[目的/意义] 评价是开源情报工作的基础，国际智库作为开源情报的重要来源却尚未得到重视，理论研究落后于实践需求，建立智库领域的开源情报评价研究，旨在对智库领域的开源情报研究做出相关理论补充，为智库领域开源情报实践提供参考。[方法/过程] 聚焦于情报收集视角，利用演绎法论证开源性是国际智库作为开源情报来源的重要前提，在此基础上结合国际智库自身特点，归纳出国际智库开源情报具有专业性、政策性、预警性、证据性和数据价值性等主要特征，为开源情报评价提供理论依据，并借鉴北约系统的评价方法建立对国际智库开源情报的评价框架。[结果/结论] 在国际智库开源情报评价框架中，情报人员和专业领域人员需要建立合作，共同作为评价主体。同时，评价对象需同时兼顾对情报源评价和情报内容评价，其中对情报源评价重点关注智库的专业性、独立性和公信力，对情报内容评价的重点包含8个要素：真实性、完整性、时效性、预测性、实践性、反情报性、可理解性和可回溯性。
[Purpose/significance] The evaluation of the value of intelligence is the foundation of open source intelligence work. International think tanks have not received attention or been considered as an important source of open source intelligence, and theoretical research lags behind practical requirements. Research on evaluation of open source intelligence from think tanks aims to make relevant theoretical supplements to open source intelligence research of think tanks and provide references for open source intelligence practices in the field of think tanks. [Method/process] Focusing on the perspective of intelligence collection, this paper used deductive methods to demonstrate that open source is an important prerequisite for international think tanks as a source of open source intelligence. On this basis, combined with the characteristics of international think tanks, this paper also concluded that the open source intelligence of international think tanks has affordances of professionalism, policy-oriented, early warning, evidence-based and data value, which provides theoretical basis for open source intelligence evaluation. And under the guidance of the evaluation methods of Admiralty Code, the paper built an open source intelligence evaluation framework of international think tanks. [Result/conclusion] In the open source intelligence evaluation framework of international think tanks, intelligence personnel and professionals in the field need to establish cooperation and jointly act as evaluators. At the same time, evaluation objects conclude both the evaluation of intelligence sources and the evaluation of intelligence content. The evaluation of intelligence sources should focus on the professionalism, independence and credibility of think tanks; and the evaluation of intelligence content should consider 8 key elements including authenticity, integrity, timeliness, predictability, practicality, counterintelligence, understandability, and traceability.
[1] 丁波涛.国外开源情报工作的发展与我国的对策研究[J].情报资料工作,2011(6):103-106.
[2] 莱特克里菲.情报主导警务[M].崔嵩, 译.北京:中国人民公安大学出版社, 2010.
[3] CHRISTOPHER H, MATTHEW M,DANIEL S, et.al. Open source intelligence in the twenty-first century:new approaches and opportunities[M]. New York:Palgrave Macmillan, 2014:9.
[4] WINKS R W. Cloak & gown:scholars in the secret war, 1939-1961[M]. New Haven:Yale University Press, 1987.
[5] MCGONAGLE J J, VELLA C M. A case for competitive intelligence[J]. Information management, 2002, 36(4):35-40.
[6] Headquarters, Department of the Army. Open source intelligence(FMI 2-22.9)[EB/OL].[2020-12-12]. https://info.publicintelligence.net/fmi2-22-9.pdf.
[7] WILLIAMS H J, BLUM I. Defining second generation open source intelligence (OSINT) for the defense enterprise[EB/OL].[2021-01-10]. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1964.html.
[8] MCGANN J G. 2019 Global go to think tank index report[R]. Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania,2020.
[9] National Counterintelligence Center. A counterintelligence reader, volume Ⅲ:Post-World War Ⅱ to closing the 20th century[M]. Washington, DC:Military Bookshop, 2011.
[10] 李刚.从情报研究到智库研究[J].图书馆论坛,2017,37(9):50-54.
[11] 陈成鑫,曾庆华.情报研究视角下智库情报能力建设路径[J].图书情报工作,2018,62(21):105-111.
[12] 周晓英, 崔佳佳, 唐宇萍, 等.情报学的起源与方向——从布什的《诚如所思》谈起[J].情报科学, 2004(2):129-132.
[13] 陈峰. 论面向高端用户提供情报服务的四个层次[J]. 情报杂志,2016,35(10):13-17.
[14] 栗琳. 情报机构视域下情报, 智库与战略决策关系透析[J]. 情报资料工作, 2020, 41(5):31-36.
[15] 李北伟,李阳,李佳逸,等.信息安全视域下的智库情报服务研究[J].情报理论与实践,2020,43(5):61-67.
