图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2022 , Vol. 66 >Issue 4: 33 - 44

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2022.04.004

专题：面向重大公共卫生事件的智库建设与开放数据治理

基于公众科学模式的重大公共卫生事件开放数据服务生态系统构建

  • 薛翔 ,
  • 赵宇翔 ,
  • 朱庆华 ,
  • 应峻 ,
  • 郝世博
展开
  • 1. 南京大学信息管理学院 南京 210023;
    2. 南京理工大学经济管理学院 南京 210094;
    3. 复旦大学图书馆 上海 200433;
    4. 南京理工大学知识产权学院 南京 210094
薛翔,博士研究生;朱庆华,教授,博士生导师;应峻,副馆长,副研究馆员;郝世博,副教授,硕士生导师。

收稿日期: 2021-10-07

  修回日期: 2021-12-12

  网络出版日期: 2022-03-01

基金资助

本文系国家自然科学基金面上项目"基于科研众包模式的公众科学项目运作与管理机制研究"（项目编号：71774083）和"公共文化服务领域开放数据的价值共创机制及实现模式研究"（项目编号：72074112）研究成果之一。

收起

Building Open Data Service Ecosystem of Major Public Health Emergencies Based on Citizen Science Mode

  • Xue Xiang ,
  • Zhao Yuxiang ,
  • Zhu Qinghua ,
  • Ying Jun ,
  • Hao Shibo
Expand
  • 1. School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023;
    2. School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Science & Technology, Nanjing 210094;
    3. Fudan University Library, Shanghai 200433;
    4. School of Intellectual Property, Nanjing University of Science & Technology, Nanjing 210094

Received date: 2021-10-07

  Revised date: 2021-12-12

  Online published: 2022-03-01

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义] 针对现阶段重大公共卫生事件数据开放面临的公众关注参与度低、数据利用率差、平台服务不完善等诸多困境，引入公众科学模式构建开放数据服务生态系统，以为打破重大公共卫生事件数据开放发展僵局提供思路。[方法/过程] 分析重大公共卫生事件开放数据情境下公众科学项目的主体要素、实施流程，并构建公众科学运作模式。在此基础上，系统梳理利益相关者、价值创造模式、约束和促进制度等关键要素，综合构建重大公共卫生事件开放数据服务生态系统。[结果/结论] 该服务生态系统以公众科学模式为基础架构，以重大公共卫生事件开放数据平台为关键节点，通过提供全方位服务内容、针对性制度约束与促进机制，引导社会公众、各行业机构与专业人员在宏观、中观和微观层面进行互动协作，整合自身优势资源、开展服务交换以实现价值共创。研究结果有助于提高开放数据的社会参与度和利用率，为重大公共卫生事件开放数据平台构建服务体系、优化服务水平提供行动参考。

关键词： 重大公共卫生事件; 开放数据; 公众科学模式; 服务生态系统

本文引用格式

薛翔 , 赵宇翔 , 朱庆华 , 应峻 , 郝世博 . 基于公众科学模式的重大公共卫生事件开放数据服务生态系统构建[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022 , 66(4) : 33 -44 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2022.04.004

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] At the present stage, the data opening of major public health emergencies is faced with many difficulties, such as low public participation, poor data utilization and imperfect platform services. This paper introduces the citizen science mode to build an open service ecosystem, aiming to provide ideas for breaking the deadlock in the development of open data on major public health emergencies.[Method/process] This paper clarified the main elements and implementation processes of citizen science projects in the context of open data on major public health emergencies, and explored the citizen science operation model. On this basis, the study systematically sorted out key elements such as stakeholders, value creation models, constraints and promotion systems. Finally, an open data service ecosystem for major public health emergencies was comprehensively constructed.[Result/conclusion] In this service ecosystem, the citizen science mode is the infrastructure, and the open data platform for major public health emergencies is the key node. By providing all-round service contents, targeted system constraints and promotional mechanisms, this system guides the public, various industry institutions and professionals to interact and cooperate at the levels of macro, meso and micro, integrate their own advantageous resources and carry out service exchange and complementarity, so as to achieve value creation. The results of this paper will help to improve the social participation and utilization of open data, and provide an action reference for the construction of the service system and optimization of the service level of open data platform for major public health emergencies.

Key words： major public health emergencies; open data; citizen science mode; service ecosystem

