图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2024 , Vol. 68 >Issue 2: 3 - 14

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2024.02.001

理论研究

科技智库在知识服务过程中的关键需求探析——基于扎根理论的探索性研究

  • 吴雅威 ,
  • 李宇佳 ,
  • 龚蛟腾
展开
  • 1 湘潭大学公共管理学院 湘潭 411105;
    2 河北经贸大学经济管理学院 石家庄 050091
吴雅威，博士，博士后，E-mail：727888263@qq.com；李宇佳，讲师，博士；龚蛟腾，教授，博士。

收稿日期: 2023-05-24

  修回日期: 2023-08-06

  网络出版日期: 2024-02-02

基金资助

本文系湖南省哲学社会科学基金青年项目“面向循证决策的智能情报分析模式构建与实证研究”(项目编号：22YBQ054)研究成果之一。

收起

Analysis of Key Needs in Knowledge Service of Science and Technology Think Tanks: An Exploratory Research Based on Grounded Theory

  • Wu Yawei ,
  • Li Yujia ,
  • Gong Jiaoteng
Expand
  • 1 School of Public Administration, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105;
    2 School of Economics and Management, Hebei University of Economics and Business, Shijiazhuang 050091

Received date: 2023-05-24

  Revised date: 2023-08-06

  Online published: 2024-02-02

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义] 探析科技智库在知识服务过程中的关键需求，可为外部机构优化配置资源，进而更高效、精准地服务科技智库提供参考，也为科技智库知识服务保障体系的建设与完善状态提供科学与客观的测度标尺。[方法/过程] 通过半结构化访谈获取原始资料，运用扎根理论方法探索科技智库需求的内容、类型与特征，最终得到 100 项初始概念、 23 项范畴与 7 项主范畴，逐步提炼出科技智库需求的 MCRT 理论分析模型，同时进一步分析需求的形成与管理机制，各主范畴之间的关联及其如何作用于知识服务过程，并辅以案例进行解析。[结果/结论] 用户需求与自身发展能够触发科技智库需求，并遵循“刺激—产生—评估—匹配”四个阶段的需求管理机制。科技智库需求包括物质资源、智慧协同、用户需求、自身特质四项维度，各个维度之间关联密切且共同作用于知识服务过程，即物质资源的传递共享和有序流通，可激活智慧协同，优化自身特质；智慧协同可对物质资源及其产品进行分析研判，也可介入用户需求产生环节；用户需求可使物质资源建设更具针对性，亦可驱动智库改善自身特质；自身特质可对用户需求进行序化管理，也可探索物质资源的高效集成与应用机制，最终提升成果整体效能。

关键词： 科技智库; 知识服务; 需求分析; 扎根理论

本文引用格式

吴雅威 , 李宇佳 , 龚蛟腾 . 科技智库在知识服务过程中的关键需求探析——基于扎根理论的探索性研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2024 , 68(2) : 3 -14 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2024.02.001

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] Analyzing the key needs in knowledge service of science and technology think tanks is conducive to optimizing the allocation of resources by external institutions, providing more efficient and accurate services, and constructing and improving the knowledge service guarantee system of science and technology think tanks scientifically and objectively.[Method/Process] Through semi-structured interview and grounded theory, the paper explored the content, types and characteristics of the needs of science and technology think tanks, and obtained 100 initial concepts, 23 categories and 7 main categories. Based on it, the paper gradually refined the MCRT theoretical analysis framework for the needs of science and technology think tanks, and further analyzed the formation and management mechanism, the correlation mechanism between each main category and its effect on the service process, with the case explanation.[Result/Conclusion] User needs and self-development can trigger the need of science and technology think tanks according to the four-stage needs management mechanism of “stimulation-generation-evaluation-matching”. The needs includes four dimensions: material resources, intelligent collaboration, user needs and self-characteristics. Each dimension is closely related and work together in the process of knowledge service. The transmission, sharing and orderly circulation of material resources can activate intelligent collaboration and optimize self-characteristics. Intelligent collaboration can analyze and judge material resources and their products, and can also intervene in the production of needs. User needs can make the construction of material resources more targeted, and can also drive think tanks to improve self-characteristics. The self-characteristics can orderly manage user needs, and also explore the efficient integration and application mechanism of material resources, and finally improve the overall efficiency of service products.

