图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2023 , Vol. 67 >Issue 16: 3 - 12

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2023.16.001

理论研究

从Altmetrics到社交媒体计量学——社交媒体时代计量学的新发展

  • 赵蓉英 ,
  • 陈文欣 ,
  • 朱伟杰
展开
  • 1武汉大学中国科学评价研究中心 武汉 430072;
    2 武汉大学信息管理学院 武汉 430072
赵蓉英，教授，博士；朱伟杰，博士研究生。

收稿日期: 2023-02-20

  修回日期: 2023-05-30

  网络出版日期: 2023-08-18

基金资助

本文系国家社会科学基金重大项目“构建中国话语权的评价科学理论、方法与应用体系研究”（项目编号：18ZDA325）研究成果之一。

收起

From Altmetrics to Social Mediametric: the New Development of Informetrics in the Era of Social Media

  • Zhao Rongying ,
  • Chen Wenxin ,
  • Zhu Weijie
Expand
  • 1 Research Center for Chinese Science Evaluation, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072;
    2 School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072

Received date: 2023-02-20

  Revised date: 2023-05-30

  Online published: 2023-08-18

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义] 提出用“社交媒体计量学”这一术语概括以社交媒体信息为逻辑起点的系列计量研究的构想，并论述在Altmetrics逐渐发展成熟的背景下提出社交媒体计量学的必要性。[方法/过程] 梳理社交媒体的定义、特点和类型，介绍Altmetrics诞生前和发展过程中产生的相关术语概念，界定社交媒体计量学的概念与研究内容，同时分析比较社交媒体计量学与Altmetrics之间的相互关系，分别从对Altmetrics和对计量学科整体发展作用的角度论证用“社交媒体计量学”这一术语概括以社交媒体信息为逻辑起点的系列计量研究的科学性、客观性和合理性。[结果/结论] 社交媒体计量学是在以社交媒体为场景的网络环境下呼之欲出的计量学分支学科，它围绕社交媒体这一新的信息载体，研究社交媒体用户之间及其与科学信息的交互特征与规律，从而提炼社交媒体信息的科学价值。这一术语的提出能够为社交媒体相关计量研究尤其是国内研究开辟新的研究思路，从而促进学科整体发展。

关键词： 社交媒体; 社交媒体计量学; Altmetrics; 评价科学

本文引用格式

赵蓉英 , 陈文欣 , 朱伟杰 . 从Altmetrics到社交媒体计量学——社交媒体时代计量学的新发展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023 , 67(16) : 3 -12 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2023.16.001

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] The paper aims to present the idea of using the term Social Mediametrics to summarize a series of metrics studies that take social media information as a logical starting point, and discusses the necessity of building social mediametrics in the context of the maturing of Altmetrics. [Method/Process] This paper presented the definition, characteristics and types of social media, introduced the related terminology and concepts generated before and during the development of Altmetrics, defined the concept and research content of social mediametrics, and analyzed the interrelationship between social mediametrics and Altmetrics, and justified the scientificity, objectivity and rationality of using the term Social Mediametrics to summarize the series of metrics research from the perspective of its role in Altmetrics and in the overall development of informetrics. [Result/Conclusion] Social mediametrics is a sub-discipline of informetrics that emerges in the context of social media as the scene of the network environment. It focuses on social media as a new information carrier, and studies the characteristics and regulations of the interaction between social media users and scientific information, so as to refine the scientific value of social media information. The proposed terminology can open up new research ideas for social media-related metrics research, especially for domestic research, and thus promote the overall development of the discipline.

