[目的/意义] 对图书情报领域的国际发文情况、研究热点以及学科前沿进行研究，有助于推动图情学科的发展，提升我国学术话语权。[方法/过程] 以SCI和SSCI收录的图书情报领域高影响力外文期刊论文为数据源，利用HistCite、CiteSpace、SPSS等工具从研究现状、高影响力学者、高被引论文、研究热点、前沿趋势5个方面分析近5年来（2016-2020年）图情领域的发展状况。通过对高频关键词的年度变化分析，总结四种呈现不同态势的关键词，并对低频关键词进行透视，得出人文、技术和管理三个维度的发展主题。[结果/结论] 随着信息技术的不断发展和信息环境的不断变化，图情学科研究主题由传统信息服务向知识服务，由知识组织与管理相关研究向知识组织体系构建等研究主题进一步延伸和细化，且注重理论和实践相结合已日渐成为图情档学科研究的重要趋势。
[Purpose/significance] The research on the international publication, research hotspots and periodical characteristics of the Library and Information Science is helpful to promote the development of the subject and enhance its international discourse power. [Method/process] In this paper, we analyzed the key words frequency of papers published in high-impact foreign journals included by SCI and SSCI, and used HistCite, CiteSpace, SPSS and other tools to analyze the development of the chart in the past five years (2016-2020) from five aspects including current research status, high-impact scholars, highly cited papers, research hotspots, and cutting-edge trends. Through the annual change analysis of high-frequency keywords, four keywords with different trends were summarized, and the low-frequency keywords are perspectived. The development themes of humanity, technology and management were obtained. [Result/conclusion] With the continuous development of information technology and changes in the information environment, the themes of the Library and Information Science have been further extended and refined from traditional information services to knowledge services, and from research related to knowledge organization and management to the construction of knowledge organization systems, and the combination of theory and practice has become an important trend in the research of Library and Information Science.
[1] WHITE H D, MCCAIN K W. Visualizing a discipline:An author co-citation analysis of information science[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Ence & Technology, 2010, 49(4):327-355.
[2] 邱均平, 温芳芳. 近五年来图书情报学研究热点与前沿的可视化分析——基于13种高影响力外文源刊的计量研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2011, 37(2):51-60.
[3] 邱均平, 马瑞敏. 基于CSSCI的图书馆、情报与档案管理一级学科文献计量评价研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2006, 32(1):24-29.
[4] 胡浪. 2012-2016年国内图书情报学研究现状及热点探析——基于13种中文图情核心期刊的计量分析[J]. 图书馆工作与研究, 2018(2):67-76.
[5] D·普赖斯, 张季娅. 洛特卡定律与普赖斯定律[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 1984(9):17-22.
[6] 百度百科.普赖斯定律[EB/OL].[2020-07-31].http://baike.baidu.com/view/2288612.htm.
[7] PAO M L. Lotka's Law:a testing procedure[J]. Information processing & management, 1985, 21(4):305-320.
[8] NAMBISAN S, LYYTINEN K, MAJCHRZAK A, et al. Digital innovation management:reinventing innovation management research in a digital world[J]. Mis quarterly, 2017, 41(1):223-238.
[9] HOU J, YANG Y, CHEN C. Emerging trends and new developments in information science:a document co-citation analysis (2009-2016)[J]. Scientometrics, 2018,115(2):869-892.
[10] HASHEM I A T, CHANG V, ANUAR N B, et al. The role of big data in smart city[J]. International journal of information management, 2016, 36(5):748-758.
[11] SHIAU W L, CHAU P Y K. Understanding behavioral intention to use a cloud computing classroom:a multiple model comparison approach[J]. Information & management, 2016, 53(3):355-365.
[12] YAO Y, LI X, LIU X, et al. Sensing spatial distribution of urban land use by integrating points-of-interest and Google Word2Vec model[J]. International journal of geographical information science, 2016, 31(4):825-848.
[13] REHMAN M H U, CHANG V. Big data reduction framework for value creation in sustainable enterprises[J]. International journal of information management. 2016, 36(6):917-928.
[14] LI L, SU F, ZHANG W, et al. Digital transformation by SME entrepreneurs:a capability perspective[J]. Information systems journal, 2018, 28(6):1129-1157.
[15] 孙清兰. 高频词与低频词的界分及词频估算法[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 1992(2):78-81.
[16] 赵蓉英, 许丽敏. 文献计量学发展演进与研究前沿的知识图谱探析[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2010(5):60-68.
[17] 屈宏明. 用文献计量学方法对网络环境下馆藏文献的评价[J]. 现代情报, 2008, 28(6):27-29.
[18] 叶晴.数字时代研究型高校图书馆空间变革研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2019.
[19] 李洁. 数据驱动下数字图书馆知识发现服务创新模式与策略研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学,2019.
[20] YUE P,GAO F,SHANGGUAN B,et al. A machine learning approach for predicting computational intensity and domain decomposition in parallel geoprocessing[J]. International journal of geogrephical information science, 2020, 34(11):2243-2274.
[21] ZHANG W, WANG M, ZHU Y C. Does government information release really matter in regulating contagion-evolution of negative emotion during public emergencies? from the perspective of cognitive big data analytics[J]. International journal of information management, 2020, 50(2):498-514.
[22] 邱均平, 余厚强. 替代计量学的提出过程与研究进展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013, 57(19):5-12.
[23] 孟小峰, 慈祥. 大数据管理:概念、技术与挑战[J]. 计算机研究与发展, 2013, 50(1):146-169.
[24] 邱均平,丁敬达. 1999-2008年我国图书馆学研究的实证分析(下)[J].中国图书馆学报,2009,35(6):79-87,118.
[25] 赵蓉英, 赵浚吟, 陈必坤. 我国"图书馆,情报与档案管理"学科的研究现状分析——以2001-2012年国家基金项目为视角[J]. 情报杂志, 2013, 32(7):106-112.
[26] 赵蓉英, 王旭. 近5年国内外情报学研究态势比较分析[J]. 情报科学, 2018, 36(7):3-9.
[27] 刘奕杉, 王玉琳, 李明鑫. 词频分析法中高频词阈值界定方法适用性的实证分析[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2017(9):42-49.
[28] 张立, 尹萍. 我国图情领域近十年国际发文研究热点和前沿剖析[J]. 情报科学, 2020, 38(5):82-89.
