[Purpose/Significance] A comprehensive analysis of the interdisciplinarity of library, information and archives management (LIAM) from the perspective of both external discipline integration and internal knowledge flow helps to sort out the interdisciplinary development and is of great significance for optimizing the construction of the disciplinary system of LIAM.[Method/Process] Based on the data from journal papers and their references of LIAM discipline, this study depicted the knowledge structure of LIAM from two dimensions:external disciplinary integration and internal knowledge flow. It then provided deep insight into LIAM's characteristics and laws of interdisciplinary evolution.[Result/Conclusion] In general, the overall influence of journals in LIAM is relatively low, and the research areas in three sub-disciplines continue to broaden. From the perspective of external disciplinary integration, the primary first-level discipline of LIAM and its secondary disciplines have deeply interacted with external disciplines, with the characteristics of a strong connection between proximate disciplines and a weak association of distant fields. In addition, the results of interdisciplinary measurement show that LIAM's degree of knowledge integration has been increasing year by year, with the highest degree of disciplinary integration in Informatics. In addition, from the internal knowledge flow dimension, all the disciplines within the LIAM have a high self-citation rate, and the knowledge flow between library science and Informatics is more active. This study comprehensively analyzes the current situation of cross integration of LIAM, which could provide a reference for exploring the development path of LIAM, especially the subject of information resources management in the new era in the interdisciplinary context.
[1] 王丹.图书情报与档案管理学科的守正与出新——"2019全国图书情报与档案管理学术期刊高峰论坛"会议综述[J].图书与情报, 2020(3):134-139.
[2] 马费成, 李志元.新文科背景下我国图书情报学科的发展前景[J].中国图书馆学报, 2020, 46(6):4-15.
[3] 初景利, 黄水清.从"图书情报与档案管理"到"信息资源管理"——一级学科更名的解析与思考[J].图书情报工作, 2022, 66(14):3-9.
[4] 杨峰.开启人才培养新征程:对"图情档"一级学科更名的释读[J].图书馆论坛, 2022, 42(6):28-29, 95.
[5] 刘琼, 刘桂锋, 卢章平, 等.开放与进取:"图情档"一级学科更名为"信息资源管理"[J].图书馆论坛, 2022, 42(6):20-27.
[6] 王宸君.图书馆学、情报学、档案学的共同基础[J].高校图书馆工作, 2003(3):6-7, 43.
[7] 金胜勇, 李雪叶, 王剑宏.图书馆学情报学档案学:研究对象与学科关系[J].中国图书馆学报, 2011, 37(6):11-16.
[8] 闫慧, 韩蕾倩, 吴萌, 等.图书馆学、情报学与档案学2029年发展前景研究[J].图书与情报, 2019(6):2-17, 153.
[9] 王知津, 徐芳, 潘永超, 等.我国图书情报学教育三十年(1978~2008)回顾与展望[J].图书与情报, 2010(2):23-30.
[10] AVERSA E S.Citation patterns of highly cited papers and their relationship to literature aging:a study of the working literature[J].Scientometrics, 1985, 7(3/6):383-389.
[11] GONZALEZ-ALCAIDE G, CASTELLO-COGOLLOS L, NAVARRO-MOLINA C, et al.Library and information science research areas:analysis of journal articles in LISA[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008, 59(1):150-154.
[12] PORTER A L, COHEN A S, ROESSNER J D, et al.Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity[J].Scientometrics, 2007, 72(1):117-147.
[13] 宋歌, 叶继元.基于SNA的图书情报学期刊互引网络结构分析[J].中国图书馆学报, 2009, 35(3):27-34.
[14] 张斌, 贾茜.我国图书情报学的认知结构及其演化[J].中国图书馆学报, 2014, 40(4):30-47.
[15] 孟祥保.图书情报学交叉融合与发展——基于国外35种核心期刊的引文分析[J].图书情报知识, 2012(5):50-58.