Key words： social media; social mediametrics; Altmetrics; evaluation science

参考文献

[1] 中国互联网信息中心. 第50次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告[R]. 北京:中国互联网信息中心, 2022.
[2] MAYFIELD A. What is social media[EB/OL].[2023-06-17]. https://www.antonymayfield.com/2006/09/27/social-mediaebook/.
[3] 谭天, 张子俊. 我国社交媒体的现状、发展与趋势[J]. 编辑之友, 2017(1):20-25.
[4] 肖璇, 王铁男, 郝凡浩. 社会影响理论视角的社交媒体持续使用研究[J]. 管理科学学报, 2017, 20(11):49-60.
[5] 凯度指数. 2019年中国社会化媒体生态概览白皮书[R]. 北京:凯度中国, 2019.
[6] 王晓真. 新生代研究者推动学术变革[N]. 中国社会科学报, 2019-07-10(3).
[7] KAPIDZIC S. The social academic:a social capital approach to academic relationship management on social media[J]. Information, communication & society, 2020, 23(11):1673-1688.
[8] DYLEWSKI Ł, MIKULA P, TRYJANOWSKI P, et al. Social media and scientific research are complementary-YouTube and shrikes as a case study[J]. The science of nature, 2017, 104(5):1-7.
[9] COOMBS K A. Lessons learned from analyzing library database usage data[J]. Library hi tech, 2005, 23(4):598-609.
[10] KRAEMER A. Ensuring consistent usage statistics, part 2:working with use data for electronic journals[J]. The serials librarian, 2006, 50(1/2):163-172.
[11] GLÄNZEL W, GORRAIZ J. Usage metrics versus altmetrics:confusing terminology?[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 102(3):2161- 2164.
[12] KAVIC M S, SATAVA R M. Scientific literature and evaluation metrics:impact factor, usage metrics, and altmetrics[J]. Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons, 2021, 25(3):e2021.00010.
[13] COUSIJN H, FEENEY P, LOWENBERG D, et al. Bringing citations and usage metrics together to make data count[J]. Data science journal, 2019, 18(9):1-7.
[14] HUNTINGTON P, NICHOLAS D, JAMALI H R. Website usage metrics:a re-assessment of session data[J]. Information processing & management, 2008, 44(1):358-372.
[15] SPILIOTOPOULOS T, OAKLEY I. Understanding motivations for Facebook use:usage metrics, network structure, and privacy[C]//Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. New York:Association for Computing Machinery, 2013:3287-3296.
[16] KONKIEL S, SCHERER D. New opportunities for repositories in the age of altmetrics[J]. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013, 39(4):22-26.
[17] PRIEM J, TARABORELLI D, GROTH P, et al. Altmetrics:a manifesto[EB/OL].[2023-06-17]. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/.
[18] MURDOUGH C. Social media measurement:it's not impossible[J]. Journal of interactive advertising, 2009, 10(1):94-99.
[19] PETERS K, CHEN Y, KAPLAN A M, et al. Social media metrics-a framework and guidelines for managing social media[J]. Journal of interactive marketing, 2013, 27(4):281-298.
[20] ALPERIN J P. Geographic variation in social media metrics:an analysis of Latin American journal articles[J]. Aslib journal of information management, 2015, 67(3):289-304.
[21] HAUSTEIN S, COSTAS R, LARIVIÈRE V. Characterizing social media metrics of scholarly papers:the effect of document properties and collaboration patterns[J]. PloS one, 2015, 10(3):e0120495.
[22] HAUSTEIN S, PETERS I, SUGIMOTO C R, et al. Tweeting biomedicine:an analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, 65(4):656-669.
[23] LI X, THELWALL M. F1000, Mendeley and traditional bibliometric indicators[C]//Proceedings of the 17th international conference on science and technology indicators. Montréal:Science-metrix, 2012:451-551.
[24] COSTAS R. Towards the social media studies of science:social media metrics, present and future[J]. Anales de investigacion. 2017, 13(1):1-5.
[25] DÍAZ-FAES A A, BOWMAN T D, COSTAS R. Towards a second generation of 'social media metrics':characterizing Twitter communities of attention around science[J]. Plos one, 2019, 14(5):e0216408.
