专题:政府开放数据用户利用行为研究

突发公共卫生事件中健康码信息资源的共享机制研究

  • 李华强 ,
  • 赵宇
展开
  • 西南交通大学公共管理与政法学院 成都 610031
李华强(ORCID:0000-0003-3965-3773),教授,博士,E-mail:hqlix@163.com;赵宇(ORCID:0000-0001-9446-644X),硕士研究生。

收稿日期: 2020-10-13

  修回日期: 2021-01-17

  网络出版日期: 2021-04-22

基金资助

本文系成都市哲学社会科学规划项目"新冠疫情后成都市旅游市场恢复策略研究"(项目编号:2020ZXA04)和成都市科技局软科学项目"新冠肺炎疫情对成都旅游需求的影响和恢复策略"(项目编号:2020-RK00-00332-ZF)研究成果之一。

Research on the Sharing Mechanism of Health-Code Information Resources in Public Health Emergencies

  • Li Huaqiang ,
  • Zhao Yu
Expand
  • School of Public Affairs&Law, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031

Received date: 2020-10-13

  Revised date: 2021-01-17

  Online published: 2021-04-22

摘要

[目的/意义] 探究突发公共卫生事件中健康码信息共享难问题的形成机理,提出改进健康码信息资源共享的对策建议,助力疫情精准防控,完善信息资源共享机制的构建。[方法/过程] 采用扎根理论研究方法,以新冠肺炎疫情中的健康码为典型案例,对健康码相关政策文件、媒体报道及公众评论进行分析,构建健康码信息共享难问题的形成机理及对策模型。[结果/结论] 在突发公共卫生事件特征和健康码产品驱动因素作用下,健康码信息采集环节的采集方法和采集内容,信息处理环节的制码流程、更新纠错,信息应用环节的终端展示和精准研判,信息存储环节的保存和安全管理方式存在差异,综合作用导致健康码信息共享难现象的形成。从政策规范、技术平台、组织管理3个视角分析共享机制现状,提出系统化的对策建议,促进政府数字资源共享机制的构建。

本文引用格式

李华强 , 赵宇 . 突发公共卫生事件中健康码信息资源的共享机制研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021 , 65(6) : 4 -11 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.06.001

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] This paper aims to explore the formation mechanism of the difficulty in sharing health-code information in public health emergencies, so as to improve the epidemic prevention efficiency. At the same time, it puts forward measures to build the government digital resource sharing mechanism, which can provide reference for sharing management. [Method/process] Taking the health-code product in the COVID-19 epidemic as a typical case, using grounded theory research method, this paper analyzed the policy documents, media reports and public comments related to health-code sharing, and constructed a model of the formation mechanism of health-code information sharing problem and the countermeasures. [Result/conclusion] Under the influence of the public health emergency situation and the driving factors of the health-code product, there are many factors in the four steps that influence the sharing. The collection methods and contents in the information collection step, the code processing and update & error correction in the information processing step, the terminal display and accurate judgment in the information application step, and the preservation and safety management in information storage step are all different among many local governments. Meanwhile, all these steps combined together lead to the formation of information sharing difficulties. From the three perspectives of policy norms, technical platforms, and organization management, a systematic countermeasure is proposed to promote the construction of government digital resource sharing mechanism.

参考文献

[1] 习近平.在统筹推进新冠肺炎疫情防控和经济社会发展工作部署会议上的讲话[N].人民日报,2020-02-24(2).
[2] 中国政府网.中华人民共和国国务院令第376号[EB/OL].[2021-02-25].http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2003/content_62137.htm.
[3] 人民网.腾讯公益慈善基金会孙懿:充分调动自身资源做好"连接器"[EB/OL].[2021-02-25].http://gongyi.people.com.cn/n1/2020/0724/c151132-31796901.html.
[4] 朱晓峰,盛天祺,张卫.重大突发公共事件冲击下政府数据开放的共生运行机制研究:构建与演进[J].情报理论与实践,2020,43(12):80-88.
[5] DAWES S S. Interagency information sharing:expected benefits, manageable risks[J]. Journal of policy analysis and management, 1996, 15(3):377-394.
[6] 孙彦明,赵树宽,张福俊,等.中美英政府数据信息开放共享保障机制比较研究[J].图书情报工作,2018,62(21):5-14.
[7] 宋魏巍.中国政府数据开放协同机制研究[J].南京社会科学,2018(2):63-68,82.
[8] 王芳,储君,张琪敏,等.跨部门政府数据共享:问题、原因与对策[J].图书与情报,2017(5):54-62.
[9] 符嵘.政府数据开放动力机制研究[J].科学管理研究,2017,35(6):28-31.
[10] 樊博.跨部门政府信息资源共享的推进体制、机制和方法[J].上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2008(2):13-20.
[11] NUTLEY S, WALTER I, DAVIES H T O. Promoting evidence-based practice:models and mechanisms from cross-sector review[J]. Research on social work practice, 2009,19(5), 552-559.
[12] WANG F. Understanding the dynamic mechanism of interagency government data sharing[J]. Government information quarterly, 2018, 35(4):536-546.
[13] 陈兰杰,刘彦麟.京津冀区域政府信息资源共享推进机制研究[J].情报科学,2015,33(6):109-114.
[14] 马海群,江尚谦.我国政府数据开放的共享机制研究[J].图书情报研究,2018,11(1):3-11.
[15] 宋懿,安小米,范灵俊,等.大数据时代政府信息资源共享的协同机制研究——基于宁波市海曙区政府信息资源中心的案例分析[J].情报理论与实践,2018,41(6):64-69.
[16] ANDREASSEN N, BORCH O J, SYDNES A K. Information sharing and emergency response coordination[J]. Safety science, 2020, 130:104895.
[17] BAKER M G, FIDLER D P. Global public health surveillance under new international health regulations[J]. Emerging infectious diseases, 2006, 12(7):1058-1065.
[18] GLASER B G, STRAUSS A L, STRUTZEL E. The discovery of grounded theory:strategies for qualitative research[J]. Nursing research, 1968, 17(4):364.
[19] 贾哲敏.扎根理论在公共管理研究中的应用:方法与实践[J].中国行政管理,2015(3):90-95.
[20] 陈茫,张庆普,郑作龙.面向高校科研的微信知识服务影响因素与作用路径探析——基于扎根理论的探索性研究[J].情报学报,2017,36(1):49-60.
[21] 汪涛,周玲,周南,等.来源国形象是如何形成的?——基于美、印消费者评价和合理性理论视角的扎根研究[J].管理世界,2012(3):113-126.
[22] MILES M B, HUBERMAN A M. Qualitative data analysis[M]. California:Sage, 1994.
[23] 陈向明. 扎根理论的思路和方法[J]. 教育研究与实验,1999(4):58-63,73.
[24] LANDSBERGEN D, WOLKEN G. Realizing the promise:government information systems and the fourth generation of information technology[J]. Public administration review, 2001, 61(2):206-220.
[25] ZUIDERWIJK A, JANSSEN M. Open data policies, their implementation and impact:a framework for comparison[J]. Government information quarterly, 2014, 31(1):17-29.
文章导航

/