图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2022 , Vol. 66 >Issue 19: 132 - 142

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2022.19.013

综述述评

科研院校技术转移效率评价研究进展述评与展望

  • 雷聪仪 ,
  • 张娴
展开
  • 1 中国科学院成都文献情报中心 成都 610299;
    2 中国科学院大学经济与管理学院图书情报与档案管理系 北京 100190
雷聪仪,博士研究生

收稿日期: 2022-04-06

  修回日期: 2022-07-18

  网络出版日期: 2022-10-25

基金资助

本文系中国科学院知识产权支撑与服务专项（项目编号：E2C00001）和中国科学院文献情报能力建设专项子课题（课题编号：E2C0001002）研究成果之一。

收起

Review and Prospect of Research Progress in Efficiency Evaluation of Technology Transfer in Scientific Research Institutions

  • Lei Congyi ,
  • Zhang Xian
Expand
  • 1 Chengdu Library and Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610299;
    2 Department of Library, Information and Archives Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190

Received date: 2022-04-06

  Revised date: 2022-07-18

  Online published: 2022-10-25

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义] 对现有科研院校技术转移效率评价研究进展进行总结，为进一步开展科研机构技术转移效率评价方法和模型的研究与应用提供理论支撑。[方法/过程] 系统梳理现有相关研究成果，从评价研究实施对象、影响因素研究、评价指标研究、评价方法与模型研究4个方面总结现有研究的主要内容与特点，分析现有研究的局限性，探讨未来研究发展方向。[结果/结论] 现有研究的局限主要在于：高度关注大学评价，面向科研机构评价的针对性研究极度匮乏；关注与技术供体相关的效率影响因素，对环境相关影响因素的定量分析较薄弱；国内研究中对于技术转移成效的经济和市场维度评价考量不足；缺乏具有应用性与实操性的定量化评价方法及模型。未来研究将关注以下方向：加强面向科研机构尤其是新型研发机构的针对性评价研究；强化影响因素作用的定量化测度；重视质量、经济与效益维度的评价指标；深化评价模式与工具创新及应用。

关键词： 技术转移; 效率评价; 科研院校; 新型研发机构

本文引用格式

雷聪仪 , 张娴 . 科研院校技术转移效率评价研究进展述评与展望[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022 , 66(19) : 132 -142 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2022.19.013

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] In this paper, the research progress in the efficiency evaluation of technology transfer in the universities and scientific research institutions is reviewed in order to carry out research and application of technology transfer efficiency evaluation methods and models in scientific research institutions to provide theoretical support.[Method/Process] The existing research progress was summarized systematically from four perspectives:evaluation objects, influencing-factor research, evaluation-index research, evaluation method and model research. Then the limitations of existing research were explored, and the future research directions were discussed.[Result/Conclusion] The main limitations of the existing research are as follows. Firstly, too much attention paid to the university evaluation, while targeted research for the scientific research institution-oriented evaluation is extremely scarce. Secondly, the efficiency influencing factor research related to patent technology itself is rich, while the environment-related influencing-factor quantitative research is weak. Thirdly, the consideration of economic and market dimensions of technology transfer effectiveness is insufficient. Finally, there is a lack of quantitative evaluation methods and models with applicability and practicality. The possible research work in the future may focus on the following:strengthen scientific research institution-oriented research, especially a targeted evaluation study of new R&D institutions; strengthen the quantitative measuring of the effect of influencing factors; pay more attention to the evaluation indicators from the perspectives of quality, economy and market benefits; deepen the innovating and application of evaluation models and tools.

