图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2021 , Vol. 65 >Issue 18: 105 - 116

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.18.011

情报研究

专利合作网络小世界特性对企业技术创新绩效的影响研究

  • 关鹏 ,
  • 王曰芬 ,
  • 傅柱 ,
  • 叶龙生
展开
  • 1. 巢湖学院经济与法学学院 合肥 238024;
    2. 南京理工大学经济管理学院 南京 210094;
    3. 江苏科技大学经济管理学院 镇江 212003
关鹏(ORCID:0000-0002-2308-3019),副教授,博士,硕士生导师,E-mail:guanpeng1983@163.com;王曰芬(ORCID:0000-0002-7143-7766),教授,博士,博士生导师;傅柱(ORCID:0000-0003-2250-7542),副教授,博士;叶龙生(ORCID:0000-0002-4554-0989),助教,硕士。

收稿日期: 2021-04-06

  修回日期: 2021-06-28

  网络出版日期: 2021-09-26

基金资助

本文系安徽省社会科学基金项目"专利合作视角下长三角地区企业技术创新合作网络对创新绩效的影响研究"（项目编号：AHSKQ2020D23）和安徽省高校人文社会科学重点项目"基于专利文本挖掘的区域创新合作网络构建及演化分析——以长三角城市群为例"（项目编号：SK2019A0550）研究成果之一。

收起

Research on the Impact of Small-World Characteristics of Patent Cooperation Network on Enterprise Technological Innovation Performance

  • Guan Peng ,
  • Wang Yuefen ,
  • Fu Zhu ,
  • Ye Longsheng
Expand
  • 1. School of Economics and Law, Chaohu University, Hefei 238024;
    2. School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Science & Technology, Nanjing 210094;
    3. School of Economics and Management, Jiangsu University of Science & Technology, Zhenjiang 212003

Received date: 2021-04-06

  Revised date: 2021-06-28

  Online published: 2021-09-26

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义]在专利合作网络小世界特性的调节下，分析企业自我中心网络特征对企业技术创新绩效的影响，为企业技术创新管理提供依据。[方法/过程]利用企业之间共同专利权人关系构建专利合作网络，以企业申请并授权的专利数量作为企业技术创新绩效的度量，以企业自我中心网络规模、自我中心网络密度和企业合作对象作为自变量，以专利合作网络小世界特性作为调节变量，构建影响企业技术创新绩效的理论模型，以语音识别技术领域企业作为研究样本进行实证分析。[结果/结论]通过实证分析揭示企业自我中心网络特征对企业技术创新绩效的影响，理清专利合作网络小世界特性影响企业技术创新绩效的机制，结果表明小世界网络通过其高聚类系数增强企业自我中心网络密度对企业创新绩效的影响。针对分析结果，提出提升企业技术创新绩效的对策和建议。

关键词： 专利; 合作网络; 自我中心网络; 小世界; 技术创新绩效

本文引用格式

关鹏 , 王曰芬 , 傅柱 , 叶龙生 . 专利合作网络小世界特性对企业技术创新绩效的影响研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021 , 65(18) : 105 -116 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.18.011

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] Based on the moderating effect of patent cooperation network's small-world characteristics, the paper analyzes the impact of enterprise ego-network characteristics on innovation and provides a basis for the management of firm's technological innovation.[Method/process] The paper used co-patentee relationship between enterprises to construct patent cooperation networks and measured innovation of enterprise with the number of patents application and authorization. The paper built the theoretical model, with the scale and density of enterprise ego-network, the proportion of cooperation with small companies as independent variables, with the small-world characteristics of patent cooperation network as a moderator variable. We took enterprises in the field of speech recognition technology as research samples for empirical analysis.[Result/conclusion] Through empirical analysis, this paper reveals the impact of the characteristics of ego-network on innovation of enterprises, and clarifies the mechanism of the impact of the small-world characteristics of the patent cooperation network on innovation. The research finds that the small-world characteristics enhance the negative influence of the density of the ego-network on innovative through its high clustering coefficient. Based on the results, the countermeasures and suggestions to improve innovation are put forward.

Key words： patent; cooperation network; ego-network; small-word; technological innovation performance

