[目的/意义] 通过探究面向科技智库决策咨询研究需求的多元化资源融合与服务路径，提升科技智库的决策咨询水平与课题研究质量，同时推动图情机构的服务创新和深化升级。[方法/过程] 首先对相关文献进行回顾，再通过专家访谈与问卷调查相结合的方法对科技智库的决策咨询研究需求进行分析，最终提出面向科技智库决策咨询研究需求的多元化资源融合与服务路径，即对多元化资源进行集成后，建立涵盖底层、中层、高层3个层次的多元化资源融合框架，重点阐述预测预警服务、智慧检索服务、精准推荐服务、个性化定制服务、智能传播推广服务5类服务路径如何在科技智库的决策咨询研究过程中发挥作用。[结果/结论] 多元化资源融合是图情机构服务创新与深化升级的重要驱动力。图情机构服务应以科技智库的决策咨询研究需求为牵引，以多元化资源融合为切入点，促进科学化与高质量服务实现，以此满足科技智库需求，突显图情机构的关键作用和潜在价值。
[Purpose/Significance] By exploring the diversified resource integration and service path for the decision-making consultation research needs of science and technology think tanks, the decision-making consultation level and research quality of science and technology think tanks can be improved, and at the same time, the service innovation and deepening upgrading of library and information institutions can be promoted. [Method/Process] Firstly, the relevant literature was reviewed, and then the research needs of decision-making consultation of science and technology think tanks were analyzed by means of expert interviews and questionnaires. Finally, it put forward the diversified resource integration and service path for the decision-making consultation research needs of science and technology think tanks. That is to say, after the integration of diversified resources, establish a diversified resource integration framework covering three levels: bottom, middle and top. This paper focused on how five service paths, namely, forecasting and early warning service, intelligent retrieval service, accurate recommendation service, personalized customization service and intelligent communication and promotion service, play a role in the decision-making consultation research process of science and technology think tanks. [Result/Conclusion] The integration of diversified resources is an important driving force for the service innovation and deepening and upgrading of library and information institutions. The service of library and information institutions should be driven by the demand of decision-making consultation and research of science and technology think tanks, and take the integration of diversified resources as the breakthrough point to promote the realization of scientific and high-quality services. In order to meet the needs of science and technology think tanks and highlight the key role and potential value of library and information institutions.
[1] 黄雯, 杨松霖. 提升科技智库的国际传播能力[N]. 中国社会科学报, 2022-03-24(2).
[2] 余玉龙. 科技智库产品的传播途径、质量特征与保障策略[J]. 中国高校科技, 2020(5):40-44.
[3] 刘岩. 我国省级科技情报机构服务科技智库的能力及策略研究[J]. 智库理论与实践, 2022, 7(1):88-97.
[4] 崔小委, 李纯. 科技智库的社会经济数据需求与实证分析[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2019, 38(4):82-90.
[5] 于升峰. 面向科技智库的知识图谱系统构建[J]. 智库理论与实践, 2021, 6(1):56-64.
[6] 梁炜, 陈京京, 代水平. 中国特色新型科技智库建设的现状评价和实现路径研究[J]. 科学管理研究, 2019, 37(1):5-8.
[7] RAND Corporation. RAND's standards for high-quality research and analysis[EB/OL].[2023-02-17]. https://www.rand.org/about/standards.html.
[8] CHRISTENSEN J, HOLST C. How do advocacy think tanks relate to academic knowledge?the case of Norway[J]. Scandinavian political studies, 2020, 43(3):223-239.
[9] MCGANN J G, WEAVER R K. Think tanks and civil societies[EB/OL].[2023-02-17]. https://www.amazon.com/Think-Tanks-Civil-Societies-Catalysts/dp/0765809524.
[10] LACAN A. Think tank:meaningful management in a postmodern society[J]. Global business and organizational excellence, 2019, 38(3):6-10.
[11] JACQUES P J, DUNLAP R E, FREEMAN M. The organization of denial:conservative think tanks and environment scepticism[J]. Environmental politics, 2008, 17(3):349-385.
[12] Research:think tank data-how big data can help to find FDI opportunities[EB/OL].[2023-02-17]. https://www.fdiintelligence.com/content/news/how-big-data-can-help-to-find-fdiopportunities-60515.
[13] TTCSP. A Q&A with Dr. McGann on the 2020 go to report and Chinese think tanks[EB/OL].[2023-02-17]. https://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks/18/.
[14] 时名早, 司明. 我国科技决策智库人才队伍建设的他国经验与对策建议[J]. 科学管理研究, 2020, 38(4):125-130.
[15] 刘书雷, 屈婷婷. 对新时代国防科技智库建设的思考与建议[J]. 智库理论与实践, 2020, 5(3):10-15.
[16] 欧阳静, 曾文, 潘可新. 大数据背景下科技智库情报信息共享体系研究[J]. 图书与情报, 2021(4):132-137.