Key words： technology transfer; efficiency evaluation; scientific research institution; new R&D institution

参考文献

[1] 中华人民共和国中央人民政府. 国务院关于印发实施《中华人民共和国促进科技成果转化法》若干规定的通知.[EB/OL] [2022-04-02]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2016-03/02/content_5048192.htm.
[2] 全国人民代表大会. 中华人民共和国科学技术进步法.[EB/OL] [2022-04-24]. http://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/c30834/202112/1f4abe22e8ba49198acdf239889f822c.shtml.
[3] ZHAO L M, REISMAN A. Toward meta research on technology transfer[J] IEEE transactions on engineering management, 1992, 39(1):13-21.
[4] 厉春雷.基于知识创造视角的技术转移研究:概念、特征与动力机制[J].北方经济,2011(10):12-13.
[5] 范小虎,陈很荣,仰书纲.技术转移及其相关概念的涵义辨析[J].科技管理究,2000(6):44-46.
[6] 刘奕岑. 国内外高校技术转移模式及其分析[D].重庆:重庆大学,2006.
[7] 科学技术部. 关于印发国家技术转移示范机构管理办法的通知.[EB/OL] [2022-06-10]. http://www.most.gov.cn/xxgk/xinxifenlei/fdzdgknr/fgzc/gfxwj/gfxwj2010before/201712/t20171222_137075.html.
[8] 吴寿仁.科技成果转化若干热点问题解析(九)——技术及技术转移概念辨析及相关政策解读[J].科技中国,2018(2):54-60.
[9] SAVVA N, TANERI N. The role of equity, royalty, and fixed fees in technology licensing to university spin-offs[J]. Management science,2015,61(6):1323-1343.
[10] 范柏乃,余钧.高校技术转移效率区域差异及影响因素研究[J]. 科学学研究,2015,33(12):1805-1812.
[11] 胡欣悦,任紫娟,汤勇力.我国重点高校技术转移效率变化的影响因素研究——基于面板随机前沿分析方法[J]. 技术经济,2020,39(7):200-208.
[12] 廖述梅,徐升华.我国校企技术转移效率及影响因素分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2009,30(11):52-56.
[13] 章琰.大学技术转移影响因素模型分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007(11):43-47.
[14] BRUNEEL J, D'ESTE P, SALTER A. Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university-industry collaboration[J]. Research policy,2010,39(7):858-868.
[15] D'ESTE P, PATEL P. University-industry linkages in the UK:what are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry?[J]. Research policy, 2007,36(9):1295-1313.
[16] CHUKUMBA C, JENSEN R. University invention, entrepreneurship and startups[R]. Cambridge:National Bureau of Economic Research, 2005.
[17] VINIG T, LIPS D. Measuring the performance of university technology transfer using metadata approach:the case of Dutch universities[J]. The journal of technology transfer, 2015,40(6):1034-1049.
[18] AVANITIS S, KUBLI U, WOERTER M. University-industry knowledge and technology transfer in Switzerland:What university scientists think about cooperation with private enterprises[J]. Research policy,2008,37(10):1865-1883.
[19] OLIVEIRA M, TEIXEIRA A. The determinants of technology transfer efficiency and the role of innovation policies:a survey[R]. Universidade do Porto:Faculdade de Economia do Porto,2010:1-40.
[20] GALAN-MUROS V, SIJDE P, GROENEWEGEN P et al. Nurture over nature:how do European universities support their collaboration with business?[J]. The journal of technology transfer,2017,42(1):184-205.
[21] FRIEDMAN J, SILBERMAN J. University, technology transfer:Do incentives, management and location matter?[J]. The journal of technology transfer,2003,28(1):17-30.
[22] ANDERSON R, DAIM U, LAVOIE F. Measuring the efficiency of university technology transfer[J]. Technovation,2007,27(5):306-318.
[23] BERCOWITZ J, FELDMAN M, FELLER I et al. Organizational structure as a determinant of academic patent and licensing behavior:an exploratory study of Duke, Johns Hopkins, and Pennsylvania State University[J]. The journal of technology transfer, 2001,26:21-35.
[24] THURSBY J G, KEMP S. Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing[J]. Research policy, 2000,31(1), 109-124.
