理论研究

双元创新平衡战略下的企业知识耦合

  • 卢艳秋 ,
  • 宋昶 ,
  • 王向阳
展开
  • 吉林大学管理学院, 长春 130022
卢艳秋(ORCID:0000-0002-4853-2837),教授,博士后,博士生导师;王向阳(ORCID:0000-0001-6240-2249),教授,博士后,博士生导师。

收稿日期: 2020-11-25

  修回日期: 2021-02-23

  网络出版日期: 2021-08-07

Enterprise Knowledge Coupling Under the Role of Ambidextrous Innovation Strategy Balance

  • Lu Yanqiu ,
  • Song Chang ,
  • Wang Xiangyang
Expand
  • School of Management, Jilin University, Changchun 130022

Received date: 2020-11-25

  Revised date: 2021-02-23

  Online published: 2021-08-07

摘要

[目的/意义] 研究双元创新平衡战略下企业知识耦合的过程、机理与保障,为促进企业知识创新提供新视角。[方法/过程] 以知识耦合和双元创新理论为基础,构建基于双元创新平衡战略的知识耦合模型,揭示知识耦合机理,并提出企业知识耦合的保障措施。[结果/结论] 原领域知识与新领域知识均是企业知识创新的重要因素,企业知识耦合过程包括知识搜寻、知识关联、知识融合与知识存储4个阶段,原有领域知识耦合与新旧领域知识耦合的平衡,是双元创新战略下实现知识创新的关键。

本文引用格式

卢艳秋 , 宋昶 , 王向阳 . 双元创新平衡战略下的企业知识耦合[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021 , 65(15) : 61 -70 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.15.008

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] This paper studies the process, mechanism and safeguards of enterprise knowledge coupling under the ambidextrous Innovation strategy balance, which provides a new perspective for promoting the enterprise knowledge innovation. [Method/process] Under the knowledge coupling and ambidextrous Innovation theory, a knowledge coupling process model based on ambidextrous Innovation strategy balance was constructed, the mechanism of knowledge coupling was clarified, and the safeguard measures were put forward. [Result/conclusion] Both the original domain knowledge and the new domain knowledge are important factors in the knowledge innovation. The internal knowledge coupling is divided into four stages: knowledge search, knowledge association, knowledge fusion and knowledge storage. The balance between the original domain knowledge coupling and the new domain knowledge coupling is the key to realize knowledge innovation.

