情报研究

开放式创新社区用户的社会资本对创意质量的影响研究

  • 王天梅 ,
  • 徐硕 ,
  • 周鑫雪 ,
  • 郭林林
展开
  • 1 中央财经大学信息学院 北京 100081;
    2 广西大学工商管理学院 南宁 530004;
    3 中国科学院文献情报中心 北京 100190
王天梅,教授,博士生导师;徐硕,硕士研究生;郭林林,馆员,硕士。

收稿日期: 2023-02-10

  修回日期: 2023-05-20

  网络出版日期: 2023-09-11

基金资助

本文系国家自然科学基金项目“在线定制企业信息交互对顾客参与价值共创的影响研究”(项目编号:72072194)和国家重点研发计划“服务效能理论与技术研究及应用”(项目编号:2021YFF0900800)研究成果之一。

Research on the Effect of User’s Social Capital on Idea Quality in Open Innovation Communities

  • Wang Tianmei ,
  • Xu Shuo ,
  • Zhou Xinxue ,
  • Guo Linlin
Expand
  • 1 School of Information, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081;
    2 School of Business, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004;
    3 National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190

Received date: 2023-02-10

  Revised date: 2023-05-20

  Online published: 2023-09-11

摘要

[目的/意义] 开放式创新社区中用户间交互是提升用户创意质量的关键因素之一,研究用户的社会资本对其创意质量的影响以及区分社会资本中与不同类型用户的关系带来的异质性影响非常重要。[方法/过程] 以乐高创意社区作为研究对象,首先采用无监督的情感分析技术根据用户评论内容的语言特征对用户进行沟通风格类型划分。基于社会资本理论构建用户创意质量的影响因素模型,探究用户的社会资本三个维度(结构型、认知型、关系型)对创意质量的影响,并进一步深入分析用户与不同类型的其他用户(赞美型、建议型、批判型)建立的社会资本联系对创意质量带来的差异性影响。根据乐高社区用户的评论关系建立评论关系网,然后采用多元回归分析进行模型验证。[结果/结论] 用户的结构型社会资本正向影响创意质量,认知型社会资本与创意质量之间呈U型关系。用户的关系型社会资本对于前者起到负向调节作用,对于后者起到正向调节作用。不同类型用户间的认知型社会资本对创意质量体现出异质性影响。

本文引用格式

王天梅 , 徐硕 , 周鑫雪 , 郭林林 . 开放式创新社区用户的社会资本对创意质量的影响研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023 , 67(17) : 88 -101 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2023.17.008

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] The interaction between users in open innovation community is one of the key factors to improve users' idea quality. This paper aims to study the effect of users' social capital on idea quality and distinguish the heterogeneous impact of relationships with different types of users in social capital. [Method/Process] Taking LEGO Ideas Community as the research object, first, unsupervised sentiment analysis method was used to classify users' communication styles according to the language features of user comments. Then, based on social capital theory, a model of influencing factors of users' idea quality was constructed to explore the effect of users' social capital (structural, cognitive, and relational). Further in-depth analysis of the differential impact of social capital connections established by users with different types of other users (praise type, suggestion type, and critique type) on idea quality. A comment net was established according to the comment relationships of LEGO Ideas Community users, and then the model was verified by multiple regression analysis. [Result/Conclusion] Users' structural social capital positively affects idea quality, and there is a U-shaped relationship between cognitive social capital and idea quality. Users' relational social capital has a negative moderating effect on the former and a positive moderating effect on the latter. Cognitive social capital between different types of users has a heterogeneous impact on idea quality.