[25] SIEGEL D S, WALDMAN D, LINK A. Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices:an exploratory study[J]. Research policy, 2003,32(1), 27-48.
[26] EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Improving institutions for the transfer of technology:from science to enterprises[M]. Luxembourg:Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2004.
[27] SWAMIDASS P M, VULASA V. Why university inventions rarely produce income? bottlenecks in university technology transfer[J]. The journal of technology transfer, 2009,34(4):343-363.
[28] COLYVAS J, CROW M, GELIJNS A,et al. How do university inventions get into practice?[J]. Management science, 2000,48(1):61-72.
[29] ROTHAERMEL F T, AGUNG S D, JIANG L. University entrepreneurship:a taxonomy of the literature[J]. Industrial and corporate change, 2007,16(4):691-791.
[30] 李文波.我国大学和国立科研机构技术转移影响因素分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2003(6):48-51.
[31] 王永梅,王峥,张黎.科研院所技术转移绩效影响因素的实证研究——基于技术供给方的视角[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2014,35(11):108-116.
[32] 罗筑华. 基于DEA的辽宁省高校产学协同创新效率研究[J]. 青岛科技大学学报(社会科学版),2019,35(2):111-115.
[33] 徐皓,姜爽.基于DEA的辽宁省高校产学协同创新效率研究[J].现代营销(经营版),2018(6):148-149.
[34] 贾艳.基于DEA的985高校技术转移效率研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2016.
[35] 钟卫,陈宝明.中国高校科技成果转化绩效评价研究[J].中国科技论坛,2018(4):41-49.
[36] 张清海,张良强.基于DEA方法的省域高校科技创新效率评价与分析[J].技术与创新管理,2015,36(3):237-242.
[37] 叶刘刚,白福臣.中国"211"高校科研效率评价和外部影响因素分析——基于Bootstrap-DEA方法的实证研究[J].高等财经教育研究,2015,18(4):6-14.
[38] CHAPPLE W, LOCKETT A, SIEGEL D et al. Assessing the relative performance of U.K. university technology transfer offices:parametric and non-parametric evidence[J]. Research policy,2005,34(3):369-384.
[39] GLASS J C, MCCallion G, MCKILLOP D et al. A ‘technically level playing field’ profit efficiency analysis of enforced competition between publicly funded institutions[J]. European economic review,2006,50:1601-1626.
[40] AGASISTI T, JOHNES G. Beyond frontiers:comparing the efficiency of higher education decision-making units across more than one country[J]. Education economics, 2009,17(1):59-79.
[41] ALSHAYEA A S, BATTAL A H. Evaluating the efficiency of faculties in Qassim University. Using data envelopment analysis[J]. Journal of business administration and education,2013,4(2):132-138.
[42] MONTEIRO A. The efficiency of Portuguese Techonology Transfer Offices and the importance of universities characteristics[D]. Porto:Universidade do Porto,2013.
[43] Altamirano-Corro A, Peniche-V era R D R. Metodología AED-RNA para la estimación de la eficiencia institucional:El caso de las dependencias de educación superior (DES) de ingeniería de México[J]. Nova scientia, 2014,6(12):356-378.
[44] ROSSI F. The efficiency of universities' knowledge transfer activities:a multi-output approach beyond patenting and licensing[R]. London:University of London,2014.
[45] TSENG A, RAUDENSKY M. Performance evaluations of technology transfer offices of major US research universities[J]. Journal of technology management & innovation, 2014,9(1):93-102.
[46] CURI C, DARAIO C, LLERENA P. The productivity of French technology transfer offices after government reforms[J]. Applied economics, 2015,47(28):3008-3019.
[47] YEVERINO-JUAREZ J A, MONTORO SANCHEZ M A. Efficiency and productivity in transfer units of scientific research results in Mexico[J]. Contaduría y administración, 2019,64(3):1-32.
