图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2022 , Vol. 66 >Issue 3: 26 - 35

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2022.03.004

专题：基层图书馆阅读服务体系研究

数字乡村战略下基层阅读服务协同治理现状与对策——以湖北省7县(市)130村为例

  • 谢娟 ,
  • 李雪 ,
  • 李红 ,
  • 张小雨 ,
  • 秦霞
展开
  • 1. 湖北省图书馆 武汉 430070;
    2. 厦门大学图书馆 厦门 361005;
    3. 华中师范大学信息管理学院 武汉 430079
谢娟,副研究馆员,硕士;李红,副研究馆员;张小雨,硕士研究生;秦霞,硕士研究生。

收稿日期: 2021-07-16

  修回日期: 2021-09-08

  网络出版日期: 2022-02-16

基金资助

本文系国家新闻出版署出版融合发展（四川新华）重点实验室课题“数字乡村战略背景下全民阅读协同服务平台构建研究”（项目编号：KT2020018）研究成果之一。

收起

Present Situations, Collaborative Governance, Grassroots Reading, Services Under, Digital Villages, A Survey, Hubei Province

  • Xie Juan ,
  • Li Xue ,
  • Li Hong ,
  • Zhang Xiaoyu ,
  • Qin Xia
Expand
  • 1. Hubei Province Library, Wuhan 430070;
    2. Xiamen University Library, Xiamen 361005;
    3. School of Information Management, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079

Received date: 2021-07-16

  Revised date: 2021-09-08

  Online published: 2022-02-16

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义] 关注乡村阅读服务协同治理，提高协同治理水平，进而提高乡村层面的基层阅读服务效能。[方法/过程] 在湖北省范围内面向乡村居民和阅读服务提供者开展问卷调查，并基于K.Emerson和T.Nabatchi提出的协同治理整合框架对调查结果进行分析，发现乡村层面基层阅读服务协同治理的现状、存在问题。[结果/结论] 分析发现：乡村阅读服务协同治理还处于比较低的层次。关于协同治理系统环境，存在相关政策、法律向下传达不足，阅读服务资源尤其是数字资源下沉不足，阅读服务人员文化水平不够，乡村缺乏阅读氛围，乡村居民对阅读服务缺乏信任等问题。关于协同治理的驱动力，各服务主体之间缺乏交流导致不确定性存在，相互依赖缺乏协调性，缺乏激励机制，服务主体跨部门（组织）的领导力不足等问题。关于协同治理动力，存在原则性接触机械且不够系统，基于理解和信任的共同动机作为行为意愿不够强烈，基层联合行动能力不足等问题。基于此，提出依托数字阅读服务平台的乡村阅读服务协同治理框架及相应的行动对策。

关键词： 乡村阅读服务; 基层阅读服务; 协同治理; 数字乡村战略; 数字阅读服务

本文引用格式

谢娟 , 李雪 , 李红 , 张小雨 , 秦霞 . 数字乡村战略下基层阅读服务协同治理现状与对策——以湖北省7县(市)130村为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022 , 66(3) : 26 -35 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2022.03.004

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] Focusing on the collaborative governance of rural reading services can improve the level of collaborative governance, and the effectiveness of rural-level grassroots reading services. [Method/process] A questionnaire survey for rural residents and reading service providers was carried out in Hubei Province.And based on the integrative framework for collaborative governance proposed by Emerson and Nabatchi, the survey results were analyzed, and the status quo and existing problems of collaborative governance of Grassroots reading services at the rural level were found. [Result/conclusion] The results show collaborative governance of rural reading services is still at a low level. Regarding the collaborative governance system environment, there are problems such as insufficient downward communication of relevant policies and laws, insufficient reading service resources, especially digital resources, insufficient education of reading service personnel, insufficient rural reading atmosphere, and insufficient trust of rural residents in reading services. Regarding the drivers of collaborative governance, there are problems such as the lack of communication between service bodies, which leads to uncertainty, interdependence lack of coordination, lack of incentive mechanisms, and insufficient leadership across departments and organizations. Regarding the collaborative governance dynamics, there is a mechanical and not systematic enough principled contact, not strong enough common motivation based on understanding and trust as willingness to act, and insufficient capacity for joint action at grassroots level. On the basis of above, a collaborative governance framework for rural reading services based on digital reading service platforms and corresponding action strategies are proposed.

