情报研究

图书情报领域期刊全文本引文特征研究——基于被引参考文献深度分析功能

  • 王露荷 ,
  • 吕沨绚 ,
  • 虞逸飞 ,
  • 张琳 ,
  • 黄颖
展开
  • 1 武汉大学信息管理学院 武汉 430072;
    2 武汉大学科教管理与评价中心 武汉 430072;
    3 比利时鲁汶大学 ECOOM 研究中心 鲁汶 B-3000
王露荷,本科生;吕沨绚,本科生;虞逸飞,硕士研究生;张琳,教授,博士,博士生导师。

收稿日期: 2022-11-08

  修回日期: 2023-01-09

  网络出版日期: 2023-05-11

基金资助

本文系武汉大学彭斐章图书馆学发展基金项目和国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目“基于多源异构数据的新兴技术演化路径识别与预测研究”(项目编号:72004169)研究成果之一。

The Full-Text Citation Characteristics of Journals in Library and Information Science: Based on the Function of In-Depth Analysis of Cited References

  • Wang Luhe ,
  • Lü Fengxuan ,
  • Yu Yifei ,
  • Zhang Lin ,
  • Huang Ying
Expand
  • 1 School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072;
    2 Center for Science, Technology & Education Assessment(CSTEA), Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072;
    3 Centre for R&D Monitoring(ECOOM) and Department of MSI, KU Leuven, Leuven B-3000

Received date: 2022-11-08

  Revised date: 2023-01-09

  Online published: 2023-05-11

摘要

[目的/意义] 全文引文分析以施引文献的全文数据为研究对象,从引文在施引文献中的引用位置、引用语境、引用情感和引用强度等方面揭示引文特征,可以从语句层面和语篇层面加深对引用内涵的理解,进而更好地辅助科学评价。[方法/过程] 基于Web of Science核心合集中新近提供的被引参考文献深度分析功能数据,以2021年出版且拥有被引参考文献深度分析模块的1 582篇图书情报领域论文数据作为研究样本,批量获取全文引用的相关图表信息和相对应的文献著录信息。借助文本分析与可视化工具从引用位置、引用语境、引用强度3个方面分析引文特征。在此基础上,引入学科交叉测度指标,分别测度不同文献章节位置和功能模块上的交叉程度,从而揭示目标文献的学科交叉特征。[结果/结论]Web of Science提供的被引参考文献深度分析功能为实现大规模全文本引文分析提供了重要数据基础,但当前版本还存在拥有被引参考文献深度分析模块的论文覆盖率低、引用情感分类模糊、引用动机缺少明确规范等问题。图书情报是一个注重跨学科交叉、多学科融合的领域,通过探究图书情报领域论文的引文特征,进而基于全文引文信息深入挖掘学科交叉特征,对于增强公众对图书情报学科的理解与认知有重要价值。

本文引用格式

王露荷 , 吕沨绚 , 虞逸飞 , 张琳 , 黄颖 . 图书情报领域期刊全文本引文特征研究——基于被引参考文献深度分析功能[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023 , 67(9) : 110 -120 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2023.09.012

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] Full-text citation analysis takes the full-text data of the citing references as the research object. Revealing the characteristics of citation mode from the citation position, citation context, citation emotion and citation intensity in the citing references can deepen the understanding of the connotation of citation from the sentence level and text level, and then better assist scientific evaluation. [Method/Process] Based on the function data of in-depth analysis of enriched cited references provided by Web of Science Core Collection, this paper took 1 582 library and information sciences (LIS) papers published in 2021 with in-depth analysis module of cited references as samples, and obtained the relevant chart information and corresponding document description information quoted in the full text in batches. With the help of text analysis technologies and visualization tools, the paper analyzed citation patterns from three perspectives of citation location, context, and strength. Then it measured the interdisciplinarity of different literature sections position and functional modules based on the interdisciplinary measurement index to reveal the interdisciplinary characteristics of the targeted papers. [Result/Conclusion] The function of in-depth analysis of enriched cited references in Web of Science provides an important data basis for realizing large-scale full-text citation analysis. However, the current version still has problems such as low coverage of papers with cited reference in-depth analysis module, vague classification of citation sentiment, and lack of precise specification of citation motives; LIS is a field that attaches importance to interdisciplinary crossover and multidisciplinary integration. By exploring the citation characteristics of papers in the field and then digging into the interdisciplinary characteristics based on full-text citation information, it is of great value to enhance the understanding and cognition of LIS.