[16] 孟巍.图书情报机构对国家智库建设的支持研究[J].河南图书馆学刊,2018,38(12):123-124.
[17] 王琪.图书情报服务建设新型智库研究[J].中国管理信息化,2018,21(12):155-157
[18] 朱波,张姝末.基于数据驱动的高校图书馆新型智库知识服务机制研究[J].图书馆学刊,2019,41(9):80-83,87.
[19] 祝红艺.开放科学视角下图情机构与智库组织合作机制研究[J].图书馆,2020(12):14-19.
[20] 彭瑛,李树德,曹如中.智库与情报机构融合发展模式研究[J].情报杂志,2019,38(8):90-96.
[21] 赵浩玥, 程刚. 新型智库视域下科技情报机构研究进展[J]. 湘南学院学报, 2020, 41(4):120-125.
[22] 栗琳,卢胜军.智库建设背景下的情报机构转型研究[J].科技情报研究,2020,2(2):1-19.
[23] 丁璐璐,徐恺英,李欣颖.智库情报收集环节质量影响因素及作用路径扎根分析[J].图书情报工作,2019,63(21):78-86.
[24] 黄晓斌, 丁孟思. 兰德公司项目研究的信息来源分析——基于2010-2019年有关中国问题研究报告的引文调查[J/OL]. 情报理论与实践.[2020-10-23]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1762.g3.20201022.1806.002.html
[25] 陈峰. 情报与智库双重视角的美国中国经济与安全评估委员会解析[J]. 情报杂志, 2019, 38(10):53-59.
[26] 张颖, 初景利, 栾瑞英. 情报视角下的智库评价[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2020, 43(10):69-73.
[27] 赵小康, 周爱民. 公开源情报的基础性价值及可靠性评价研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2011, 30(10):16-20,63.
[28] 曾文, 李辉, 樊彦芳, 等. 开源情报环境下的科技前沿识别体系研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2019, 42(7):30-34.
[29] 王秀成. 关于情报源定量评价问题的探讨[J]. 情报科学, 1986(3):28-35.
[30] NATO. NATO OSINT handbook v1.2[M/OL].[2020-11-10]. http://www.oss.net/dynamaster/file_archive/030201/ca5fb66734f540fbb4f8f6ef759b258c/NATO%20OSINT%20Handbook%20v1.2%20-%20Jan%202002.pdf.
[31] ENGLISH L. Process management and information quality:how improving information production processes improved information(product) quality[C]//FISHER C, DAVIDSON B. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on information quality.Cambridge:Institute of Technology, 2002:206-209.
[32] 邹培. 开源数据评估与使用探析[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2019,42(10):52-56.
[33] NOBLE D F. Assessing the reliability of open source information[C]//Proceedings of the 7th international conference on information fusion. Paris:International Society of Information Fusion, 2004:1172-1178.
[34] 任恒.国外智库研究的兴起与进展[J].情报杂志,2020,39(7):59-66,113.
[35] 李奡.推动媒体与智库融合发展[J].现代国企研究,2015(15):44-51.
[36] Brookings. Brookings 2019 annual report[EB/OL].[2020-11-22]. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/2019-annual-report.pdf.
[37] 初景利,唐果媛.论从学术研究到智库研究的转化机制[J].情报理论与实践,2018,41(11):1-5.
[38] 王文.论智库与学术的异同[J].智库理论与实践,2017,2(2):24-32.
[39] 缪其浩.组织决策中的"情报"与循证决策中的"证据"[J].科技情报研究,2020,2(3):1-12.
[40] 梁宵萌,刘燕权.皮尤研究中心信息管理实践对学术图书馆智库服务的启示[J].图书与情报,2019(5):72-78.
[41] Pew Research Center. How to access Pew research datasets[EB/OL].[2020-12-10]. https://www.pewresearch.org/2013/04/18/how-to-access-pew-research-datasets/.
[42] HANSON J M. The admiralty code:a cognitive tool for self-directed learning. International journal of learning, teaching and educational research, 2015,14(1):97-115.
[43] LEMERCIER P. The fundamentals of intelligence[M]//CAPET P, DELAVALLADE T. Information evaluation. Hoboken:Wiley-ISTE, 55-100.
[44] HOVLAND C I, JANIS I L, KELLE H H. Communication and persuasion[M]. New Haven:Yale University Press:1953.
[45] 张志强.世界百年未有之大变局与智库使命和智库建设[J].智库理论与实践,2020,5(4):1-12.
[46] TROMBLAY D E. Intelligence and the intelligentsia:exploitation of U.S. think tanks by foreign powers[J]. International journal of intelligence and counterintelligence,2018,31(1):1-18.
[47] 李刚.高校新型智库治理与营运[J].决策与信息,2018(11):37-45.
