[目的/意义] 对上海图书馆举办的2020年数字人文年会会议征集的51个汉语语境下数字人文项目进行分析，总结汉语世界关于中华文化主题的数字人文项目概况，为国内数字人文的未来发展提供参考。[方法/过程] 采用网络调查法和数据分析法对51个数字人文项目进行分类研究，根据项目的研究对象、研究方法、基础设施类型和项目成果的现实意义进行分析与讨论以获取有价值的特征。就"数字人文与人文学科""技术手段与方法应用""基础设施建设""服务模式与问题解决"四个维度进行深入探讨。[结果/结论] 51个项目的总结显示出五大特点：在历史学、文学领域蓬勃发展，机器学习与数字人文深度结合，数字资源建设至关重要，综合性数字人文平台的时代已经到来，跨学科、跨机构、跨国家的合作性项目开始显现。本文也针对当前数字人文项目存在的不足提出了促进机构间合作及多学科交叉融合，加强大数据交叉思维和人文素养培养，加强区域协同发展，继续提升学科服务能力和基础资源建设的主要建议。
[Purpose/significance] This paper analyzes 51 digital humanities projects in Chinese context which is collected at the 2020 digital humanities conference held by Shanghai Library. This paper summarizes the general situation of digital humanities projects on Chinese cultural themes in the Chinese context, and provides reference for the future development of digital humanities in China.[Method/process] The 51 projects were analyzed by network survey and data analysis, and classified according to the different research objects and contents. Meanwhile, valuable features were obtained by analyzing and discussing the research methods, implementation conditions and practical significance of the project results. This paper discussed four dimensions of "Digital Humanities and humanities" "Application of technical means and methods" "infrastructure construction" and "extended service and problem solving".[Result/conclusion] The overview of 51 projects show five characteristics:Digital Humanities is flourished in the fields of history and literature, and has deep combination of machine learning. The construction of digital resources is still the top priority. The era of Comprehensive Digital Humanities platform has come, and interdisciplinary, inter institutional and international cooperative projects have also begun to appear. In view of the shortcomings in the construction and development of Chinese Digital Humanities projects, this paper also puts forward the main suggestions to promote inter agency cooperation and interdisciplinary integration, to strengthen the cultivation of big data cross thinking and humanistic quality, and continue to improve the subject service ability and basic resources construction.
[1] KIRSCHENBAUM M G, What is digital humanities and what's it doing in English Departments?[EB/OL].[2021-08-30]. https://www.uvic.ca/humanities/english/assets/docs/kirschenbaum.pdf.
[2] 刘炜,叶鹰.数字人文的技术体系与理论结构探讨[J].中国图书馆学报,2017,43(5):32-41.
[3] 朱本军,聂华.跨界与融合:全球视野下的数字人文——首届北京大学"数字人文论坛"会议综述[J].大学图书馆学报,2016,34(5):16-21.
[4] 高胜寒,赵宇翔,朱庆华.国内外数字人文领域研究进展分析[J].图书馆杂志,2016,35(10):9-18.
[5] Yale university library digital humanities lab[EB/OL].[2021-07-13]. http://dhlab.yale.edu.
[6] Hyperstudio-digital humanities at MIT[EB/OL].[2021-07-13].http://hyperstudio.mit.edu.
[7] 徐彤阳,顾婷婷.日本数字人文项目探析和启示[J].国家图书馆学刊,2021,30(3):88-99.
[8] Sydney digital humanities research group[EB/OL].[2021-07-13]. https://www.sydney.edu.au/arts/our-research/centres-institutes-and-groups/sydney-digital-humanities-research-group.html.
[9] 邓要然.美国图书馆领域数字人文项目研究[J].图书馆工作与研究,2017(8):29-35.
[10] 赵雪芹,莫长镭,雷春蓉.美国高校图书馆数字人文项目调研与启示——以美国排名前10位的高校为例[J].图书馆,2021(1):70-76.
[11] 徐彤阳,杨明睿.澳大利亚数字人文项目透视——兼论对我国数字人文项目的启示[J].图书情报工作,2020,64(22):145-152.
[12] 林泽斐.英国数字人文项目研究热点分析——基于DHCommons项目数据库的实证研究[J].情报资料工作,2018,39(1):97-104.
[13] 蔡迎春.特色资源建设中的数字人文应用进展研究——基于国内数字人文相关项目及实践案例[J].图书馆建设,2018(7):18-24,30.
[14] 苏敏.图书馆开展数字人文服务研究综述[J].情报探索,2020,4(1):120-126.
[15] 吴丽萍.我国图书馆数字人文研究现状及展望[J].图书馆工作与研究,2021,4(6):30-36.
[16] 朱本军,聂华.互动与共生:数字人文与史学研究——第二届"北京大学数字人文论坛"综述[J].大学图书馆学报,2017,35(4):18-22.
[17] 吕璐成,韩涛.AI在图情:人工智能赋能图情服务——2019年图书馆前沿技术论坛(IT4L)会议综述[J].农业图书情报学报,2020,32(5):13-18.
[18] 刘炜,谢蓉,张磊,等.面向人文研究的国家数据基础设施建设[J].中国图书馆学报,2016,42(5):29-39.
[19] 夏翠娟.面向人文研究的"数据基础设施"建设——试论图书馆学对数字人文的方法论贡献[J].中国图书馆学报,2020,46(3):24-37.
[20] 中央文化体制改革和发展工作领导小组.关于做好国家文化大数据体系建设的通知[EB/OL].[2021-02-01].https://www.gujianchina.cn/news/show-9194.html
[21] 赵宇翔,练靖雯.数字人文视域下文化遗产众包研究综述[J].数据分析与知识发现,2021,5(1):36-55.
[22] 曾熙,谭旭,王晓光.文化遗产大数据二维分类框架研究[J].图书情报知识,2020,37(1):84-93.
[23] 吴健.多元异构的数字文化——敦煌石窟数字文化呈现与展示[J].敦煌研究,2016(1):123-127.
[24] YARROW A, CLUBB B, DRAPER J. Public libraries, archives and museums:trends in collaboration and cooperation[R]. The Hague:IFLA Headquarters, 2008.
[25] 颜佳,姚啸华.数字人文发展的"主导者"与"使能者"——2020数字人文年会"数字人文基础设施建设"专家论辩综述[J].数字人文,2021(1):123-133.
[26] 王丽华,刘炜.助力与借力:数字人文与新文科建设[J].南京社会科学,2021, 4(7):130-138.