Key words： rural reading service; grassroots reading service; collaborative governance; digital villages strategy; digital reading service

参考文献

[1] 中国新闻出版研究院. 第十八次全国国民阅读调查成果发布[EB/OL].[2021-06-18]. http://www.nppa.gov.cn/nppa/contents/280/75981.shtml.
[2] 韩晓玲. 湖北数字农家书屋探索"百姓点单"服务模式[EB/OL].[2021-06-06]. http://news.cnhubei.com/content/2020-05/20/content_13060109.html.
[3] 安徽新闻出版广电局. 安徽省数字农家书屋数字阅读引领未来[EB/OL].[2021-06-06]. http://www.ahsnjsw.com/.
[4] 江苏省新闻出版局. 江苏省数字农家书屋[EB/OL].[2021-06-06]. http://jsnjsw.cnki.net/Main_jiangsu.
[5] 中共中央办公厅, 国务院办公厅. 数字乡村发展战略纲要[EB/OL].[2021-06-18]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2019-05/16/content_5392269.htm.
[6] 陈含章. 我国数字农家书屋建设现状及模式探析[J]. 出版发行研究, 2017(9):24-28.
[7] 陈庚, 胡雅纯. 农村居民公共阅读低度参与归因分析——来自湖北省77个行政村的调查[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2020,46(5):36-53.
[8] 王虹, 邓福庆, 杨红岩. 农村阅读的需求贫困与"不发展"原则探析[J]. 图书与情报, 2015(6):126-133.
[9] 田玉麒. 破与立:协同治理机制的整合与重构——评Collaborative Governance Regimes[J]. 公共管理评论, 2019(2):131-143.
[10] 董丽晶, 谢志远. 协同治理视角下城市新型公共阅读空间建设研究[J]. 出版发行研究, 2020(1):74-77.
[11] 李熠煜, 马德勤. 协同治理视角下贫困山区阅读推广的现状、困境及突破[J]. 图书馆研究, 2020(6):81-88.
[12] CHRIS ANSELL A C. Collaborative governance in theory and practice[J]. Journal of public administration research and theory, 2007,4:543-571.
[13] BRYSON J M, CROSBY B C, STONE M M. The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations:propositions from the literature[J]. Public administration review, 2006,66(S):44-55.
[14] 胡那苏图. 产业地域典型社区协同治理研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学, 2020.
[15] EMERSON K, NABATCHI T. Collaborative governance regimes[M]. Washington, DC:Georgetown University Press, 2015.
[16] EMERSON K, NABATCHI T, BALOGH S. An integrative framework for collaborative governance[J]. Journal of public administration research and theory, 2012(1):1-29.
[17] 湖北省委省政府. 湖北省乡村振兴战略规划(2018-2022年)[EB/OL].[2021-04-25]. http://www.hubei.gov.cn/zwgk/hbyw/hbywqb/201905/t20190517_1394193.shtml.
[18] 傅才武, 王文德. 农村文化惠民工程的"弱参与"及其改革策略——来自全国21省282个行政村的调查[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2020,46(5):54-73.
[19] PROVAN K G, MILWARD H B. A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness:a comparative study of four community mental health systems[J]. Administrative science quarterly, 1995,40(1):1-33.
[20] 胡维青, 张艳花, 刘莹, 等. 美国农村图书馆与数字共融:问题与挑战[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2019(9):89-93.
[21] 杨华锋. 协同治理——社会治理现代化的历史进路[M]. 北京:经济科学出版社, 2017:209.
[22] 曹凌, 杨玉麟, 林强. 人的发展:文化共享工程效果反思[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2014,40(2):27-32.
[23] 魏辅轶. 中国图书馆学理论跨世纪的三次"重逢"与"莫比乌斯陷阱"[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2021,47(1):34-46.
[24] 李枭. 多元主体参与下的我国城市社区协同治理研究[M]. 北京:经济科学出版社, 2018:108-113.
[25] 沙美图书馆:打造厦大边上的公益图书馆[EB/OL].[2021-09-06]. https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1681836068586927901.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