[Purpose/significance] The synergy effect of scientific research should depend on the complete, correct and effective flow of information, and there are inevitably intentional information distortion behaviors in the process of information flow, that is, behaviors such as manipulating information through falsification, concealment and evasion. Studying the information manipulation behaviors of scientific research collaboration and their influencing factors can help research institutions grasp the characteristics of information manipulation behaviors, formulate information governance strategies, and enhance the synergy effect.[Method/process] Based on grounded theory, this paper conducted in-depth interviews with 111 researchers, and constructed the conceptual model of influencing factors of information manipulation behaviors in scientific research collaboration.[Result/conclusion] Information manipulation behaviors in scientific research collaboration have the characteristics of selfishness, deception, strategy and concealment. The governance of information manipulation behaviors can be strengthened by cultivating the dedication of researchers, improving their information literacy, promoting a collaborative culture, creating a friendly atmosphere, establishing an effective incentive mechanism, and adopting advanced information management platforms and technologies.
[1] 张云开,马捷.跨学科视角下的协同信息行为研究:合作、平衡与博弈[J].情报资料工作,2020,41(1):32-38.
[2] KIMMERLE J, WODZICKI K.Value of information,behavioral guidelines, and social value orientation in an information-exchange dilemma[J].Group dynamics theory research & practice, 2011, 15(2):173-186.
[3] HELLER M A. The tragedy of the anticommons:property in the transition from marx to markets.[J]. Harvard law review, 1998,111(3):621-688.
[4] FONG P, MEN C, LUO J, et al. Knowledge hiding and team creativity:the contingent role of task interdependence[J]. Management decision, 2018, 56(2):329-343.
[5] CHATTERJEE S, SARKER S. Infusing ethical considerations in knowledge management scholarship:toward a research agenda[J].Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2013, 14(8):452-481.
[6] 巴泽尔.产权的经济分析[M].2版.费方域,钱敏,段毅才,译.上海:格致出版社,2017.
[7] CERNE M, NERSTAD C G L, DYSVIK A, et al.What goes around comes around:knowledge hiding, perceived motivational climate, and creativity[J].Academy of management journal, 2014, 57(1):172-192.
[8] RHEE Y W, CHOI J N.Knowledge management behavior and individual creativity:goal orientations as antecedents and in-group social status as moderating contingency[J].Journal of organizational behavior, 2017, 38(6):813-832.
[9] MCCORNACK S A. Information manipulation theory[J].Communications monographs,1992, 59(1):1-16.
[10] STEVEN M.Information manipulation theory[M].New York:John Wiley & Sons,2015.
[11] RUBIN V L,CHEN Y.Information manipulation classification theory for LIS and NLP[J]. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2012, 49(1):1-5.
[12] MITTAL R,RANDHAWA V,GAP K.Information manipulation theory:as a way of capturing information exchange[J]. Annuals agri bio research, 2014, 20(1):134-138.
[13] MITTAL R.Testing the applicability of information manipulation theory (IMT) in indian organizational context[J].Research journal of social science & management,2015,4(9):25-32.
[14] HOWARD H A, GRIFFIN D J, ARTH Z W. Information manipulation and cognitive trust:an organizational replication and extension of IMT[J].Atlantic journal of communication, 2021,30(2):1-12.
[15] MCCORNACK S A,MORRISON K,PAIK J E,et al.Information manipulation theory 2:a propositional theory of deceptive discourse production[J].Journal of language & social psychology, 2015, 33(4):348-377.
[16] STEINEL W, UTZ S, KONING L.The good, the bad and the ugly thing to do when sharing information:revealing, concealing and lying depend on social motivation, distribution and importance of information[J].Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 2010,113 (2):85-96.
[17] FORD D P, STAPLES S.Are full and partial knowledge sharing the same[J].Journal of knowledge management, 2010, 14(3):394-409.
[18] CULLOTY E, SUITER J. Disinformation and manipulation in digital media:information pathologies[M]. London:Routledge, 2021.
