图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2021 , Vol. 65 >Issue 18: 58 - 70

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.18.007

情报研究

国际公共卫生紧急事件下中美科学合作模式比较分析

  • 赵文静 ,
  • 张琳 ,
  • 尚媛媛 ,
  • 黄颖
展开
  • 1. 武汉大学信息管理学院 武汉 430072;
    2. 武汉大学科教管理与评价研究中心 武汉 430072;
    3. 比利时鲁汶大学ECOOM 研究中心 鲁汶 B-3000
赵文静(ORCID:0000-0003-1792-8940),博士研究生;尚媛媛(ORCID:0000-0003-4219-2541),博士研究生;黄颖(ORCID:0000-0003-0115-4581),副教授,博士,博士生导师。

收稿日期: 2021-04-06

  修回日期: 2021-06-12

  网络出版日期: 2021-09-26

基金资助

本文系国家自然科学基金面上项目"交叉科学的三维测度：内在知识基础、外在信息链接和科学活动模式"（项目编号：71573085）和国家自然科学基金面上项目"科研人员职业生涯的性别差异和影响机理研究：合作、流动与学术表现"（项目编号：71974150）研究成果之一。

收起

Research on Scientific Collaboration Pattern Between Mainland China and the USA Under Public Health Emergencies

  • Zhao Wenjing ,
  • Zhang Lin ,
  • Shang Yuanyuan ,
  • Huang Ying
Expand
  • 1. School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072;
    2. Research Center for Science, Technology & Education Management and Evaluation, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072;
    3. Centre for R&D Monitoring (ECOOM) and Department of MSI, KU Leuven, Leuven B-3000

Received date: 2021-04-06

  Revised date: 2021-06-12

  Online published: 2021-09-26

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义]中美是全球科学文献产出的核心力量，探究其在应对不同疫情下科学合作模式的特征与差异，为相关政策制定及实践提供有益参考。[方法/过程]以SARS和COVID-19相关的科研论文为研究对象，在细分不同合作类型和改进合作强度指标的基础上，从科研贡献、合作强度、合作网络与合作领域视角对中美科学合作模式展开研究。[结果/结论]中国大陆与美国均为两次疫情的主要科研贡献者，但中国大陆对疫情研究的关注度更易随疫情态势变化而改变。虽然中美在两次疫情中均互为双方最密切的合作伙伴，但两国在COVID-19研究中的合作强度明显低于SARS研究。从合作网络来看，美国在两次疫情的全球合作网络中均处于核心地位，而中国大陆的中心程度则低于美国。从合作领域来看，中美在两种疾病研究中的学科分布各有侧重。

关键词： 严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS); 新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19); 科学合作; 社会网络分析; 公共卫生

本文引用格式

赵文静 , 张琳 , 尚媛媛 , 黄颖 . 国际公共卫生紧急事件下中美科学合作模式比较分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021 , 65(18) : 58 -70 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.18.007

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] Understanding the pattern of scientific collaboration between Mainland China and the USA-the world's leading producers of scientific publications, could be beneficial to decision-makers in research and health policy in creating and adjusting anti-epidemic strategies.[Method/process] Taking publications related to SARS and COVID-19 as research objects, this study explored the collaboration patterns of the Mainland China and the USA from the perspectives of research effort, collaboration strength, collaboration network and major fields on the basis of classification of collaboration types and improvement of Salton's index.[Result/conclusion] Both the Mainland China and the USA are the main contributors to the research on SARS and COVID-19, while the attention of the Chinese scholars to relevant research tends to change with the situation of the epidemics. Although Mainland China and the USA were the closest partners for each other in SARS and COVID-19 research, the collaboration strength between the two countries is obviously lower in COVID-19 research than that of SARS research. The USA is at the heart of both SARS and COVID-19 collaborative networks, while Mainland China's position is significantly lower. As for the research fields, Mainland China and the USA have different emphasis on the discipline distributions.