[17] PHILLIPPS J. The role of epistemic communities:local think tanks, international practitioners and security sector reform in Kosovo[J]. Southeast European and Black Sea studies, 2018, 18(2):281-299.
[18] Brookings. About Brookings[EB/OL].[2023-02-17]. https://www.brookings.or.us/.
[19] BERTELLI A M, WENGER J B. Demanding information:think tanks and The US Congress[J]. British journal of political science, 2009, 39(2):225-242.
[20] WU H. Exploring the coping strategies of university library and information organizations in the construction of national think tanks[C]//2019 international conference on arts, management, education and innovation. Ottawa:Clausius Scientific Press, 2019:18-23.
[21] 刘伟东. 社会科学院图情机构服务智库研究[J]. 情报资料工作, 2020, 41(5):23-30.
[22] 黄晓斌, 林菁. 面向新型智库的情报服务创新策略[J]. 科技情报研究, 2020, 2(1):46-55.
[23] 宋芳. 支撑新型智库的图情机构智慧服务创新探究[J]. 情报资料工作, 2015(5):81-85.
[24] 董薇, 姜宇飞, 张明昊, 等. 图书馆服务高校智库建设的策略-"双一流"高校建设背景下的思考[J]. 智库理论与实践, 2017, 2(3):36-43.
[25] 吴雅威, 张向先, 卢恒. 面向智库需求的智慧数据服务能力评价体系研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2022, 45(1):77-85.
[26] CLARK R M. Intelligence analysis:a target-centric approach[M]. Washington DC:Congressional Quarterly Press, 2012.
[27] SIMON H A. Models of man:social and rational[M]. New York:John Wiley & Sons, 1957.
[28] 栗琳. 情报机构视域下情报、智库与战略决策关系透析[J]. 情报资料工作, 2020, 41(5):31-36.
[29] 徐艳芳, 李健捷. 智库决策研究信息支撑协同创新机制探索[J]. 智库时代, 2020(15):1-2.
[30] WELLS P. Prescriptions for regional economic dilemmas:understanding the role of think tanks in the governance of regional policy[J]. Public administration, 2012, 90(1):211-229.
[31] 刘敬仪, 廖宇. 国外高校图书馆支撑智库建设的启示[J]. 智库理论与实践, 2018, 3(4):33-38.
[32] 黄晓斌, 王尧. 国外图情机构服务智库的做法及启示[J]. 现代情报, 2018, 38(3):159-163, 170.
[33] 王玉霞, 王凤姣, 龚蛟腾. 英国萨塞克斯大学图书馆支撑智库建设的创新与启示[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2020, 32(8):68-78.
[34] 吴玉阁, 邵长臻, 魏文忠. 新型高校智库人才管理机制改革推进路径研究[J]. 智库理论与实践, 2022, 7(4):44-53.
[35] 潘教峰, 杨国梁, 刘慧晖. 多规模智库问题DIIS理论方法[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2019, 34(7):785-796.
[36] 陈思. 面向产品设计的语义化知识服务关键技术研究[D]. 北京:北京理工大学, 2015.
[37] 曹嘉君, 王曰芬. 基于数据科学的知识创新服务应用模式构建研究[J]. 情报学报, 2018, 37(10):971-978.
[38] 王世伟. 论中国特色公共图书馆新型智库建设的定位与发展[J]. 情报资料工作, 2020, 41(5):14-22.
[39] 郑荣, 王洁, 杨冉. 合作联盟视角下图情机构与智库的协同创新与保障机制建设[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(19):5-12.
[40] Affiliated advisers and experts(non-resident)[EB/OL].[2023-02- 17]. https://csis.or.id/research-topic/international-relations/.
[41] 王海良, 王立伟. 地方社科院信息文献服务创新初探-以上海社科院创新工程数字文献信息平台为例[J]. 图书馆工作与研究, 2016(7):64-68.
[42] 王世伟. 智库专报五大要素探析[J]. 情报资料工作, 2017(4):96-102.
[43] 魏秀玲. 党校图书馆服务智库建设策略研究[J]. 智库理论与实践, 2021, 6(6):95-101.
[44] Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs[EB/OL].[2023-02-17]. https://worldwide.harvard.edu/belfer-centerscience-and-international-affairs-0.
[45] Davis Center for Russian and Eurasian Studies[EB/OL].[2023- 02-17]. https://worldwide.harvard.edu/department/davis-centerrussian-and-eurasian-studies.
[46] 刘珊. 如何利用新媒体提升智库传播力[J]. 传媒论坛, 2020, 3(20):5-6.
[47] Brookings. Brookings 2019 annual report[EB/OL].[2023-02- 17]. https://www.brookingscountysd.gov/DocumentCenter/View/3866/2019-Annual-Report.
