体系，具体包含4个评价方面、16项评价指标。

关键词： 外文电子期刊; 集团采购; 科技支撑绩效; 评价指标体系

本文引用格式

朱学军 , 罗祺姗 , 赵艳 . 科研机构引进电子资源科技支撑绩效评价研究与发展——以中国科学院集团引进外文电子期刊为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020 , 64(24) : 57 -62 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2020.24.007

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] This paper mainly introduced the e-resources scientific outcome assessment index system and relevant practice carried by National Science Library, CAS, in order to provide useful suggestion for scientific outcome assessment.[Method/process] Based on the theory and experience of outcome assessment carried by the main libraries at home and abroad, the e-resources scientific outcome assessment index system is established and applied to assess foreign e-journals scientific outcome, and is improved combined with the assessment needs of National Science Library, CAS and CAS's institutions.[Result/conclusion] The e-resources scientific outcome assessment index system is operable, and is improved, containing 4 assessment aspects and 16 indicators, to meet the assessment needs of National Science Library, CAS and CAS's institutions.

Key words： foreign e-journals; consortium purchasing; scientific outcome assessment; evaluation index system

参考文献

[1] 《数字图书馆资源管理指南》发布[EB/OL].[2020-11-06]. http://www.lsc.org.cn/contents/1186/14755/.
[2] 张红霞. 国际图书馆服务质量评价:绩效评估与成效评估两大体系的形成与发展[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2009, 35(1):78-85.
[3] American Library Association. Task force on academic library outcomes assessment report[EB/OL].[2020-11-17]. http://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/whitepapers/taskforceacademic.
[4] Institute of Museum and Library Services. Outcome based evaluation basics[EB/OL].[2020-11-19]. https://www.imls.gov/grants/outcome-based-evaluation/basics.
[5] American Library Association. Standards for libraries in higher education[EB/OL].[2020-11-19]. http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/standardslibraries.
[6] BLAGDEN P. The LIRG/SCONUL measuring impact initiative overview of phase 1 impact projects[J/OL].[2020-11-19]. https://www.lirgjournal.org.uk/index.php/lir/article/view/184.
[7] PAYNE P, CONYERS A. Measuring the impact of higher education libraries:the LIRG/SCONUL impact implementation initiative[J/OL].[2020-11-19]. https://www.lirgjournal.org.uk/index.php/lir/article/view/180.
[8] Association of College and Research Libraries. Academic library impact on student learning and success:findings from assessment in action team projects[R]. Chicago:ACRL,2017.
[9] 教育部高等学校图书情报工作指导委员会. 《普通高等学校图书馆评估指标》及评估办法(2010年修改稿)[EB/OL].[2020-11-06]. http://www.scal.edu.cn/tjpg/202006030136.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