Key words： SARS; COVID-19; scientific collaboration; social network analysis; public health

参考文献

[1] 习近平.为打赢疫情防控阻击战提供强大科技支撑[J]. 求是, 2020(6):4-8.
[2] ZHANG L, ZHAO W, SUN B, et al.How scientific research reacts to international public health emergencies:a global analysis of response patterns[J]. Scientometrics, 2020, 124:747-773.
[3] ADAMS J.The fourth age of research[J]. Nature, 2013, 497:557-560.
[4] GLÄNZEL W.Coauthorship patterns and trends in the sciences (1980-1998):a bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies[J]. Library trends, 2002, 50 (3):461-473.
[5] LARIVIōRE V, GINGRAS Y, ARCHAMBAULT É.Canadian collaboration networks:a comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities[J]. Scientometrics, 2006, 68 (3):519-533.
[6] 曾德明, 尹恒, 文金艳.科学合作网络关系资本、邻近性与企业技术创新绩效[J]. 软科学, 2002, 34 (3):37-42.
[7] FRANCESCHE M.Collaboration in computer science:a network science approach[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011, 62 (10):1992-2012.
[8] CHANG Y W, HUANG M H. A study of the evolution of interdisciplinarity in library and information science:using three bibliometric methods[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011, 63 (1):22-33.
[9] 黄颖, 张琳, 孙蓓蓓, 等.跨学科的三维测度——外部知识融合、内在知识会聚与科学合作模式[J]. 科学学研究, 2019, 37 (1):25-35.
[10] 李爱花, 任慧玲, 张玢.基于文献计量的新型冠状病毒肺炎研究现状分析[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2020(3):2-8.
[11] 陈莹, 郭怡博, 郭然, 等.基于文献计量学的新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)研究可视化分析[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2020, 45 (10):2239-2248.
[12] 张泽华, 郭姗姗, 赵志刚, 等.基于CiteSpace的新冠肺炎研究文献计量分析[J]. 中国医院药学杂志, 2020, 40 (19):2029-2035.
[13] MORADI S, ABDI S.Pandemic publication:correction and erratum in COVID-19 publications[J]. Scientometrics, 2020, 126:1849-1857.
[14] SAHOO S, PANDEY S.Evaluating research performance of Coronavirus and Covid-19 pandemic using scientometric indicators[J]. Online information review, 2020, 44 (7):1443-1461.
[15] TRAN B X, HA G H, NGUYEN L H, et al.Studies of novel coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic:a global analysis of literature[J]. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020, 17 (11):4095.
[16] GKIOURAS K, NIGDELIS M P, GRAMMATIKOPOULOU M G, et al.Tracing open data in emergencies:the case of the COVID-19 pandemic[J]. European journal of clinical investigation, 2020, 50 (9):e13323.
[17] 陈大明, 赵晓勤, 缪有刚, 等.全球冠状病毒研究态势分析及其启示[J]. 中国临床医学, 2020, 27 (1):1-12.
[18] KAGAN D, MORAN-GILAD J, FIRE M.Scientometric trends for coronaviruses and other emerging viral infections[J]. Gigascience, 2020, 9 (8):giaa085.
[19] HAGHANI M, BLIEMER M C J.COVID-19 pandemic and the unprecedented mobilisation of scholarly efforts prompted by a health crisis:scientometric comparisons across SARS, MERS and 2019-nCoV literature[J]. Scientometrics, 2020, 125(3):2695-2726.
[20] HAGHANI M, BLIEMER M C J, GOERLANDT F, et al.The scientific literature on Coronaviruses, COVID-19 and its associated safety-related research dimensions:a scientometric analysis and scoping review[J]. Safety science, 2020, 129:10480.
[21] FRY C V, CAI X, ZHANG Y, et al.Consolidation in a crisis:patterns of international collaboration in early COVID-19 research[J]. PLoS ONE, 2020, 15 (7):e0236307.
[22] 张生太, 宣雅迪, 仇泸毅, 等.基于社会网络分析和文献计量学的新冠肺炎学术研究现状与特点研究[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 22 (5):87-98, 124.
[23] PATHAK M.Quantitative analysis of international collaboration on COVID-19:Indian perspective[J]. Indian journal of biochemistry & biophysics, 2020, 57 (4):439-443.
[24] LEE J J, HAUPT J P.Scientific globalism during a global crisis:research collaboration and open access publications on COVID-19[J]. Higher education, 2021(81):949-966.
[25] WAGNER C, BORNMANN L, LEYDESDORFF L.Recent developments in China-U.S. cooperation in science[J]. Minerva, 2015, 53 (3):199-214.
