[目的/意义]随着南海问题司法化进程的不断推进,对单个证据的证明力,多个证据的关联性进行有效分析是提升维权证据证明效力的关键,可进一步推动南海疆维权证据链工程。[方法/过程]以国际法院判例和证据法的审查判断标准、证据分类和证明力比较规则为法理依据,建立南海疆维权证据的证明力综合评价指标计算体系,设计基于证明力的南海疆维权证据关联模型,并以"南沙群岛"相关的维权证据材料进行实证分析。[结果/结论]研究表明,南海疆维权证据证明力综合指标体系,以及基于证明力的维权证据关联模型的构建,为司法维权的量化研究奠定了理论基础,为司法维权场景下证据呈现提供了依据,有利于发挥学科在国家安全中的情报支持作用。
[Purpose/Significance]With the advancement of the judicial process of the South China Sea issue,effective analysis of the probative power of a single evidence and the relevance of multiple evidences is the key to improve the effectiveness of the evidence of rights protection,which can further promote the South China Sea Rights Protection evidence chain project.[Method/Process]This paper was based on international court jurisprudence and evidence law and the review and judgment standards,evidence classification and comparative rules of probative force,established the comprehensive evaluation index calculation system of rights protection evidence in the South China Sea,and designed a strong safeguarding right evidence correlation model in the South China Sea based on probative force.The empirical analysis was carried out based on the evidence of the Nansha Islands'relevant rights protection.[Result/Conclusion]The research will help to build a comprehensive index system of the evidentiary power of the rights protection evidence in the South China Sea and a correlation model of the rights protection evidence based on the evidentiary power.Moreover,it will conduce to lay a theoretical foundation for the quantitative research of judicial rights protection,and provide a basis for the presentation of evidence in the scene of judicial rights protection.At the same time,it is conducive to give full play to the intelligence support role of disciplines in national security.
[1] 司徒凌云,石进,杨海平,等.基于多模态知识图谱的南海疆维权证据链系统构建[J].情报杂志,2021,40(12):23-29,44.
[2] 郑志华.中国南海U形线地图的可采性与证明力[J].外交评论(外交学院学报),2013,30(4):30-44.
[3] 王璇.我国拥有黄岩岛主权的地图证据证明力研究[D].合肥:安徽财经大学,2017.
[4] 康丹.南海岛礁主权归属证据研究初论[D].武汉:武汉大学,2013.
[5] 张卫彬.中国拥有南沙群岛主权证据链的构造[J].社会科学,2019(9):85-96.
[6] 何家弘.证据的审查与认定原理论纲[J].法学家, 2008(3):95-103.
[7] 郑飞.证据属性层次论——基于证据规则结构体系的理论反思[J].法学研究,2021,43(2):123-137.
[8] 卞建林.证据法学[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2005.
[9] 张卫彬.国际法院解决领土争端中的证据问题研究[D].上海:华东政法大学,2011.
[10] 王铁崖,田如萱.国际法资料选编[M].北京:法律出版社,1986.
[11] SEOUNG Y H, JON M. V D, Maritime boundary disputes, settlement processes, and the law of the sea[J]. Ocean yearbook online,2011, 25(1):481-486.
[12] GOLDIE L.The critical date[J].International and compatative law quarterly,1963,12(4):1251-1284.
[13] International Court of Justice.Territorial and maritime dispute (Nicaragua V.Colombia)[EB/OL].[2022-06-25].https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/124.
[14] 王秋荣.证据关联性规则研究[D].上海:复旦大学,2012.
[15] 张卫彬.争议领土主权归属仲裁证据规则研究——基于证据分量视角分析中菲南海主权争端[J].太平洋学报,2015,23(6):6-16.
[16] BRIAN T S. Territorial disputes at the international court of justice[J]. Duke law journal,2004, 53(2):1794.
[17] 何圣.上海劳动关系综合评价指标体系构建及应用研究[D].上海:复旦大学,2007.
[18] 苏为华.多指标综合评价理论与方法问题研究[D].厦门:厦门大学,2000.
[19] 巩建华.南海问题的产生原因、现实状况和内在特点[J].理论与改革,2010(2):144-147.
[20] 李金明.海峡两岸在南海问题上的默契与合作[J].台湾研究集刊,2010(5):7-15.
[21] 贾宇.南海问题的国际法理[J].中国法学,2012(6):26-47.
[22] 邵建平,李晨阳.东盟国家处理海域争端的方式及其对解决南海主权争端的启示[J].当代亚太,2010(4):144-156,144.
[23] 苏新宁.大数据时代情报学学科崛起之思考[J].情报学报,2018,37(5):451-459.
[24] 杨国立,苏新宁.迈向Intelligence导向的现代情报学[J].情报学报,2018,37(5):460-466.
[25] 马费成,李志元.中国当代情报学的起源及发展[J].情报学报,2021,40(5):547-554.
[26] 陈芬,苏新宁.我国情报学学科发展现状与未来思考[J].情报学报,2019,38(9):988-996.
[27] 詹宁斯,瓦茨.奥本海国际法(第二分册)[M].王铁崖,等译.北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1995.
