专题:预印本与预印本平台建设

我国科研人员对预印本平台的认知与使用研究

  • 刘静羽 ,
  • 刘敬仪 ,
  • 杨恒 ,
  • 初景利
展开
  • 1 中国科学院文献情报中心 北京 100190;
    2 中国科学院大学经济与管理学院信息资源管理系 北京 100190
刘静羽,副研究馆员,博士研究生;刘敬仪,博士,博士后;杨恒,博士研究生

收稿日期: 2023-01-09

  修回日期: 2023-01-25

  网络出版日期: 2023-04-05

基金资助

本文系中国科学院文献情报能力专项“建设国家前沿领域预印本平台”(项目编号:E1290805)和中国科学院科学传播专项“数字化平台建设项目”课题4“ChinaXiv预印本学术交流平台建设”(项目编号:E2e91901)研究成果之一。

Research on Cognition and Use of Preprint Servers by Chinese Researchers

  • Liu Jingyu ,
  • Liu Jingyi ,
  • Yang Heng ,
  • Chu Jingli
Expand
  • 1 National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190;
    2 Department of Information Resources Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190

Received date: 2023-01-09

  Revised date: 2023-01-25

  Online published: 2023-04-05

摘要

[目的/意义] 当前全球学术交流模式发生深刻变革,我国正积极探索预印本平台建设路径,需要深入了解和掌握我国科研人员对预印本平台的认知与使用情况。[方法/过程] 面向科研人员(包括研究生)开展问卷调查,调查内容包括科研人员对预印本及预印本平台的认知程度、对预印本平台的功能需求与使用情况、对预印本政策的需求建议3个层面,并从概况、年龄、角色、学科等多个维度对调查结果进行分析。[结果/结论] 我国科研人员对于预印本交流已有一定程度的认知,但总体认知水平不高。不同年龄和学科背景的科研人员使用预印本平台的行为有一定差异,国外预印本平台是目前我国科研人员的首选。我国科研人员普遍认为,制定预印本政策对促进我国预印本交流、预印本平台发展有重要意义。我国预印本平台建设应重视提升青年科研人员认知、关注用户需求差异性、完善平台功能、构建多层级的预印本政策体系。

本文引用格式

刘静羽 , 刘敬仪 , 杨恒 , 初景利 . 我国科研人员对预印本平台的认知与使用研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023 , 67(5) : 26 -48 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2023.05.003

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] The current global scholarly communication mode has undergone profound changes. China is actively exploring the path of preprint server construction. It is necessary to deeply understand and master the cognition and use of preprint server by Chinese researchers. [Method/Process] A questionnaire survey was conducted for national researchers (including postgraduates). The survey content included three aspects: researchers’ awareness of the preprint and preprint server, their functional needs and use of the preprint server, and their needs for preprint policies. The survey results were analyzed from the perspectives of profile, age, role and discipline. [Result/Conclusion] Chinese researchers have a certain degree of cognition about preprint communication, but the overall cognitive level is not high. There are some differences in the behavior of researchers of different ages and academic backgrounds in using the preprint server. At present, foreign preprint servers are the first choice for Chinese researchers. Chinese researchers generally believe that the formulation of preprint policy is of great significance for promoting the exchange of preprint and the development of preprint server in China. The construction of preprint server in China should pay attention to improving the cognition of young researchers, paying attention to the difference of user needs, improving the platform functions, and building a multi-level preprint policy system.

参考文献

[1] 张智雄. 发展学界自治的预印本交流模式[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2017(10):1.
[2] Science. 2017 breakthrough of the year[EB/OL].[2022-12-02]. https://vis.sciencemag.org/breakthrough2017/finalists/#cosmicconvergence.
[3] CHU J, REN J, WANG J, et al. The development of the LIS preprint server in China[EB/OL].[2022-12-02]. https://informationmatters.org/2022/07/the-development-of-lis-preprintplatform-in-china/.
[4] 赵红州. 科学能力学引论[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 1984.
[5] ASAPbio. Survey results[EB/OL].[2023-01-18]. https://asapbio.org/survey.
[6] ASAPbio. Why do people use preprints? what is their value?[EB/OL].[2022-12-02]. https://asapbio.org/faq/why-do-people-use-preprints-what-is-their-value.
[7] ASAPbio. Preprint licensing survey[EB/OL].[2022-12-02]. https://github.com/asapbio/licensing.
[8] ASAPbio. Survey:how early would you preprint and what feedback would you like?[EB/OL].[2022-12-02]. https://asapbio.org/how-early-would-you-preprint.
[9] TENOPIR C, LEVINE K, ALLARD S, et al. Trustworthiness and authority of scholarly information in a digital age:results of an international questionnaire[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2016, 67(10):2344-2361.
[10] COURTNEY K, TIMOTHY M, BRIAN A. Credibility of preprints:an interdisciplinary survey of researchers[J]. Royal Society open science, 2020, 7(10):20152.
[11] CHIARELLI A, JOHNSON R, PINFIELD S, et al. Preprints and scholarly communication:adoption, practices, drivers and barriers[EB/OL].[2022-12-02]. https://f1000research.com/articles/8-971/v1.
[12] JORDAN S. Preprint servers:status, challenges, and opportunities of the new digital publishing paradigm[EB/OL].[2022-09-21]. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=1A8467A149391553F66EF55670B10446?doi=10.1.1.42.5827&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
[13] 唐耕砚. 重构与再造:预印本平台对科学交流体系的影响[J]. 科学学研究, 2021, 39(10):1729-1735, 1831.
[14] 张智雄, 黄金霞, 陈雪飞, 等. 科技预印本库的政策动向与政策挑战[J]. 中国科学基金, 2019, 33(3):219-228.
[15] 解贺嘉, 刘筱敏. 国外预印本平台研究述评[J]. 科技与出版, 2020(6):21-27.
[16] 和鸿鹏. 预印本可否替代学术期刊?——基于科学社会学的视角[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 2021, 37(7):72-77.
[17] 许玉俊. 基于预印本的科学交流机制探析[J]. 科学技术哲学研究, 2022, 39(4):111-116.
[18] 黄国彬, 白旭, 王涛. 实证视角下同行评议对审定预印本在期刊发表的影响研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(21):57-66.
[19] 赵旸, 张智雄. 当前国际预印本平台主要创新功能研究[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2022, 33(10):1305-1312.
[20] 朱佳丽, 张智雄. 预印本学术交流体系参与主体权益调研与启示[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2022, 33(10):1313-1320.
[21] 孙异凡, 陈一, 蒋子可, 等. 开放科学视域下预印本认可政策研究[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2021(6):2-12.
[22] 陈雪飞, 张智雄, 黄金霞. 国际学术出版机构预印本政策分析[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2017(10):8-14
[23] WYKLE S. Enclaves of anarchy:preprint sharing, 1940-1990[J]. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2014(51):1-10.
[24] COBB M. The prehistory of biology preprints:a forgotten experiment from the 1960s[J]. PLoS biology, 2017, 15(11):e2003995.
文章导航

/

〈 〉