参考文献

[1] 万文海, 刘龙均. 员工与用户内外协同对平台企业创新绩效的影响:基于价值共创视角[J]. 南开管理评论, 2021, 24(2):72-84. (WAN W H, LIU L J. Impact of internal and external collaboration between employees and users on innovation performance of platform enterprises:based on the perspective of value co-creation[J]. Nankai business review, 2021, 24(2):72-84.)
[2] RANJAN K R, READ S. Value co-creation:concept and measurement[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2016, 44(3):290-315.
[3] SCHRODER A, HOLZLE K. Virtual communities for innovation:influence factors and impact on company innovation[J]. Creativity and innovation management, 2010, 19(3):257-268.
[4] PALMA F C, TRIMI S, HONG S G. Motivation triggers for customer participation in value co-creation[J]. Service business, 2019, 13(3):557-580.
[5] 刘倩, 孙宝文. COI社区在线交互对用户创意质量的影响——专业成功经验的调节效应[J]. 南开管理评论, 2018, 21(2):16-27, 42. (LIU Q, SUN B W. The effect of online interaction on users'idea quality in crowdsourcing-based open innovation (COI) community:the moderating effect of professional success experience[J]. Nankai business review, 2018, 21(2):16-27, 42.)
[6] 王楠, 陈详详, 孙百惠, 等. 谁的创意更具价值——内外部领先用户的对比研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2021, 24(5):51-64, 72. (WANG N, CHEN X X, SUN B H, et al. Whose idea is more valuable?A comparative study based on internal and external lead users[J]. Nankai business review, 2021, 24(5):51-64, 72.)
[7] 董念念, 王雪莉. 有志者, 事竟成:内在动机倾向、创意质量与创意实施[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(6):801-810. (DONG N N, WANG X L. Where there's a will, there's a way:intrinsic motivational orientation, idea quality, and idea implementation[J]. Acta psychologica sinica, 2020, 52(6):801-810.)
[8] 杨光, 汪立. 思维定势如何影响创意质量——基于"众包"平台的实证研究[J]. 管理世界, 2017(12):109-124, 157, 188. (YANG G, WANG L. How does cognitive fixation affect innovation?An empirical examination of image ideation crowdsourcing[J]. Journal of management world, 2017(12):109-124, 157, 188.)
[9] 吉海颖, 戚桂杰, 梁乙凯. 行动比声音更有力量吗?——开放式创新社区用户交互与用户创意更新持续贡献行为研究[J]. 管理评论, 2022, 34(4):80-89. (JI H Y, QI G J, LIANG Y K. Are actions more powerful than words?——User interaction and continuous contribution of user idea updates in open innovation community[J]. Management review, 2022, 34(4):80-89.)
[10] WOOTEN J O, ULRICH K T. Idea generation and the role of feedback:evidence from field experiments with innovation tournaments[J]. Production and operations management, 2017, 26(1):80-99.
[11] CHESBROUGH H. Open innovation:a new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation[M]. Berkeley:Oxford University Press, 2008
[12] WEST J, BOGERS M. Leveraging external sources of innovation:a review of research on open innovation[J]. Journal of product innovation management, 2014, 31(4):814-831.
[13] FüLLER J, MATZLER K, HOPPE M. Brand community members as a source of innovation[J]. Journal of product innovation management, 2008, 25(6):608-619.
[14] VON HIPPEL E. Free innovation by consumers-how producers can benefit:consumers'free innovations represent a potentially valuable resource for industrial innovators[J]. Researchtechnology management, 2017, 60(1):39-42.
[15] BAYUS B L. Crowdsourcing new product ideas over time:an analysis of the dell ideastorm community[J]. Management science, 2013, 59(1):226-244.
[16] KIM Y, SLOTEGRAAF R J. Brand-embedded interaction:a dynamic and personalized interaction for co-creation[J]. Marketing letters, 2015, 27(1):183-193.
[17] ZHU H, KOCK A, WENTKER M, et al. How does online interaction affect idea quality?the effect of feedback in firminternal idea competitions[J]. Journal of product innovation management, 2019, 36(1):24-40.
[18] JENSEN M B, HIENERTH C, LETTL C. Forecasting the commercial attractiveness of user-generated designs using online data:an empirical study within the lego user community[J]. Journal of product innovation management, 2014, 31(S1):75-93.
[19] LEE H, SEO S. What determines an agreeable and adoptable idea?a study of user ideas on mystarbucksidea.Com[C]//46th Hawaii international conference on system sciences. Hawaii:IEEE, 2013:3207-3217.
[20] CHANG H H, CHUANG S-S. Social capital and individual motivations on knowledge sharing:participant involvement as a moderator[J]. Information & management, 2011, 48(1):9-18.
[21] ADLER P S, KWON S-W. Social capital:prospects for a new concept[J]. Academy of management review, 2002, 27(1):17-40.
[22] NAHAPIET J, GHOSHAL S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage[J]. Academy of management review, 1998, 23(2):242-266.
[23] AG A, MS A, MR B. The impact of social capital and social interaction on customers'purchase intention, considering knowledge sharing in social commerce context[J]. Journal of innovation & knowledge, 2020, 5(3):191-199.
[24] 赵大丽, 孙道银, 张铁山. 社会资本对微信朋友圈用户知识共享意愿的影响研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2016, 39(3):102-107. (ZHAO D L, SUN D Y, ZHANG T S. Research on the impact of social capital on users'willingness of knowledge sharing in Wechat moments[J]. Information studies:theory & application, 2016, 39(3):102-107.)
[25] 张璐, 张鹏翼. 线上线下社会资本与社会化问答行为的关系研究——以知乎医学和健康话题为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(17):84-90. (ZHANG L, ZHANG P Y. The relationship between online/offline social capital and user behavior in social Q&A:the case of medical and health topics in Zhihu[J]. Library and information service, 2017, 61(17):84-90.)
[26] ARISTEIDOU M, SCANLON E, SHARPLES M. Profiles of engagement in online communities of citizen science participation[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2017, 74:246-256.