[26] 余厚强. 替代计量学的理论框架研究[J]. 情报学报, 2022, 41(8):775-785.
[27] FANG Z, DUDEK J, COSTAS R. Facing the volatility of tweets in altmetric research[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2022, 73(8):1192-1195.
[28] FANG Z, COSTAS R. Studying the accumulation velocity of altmetric data tracked by Altmetric. com[J]. Scientometrics, 2020, 123(2):1077-1101.
[29] 赵蓉英, 吴胜男, 王旭, 等. Altmetrics理论与实践[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2019:103.
[30] PRIEM J, GROTH P, TARABORELLI D. The altmetrics collection[J]. Plos one, 2012, 7(11):e48753.
[31] GALLIGAN F, DYAS-CORREIA S. Altmetrics:rethinking the way we measure[J]. Serials review, 2013, 39(1):56-61.
[32] SHEMA H, BAR-LAN J, THELWALL M. Do blog citations correlate with a higher number of future citations? research blogs as a potential source for alternative metrics[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, 65(5):1018-1027.
[33] HOWARD J. Scholars seek better ways to track impact online[J]. Chronicle of higher education, 2012, 58:A1-A4.
[34] PIWOWAR H. Value all research products[J]. Nature, 2013, 493(7431):159.
[35] THELWALL M, KOUSHA K. Web indicators for research evaluation, part 2:social media metrics[J]. Profesional de la informacion, 2015, 24(5):607-620.
[36] Altmetric. sources of attention[EB/OL].[2023-06-17]. https://www.altmetric.com/about-our-data/our-sources-2/.
[37] 赵蓉英, 魏明坤, 汪少震. 基于Altmetrics的开源软件学术影响力评价研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2017, 43(2):80-95.
[38] LIN J, FENNER M. Altmetrics in evolution:defining and redefining the ontology of article-level metrics[J]. Information standards quarterly, 2013, 25(2):20.
[39] WOUTERS P, ZAHEDI Z, COSTAS R. Springer handbook of science and technology indicators[M]. Cham:Springer, 2019:687-713.
[40] FANG Z, COSTAS R, TIAN W, et al. How is science clicked on Twitter? click metrics for bitly short links to scientific publications[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2021, 72(7):918-932.
[41] THELWALL M. The pros and cons of the use of altmetrics in research assessment[J]. Scholarly assessment reports, 2020, 2(1):2.
[42] 邱均平, 余厚强. 论推动替代计量学发展的若干基本问题[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2015, 41(1):4-15.
[43] 刘春丽.Web 2.0环境下的科学计量学:选择性计量学[J]. 图书情报工作, 2012, 56(14):52-56, 92.
[44] 邱均平, 韩小林. 基于扎根理论的" 五计学" 理论融合与发展脉络研究[J]. 现代情报, 2022, 42(6):132-137.
[45] PRITCHARD A. Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics[J]. Journal of documentation, 1969, 25:348.
[46] NACKE O. Informetrics-definition, status of knowledge and development of principles[J]. Nachrichten fur dokumentation, 1979, 30(6):219-226.
[47] ALMIND T C, INGWERSEN P. Informetric analyses on the World Wide Web:methodological approaches to 'Webometrics'[J]. Journal of documentation, 1997, 53(4):404- 426.
[48] 刘则渊, 刘凤朝. 关于知识计量学研究的方法论思考[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2002(8):5-8.
[49] 邱均平, 余厚强. 替代计量学的提出过程与研究进展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013, 57(19):5-12.
[50] 由庆斌, 汤珊红. 补充计量学及应用前景[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2013, 36(12):6-10.
[51] 赵蓉英, 汪少震, 陈志毅. 补充计量学及其分析工具之探究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2015, 38(6):29-34.
[52] RONALD R, FRED Y Y. A multi-metric approach for research evaluation[J]. Chinese science bulletin, 2013, 58:3288-3290.
[53] EYSENBACH G. Can Tweets predict citations? metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact[J]. Journal of medical Internet research, 2011, 13(4):e2012.
[54] 宋艳辉, 魏开洋, 邱均平. 从第17届 ISSI会议看" 五计学" 的发展[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2020, 43(10):55-62.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