[48] SHANE S. Academic entrepreneurship:University spin-offs and wealth creation[M]. Cheltenham:Edward Elgar Publishing, 2004.
[49] CALDERA A, DEBANDE O. Performance of spanish universities in technology transfer:An empirical analysis[J]. Research policy, 2010, 39(9):1160-1173.
[50] KLOFSTEN M, SCHEELE J. Academic entrepreneurship:University spin-offs and wealth creation[J]. International small business journal,2005,23(2):214-217.
[51] SIEGEL D, WRIGHT M, CHAPPLE W et al. Assessing the relative performance of university technology transfer in the US and UK:a stochastic distance function approach[J]. Economics of innovation and new technology, 2008,17(7):717-729.
[52] BRAY M J, LEE J N. University revenues from technology transfer:Licensing fees vs. equity positions[J]. Journal of business venturing, 2000,15(5/6):385-392.
[53] FORAY D, LISSONI F. University research and public-private interaction[J]. Handbook of the economics of innovation, 2010,1:275-314.
[54] 李源.基于DEA-Malmquist的中国高校技术转移效率动态评价[J]. 科技创业, 2021(1):87-93.
[55] 何彬,范硕.中国大学科技成果转化效率演变与影响因素——基于Bootstrap-DEA方法和面板Tobit模型的分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2013,34(10):85-93.
[56] CASTELLI L, PESENTI R, UKOVICH W. A classification of DEA models when the internal structure of the decision making units is considered[J]. Annals of operations research, 2010,173(1):207-235.
[57] 成刚,林涛,穆素红.基于SFA的教育部直属高校成本效率评价[J].高等工程教育研究,2008(6):93-97,102.
[58] 姜彦钊.我国高校技术转移效率及其影响因素研究[D].上海:上海交通大学,2019.
[59] ROSSI F. The drivers of efficient knowledge transfer performance:evidence from British universities[J]. Cambridge journal of economics, 2018,42(3):729-755.
[60] LEE T, ZHANG Y, JEONG B H. A multi-period output DEA model with consistent time lag effects[J]. Computers & industrial engineering, 2016,93:267-274.
[61] 徐晨,邵云飞.基于DEA的科技成果转化绩效评价研究[J].电子科技,2010,23(7):58-61.
[62] 任冬林,黄燕琳. 基于DEA的我国西部高校科技成果转化评价研究——以国家重点建设西部十四所高校为例[J].西南科技大学:哲社科版, 2012,29(3):85-90.
[63] 尹伟华,袁卫.基于Bootstrap-DEA方法的中国教育部直属高校科研效率评价[J].统计与信息论,2013,28(5):61-69.
[64] FARE R, GROSSKOPF S. Productivity and intermediate products:a frontier approach[J]. Economics letters,1996,50(1):65-70.
[65] IVANAUSKAS F, KREGZDE A, PIKTURNA A. Analysing the funding changes of Lithuanian higher education[J]. Transformations in business & economics, 2015,14(3):38-53.
[66] 杨秀华,俞培果.我国高校科技成果转化效率研究——基于DEA方法的实证分析[J]. 特区经济, 2014(3):209-210.
[67] 单丽曼.中国技术转移效率研究[D].北京:北京交通大学,2018.
[68] 龚炳刚.基于模糊神经网络的科研院所专利技术转化绩效评价[D]. 北京:北京交通大学, 2014.
[69] 唐允斌. 应当研究技术引进中的经济问题[J]. 世界经济, 1978(1):69-71.
[70] United nations conference on trade and development. Transfer of technology[R]. New York and Geneva:United Nations, 2001.
[71] 科学技术部火炬高技术产业开发中心. 中国火炬统计年鉴(2021)[M]. 北京:中国统计出版社,2021.
[72] 中国科技评估与成果管理研究会,国家科技评估中心,中国科学技术信息研究所. 中国科技成果转化年度报告2020(高等院校与科研院所篇)[M]. 北京:科学技术文献出版社, 2021.
[73] 中华人民共和国中央人民政府.中共中央国务院印发《国家创新驱动发展战略纲要》.[EB/OL] [2022-03-10]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2016-05/19/content_5074812.htm.
[74] 中华人民共和国中央人民政府.国务院关于印发"十三五"国家科技创新规划的通知.[EB/OL] [2022-06-08]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2016-08/08/content_5098072.htm.
[75] 中华人民共和国中央人民政府.科技部印发《关于促进新型研发机构发展的指导意见》的通知.[EB/OL] [2022-03-10]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-09/19/content_5431291.htm.
[76] 张昱, 乔俏. 我国新型研发机构治理与成果转化模式特点分析及建议[J]. 全球科技经济瞭望, 2022,37(1):37-42,54.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