[目的/意义]《七略》久佚,清人姚振宗《七略佚文》在前人辑佚成果的基础上,参考《汉志》的目录框架,提供了最为接近《七略》原貌的文本。反思姚氏《七略佚文》的得失,有助于准确认读《七略》以及作为《七略》节本的《汉志》。[方法/过程]从姚振宗对《七略》序言、分类结构、文献著录和叙录四大目录要素的具体还原过程,分析《七略佚文》"依据《汉书·艺文志》移易其体裁"的目录学洞见与疏漏。[结果/结论]姚氏《七略佚文》不仅在辑佚学意义上指向《七略》的复原,成为最为接近《七略》原貌的文本;也在目录学意义上,揭示了《汉志》基于"史志之例"而生成的目录学新范式,重建了目录学的框架结构,从而也改变了传统目录学动称"依刘向故事"的叙事模式。由此,姚氏《七略佚文》也超越了诸家争胜于所辑条目多寡的辑佚学层次,成为聚焦"体例"的目录学之作。

[Purpose/Significance] Qilue has been lost for a long time. The Qing Dynasty Yao Zhenzong’s Lost articles of Qilue, based on the past achievements of predecessors’ compilation,referred to the catalogue frame of Hanzhi, provides the text closest to the original appearance of Qilue. Reflecting on gains and losses of Yao’s Lost Articles of Qilue will help to accurately identify Qilue and Hanzhi as an abridged version of Qilue.[Method/Process] According to Yao Zhenzong’s specific restoration process of the four bibliographic elements of Qilue, including the preface, classification structure, bibliography and narration, this paper analyzed the bibliographical insights and omissions of Lost Articles of Qilue from transforming its genre according to Hanshu·Yiwenzhi.[Result/Conclusion] Yao’s Lost Articles of Qilue not only points to the restoration of Qilue in the sense of compilation, and becomes the text closest to the original appearance of Qilue, also in the sense of bibliography, it reveals that Hanzhi is based on an example of historical records, reconstructs the frame structure of bibliography, and changes the narrative mode of traditional bibliography called "Liu Xiang’s story". As a result, Yao’s Lost Articles of Qilue has also surpassed the level of bibliography where various scholars compete for the number of entries in the compilation, and has become a bibliographic work that focuses on "styles".