[27] AKAR E, MARDIKYAN S, DALGIC T. User roles in online communities and their moderating effect on online community usage intention:an integrated approach[J]. International journal of human-computer interaction, 2018, 35(6):495-509.
[28] BULGURCU B, VAN OSCH W, KANE G C. The rise of the promoters:user classes and contribution patterns in enterprise social media[J]. Journal of management information systems, 2018, 35(2):610-646.
[29] MARTINEZ-TORRES R, OLMEDILLA M. Identification of innovation solvers in open innovation communities using swarm intelligence[J]. Technological forecasting and social change, 2016, 109:15-24.
[30] LE L T, SHAH C. Retrieving people:identifying potential answerers in community question-answering[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2018, 69(10):1246-1258.
[31] LI Y, MA S, ZHANG Y, et al. An improved mix framework for opinion leader identification in online learning communities[J]. Knowledge-based systems, 2013, 43:43-51.
[32] 韩平, 闫围, 弓雅琼. 企业内上下级沟通与下属上向信任的关系研究[J]. 管理学报, 2012, 9(3):396-400, 407. (HAN P, YAN W, GONG Y Q. The study on the relationship between superiorsubordinate communication and upward trust in corporation[J]. Chinese journal of management, 2012, 9(3):396-400, 407.)
[33] 杜清玲, 刘英. 个体沟通风格研究[J]. 商业研究, 2008(6):79-81. (DU Q L, LIU Y. On individual communication research[J]. Commercial research, 2008(6):79-81.)
[34] KAMINS M L, DWECK C S. Person versus process praise and criticism:implications for contingent self-worth and coping[J]. Developmental psychology, 1999, 35(3):835.
[35] NOELS K A. Learning spanish as a second language:Learners'orientations and perceptions of their teachers'communication style[J]. Language learning, 2001, 51(1):107-144.
[36] HUTTO C J, GILBERT E. Vader:a parsimonious rulebased model for sentiment analysis of social media text[C]. International conference on weblogs and social media. Ann Arbor:AAAI. 2014:216-225.
[37] ALHARBI K M M. Voting and commenting mechanisms in ongoing crowdsourcing platforms:a case study of lego ideas platform[D]. Singapore:Singapore Management University, 2018.
[38] III E, HOUSTON M B, TANG Y E. Establishing a hightechnology knowledge transfer network:the practical and symbolic roles of identification[J]. Industrial marketing management, 2008, 37(6):641-652.
[39] LEFEBVRE V M, SORENSON D, HENCHION M, et al. Social capital and knowledge sharing performance of learning networks[J]. International journal of information management, 2016, 36(4):570-579.
[40] WARREN A M, SULAIMAN A, JAAFAR N I. Understanding civic engagement behaviour on Facebook from a social capital theory perspective[J]. Behaviour & information technology, 2015, 34(2):163-175.
[41] ZHENG H, LI D, WU J, et al. The role of multidimensional social capital in crowdfunding:a comparative study in China and us[J]. Information & management, 2014, 51(4):488-496.
[42] RAVINDRAN K, SUSARLA A, MANI D, et al. Social capital and contract duration in buyer-supplier networks for information technology outsourcing[J]. Information systems research, 2015, 26(2):379-397.
[43] WANG J C, CHIANG M J. Social interaction and continuance intention in online auctions:a social capital perspective[J]. Decision support systems, 2009, 47(4):466-476.
[44] 杨雪. 社会嵌入视角下的顾客价值共创产生内容的影响因素研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2017. (YANG X. Factors influencing consumer-generated content in value co-creation from social embeddedness perspectives[D]. Harbin:Harbin Institute of Technology, 2017.)
[45] WANG E S T, CHEN L S L. Forming relationship commitments to online communities:the role of social motivations[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2012, 28(2):570-575.
[46] 戚桂杰, 李娜, 王凯平, 等. 开放式创新平台用户交互, 信息冗余与知识贡献研究[J]. 现代情报, 2020, 40(12):45-54. (QI G J, LI N, WANG K P, et al. Research on user interaction, information redundancy and knowledge contribution of open innovation platform[J]. Journal of modern information, 2020, 40(12):45-54.)
[47] CHIU C-M, HSU M-H, WANG E T. Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities:an integration of social capital and social cognitive theories[J]. Decision support systems, 2006, 42(3):1872-1888.
[48] LEVINE S S, PRIETULA M J. The hazards of interaction:when isolation benefits performance[C]//Proceedings of the academy of management annual meeting. Boston:Academy of management, 2014:21-29.
[49] LIANG H, FU K W. Network redundancy and information diffusion:the impacts of information redundancy, similarity, and tie strength[J]. Communication research, 2019, 46(2):250-272.
[50] HAKSEUNG, SHIN, RICHARD, et al. Managing customer reviews for value co-creation:an empowerment theory perspective[J]. Journal of travel research, 2019, 59(5):792-810.
[51] BRADLEY G L, SPARKS B A, WEBER K. The stress of anonymous online reviews:a conceptual model and research agenda[J]. International journal of contemporary hospitality management, 2015, 27(5):739-755.
[52] 吴小兰, 章成志. 面向大规模多维社会网络的社区发现研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014, 58(16):122-130. (WU X L, ZHANG C Z. Community detection for large-scale multi-dimensional network[J]. Library and information service, 2014, 58(16):122-130.)
[53] HAANS R F, PIETERS C, HE Z L. Thinking about u:theorizing and testing u-and inverted u-shaped relationships in strategy research[J]. Strategic management journal, 2016, 37(7):1177-1195.
文章导航

/