Key words： science and technology think tank; knowledge service; need analysis; grounded theory

参考文献

[1] HAIBIN L I, DONGTAO Q I. The new-type think tanks with Chinese characteristics:development and challenges[J]. China:an international journal, 2018, 16(2):3-11.
[2] FISHER G H, WALKER W E, RICH M. RAND corporation[M]. Boston:Springer, 2012.
[3] 习近平.为建设世界科技强国而奋斗[N].新华每日电讯, 2016-06-01(2).(XI J P. Striving for building a world leader in science and technology[N]. Xinhua daily telegraph, 2016-06-01(2).)
[4] 缪其浩,鲍珀.科技智库问答录:访兰德科技政策专家鲍珀博士[J].竞争情报, 2020, 16(1):2-8.(MIAO Q H, POPPER S W. Science and technology think tank Q&A:interview with RAND technology policy expert Dr.Popper[J]. Competitive intelligence, 2020, 16(1):2-8.)
[5] 聂峰英,孙明杰,张海燕,等.国际比较视域下科技智库多主体运营模式研究[J].情报理论与实践, 2020, 43(10):74-80.(NIE F Y, SUN M J, ZHANG H Y, et al. An analysis on the multi-agent operation mode of science and technology think tanks from the perspective of international comparison[J]. Information studies:theory&application, 2020, 43(10):74-80.)
[6] 潘刚,陈秀敏.中国特色新型科技智库建设的思考[J].智库理论与实践, 2021, 6(6):39-45.(PAN G, CHEN X M. Thoughts on the construction of new science and technology think tank with Chinese characteristics[J]. Think tank:theory and practice, 2021, 6(6):39-45.)
[7] 李纯,张冬荣.科技智库数据信息服务模式研究[J].情报理论与实践, 2016, 39(6):32-37.(LI C, ZHANG D R. Research on data and information service model of science and technology think tank[J]. Information studies:theory&application, 2016, 39(6):32-37.)
[8] 商丽媛,谭清美,夏后学.大数据环境下科技智库信息服务模式研究[J].图书馆工作与研究, 2017, 1(7):20-25.(SHANG L Y, TAN Q M, XIA H X. Research on the information service mode of science and technology think tank under big data environment[J]. Library work and study, 2017, 1(7):20-25.)
[9] 孙华伟,王克平,张浩川,等.基于大数据思维的科技智库情报服务机制研究[J].情报理论与实践, 2023, 46(1):45-52, 71.(SUN H W, WANG K P, ZHANG H C. Research on intelligence service mechanism of science and technology think tank based on big data thinking[J]. Information studies:theory&application, 2023, 46(1):45-52, 71.)
[10] 严伟,徐锦英.大数据环境下的科技智库信息服务平台构建研究[J].科技通报, 2018, 34(8):268-271.(YAN W, XU J Y. Research on the construction of information service platform of science and technology think tank under big data environment[J]. Bulletin of science and technology, 2018, 34(8):268-271.)
[11] 于升峰.面向科技智库的知识图谱系统构建[J].智库理论与实践, 2021, 6(1):56-64.(YU S F. Construction of mapping knowledge system for science and technology think tanks[J]. Think tank:theory and practice, 2021, 6(1):56-64.)
[12] 李慧佳,王楠.基于语义关联的智库资源知识组织研究[J].图书与情报, 2020, 40(1):120-126.(LIH J, WANG N. Study on knowledge organization of think tank resources based on semantic link[J]. Library and information, 2020, 40(1):120-126.)
[13] 戎军涛,李华,乔伟荣.数据与智慧双轮驱动下的新型科技智库知识服务机制研究[J].图书馆, 2018, 36(7):24-29.(RONG J T, LI H, QIAO W R.A study on the knowledge service mechanism of new technology think tank based on data and intelligence driven[J]. Library, 2018, 36(7):24-29.)
[14] 于旭,项亚男.科技智库动态知识服务能力体系研究[J].情报科学, 2022, 40(4):64-70, 89.(YU X, XIANG Y N. Dynamic knowledge service capability system of science and technology think tank[J]. Information science, 2022, 40(4):64-70, 89.)
