情报研究

网络隐私争议事件中用户隐私关注及情感对比研究

  • 谭芳 ,
  • 杨阳 ,
  • 卓伊玲 ,
  • 徐健 ,
  • 肖卓
展开
  • 1. 中山大学资讯管理学院 广州 510006;
    2. 中山大学图书馆 广州 510275
谭芳(ORCID:0000-0003-3007-0547),硕士研究生;杨阳(ORCID:0000-0003-0154-1637),硕士研究生;卓伊玲(ORCID:0000-0001-7522-6328),硕士研究生;徐健(ORCID:0000-0003-4886-4708),教授,硕士生导师。

收稿日期: 2020-06-25

  修回日期: 2020-09-07

  网络出版日期: 2021-01-20

基金资助

本文系广东省自然科学基金项目“情感分歧度量化模型及其应用研究”(项目编号:2018A030313981)研究成果之一。

Comparison of Privacy Concern and Sentimental Characteristics of Users in Internet Privacy Controversial Events

  • Tan Fang ,
  • Yang Yang ,
  • Zhuo Yiling ,
  • Xu Jian ,
  • Xiao Zhuo
Expand
  • 1. School of Information Management, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510006;
    2. Sun Yat-Sen University Library, Guangzhou 510275

Received date: 2020-06-25

  Revised date: 2020-09-07

  Online published: 2021-01-20

摘要

[目的/意义] 人工智能、大数据等领域的快速发展使得商业发展与隐私保护之间的矛盾愈发尖锐。通过对不同类型的网络隐私争议事件微博评论进行情感及话题对比分析,以探究不同情境下网络用户的隐私态度的异同点与背后机理。[方法/过程] 采集2012年至2019年网络隐私争议事件的相关微博评论,对其进行预处理,作为实验数据;基于情感词典计算各评论的情感强度值,并将隐私争议事件分为隐私收集类、隐私曝光类及隐私协议类,对比分析不同情境下的用户评论情感趋势;构建用户隐私讨论对象-情感表达二分网络,并通过二分网络投影构建单顶点网络,结合节点中心性等指标进行二分网络及投影分析。[结果/结论] 结果表明,用户整体隐私关注呈现上升趋势;不同类型隐私争议事件的用户负面情感强度水平不同;不同隐私争议情境下用户的关注热点差异较大,情感表达各有特点。以上结果表明不同情境中的用户隐私关注及情感表现具有明显差异。

本文引用格式

谭芳 , 杨阳 , 卓伊玲 , 徐健 , 肖卓 . 网络隐私争议事件中用户隐私关注及情感对比研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021 , 65(2) : 87 -97 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.02.009

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] The rapid development of AI, big data etc. makes an increasingly fierce confrontation between business development and privacy protection. This paper finds the differences in privacy concern and sentimental characteristics of users in different situations through the comparative analysis of sentiment and topic of Weibo comments on different types of online privacy controversial events.[Method/process] Firstly, Weibo comments related to privacy controversial events from 2012 to 2019 were collected and preprocessed as experimental data. Secondly, the sentiment value of each comment was calculated based on the sentiment dictionary. Then, the privacy controversial events were classified into privacy collection categories, privacy exposure categories and privacy agreement categories. The sentimental analysis was conducted under different situations. Finally, a bipartite network of "discussed object-emotional expression" was constructed, and a single vertex network was constructed by the bipartite network projection, and the analysis of both were carried out by combining the indexes such as node centrality.[Result/conclusion] The result shows that users' overall privacy concern shows an upward trend; users of different types of privacy controversial events have different levels of negative sentimental intensity; the hotspots of users' concern vary widely across privacy controversial events, and emotional expression have different characteristics. These findings indicate that there are significant differences in user privacy concern and sentimental performance in different situations.