参考文献

[1] KAPLAN N. The norms of citation behavior-prolegomena to the footnote[J]. American documentation, 1965, 16(3):179-184.
[2] 易平. 核心期刊的综合分析与确定——浙江医大重点学科核心期刊表的编制[J]. 医学情报工作, 1996(2):43-46.
[3] SHIAU W L, DWIVEDI Y K. Citation and co-citation analysis to identify core and emerging knowledge in electronic commerce research[J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 94(3):1317-1337.
[4] PERITZ B C. On the objectives of citation analysis-problems of theory and method[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1992, 43(6):448-451.
[5] 魏海燕, 尹怀琼, 刘莉. 基于引文分析的情报学与相关学科的研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2010, 29(2):38-43.
[6] 葛菲, 谭宗颖. 学科领域主题新兴趋势探测方法研究——基于关键词生命周期和引文分析[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2013, 36(9):78-82.
[7] NERUR S P, RASHEED A A, NATARAJAN V. The intellectual structure of the strategic management field:an author co-citation analysis[J]. Strategic management journal, 2008, 29(3):319-336.
[8] GARFIELD E. Citation indexes for science:a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas[J]. Science, 1955, 122(3159):108-111.
[9] 祝清松. 语义增强的引文分析方法与应用实验研究[D].北京:中国科学院大学, 2014.
[10] 叶继元. 引文的本质及其学术评价功能辨析[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2010, 36(1):35-39.
[11] 杨思洛. 引文分析存在的问题及其原因探究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2011, 37(3):108-117.
[12] 胡志刚. 全文引文分析方法与应用[D]. 大连:大连理工大学, 2014.
[13] GARFIELD E. Can citation indexing be automated?[J]. Essays of an information scientist, 1964, 13(1):84-90.
[14] VOOS H, DAGAEV K S. Are all citations equal? or, did we op. cit. your idem?[J]. The journal of academic librarianship, 1976, 1(6):19-21.
[15] CANO V. Citation behavior:classification, utility, and location[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1989, 40(4):284-290.
[16] SOMBATSOMPOP N, KOSITCHAIYONG A, MARKPIN T, et al. Scientific evaluations of citation quality of international research articles in the SCI database:Thailand case study[J]. Scientometrics, 2006, 66(3):521-535.
[17] HU Z, CHEN C, LIU Z. Where are citations located in the body of scientific articles? a study of the distributions of citation locations[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2013, 7(4):887-896.
[18] 胡志刚, 陈超美, 刘则渊, 等. 从基于引文到基于引用——一种统计引文总被引次数的新方法[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013, 57(21):5-10.
[19] ZHU X D, TURNEY P D, LEMIRE D, et al. Measuring academic influence:not all citations are equal[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science, 2015, 66(2):408-427.
[20] ZHAO D Z, CAPPELLO A, JOHNSTON L. Functions of uniand multi-citations:implications for weighted citation analysis[J]. Journal of data and information science, 2017, 2(1):51-69.
[21] 刘盛博, 丁堃, 张春博. 基于引用内容性质的引文评价研究情[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2015, 38(3):77-81.
[22] 耿树青, 杨建林. 基于引用情感的论文学术影响力评价方法研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2018, 41(12):93-98.
[23] 姜霖, 张麒麟. 基于引文细粒度情感量化的学术评价研究[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2020, 4(6):129-138.
[24] 石泽顺, 肖明. 基于本体和关联数据的全文引文分析方法研究[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2021, 40(4):100-108.
[25] BURROUGH-BOENISCH J. International reading strategies for IMRD articles[J]. Written communication, 1999, 16(3):296-316.
[26] ELKISS A, SHEN S, FADER A, et al. Blind men and elephants:what do citation summaries tell us about a research article?[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008, 59(1):51-62.
[27] ZHANG L, ROUSSEAU R, GLANZEL W. Diversity of references as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of journals:taking similarity between subject fields into account[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2016, 67(5):1257-1265.
[28] CASSI L, CHAMPEIMONT R, MESCHEBA W, et al. Analysing institutions interdisciplinarity by extensive use of rao-stirling diversity index[J]. PloS one, 2017, 12(1):e0170296.
[29] LEYDESDORFF L, BORNMANN L, ZHOU P. Construction of a pragmatic base line for journal classifications and maps based on aggregated journal-journal citation relations[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2016, 10(4):902-918.
[30] 黄颖, 张琳, 孙蓓蓓, 等. 跨学科的三维测度——外部知识融合、内在知识会聚与科学合作模式[J]. 科学学研究, 2019, 37(1):25-35.
[31] 王佳敏, 李信, 刘齐进. 全文本文献计量分析学术沙龙综述[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2018, 8(4):119-125.
[32] HU Z G, LIN G G, SUN T A, et al. Understanding multiply mentioned references[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2017, 11(4):948-958.
[33] 吴涵, 肖明, 林霄楠, 等. 引用位置视角下数据论文引用行为特征分析——以Scientific Data为例[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2022, 41(6):101-107.
[34] 张梦莹, 卢超, 郑茹佳, 等. 用于引文内容分析的标准化数据集构建[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2016, 36(8):48-53.
[35] 张琳, 刘冬东, 吕琦, 等. 论文学科交叉测度研究:从全部引文到章节引文[J]. 情报学报, 2020, 39(5):492-499.
[36] 廖君华, 刘自强, 白如江, 等. 基于引文内容分析的引用情感识别研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(15):112-121.
[37] CHUBIN D E, MOITRA S D. Content-analysis of referencesadjunct or alternative to citation counting[J]. Social studies of science, 1975, 5(4):423-441.
[38] 叶继元, 袁培国, 吴向东. 引文数据中的负面引用初探[J]. 新世纪图书馆, 2007, (6):22-23, 62.
[39] DING Y, LIU X Z, GUO C, et al. The distribution of references across texts:some implications for citation analysis[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2013, 7(3):583-592.
[40] BERTIN M, ATANASSOVA I. The context of multiple in-text references and their signification[J]. International journal on digital libraries, 2018, 19(2-3):127-138.
[41] 马费成, 李志元. 新文科背景下我国图书情报学科的发展前景[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2020, 46(6):4-15.
[42] 李亚婷. 图书情报学的学科交叉研究进展[J]. 情报科学, 2017, 35(11):156-160, 171.
[43] 尤江东, 李丹浓, 张伟丽, 等. 数据测度下图书情报域跨学科知识融合性研究[J]. 大学图书情报学刊, 2022, 40(4):129-133.
[44] 胡志刚, 章成志. 悄然兴起的全文计量分析[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2021, 41(3):1-11.
[45] FRICKE S. Semantic scholar[J]. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 2018, 106(1):145-147.
文章导航

/

〈 〉