[目的/意义] 民国时期图书馆学教材是图书馆学学科知识体系的重要载体,也是图书馆学学科发展史的重要见证。对民国时期图书馆学教材建设进行研究,有助于深化图书馆学教育史研究,对于学科发展与建构本土特色的知识体系具有参考价值。[方法/过程] 采用历史研究法和文献学相关理论,从文献形成方式与知识构成的角度,对民国时期图书馆学教材进行整体性考察。[结果/结论] 民国时期图书馆学教材可分为翻译式、编述式、著作式三大类。三类教材出现的时间大致遵循翻译、编述、著作的先后顺序,新旧知识的关系从"平行"走向"相交",图书馆学知识生产的自主性和本土化程度不断提升,讲求实用的总体特征显示出西方尤其是美国图书馆学知识在民国图书馆学知识版图中的重要地位。在此基础上提出避免学习借鉴的路径依赖、应从中国典籍文化与图书馆实践两个层面推动本土"新知"进教材、重新审视中西知识融合的适切性等建议。
[Purpose/Significance] Library science textbooks are not only important carriers of discipline knowledge systems, but also important witness of the history of library science in the Republic of China (1912-1949). This study researches on the construction of library science textbooks during the Republic of China, contributes to deepen the research on the history of library education and has reference value for the development of library science and the construction of the knowledge system with Chinese characteristics. [Method/Process] Using the historical research method and the relevant theories of philology, the paper had made a holistic investigation of the textbooks of library science in the Republic of China from the perspectives of document formation and knowledge composition. [Result/Conclusion] Library science textbooks in the Republic of China are divided into three categories:translation style, compilation style and creation style. The time of appearance of the three types of textbooks roughly follows the sequence of translation, compilation and writing. The relationship between new and old knowledge changes from "paralleling" to "intersecting". The degree of autonomy and localization of knowledge production of library science is improved. The overall characteristics of practicality are presented among these textbooks, which show the important position of western especially American library science knowledge in the territory of library science knowledge. Furthermore, some suggestions are put forward, such as avoiding the path dependence of learning and reference, promoting the local "new knowledge" into the textbooks from the two aspects of Chinese ancient book culture and library practice, and re-examining the appropriateness of the integration of Chinese and Western knowledge.
[1] 李明杰,李瑞龙.民国图书馆学教育体系考述[J].图书情报研究,2018,11(3):78-86.
[2] 校闻及同门消息:(三)征集参考材料[J]. 文华图书馆学专科学校季刊,1937,9(1):145.
[3] 刘奕,肖希明.金陵大学图书馆学教育本土化探索及其启示[J].大学图书馆学报,2021,39(4):111-118.
[4] 陈伯逵. 本会圕学函授社告全国圕界同志及留心永久专门职业者[J].上海圕协会会报,1930(2):41-43.
[5] 任家乐.民国时期图书馆学教育研究[M].北京:国家图书馆出版社,2018:191-193.
[6] 刘奕,肖希明.金陵大学图书馆学教育本土化探索及其启示[J].大学图书馆学报,2021,39(4):111-118.
[7] 张康,李卓卓.中国图书馆学专业教材建设百年历史演变[J].图书情报知识,2021,38(4):27-40.
[8] 张舜徽.中国文献学[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2009:23-26.
[9] 杜泽逊.文献学概要[M].北京:中华书局,2001:36-58.
[10] AKERS S G. Simple library cataloging[M]. Chicago: American Library Association, 1927:5-6.
[11] 爱克斯. 简明图书馆编目法[M].沈祖荣,译.武昌:文华公书林,1929:沈祖荣序.
[12] 私立武昌文华图书馆学专科学校一览(1935)[G]//王余光,范凡.清末民国图书馆史料汇编:第2 册.北京:国家图书馆出版社,2014:16.
[13] 戴志骞. 图书馆学术讲稿[J].北京高师教育丛刊,1923,3(6):1-67.
[14] 金敏甫.中国图书馆学术史[J]. 中山大学图书馆周刊,1928,2(2):1-14.
[15] 杨昭悊.图书馆学[M].上海:商务印书馆,1923:凡例, 10.
[16] 马宗荣. 现代图书馆序说[M].上海:中华学艺社,1928:序.
[17] 清心中学圕学班之发展[J].中华图书馆协会会报,1931,6(4):22-23.
[18] 马宗荣. 大学图书馆经营之实际[M].上海:大夏大学图书馆,1934: 马宗荣序.
[19] 汪辟疆.目录学研究[M].上海:商务印书馆,1934:序.
[20] 胡朴安,胡道静.校雠学[M].上海:商务印书馆,1943:序.
[21] SENG S T. Can the American library system be adapted to China? [J]. Library journal, 1916,41(6):384-389.
[22] 洪有丰.图书馆组织与管理[M].上海:商务印书馆,1926:洪有丰自序, 凡例.
[23] 无锡之图书馆学教学[J].中华图书馆协会会报,1929,5(3):32.
[24] 徐旭.民众图书馆图书分类法[M]. 无锡:江苏省立教育学院实验民众图书馆,1930:丛书序.
[25] 徐旭.民众图书馆学[M]. 上海:世界书局,1935:庄序, 自序.
[26] 徐旭.图书馆与民众教育[M]. 上海:商务印书馆,1941:序.
[27] 俾沙普.现代图书馆编目法[M].金敏甫,译.上海:商务印书馆,1937: 杜定友序.
[28] 程伯群.比较图书馆学[M].上海:世界书局,1935:自序.
[29] 彭敏惠. 毛坤对目录学的贡献与影响[J].图书馆建设,2014(10):92-95.
[30] 金天游. 图书之分类[M]. 杭州:浙江省立图书馆,1936:弁言.
[31] 亚当.民众图书馆的行政[M].章新民,译.武昌:文华图书馆学专科学校,1934:沈祖荣序.
[32] 杜定友.学校图书馆学[M].上海:商务印书馆,1933:例言.
[33] 刘国钧.图书馆学要旨[M].上海:中华书局,1934:舒新城总序.
[34] 周亚,肖希明. 中外图书馆学教育比较研究:问题、方法与使命[J].中国图书馆学报, 2019, 45(5): 112-125.
[35] 周亚.美国图书馆学教育思想研究(1887-1955)[M].上海:上海人民出版社&学林出版社,2018:223-274.