[16] 冯志刚, 李长玲, 刘小慧, 等.基于引用与被引用文献信息的图书情报学跨学科性分析[J].情报科学, 2018, 36(3):105-111.
[17] 杨瑞仙, 姜小函.从学科和期刊的引证视角看交叉学科的知识结构和演化问题——以图书情报学科为例的实证研究[J].图书情报工作, 2018, 62(5):30-39.
[18] 宋艳辉, 朱李, 舒非, 等.中美图情学博士学位论文主题跨学科发展比较研究[J].情报学报, 2022, 41(5):536-548.
[19] 黄媛.对我国图书、情报、档案一体化管理研究的回顾与展望[J].情报资料工作, 2009(1):83-85.
[20] 陈晶晶.浅议图书、情报、档案管理的学科边缘界定及其功能属性[J].图书馆工作与研究, 2012(11):32-35.
[21] 王玉梅, 朱学芳.我国图情档领域CSSCI期刊内部知识流动探析[J].情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(9):122-128.
[22] 赵国俊.我国图书情报与档案管理学科发展中的分化与整合[J].情报资料工作, 2013(3):11-16.
[23] 柯平.新图情档——新文科建设中的图书情报与档案管理一级学科发展[J].情报资料工作, 2021, 42(1):15-20.
[24] 苏新宁.大数据时代情报学与情报工作的回归[J].情报学报, 2017, 36(4):331-337.
[25] PORTER A L, ROESSNER J D, COHEN A S, et al.Interdisciplinary research:meaning, metrics and nurture[J].Research evaluation, 2006, 15(3):187-195.
[26] ZHANG L, ROUSSEAU R, GLANZEL W.Diversity of references as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of journals:taking similarity between subject fields into account[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2016, 67(5):1257-1265.
[27] CASSI L, CHAMPEIMONT R, MESCHEBA W, et al.Analysing institutions interdisciplinarity by extensive use of Rao-Stirling Diversity Index[J].PloS one, 2017, 12(1):e0170296.
[28] LEYDESDORFF L, BORNMANN L, ZHOU P.Construction of a pragmatic base line for journal classifications and maps based on aggregated journal-journal citation relations[J].Journal of informetrics, 2016, 10(4):902-918.
[29] 金碧辉, 汪寿阳, 任胜利, 等.论期刊影响因子与论文学术质量的关系[J].中国科技期刊研究, 2000, 11(4):202-205.
[30] 王知津.拓宽专业与学科融合:以MLIS为例[J].情报学报, 2022, 41(2):188-201.
[31] RAFOLS I, PORTER A L, LEYDESDORFF L.Science overlay maps:a new tool for research policy and library management[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 61(9):1871-1887.
[32] 马费成, 张帅.中国当代情报学的发展路径与本土特色[J].情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(7):15-21.
[33] 徐建中, 王名扬.文献被引特征空间上的引文模式分析[J].情报杂志, 2013, 32(11):55-58.
[34] 周林兴, 徐承来.鉴今知来:双一流背景下我国图情档学科建设探路[J].图书馆, 2021(5):17-24, 33.
[35] 刘曙光.关于人文社科期刊导向管理的若干思考[J].山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2019, 64(5):132-139.
[36] 陆伟, 杨金庆.数智赋能的情报学学科发展趋势探析[J].信息资源管理学报, 2022, 12(2):4-12.
[37] 夏翠娟.新文科背景下的图情档与数字人文融合研究热点透析及趋势前瞻[J].情报资料工作, 2022, 43(1):17-19, 22.
[38] 赵星, 乔利利, 杨洁.我国高教变革对信息资源管理学科群的影响[J].图书与情报, 2019(6):18-24.
[39] 宋艳辉, 魏新星, 余彩霞.从"图书情报与档案管理"到"信息资源管理"的学科嬗变与教学发展[J].评价与管理, 2022, 20(2):1-6.