[15] 靖舒婷,于旭,项亚男.数字环境下科技智库知识服务能力提升路径研究[J].情报科学, 2022, 40(12):136-142.(JING S T, YU X, XIANG Y N. The path to enhance the knowledge service capability of science and technology think tank under digital environment[J]. Information science, 2022, 40(12):136-142.)
[16] 吴雅威,龚蛟腾,朱洪涛.面向科技智库决策咨询研究需求的多元化资源融合与服务路径[J].图书情报工作, 2023, 67(5):78-89.(WU Y W, GONG J T, ZHU H T. Diversified resource integration and service path for decision-making consultation research needs of scientific and technological think tanks[J]. Library and information service, 2023, 67(5):78-89.)
[17] 焦健,杜鹏.新型科技智库建设的目标定位与内在需求研究[J].管理观察, 2019, 43(34):16-17.(JIAO J, DU P. Research on the target orientation and inherent needs of the construction of new science and technology think tanks[J]. Management observer, 2019, 43(34):16-17.)
[18] 王超,王光志.适应科技智库创新政策研究需求的政策内容分析框架探究[J].科学与管理, 2019, 39(3):33-41.(WANG C, WANG G Z. Research on the framework of policy content analysis adapting to the demand of scientific and technological think tank[J]. Science and management, 2019, 39(3):33-41.)
[19] 崔小委,李纯.科技智库的社会经济数据需求与实证分析[J].图书馆杂志, 2019, 38(4):82-90.(CUI X W, LI C. Socioeconomic data demand and empirical analysis of scientific and technological think tanks[J]. Library journal, 2019, 38(4):82-90.)
[20] TROMBLAY D E. Intelligence and the intelligentsia:exploitation of US think tanks by foreign powers[J]. International journal of intelligence and counterintelligence, 2018, 31(1):1-18.
[21] 周城雄,刘卓军,洪志生.基于DIIS理论的科技智库人才复合型知识需求分析——以基础研究政策分析为例[J].科技促进发展, 2021, 17(6):1044-1051.(ZHOU C X, LIU Z J, HONG Z S. Analysis of the demand of interdisciplinary knowledge of science and technology think tank talents based on DIIS theory:taking basic research policy analysis as an example[J]. Science&technology for development, 2021, 17(6):1044-1051.)
[22] GLASER B, STRAUSS A. The discovery of grounded theory:strategies for qualitative research[M]. New Brunswick:Aldine Transaction, 1967.
[23] STRAUSS A, CORBIN J. Basics of qualitative research:grounded theory procedures and techniques[M]. Thousand Oaks:Sage, 1990.
[24] CHARMAZ K. Constructing grounded theory[M]. Thousand Oaks:Sage, 2006.
[25] JOHNNY S. The coding manual for qualitative researchers[M]. Thousand Oaks:Sage, 2013.
[26] 列宁.列宁全集[M]. 2版.中共中央编译局,译.北京:人民出版社, 2017:342.(LENIN. The complete works of Vladimir Lenin[M]. 2nd ed. Central Compilation and Translation Bureau, trans. Beijing:People's Publishing House, 2017:342.)
[27] 潘教峰,杨国梁,刘慧晖.智库DIIS理论方法[C]//第十九届中国管理科学学术年会论文集.北京:中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院, 2017:10-23.(PAN J F, YANG G L, LIU H H. A theoretical approach to think tank DIIS[C]//Proceedings of the 19th annual conference on management science in China. Beijing:Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2017:10-23.)
[28] ANTON P S, MCKERNAN M, MUNSON K, et al. Assessing department of defense use of data analytics and enabling data management to improve acquisition outcomes[EB/OL].[2023-12-01]. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR3136.html.
[29] 罗繁明,袁俊,赵恒煜.基于大数据的特色新型智库平台建设研究——以广东智库信息化平台为例[J].情报资料工作, 2020, 41(5):42-48.(LUO F M, YUAN J, ZHAO H Y. Research on the construction of characteristic new think tank platform based on big data:taking Guangdong think tank information platform for example[J]. Information and documentation services, 2020, 41(5):42-48.)