[26] 万方医学网. 万方医学网新型冠状病毒肺炎专题频道[DB/OL].[2021-05-05]. http://subject.med.wanfangdata.com.cn/Channel/7.
[27] 中国知网. 知网抗击新冠肺炎疫情知识服务平台[DB/OL].[2021-05-15]. https://cajn.cnki.net/xgbt.
[28] SPRINGER NATURE. Coronavirus (COVID-19) Research Highlights-Find free access to the latest COVID-19 research papers and articles[DB/OL].[2021-04-25]. https://www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/campaigns/coronavirus.
[29] THE LANCET. COVID-19 Resource Centre[DB/OL].[2021-04-18]. https://www.thelancet.com/coronavirus.
[30] ELSEVIER. Novel Coronavirus Information Center-Elsevier's free health and medical research on the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) and COVID-19[DB/OL].[2021-04-06]. https://www.elsevier.com/connect/coronavirus-information-center.
[31] NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE. MEDLINE®/PubMed® Data Element (Field) Descriptions[EB/OL]. [2021-04-17]. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/mms/medlineelements.html#ad
[32] BIRKLE C, PENDLEBURY D A, SCHNELL J, et al.Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity[J]. Quantitative science studies, 2020, 1 (1):363-376.
[33] BELLI S, MUGNAINI R, BALTÀ J, et al.Coronavirus mapping in scientific publications:when science advances rapidly and collectively, is access to this knowledge open to society?[J]. Scientometrics, 2020, 124 (3):2661-2685.
[34] HOSSAIN M M.Current status of global research on novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19):a bibliometric analysis and knowledge mapping[J]. SSRN electronic journal, 2020(3):1-22.
[35] 陈莉玥, 杨立英, 丁洁兰.科学计量研究中全计数法与分数计数法研究综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62 (23):132-141.
[36] ZHANG L, SHANG Y, HUANG Y, et al.Toward internationalization:a bibliometric analysis of the social sciences in Mainland China from 1979 to 2018[J]. Quantitative science studies, 2021, 2(1):376-408.
[37] SALTON G, BERGMARK D.A citation study of computer science literature[J]. IEEE Transactions on professional communication, 1979, PC-22 (3):146-158.
[38] ZHOU P, THIJS B, GLÄNZEL W.Is China also becoming a giant in social sciences?[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 73 (3):593-621.
[39] LUUKKONEN T, TIJSSEN R J W, PERSSON O, et al.The measurement of international scientific collaboration[J]. Scientometrics, 1993, 28 (1):15-36.
[40] 王文平. 基于科学计量的中国国际科技合作模式及影响研究[D]. 北京:北京理工大学, 2014.
[41] FRAME J D, CARPENTER M P.International research collaboration[J]. Social studies of science, 1979 (9):481-497.
[42] BRAUN T, GLÄNZEL W.International collaboration:will it be keeping alive East European research?[J]. Scientometrics, 1996, 36 (2):247-254.
[43] 王文峰.2003年中美关系研究主要资料信息[J]. 国际资料信息, 2004 (3):38-40.
[44] 潘林峰.2003年中美关系回顾与展望[J]. 现代台湾研究, 2004 (1):49-53.
[45] 张宇燕, 倪峰, 杨伯江, 等.新冠疫情与国际关系[J]. 世界经济与政治, 2020, 新冠疫情与国际关系 (4):4-26, 155.
[46] 周文星.中美战略竞争与国际政治研究转向的强化——2020年中国国际政治研究著作盘点[J]. 中国图书评论, 2021 (5):106-115.
[47] 黄萃, 杨超."计算社会科学"与"社会计算"概念辨析与研究热点比较分析[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2020, 10 (6):4-19.
[48] 网易科技. 专家:非典后没有对其系统研究 新冠不能再有同样失误, [EB/OL]. [2021-01-16]. https://tech.163.com/20/0320/20/F86JGO13000999D8.html.
[49] LEIDEN MADTRICS. COVID-19:what do funders consider relevant research?[EB/OL]. [2021-02-05]. https://leidenmadtrics.nl/articles/covid-19-what-do-funders-consider-relevant-research.
[50] UNITED NATIONS. "Mental health services are an essential part of all government responses to COVID-19"[EB/OL]. [2021-02-05]. https://www.un.org/en/coronavirus/mental-health-services-are-essential-part-all-government-responses-covid-19.作者贡献说明:赵文静:设计论文框架、采集处理数据、论文撰写与修订; 张琳:提出研究选题、设计研究方案、指导数据处理、论文修订与定稿; 尚媛媛:调研整理文献、校验数据结果、论文修订与审阅; 黄颖:设计研究方案、指导数据处理、论文修订与审阅。
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