参考文献

[1] 吕文晶,陈劲,刘进.工业互联网的智能制造模式与企业平台建设:基于海尔集团的案例研究[J].中国软科学,2019(7):1-13.
[2] 金昕,陈松,邵俊岗.双元创新战略、组织动态能力对企业绩效的多维度影响[J].预测,2019,38(1):30-36.
[3] 吴言波.联盟组合配置、知识耦合与企业创新能力关系研究[D].成都:电子科技大学,2020.
[4] 王文静,张卫.产学知识耦合的协同创新效应:基于创新系统的视角[J].中国科技论坛,2019(7):61-68.
[5] CUMMINGS J L,TENG B S.Transferring R&D knowledge:the key factors affecting knowledge transfer success[J].Journal of engineering and technology management,2003,20(1/2):39-68.
[6] SZULANSKI G,CAPPETTA R,JENSEN R J. When and how trustworthiness matters:knowledge transfer and the moderating effect of causal ambiguity[J].Organization science,2004,15(5):600-613.
[7] 于飞,胡泽民,董亮,等.知识耦合对企业突破式创新的影响机制研究[J].科学学研究,2018,36(12):2292-2304.
[8] 易比一,曾立.知识耦合型协同创新模式研究:以Open NASA为例[J].科研管理,2020,41(5):231-239.
[9] YAYAVARAM S,CHEN W R.Changes in firm knowledge couplings and firm innovation performance:the moderating role of technological complexity[J].Strategic management journal,2015,36(3):377-396.
[10] 姚艳虹,张翠平.知识域耦合、知识创新能力与企业创新绩效:环境不确定性和战略柔性的调节作用[J].科技进步与对策,2019,36(23):76-84.
[11] 于飞,胡泽民,袁胜军.打开制度压力与企业绿色创新之间的黑箱:知识耦合的中介作用[J].预测,2020,39(2):1-9.
[12] CHEN H H, YAO Y H,ZHOU H P.How does knowledge coupling affect exploratory and exploitative innovation? the chained mediation role of organisational memory and knowledge creation[J].Technology analysis & strategic management,2020,11:15.
[13] YAYAVARAM S,AHUJA G.Decomposability in knowledge structures and its impact on the usefulness of inventions and knowledge-base malleability[J].Administrative science quarterly,2008,53(2):333-362.
[14] 传鹏,林春培,张振刚,等.专业化知识搜寻、管理创新与企业绩效:认知评价的调节作用[J].管理世界,2020,36(1):146-166,240.
[15] 姚艳虹,葛哲宇,周惠平.创新网络中知识耦合、组织记忆与企业创新绩效[J].软科学,2018,32(8):38-42.
[16] 于飞,刘明霞,王凌峰,等.知识耦合对制造企业绿色创新的影响机理:冗余资源的调节作用[J].南开管理评论,2019,22(3):54-65,76.
[17] LEANA C R,BARRY B.Stability and change as simultaneous experiences in organizational life[J].Academy of management review,2000,25(4):753-759.
[18] BENNER M J,TUSHMAN M L.Reflections on the 2013 decade award-"exploitation,exploration, and process management:the productivity dilemma revisited" ten years later[J].Academy of management review,2015,40(4):497-514.
[19] UOTILA J,MAULA M,KEIL T,et al.Exploration,exploitation,and financial performance:analysis of S&P 500 corporations[J].Strategic management journal,2009,30(2):221-231.
[20] HE Z L,WONG P K.Exploration vs.exploitation:An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis[J].Organization science,2004,15(4):481-494.
[21] 杨学儒,李新春,梁强,等.平衡开发式创新和探索式创新一定有利于提升企业绩效吗?[J].管理工程学报,2011,25(4):17-25.
[22] 张峰,邱玮.探索式和开发式市场创新的作用机理及其平衡[J].管理科学,2013,26(1):1-13.
[23] WEICK K E.Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems[J].Administrative science quarterly,1976,21(1):1.
[24] 叶江峰,陈珊,郝斌.知识搜寻如何影响企业创新绩效?:研究述评与展望[J].外国经济与管理,2020,42(3):17-34.
[25] WANG G H,YU L Y.Differential game analysis of scientific crowdsourcing on knowledge Transfer[J].Sustainability,2019,11(10):2735.
[26] 武华维,王超,许海云,等.知识耦合视角下区域科学-技术-产业协同创新水平的评价方法研究[J].情报理论与实践,2020,43(5):91-98,8.
[27] 刘晓娟,李广建,化柏林.知识融合:概念辨析与界说[J].图书情报工作,2016,60(13):13-19,32.[维普]
[28] 唐晓波,朱娟,杨丰华.大数据环境下的知识融合框架模型研究[J].图书馆学研究,2016(1):32-35,18.
[29] 叶英平,卢艳秋,肖艳红.基于网络嵌入的知识创新模型构建[J].图书情报工作,2017,61(7):102-110.
[30] 姚艳虹,谢敏,葛哲宇.协同网络中知识域耦合对企业二元创新的影响[J].华东经济管理,2019,33(7):120-127.
[31] 胡畔,于渤.跨界搜索、能力重构与企业创新绩效:战略柔性的调节作用[J].研究与发展管理,2017,29(4):138-147.
[32] 吴航,陈劲.企业外部知识搜索与创新绩效:一个新的理论框架[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015,36(4):143-151.
[33] 肖璐,赵之辉,陈果.全局视角下的网络社区多元知识关联挖掘[J].图书情报工作,2020,64(6):100-107.
[34] 李旭晖,凡美慧.大数据中的知识关联[J].情报理论与实践,2019,42(2):68-73,107.
[35] 高继平,丁堃,潘云涛,等.知识关联研究述评[J].情报理论与实践,2015,38(8):135-140.
[36] 朱祥,张云秋.近年来知识融合研究进展与趋势[J].图书情报工作,2019,63(16):143-150.
[37] 索传军,盖双双.知识元的内涵、结构与描述模型研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2018,44(4):54-72.
[38] CARLILE P R,REBENTISCH E S.Into the black box:the knowledge transformationcycle[J].Management science,2003,49(9):1180-1195.
[39] 张莉,田也壮,齐中英.基于知识的组织记忆框架研究[J].情报科学,2005,23(9):1297-1301.
[40] 韵江,王文敬.组织记忆、即兴能力与战略变革[J].南开管理评论,2015,18(4):36-46,105.
[41] 彭志强,刘俊娜,刘雅婕.SECI知识螺旋视角下的专利管理提升策略[J].中国发明与专利,2019,16(9):53-60.
文章导航

/