[目的/意义] 学科交叉融合使得学科间知识交流日益频繁，从个体引文网络和整体引文网络入手，对我国人文社会科学领域跨学科知识流动进行量化分析，对“新文科”背景下该领域学科的守正与创新具有重要意义。[方法/过程]以2016-2020年23个学科450本期刊的论文引用关系为数据源，基于个体引文网络，从23个学科自身出发，根据学科互引关系确定模糊规则，利用Matlab进行模糊推理，确定学科知识固化程度；基于整体引文网络，运用“累积”的思想，计算学科知识累积流动率和累积影响力，根据知识流动情况划分学科类型。[结果/结论] 研究结果表明，从个体引文网络视角分析，语言学、体育学、法学综合知识固化程度较高，统计学综合知识固化程度最低；从整体引文网络视角分析，将该领域23个学科根据知识流动划分为3种类型，经济学和管理学的累积影响力最大。研究发现“累积”思想对学科的评价效力优于直接引文分析，能够挖掘“隐藏”的学科知识流动潜在信息，为我国人文社科领域的学科建设和发展提供一定的启示。
[Purpose/Significance] The interdisciplinary integration makes frequent knowledge exchange between disciplines. Starting from the individual citation network and the overall citation network, the quantitative analysis is applied into interdisciplinary knowledge flow in the field of humanities and social sciences in China, which is of great significance to the discipline's integrity and innovation in this field under the background of "New Liberal Arts".[Method/Process] Citation relationships of 450 journals in 23 disciplines from 2016 to 2020 were used as data sources. Based on the individual citation network, starting from the 23 disciplines themselves, this paper determined the fuzzy rules according to the mutual citation relationship of disciplines, and used Matlab to carry out fuzzy reasoning to determine the degree of discipline knowledge solidification. Based on the overall citation network, this paper used the idea of "accumulation" to calculate the cumulative flow rate and cumulative impact of discipline knowledge, and divide discipline types according to the knowledge flow.[Result/Conclusion] The research results show that from the perspective of individual citation network, the solidification degree of comprehensive knowledge of linguistics, sports science and law is high, and that of statistical is the lowest. From the perspective of the overall citation network, 23 disciplines in this field are divided into three types according to the knowledge flow, and economics and management have the largest cumulative impact. The research found that "accumulation" thought is more effective in evaluating disciplines than direct citation analysis, and it can tap the "hidden" potential information of discipline knowledge flow, which provides some inspiration for the discipline construction and development in the field of humanities and social sciences in China.
[1] 尤江东, 李丹浓, 张伟丽, 等.数据测度下图书情报域跨学科知识融合性研究[J].大学图书情报学刊, 2022, 40(4):129-133.
[2] 新华网.国家、高校共培交叉学科沃土期待更多原始创新萌[EB/OL].[2022-10-27].http://education.news.cn/2021-05/13/c_1211153281.htm.
[3] 曹树金, 曹茹烨.基于知识图谱支持科研创新的跨学科知识发现研究[J].情报理论与实践, 2022, 45(11):10-20.
[4] 吕海华, 李江.1987-2016年跨学科知识流动的规律:一个新的视角"学科势能"[J].图书情报知识, 2021, 38(4):125-135.
[5] 张慧, 张家榕, 叶鹰.CSSCI体现的我国人文社科领域知识流动探析[J].图书与情报, 2020(3):41-48.
[6] 杨瑞仙, 姜小函.从学科和期刊的引证视角看交叉学科的知识结构和演化问题——以图书情报学科为例的实证研究[J].图书情报工作, 2018, 62(5):30-39.
[7] RINIA E J, LEEUWEN T N V, BRUINS E E W, et al.Measuring knowledge transfer between fields of science[J].Scientometrics, 2002, 54(3):347-362.
[8] ZHU Y J, YAN E.Dynamic subfield analysis of disciplines:an examination of the trading impact and knowledge diffusion patterns of computer science[J].Scientometrics, 2015, 104(1):335-359.
[9] SUN Y, LATORA V.The evolution of knowledge within and across fields in modern physics[J].Scientific reports, 2020, 10(1):12603-12607.
[10] CHEN L, WEI S, JING Y.Shaping the interdisciplinary knowledge network of China:a network analysis based on citation data from 1981 to 2010[J].Entometrics, 2011, 89(1):89.
[11] 赵星, 谭旻, 余小萍, 等.我国文科领域知识扩散之引文网络探析[J].中国图书馆学报, 2012, 38(5):59-67.
[12] 张家榕, 张慧, 叶鹰.CSCD体现的我国理工农医跨学科知识流动探析[J].图书与情报, 2020(3):49-54, 60.
[13] 宋凯, 李秀霞, 赵思喆, 等.基于引文分析的学科知识流动计量研究[J].情报杂志, 2017, 36(1):154-159.
[14] 高继平, 高翠玲.技术縻母视角下的技术进化过程研究[J].科学学研究, 2015, 33(7):967-974.
[15] WARTBURG I V, TEICHERT T, ROST K.Inventive progress measured by multi-stage patent citation analysis[J].Research policy, 2005, 34(10):1591-1607.
[16] 胡小君.基于科技引用网络结构算法的科学计量新方法研究[D].杭州:浙江大学, 2012.
[17] 冯岭, 彭智勇, 刘斌, 等.一种基于潜在引用网络的专利价值评估方法[J].计算机研究与发展, 2015, 52(3):649-660.
[18] 康旭东, 邓乐乐, 王宇开, 等.基于全代引证的专利累积影响力评价——一个诺奖得主专利的案例研究[J].情报学报, 2021, 40(3):267-277.
[19] 马费成, 李志元.新文科背景下我国图书情报学科的发展前景[J].中国图书馆学报, 2020, 46(6):4-15.
[20] 张海涛, 张春龙, 张鑫蕊, 等.新文科背景下"情报学+"人才的时代意蕴[J].中国图书馆学报, 2022, 48(4):67-78.
[21] 陈立新.学科结构研究的新视角——基于学术期刊论文引文的学科结构探索[J].统计与信息论坛, 2011, 26(5):105-108.
[22] 王玉梅, 朱学芳.我国图情档领域CSSCI期刊内部知识流动探析[J].情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(9):122-128.
[23] 吕冬晴, 谢娟, 成颖, 等.我国人文社会科学间跨学科模式研究[J].图书情报知识, 2018, (6):37-49, 14.
[24] 邱均平.信息计量学[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社, 2007.
[25] 周文康.基于层次分析法和模糊推理系统的无线传感器网络路由算法研究[D].合肥:中国科学技术大学, 2021.
[26] OLIVEIRA S C, COBRE J, PEREIRA D F.A measure of reliability for scientific co-authorship networks using fuzzy logic[J].Scientometrics, 2021, 126(6):4551-4563.
[27] 邢岩, 郝雨晴, 高治军, 等.基于模糊控制的单交叉口信号配时优化[J].中国科技论文, 2021, 16(8):890-894.
[28] 王云峰.统计学原理[M].上海:复旦大学出版社, 2013.
[29] 杨中楷, 刘佳.基于专利引文网络的技术轨道识别研究——以太阳能光伏电池板领域为例[J].科学学研究, 2011, 29(9):1311-1317.
[30] 邱均平, 文庭孝, 宋艳辉, 等.知识计量学[M].北京:科学出版社, 2014.
[31] NEAL Z.Differentiating centrality and power in the world city network[J].Urban studies, 2011, 48(13):2733-2748.
[32] 张宝隆, 王昊, 毕丽萍.知识流动视角下人文社会学科区分度及其变化趋势研究[J].情报资料工作, 2022, 43(3):43-55.
