[目的/意义] 对标五项政策文件、构建评估体系有利于发现数字乡村建设过程中的现存问题、明确发展方向，为加快实现我国农业农村现代化全面升级提供指引。[方法/过程] 通过政策文本计算提取关键词并进行语义融合，确定评估要素，构建数字乡村建设水平综合评价指标体系；运用数据包络分析方法结合BCC模型对我国31个地区的数字乡村建设有效性进行定量测度。[结果/结论] 对标五项政策文件构建的评价指标体系分为数字基建、数字经济、数字环境、数字惠民4个维度，可以对数字乡村建设的有效性进行合理评估；23个地区达到DEA有效，其数字乡村建设重点各有不同； 8个地区未达到DEA有效，其数字乡村建设投入和产出存在不合理性；最后总结数字乡村建设的6种类型并提出各地区改进提升数字乡村建设水平的切入点。
[Purpose/Significance] Benchmarking the five policy documents and constructing the evaluation system are conducive to discovering the existing problems in the process of digital village construction, clarifying the development direction, and providing guidance for accelerating the comprehensive upgrading of China’s agricultural and rural modernization. [Method/Process] This study extracted keywords through policy text calculation and semantic fusion, determined the evaluation elements, built a comprehensive evaluation index system of digital village construction level; the data envelopment analysis method and BCC model were used to quantitatively measure the effectiveness of digital village construction level of 31 regions in China. [Result/Conclusion] The evaluation index system constructed by the five policy documents can be divided into four dimensions: digital infrastructure, digital economy, digital environment and digital benefiting the people, which can reasonably evaluate the effectiveness of digital village construction; 23 regions have achieved DEA efficient, and their digital village construction priorities are different; 8 regions have not reached DEA efficient, and their digital village construction input and output are unreasonable; Finally, the six types of digital village construction are summarized and the entry points of promoting the level of digital village construction in various regions are proposed.
[1] 宋常迎,郑少锋,于重阳."十四五"时期数字乡村发展的创新驱动体系建设[J].科学管理研究, 2021, 39(3):100-107.[2] 常倩,李瑾.乡村振兴背景下智慧乡村的实践与评价[J].华南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 18(3):11-21.[3] 崔凯,冯献.数字乡村建设视角下乡村数字经济指标体系设计研究[J].农业现代化研究, 2020, 41(6):899-909.[4] 马晓旭,华宇佳.乡村生态振兴成效评价指标体系构建研究——基于江苏省、浙江省、安徽省的对比[J].中国农业资源与区划, 2021, 42(1):60-67.[5] 张鸿,杜凯文,靳兵艳.乡村振兴战略下数字乡村发展就绪度评价研究[J].西安财经大学学报, 2020, 33(1):51-60.[6] 沈剑波,王应宽.中国农业信息化水平评价指标体系研究[J].农业工程学报, 2019, 35(24):162-172.[7] 芦风英,庞智强,邓光耀.中国乡村振兴发展的区域差异测度及形成机理[J].经济问题探索, 2022(4):19-36.[8] LI X J, SINGH C R B, XIA X L. Analysis on regional differences and spatial convergence of digital village development level:theory and evidence from China[J]. Agriculture, 2022, 12(2):1-20.[9] 申云,陈慧,陈晓娟,等.乡村产业振兴评价指标体系构建与实证分析[J].世界农业, 2020(2):59-69.[10] 吕承超,崔悦.乡村振兴发展:指标评价体系、地区差距与空间极化[J].农业经济问题, 2021(5):20-32.[11] 陈俊梁,史欢欢,林影,等.长三角一体化背景下乡村振兴差异化策略[J].华东经济管理, 2021, 35(9):21-30.[12] 钱佰慧,陈思霖,徐洋,等.农村现代化水平评价指标体系构建与测度分析[J].农业经济与管理, 2021(6):39-49.[13] 芦风英,邓光耀.中国省域乡村振兴水平的动态比较和区域差异研究[J].中国农业资源与区划, 2022, 43(10):199-208.[14] 田野,黄进,安敏.乡村振兴战略下农业现代化发展效率评价——基于超效率DEA与综合熵值法的联合分析[J].农业经济问题, 2021(3):100-113.[15] 温婷,罗良清.中国乡村环境污染治理效率及其区域差异——基于三阶段超效率SBM-DEA模型的实证检验[J].江西财经大学学报, 2021(3):79-90.[16] 姚维保,李志聪,林琳.乡村振兴视角下公共文化服务财政支出效率测度及影响因素——来自省级面板数据的实证分析[J].图书与情报, 2021(3):135-144.[17] CAO L L, NIU H W, WANG Y F. Utility analysis of digital villages to empower balanced urban-rural development based on the three-stage DEA-Malmquist model[J]. PloS one, 2022, 17(8):e0270952.[18] 任海军,王艺璇.乡村振兴战略下的西部数字普惠金融效率测度及影响因素研究[J].兰州大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 49(5):40-48.[19] 刘健,毕强,李瑞.微博舆情信息传播效果评价指标体系构建研究——基于模糊数据包络分析法[J].情报理论与实践, 2016, 39(12):31-38.[20] 崔静,黄水清,周建农,等.基于DEA方法的我国农村信息资源配置效率评价研究[J].图书情报工作, 2012, 56(18):60-64.[21] USMAN A, LI Q L, MUHMMAD A A, et al. Nexus between agro-ecological efficiency and carbon emission transfer:evidence from China[EB/OL].[2022-06-04]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09614-2.