[30] MCCARTY C, KILLWORTH P D, RENNELL J. Impact of methods for reducing respondent burden on personal network structural measures[J]. Social networks, 2007, 29(2):300-315.
[31] 孙涛.美国智库人才队伍建设经验及启示[J].青岛行政学院学报, 2019, 45(3):63-67.(SUN T. U.S think tank talent team building experience and inspiration[J]. Journal of Qingdao Administrative College, 2019, 45(3):63-67.)
[32] 栗琳,孙敏.数据智能技术驱动的情报全流程变革及发展[J].情报理论与实践, 2020, 43(10):7-12.(LI L, SUN M. Intelligence process transformation and development driven by data intelligence technology[J]. Information studies:theory&application, 2020, 43(10):7-12.)
[33] UK Government Chief Scientific Adviser. Distributed ledger technology:beyond block chain[EB/OL].[2023-12-01]. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/492972/gs-16-1-distributed-ledgertechnology.pdf.
[34] WIPO proof-trusted digital evidence[EB/OL].[2023-12-18]. https://www.wipo.int/wipoproof/en/.
[35] 全球化智库[EB/OL].[2023-12-18]. http://www.ccg.org.cn/overview.(Center for China and Globalization[EB/OL].[2023-12-18]. http://www.ccg.org.cn/overview.)
[36] 李雪.变中求新:推动中国智库高质量发展——四川省社会科学院院长向宝云访谈录[J].经济师, 2021, 38(8):6-7.(LI X. Innovation in new evolution:promoting high-quality development of Chinese think tanks:interview with Xiang Baoyun, president of Sichuan Academy of Social Sciences[J]. China economist, 2021, 38(8):6-7.)
[37] Russell sage foundation[EB/OL].[2023-12-18]. https://www.russellsage.org/about.
[38] 易观分析智库[EB/OL].[2023-12-18]. https://www.analysys.cn/.(YI GUAN analytics think tank[EB/OL].[2023-12-18]. https://www.analysys.cn/.)
[39] 中国科学技术协会章程[EB/OL].[2023-12-18]. https://www.cast.org.cn/art/2022/11/2/art_1911_201541.html.(Constitution of the China association for science and technology[EB/OL].[2023-12-18]. https://www.cast.org.cn/art/2022/11/2/art_1911_201541.html.)
[40] 魏丽.政策过程理论框架下国际知名智库参与全球治理的机制研究——以美国布鲁金斯学会为例[J].智库理论与实践, 2022, 7(3):116-124.(WEI L. Research on the mechanism of internationally renowned think tanks'participating in global governance under the framework of policy process theory:taking the Brookings Institution as an example[J]. Think tank:theory and practice, 2022, 7(3):116-124.)
[41] 夏婷.中国科协高端科技创新智库建设成效、问题与建议[J].科技导报, 2021, 39(10):57-64.(XIA T. Achievements, problems and suggestions on the construction of high-end scientific and technological innovation think tank of China Association for Science and Technology[J]. Science technology review, 2021, 39(10):57-64.)
[42] 刘文俭,陈超贤.美国智库建设的经验与启示[J].中共中央党校学报, 2019, 23(3):130-135.(LIU W J, CHEN C X. The experience and enlightenment of American think tanks[J]. Journal of the Party School of the Communist Party of China Party Committee, 2019, 23(3):130-135.)
[43] 拜争刚,黄泳淇,李刚.循证决策理念对我国新型智库建设的借鉴作用[J].智库理论与实践, 2020, 5(2):1-10.(BAI Z G, HUANG Y Q, LI G. The role of evidence-based decision-making in the construction of new think tanks in China[J]. Think tank:theory and practice, 2020, 5(2):1-10.)
[44] 国際日本文化研究センター[EB/OL].[2023-12-31]. https://www.nichibun.ac.jp/en/.(International research center for Japanese studies[EB/OL].[2023-12-31]. https://www.nichibun.ac.jp/en/.)
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