参考文献

[1] 突发公共卫生事件应急条例[EB/OL].[2021-08-11]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2008-03/28/content_6399.htm.
[2] 习近平主持召开中央全面深化改革委员会第十二次会议强调:完善重大疫情防控体制机制健全国家公共卫生应急管理体系[EB/OL].(2020-02-14)[2021-08-14].http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2020-02/14/content_5478896.htm.
[3] 相雅凡,马续补,秦春秀,等.突发公共卫生事件地方政府数据开放评估研究——基于2019新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情[J].情报理论与实践,2020,43(9):79-86.
[4] 季统凯,刘甜甜,伍小强.政府数据开放:概念辨析、价值与现状分析[J].北京工业大学学报,2017,43(3):327-334.
[5] 胡海波,高鹏.面向用户服务的政府开放数据:一个概念性阐释框架[J].情报理论与实践,2018,41(6):45-51.
[6] NEWMAN G, WIGGINS A, CRALL A, et al. The future of citizen science:emerging technologies and shifting paradigms[J]. Frontiers in ecology and the environment, 2012, 10(6):298-304.
[7] 赵宇翔.科研众包视角下公众科学项目刍议:概念解析、模式探索及学科机遇[J].中国图书馆学报,2017,43(5):42-56.
[8] AKAKA M A, VARGO S L, LUSCH R F. The complexity of context:a service ecosystems approach for international marketing[J]. Journal of international marketing, 2013, 21(4):1-20.
[9] LUSCH R F, NAMBISAN S. Service innovation[J]. MIS quarterly, 2015, 39(1):155-176.
[10] 令狐克睿,简兆权,李雷.服务生态系统:源起、核心观点和理论框架[J].研究与发展管理,2018,30(5):147-158.
[11] VARGO S L, LUSCH R F. Service-dominant logic:continuing the evolution[J]. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 2008, 36(1):1-10.
[12] VARGO S L, LUSCH R F. Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing[J]. Journal of marketing, 2004, 68(1):1-17.
[13] PRAHALAD C K, RAMASWAMY V. Co-creation experiences:Tthe next practice in value creation[J]. Journal of interactive marketing, 2004, 18(3):5-14.
[14] CHANDLER J D, VARGO S L. Contextualization and value-in-context:how context frames exchange[J]. Marketing theory, 2011, 11(1):35-49.
[15] VARGO S L, LUSCH R F. Inversions of service-dominant logic[J]. Marketing theory, 2014, 14(3):239-248.
[16] VARGO S L, LUSCH R F. Institutions and axioms:an extension and update of service-dominant logic[J]. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 2016, 44(1):5-23.
[17] BARNEY J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage[J]. Journal of management, 1991, 17(1):99-120.
[18] 朱晓峰,盛天祺,张卫.重大突发公共卫生事件冲击下的政府数据开放共生模式研究:界定、演进与重构[J].情报资料工作,2021,42(1):77-87.
[19] 邹超.开放数据的多角色关系模式探究[J].情报理论与实践,2017,40(9):50-54.
[20] 简兆权,令狐克睿,李雷.价值共创研究的演进与展望——从"顾客体验"到"服务生态系统"视角[J].外国经济与管理,2016,38(9):3-20.
[21] SAGARRA O, GUTIERREZ-ROIG M, BONHOURE I, et al. Citizen science practices for computational social science research:the conceptualization of pop-up experiments[J]. Frontiers in physics, 2016, 3:93.
[22] 张轩慧,赵宇翔,朱庆华.国内公众科学项目的运作流程和组织管理模式:机构视角下的案例分析[J].图书与情报,2018(6):53-62.
[23] ZHAO Y C, ZHU Q. Conceptualizing task affordance in online crowdsourcing context[J]. Online information review, 2016, 40(7):938-958.
[24] BONNEY R,COOPER C B,DICKINSON J,et al.Citizen science:a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy[J]. BioScience,2009,59(11):977-984.
[25] 赵宇翔,张轩慧,朱庆华.面向突发公共卫生事件的公众科学应用探索及平台体系构建[J].情报资料工作,2021,42(1):95-104.
[26] KWITT R, HEGENBART S, RASIWASIA N, et al. Do we need annotation experts? a case study in celiac disease classification[C]//International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Boston:Springer, 2014:454-461.
[27] DE WEGER L A, HIEMSTRA P S, OP DEN BUYSCH E, et al. Spatiotemporal monitoring of allergic rhinitis symptoms in the Netherlands using citizen science[J]. Allergy, 2014, 69(8):1085-1091.
[28] BAHK C Y, GOSHGARIAN M, DONAHUE K, et al. Increasing patient engagement in pharmacovigilance through online community outreach and mobile reporting applications:an analysis of adverse event reporting for the Essure device in the US[J]. Pharmaceutical medicine, 2015, 29(6):331-340.
[29] SWAN M. DIYgenomics crowdsourced health research studies:personal wellness and preventive medicine through collective intelligence[C]//2012 AAAI Spring symposium series. Palo Alto:Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, 2012:54-59.
[30] RAMIREZ-ANDREOTTA M D, BRUSSEAU M L, ARTIOLA J F, et al. Building a co-created citizen science program with gardeners neighboring a superfund site:the garden roots case study[J]. International public health journal, 2015, 7(1):139-153.
[31] LAAKSONEN M, SAJANTI E, SORMUNEN J J, et al. Crowdsourcing-based nationwide tick collection reveals the distribution of Ixodes ricinus and I. persulcatus and associated pathogens in Finland[J]. Emerging microbes & infections, 2017, 6(1):1-7.
[32] RAMASWAMY V, OZCAN K. Strategy and co-creation thinking[J]. Strategy & leadership, 2013, 41(6):5-10.
[33] RAMASWAMY V, CHOPRA N. Building a culture of co-creation at Mahindra[J]. Strategy & leadership, 2014, 42(2):12-18.
[34] ZHAO Y, ZHU Q. Evaluation on crowdsourcing research:current status and future direction[J]. Information systems frontiers, 2014, 16(3):417-434.
[35] BONNEY R, COOPER C B, DICKINSON J, et al. Citizen science:a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy[J]. Bioscience, 2009, 59(11):977-984.
[36] 段尧清,姜慧,汤弘昊.政府开放数据全生命周期:概念、模型与结构——系统论视角[J].情报理论与实践,2019,42(5):35-40, 50.
[37] 王昊,陈菊红,姚树俊,等.服务生态系统利益相关者价值共创分析框架研究[J].软科学,2021,35(3):108-115.
[38] LUSCH R F, NAMBISAN S. Service innovation[J]. MIS quarterly, 2015, 39(1):155-176.
[39] 王晶,王卫,张梦君.开放政府数据价值实现保障机制研究——基于系统动力学方法[J].图书馆学研究,2019(16):51-59.
[40] 谭军.基于TOE理论架构的开放政府数据阻碍因素分析[J].情报杂志,2016,35(8):175-178, 150.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