参考文献

[1] HAGEDOORN J. Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering:nterorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences[J]. Strategic management journal, 1993, 14(5):371-385.
[2] ROTHAERMEL F T, DEEDS D L. Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology:a system of new product development[J]. Strategic management journal, 2004, 25(3):201-221.
[3] GNYAWALI D R, PARK B. Co-opetition between giants:collaboration with competitors for technological innovation[J]. Research policy, 2011, 40(5):650-663.
[4] HUANG M, DONG H, CHEN D, et al. Globalization of collaborative creativity through cross-border patent activities[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2012, 6(2):226-236.
[5] JAFFE A, TRAJTENBERG M, FOGARTY M. Knowledge spillovers and patent citations:evidence froma survey of inventors[J]. American economic review, 2000, 90(2):215-218.
[6] 解学梅, 刘丝雨.协同创新模式对协同效应与创新绩效的影响机理[J]. 管理科学, 2015, 28(2):27-39.
[7] SCHILLING M A, PHELPS C C. Interfirm collaboration networks:the impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation[J]. Management science, 2007, 53(7):1113-1126.
[8] TAKAGI S, TOYAMA R. On growth of network and centrality's change analysis of co-inventors network in enterprise[C]//World summit on knowledge society. Berlin:Springer, 2008:422-427.
[9] NERKAR A, PARUCHURI S. Evolution of r&d capabilities:the role of knowledge networks within a firm[J]. Management science, 2005, 51(5):771-785.
[10] FLEMING L, MINGO S, CHEN D. Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success[J]. Adminis-trative science quarterly, 2007, 52(3):443-475.
[11] 迟嘉昱, 孙翎, 杨晓华.网络结构、地理接近性对企业专利合作的影响机制研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2018, 38(16):144-149.
[12] KASTELLE T, STEEN J. Are small world networks always best for innovation[J]. Innovation-management policy & practice, 2010, 12(1):75-87.
[13] WATTS D J, STROGATZ S H. Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks[J]. Nature, 1998, 393(6684):440.
[14] FLEMING L, MARX M. Managing creativity in small worlds[J]. California management review, 2006, 48(4):6-27.
[15] GALASKIEWICZ J. Has a network theory of organizational behaviour lived up to its promises[J]. Management and organization review, 2007, 3(1):1-18.
[16] LINDNER I, STRULIK H. Innovation and inequality in a small world[J]. International economic review, 2020, 61(2):683-719.
[17] 陈子凤, 官建成.国际专利合作和引用对创新绩效的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2014, 35(3):35-42.
[18] CHEN Z, GUAN J. The impact of small world on innovation:an empirical study of 16 countries[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2010, 4(1):97-106.
[19] ZHANG G, GUAN J, LIU X, et al. The impact of small world on patent productivity in China[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 98(2):945-960.
[20] FLEMING L, KING C, JUDA A I. Small worlds and regional innovation[J]. Organization science, 2007, 18(6):938-954.
[21] 赵良杰, 宋波.联盟网络结构和技术互依性对双元型技术联盟网络创新绩效的影响[J]. 管理学报, 2015, 12(4):558-564.
[22] 吴慧, 顾晓敏.产学研合作创新绩效的社会网络分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2017, 35(10):1578-1586.
[23] UZZI B, SPIRO J. Collaboration and creativity:the small world problem[J]. American journal of sociology, 2005, 111(2):447-504.
[24] SHI Y, GUAN J C. Small-world network effects on innovation:evidences from nanotechnology patenting[J]. Journal of nanoparticle research, 2016, 18(11):329.
[25] BRAHA D, BARYAM Y. The statistical mechanics of complex product development:empirical and analytical results[J]. Management science, 2007, 53(7):1127-1145.
[26] 张古鹏.小世界创新网络动态演化及其效应研究[J]. 管理科学学报, 2015, 18(6):15-29.
[27] FREEMAN L C. Centered graphs and the structure of ego networks[J]. Mathematical social sciences, 1982, 3(3):291-304.
[28] PHELPS C. A longitudinal study of the influence of alliance network structure and composition on firm exploratory innovation[J]. Academy of management journal, 2010, 53(4):890-913.
[29] 崔芳, 孙笑明, 熊旺, 等.关键研发者自我中心网络变化对企业创新绩效的影响:以整体网络为中介变量[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2017, 34(17):80-90.
[30] ARNABOLDI V, CONTI M, LA G M, et al. Ego network structure in online social networks and its impact on information diffusion[J]. Computer communications, 2016, 76:26-41.
[31] SOHN D, GEIDNER N. Collective dynamics of the spiral of silence:the role of ego-network size[J]. International journal of public opinion research, 2016, 28(1):25-45.
[32] BURT R S. The network structure of social capital[J]. Research in organizational behavior, 2000, 22(22):345-423.
[33] FORNAHL D, BROEKEL T, BOSCHMA R. What drives patent performance of German biotech firms? the impact of R&D subsidies, knowledge networks and their location[J]. Regional science, 2011, 90(2):395-418.
[34] CHANDY R, TELLIS GJ. The incumbent's curse? incumbency, size, and radical product innovation[J]. Journal of marketing, 2000(64):1-17.
[35] FILHO D V, ONEALE D R. Bipartite networks describe R&D collaboration between institutions[EB/OL]. [2021-06-26]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.10977.
[36] BEAUDRY C, SCHIFFAUEROVA A. Impacts of collaboration and network indicators on patent quality:the case of Canadian nanotechnology innovation[J]. European management journal, 2011, 29(5):362-376.
[37] GUAN J, ZUO K, CHEN K, et al. Does country-level R&D efficiency benefit from the collaboration network structure?[J]. Research policy, 2016, 45(4):770-784.
[38] BLUNDELL R, GRIFFITH R, VAN REENEN J, et al. Dynamic count data models of technological innovation[J]. The economic journal, 1994, 105(429):333-344.
[39] OWENSMITH J, POWELL W W. Knowledge networks as channels and conduits:the effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community[J]. Organization science, 2004, 15(1):5-21.
[40] YAMAGUCHI K. The flow of information through social networks:diagonal-free measures of inefficiency and the structural determinants of inefficiency[J]. Social networks, 1994, 16(1):57-86.
[41] 何晓群.应用回归分析[M]. 北京:电子工业出版社, 2017.
[42] GUIMERA R, AMARAL L A. Cartography of complex networks:modules and universal roles[J]. Journal of statistical mechanics:theory and experiment, 2005(P02001):1-17.
[43] CHEN Y, JAW Y. How do business groups' small world networks effect diversification, innovation, and internationalization?[J]. Asia Pacific journal of management, 2014, 31(4):1019-1044.作者贡献说明:关鹏:提出研究思路, 负责文献调研、数据分析与论文撰写; 王曰芬:提出论文思路, 指导论文修改与定稿; 傅柱:参与讨论研究思路和提出修改意见; 叶龙生:参与数据分析与模型构建。
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