[19] BENIGNI M C, JOSEPH K, CARLEY K M. Bot-ivistm:assessing information manipulation in social media using network analytics[M]. Berlin:Springer, 2019.
[20] EDMOND C, LU Y K. Creating confusion:information manipulation and imperfect coordination[EB/OL].[2021-10-05].http://www.chrisedmond.net/Edmond%20Lu%20Creating%20Confusion%202017.pdf.
[21] FONG E A, WILHITE A W. Authorship and citation manipulation in academic research[J]. PloS one, 2017, 12(12):e0187394.
[22] BIAGIOLI M, LIPPMAN A. Gaming the metrics:misconduct and manipulation in academic research[M]. London:Mit Press, 2020.
[23] 严炜炜,刘倩,胡媛.基于科研协同关系的模块化协同分工体系构建研究[J].信息资源管理学报,2017,7(4):97-102,112.
[24] 张培.高校学生用户学术数据库使用意向影响因素研究[J].图书情报知识,2017(5):108-119.
[25] 克里斯滕森,约翰逊,特纳.研究方法设计与分析[M]. 11版.赵迎春,译.北京:商务印书馆,2018.
[26] 卢恒,张向先,吴雅威,等.基于扎根理论的学术APP用户信息交互行为影响因素研究[J].情报杂志,2021,40(4):170-178.
[27] HALDER S, ROY A, CHAKRABORTY P K. The influence of personality traits on information seeking behaviour of students[J].Malaysian journal of library & information science,2017,15(1):41-53.
[28] 李雪,刘益,高伟.用户评论信息特征与信息采纳——产品涉入与社区涉入的不同调节作用[J].情报科学,2018,36(11):115-121.
[29] COOKE N A. Posttruth, truthiness, and alternative facts:information behavior and critical information consumption for a new age[J]. The library quarterly, 2017, 87(3):211-221.
[30] HUR K, KIM T T, KARATEPE O M, et al. An exploration of the factors influencing social media continuance usage and information sharing intentions among Korean travellers[J]. Tourism management, 2017(63):170-178.
[31] 赵越岷,李梦俊,陈华平.虚拟社区中消费者信息共享行为影响因素的实证研究[J].管理学报,2010,7(10):1490-1494,1501.
[32] GAGNÉ M, TIAN A W, SOO C, et al. Different motivations for knowledge sharing and hiding:the role of motivating work design[J].Journal of organizational behavior,2019,40(7):783-799.
[33] XIAO M, COOKE F L. Why and when knowledge hiding in the workplace is harmful:a review of the literature and directions for future research in the Chinese context[J]. Asia Pacific journal of human resources, 2019, 57(4):470-502.
[34] CABAJ K, CAVIGLIONE L, MAZURCZYK W, et al. The new threats of information hiding:the road ahead[J]. IT professional, 2018, 20(3):31-39.
[35] 张敏,赵雅兰,张艳.基于自我决定理论的科研工作者知识利用行为形成机制与路径[J].图书馆杂志,2018,37(10):12-19.
[36] ZHANG X, LIU S, DENG Z, et al.Knowledge sharing motivations in online health communities:a comparative study of health professionals and normal users[J].Computers in human behavior, 2017(75):797-810.
[37] EMPSON L.Fear of exploitation and fear of contamination:impediments to knowledge transfer in mergers between professional service firms[J].Human relations,2001,54(7):839-862.
[38] ZHAO H, XIA Q, HE P, et al.Workplace ostracism and knowledge hiding in service organizations[J].International journal of hospitality management, 2016(59):84-94.
[39] ERDEM K, MUSTAFA S.Knowledge manipulation in inter organizational networks:a new role for brokers[M].London:Academic Publishing Limited, 2009.
[40] LIU Y, LI Y, SHI L H, et al.Knowledge transfer in buyer-supplier relationships:the role of transactional and relational governance mechanisms[J].Journal of business research,2017, 78(9):285-293.
[41] 孔繁超.基于区块链的开放获取资源建设与管理[J].情报理论与实践,2019,42(5):153-158.