参考文献

[1] 国家计算机网络应急技术处理协调中心.2019年上半年我国互联网网络安全态势[R/OL].[2020-03-24].http://www.cac.gov.cn/2019-08/13/c_1124871484.htm.
[2] 王乐,王璐瑶,孙早.隐私侵犯经历对网络用户自我披露的影响机制[J].系统工程理论与实践,2020,40(1):79-92.
[3] MARTIN K D, MURPHY P E. The role of data privacy in marketing[J].Journal of the academy of marketing science,2017,2(45):135-155.
[4] 于婷婷,杨蕴焓.精准广告中的隐私关注及其影响因素研究[J].新闻大学,2019(9):101-116.
[5] 刘茜.青年用户微信朋友圈隐私管理动因研究[J].当代传播,2019(4):84-89.
[6] ALASHOOR T, HAN S, JOSEPH R C. Familiarity with big data,privacy concerns,and self-disclosure accuracy in social networking websites:an APCO model[J].Communications of the association for information systems,2017,41(4):62-96.
[7] YU L, LI H, HE W, et al. A meta-analysis to explore privacy cognition and information disclosure of internet users[J]. International journal of information management,2020,51:1-10.
[8] JEONG Y, COYLE E. What are you worrying about on Facebook and Twitter? An empirical investigation of young social network site users' privacy perceptions and behaviors[J].Journal of interactive advertising,2014,2(14):51-59.
[9] JEONG Y, KIM Y. Privacy concerns on social networking sites:interplay among posting types,content,and audiences[J].Computers in human behavior,2017,69:302-310.
[10] 高山川,王心怡.网络平台和收益的类型对信息隐私决策的影响[J].应用心理学,2019,25(4):364-371.
[11] WARREN S D, BRANDEIS L D. The right to privacy[J].Harvard law review,1890,5(4):193-220.
[12] 段伟文,纪长霖.网络与大数据时代的隐私权[J].科学与社会,2014,4(2):90-100.
[13] 刘健,陈卓."隐私"研究的三种话语分析[J].陕西理工大学学报(社会科学版),2017,35(2):47-51.
[14] 吕耀怀,熊节春.信息隐私界定的BIT模式[J].图书馆理论与实践,2011(6):35-39.
[15] WESTIN A F. Privacy and freedom[M].New York:Athenum, 1967.
[16] 李睿.移动互联网环境下隐私泄露容忍度的测量与实证研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2014.
[17] PETRONIO S. Boundaries of privacy:dialectics of disclosure[M].Albany, New York:State University of New York Press, 2002.
[18] 钟瑛,刘利芳. 信息传播中的隐私侵犯及保护[J].新闻与写作,2018(2):23-26.
[19] EINSPÄNNER J. Privacy online:perspectives on privacy and self-disclosure in the social Web[J].New media & society,2013,8(15):1401-1402.
[20] 陈昊,李文立,柯育龙.社交媒体持续使用研究:以情感响应为中介[J].管理评论,2016,28(9):61-71.
[21] 李贺,余璐,许一明,等.解释水平理论视角下的社交网络隐私悖论研究[J].情报学报,2018,37(1):1-13.
[22] 沈旺,高雪倩,代旺,等.基于解释水平理论与调节定向理论的社交网络隐私悖论研究[J].情报科学,2020,38(8):120-127,140.
[23] 陈小燕, CLIQUET G.隐私权衡理论视角下用户隐私关注研究[J].技术经济与管理研究,2020(5):9-13.
[24] MARTIN K D, MURPHY P E. The role of data privacy in marketing[J]. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 2017, 45(2):135-155.
[25] VAN DEN BROECK E, POELS K, WALRAVE M. Older and wiser? Facebook use, privacy concern, and privacy protection in the life stages of emerging, young, and middle adulthood[J].Social media+ society,2015,1(2):671657067.
[26] 杨嫚,温秀妍.隐私保护意愿的中介效应:隐私关注、隐私保护自我效能感与精准广告回避[J].新闻界,2020(7):41-52.
[27] 谢毅,高充彦,童泽林.消费者隐私关注研究述评与展望[J].外国经济与管理,2020,42(6):111-125.
[28] 中国新闻网[EB/OL].[2020-03-24].https://www.chinanews.com/.
[29] 搜狐新闻[EB/OL].[2020-03-24].https://news.sogou.com.
[30] 新浪微博[EB/OL].[2020-03-24].https://weibo.com.
[31] 八爪鱼采集器[EB/OL].[2020-03-24].https://www.bazhuayu.com/.
[32] 徐琳宏,林鸿飞,潘宇,等.情感词汇本体的构造[J].情报学报,2008,27(2):180-185.
[33] 邓淑卿,李玩伟,徐健.基于句法依赖规则和词性特征的情感词识别研究[J].情报理论与实践,2018,41(5):137-142.
[34] 情感词典[EB/OL].[2020-03-24].https://figshare.com/articles/12240224.
[35] 常用程度副词及否定词词典[EB/OL].[2020-03-24].https://figshare.com/articles/12240233.
[36] 徐健,吴思洋.网络用户评论的情感分歧度量化算法研究[J].情报学报,2020,39(4):427-435.
[37] 卢伟聪,徐健.基于二分网络的网络用户评论情感分析[J].情报理论与实践,2018,41(2):121-126.
[38] LATAPY M, MAGNIEN C, VECCHIO N D. Basic notions for the analysis of large two-mode networks[J].Social networks,2008,30(1):31-48.
[39] 李树青,徐侠,许敏佳.基于读者借阅二分网络的图书可推荐质量测度方法及个性化图书推荐服务[J].中国图书馆学报,2013,39(3):83-95.
[40] 张金柱,韩涛,王小梅.作者-关键词二分网络中的合著关系预测研究[J].图书情报工作,2016,60(21):74-80.
[41] 隐私讨论对象-情感表达词典[EB/OL].[2020-03-24].https://figshare.com/articles/___-___/12401426.
[42] BASTIAN M, HEYMANN S, JACOMY M. Gephi:an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks[C]//The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.Proceedings of the third international conference on weblogs and social media.Menlo Park,California:The AAAI Press,2009:361-362.
[43] BATAGELJ V, MRVAR A. Pajek-program for large network analysis[J].Connections,1998,2(21):47-57.
[44] BURGOON J K, PARROTT R, LE POIRE B A, et al. Maintaining and restoring privacy through communication in different types of relationships[J].Journal of social and personal relationships,1989,2(6):131-158.
[45] 全国人民代表大会常务委员会.中华人民共和国网络安全法[EB/OL].[2020-03-24].http://www.moj.gov.cn/Department/content/2016-11/23/592_201322.html.
[46] 郭龙飞.社交网络用户隐私关注动态影响因素及行为规律研究[D].北京:北京邮电大学,2013.
[47] CHOI H, PARK J, JUNG Y. The role of privacy fatigue in online privacy behavior[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2018, 81:42-51.
[48] TROPE Y, LIBERMAN N, WAKSLAK C. Construal levels and psychological distance:effects on representation,prediction,evaluation,and behavior[J].Journal of consumer psychology,2007,2(17):83-95.
[49] BRANDES U. A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality[J].Journal of mathematical sociology,2001,2(25):163-177.
[50] 李秉权. 社交媒体语境下隐私侵权、边界划定及保护研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2020.
[51] 刘英华,翟嘉靖.信息系统用户隐私计算研究综述[J].大学图书情报学刊,2020,38(3):113-119.
[52] WANG E S. Effects of brand awareness and social norms on user-perceived cyber privacy risk[J].International journal of electronic commerce,2019,23(2):272-293.
文章导航

/