图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2024 , Vol. 68 >Issue 3: 15 - 26

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2024.03.002

理论研究

在线健康社区用户信息交互的驱动因素研究

  • 翟冉冉 ,
  • 韩正彪
展开
  • 南京农业大学信息管理学院 南京 210095
翟冉冉,博士研究生。

收稿日期: 2023-07-18

  修回日期: 2023-11-01

  网络出版日期: 2024-02-23

基金资助

本文系南京农业大学中央高校基本科研业务费人文社会科学研究基金“在线健康社区用户信息交互机理及效率提升研究”（项目编号：SKYC2023013）研究成果之一。

收起

Research on the Driving Factors of User Information Interaction in Online Health Communities

  • Zhai Ranran ,
  • Han Zhengbiao
Expand
  • College of Information Management, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095

Received date: 2023-07-18

  Revised date: 2023-11-01

  Online published: 2024-02-23

Supported by

This work is supported by the Research Fund for Humanities and Social Sciences of the Central Universities of Nanjing Agricultural University titled "Research on the Mechanism of User Information Interaction and Efficiency Improvement in Online Health Communities" (Grant No. SKYC2023013).

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义] 研究旨在识别在线健康社区用户信息交互的驱动因素，并从整体视角出发构建在线健康社区用户信息交互的驱动因素理论模型。[方法/过程] 采用微刻时序访谈法和中立性提问对招募的21名不同年龄和职业的在线健康社区用户进行半结构化访谈，共获得20.95万字的访谈文本数据，并采用扎根理论方法对访谈数据进行分析。[结果/结论] ①在线健康社区用户信息交互的驱动因素由健康问题、社区特征、限制条件3个外部驱动因素和健康认知需求、健康情感感受、健康信息需求、感知社区质量、搜索引擎和社区使用经验5个内部驱动因素组成。②健康问题会通过激发用户产生健康认知需求和健康情感感受对用户的健康信息需求产生驱动，进而间接驱动在线健康社区用户信息交互的产生。健康信息需求是健康信息交互的直接驱动因素。③社区特征、搜索引擎和社区使用经验会通过影响感知社区质量对在线健康社区用户信息交互起间接驱动作用。感知社区质量、搜索引擎和社区使用经验、限制条件会综合驱动在线健康社区用户信息交互的产生。

关键词： 在线健康社区; 信息交互; 驱动因素; 健康信息需求; 任务

本文引用格式

翟冉冉 , 韩正彪 . 在线健康社区用户信息交互的驱动因素研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2024 , 68(3) : 15 -26 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2024.03.002

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] This study aims to reveal the driving factors of user information interaction in online health communities and construct a theoretical model of that from a holistic perspective. [Method/Process] The study conducted semi-structured interviews with 21 online health community users of different ages and occupations with the micro-moment time-line and neutral questions, and analyzed the obtained 209,500 words of interview data on grounded theory. [Result/Conclusion] ① The driving factors for user information interaction in online health communities are composed of three external factors, that is, health problems, community characteristics, and constraints, as well as five internal factors, that is, health cognitive needs, health affective perception, health information needs, perceived community quality, and experience with search engines and communities. ② The health problems will indirectly drive user information interaction by stimulating users’ health cognitive needs and affective perception while the health information needs are the direct factors. ③ Community characteristics, experience with search engine and community will indirectly drive user information interaction by influencing perceived community quality, while perceived community quality, experience with search engines and communities, and constraints will comprehensively work together.

Key words： online health community; information interaction; driving factors; health information needs; task

参考文献

[1] ZHOU T. Understanding online health community users' information adoption intention:an elaboration likelihood model perspective[J]. Online information review, 2022, 46(1):134-146.
[2] 吴江, 李姗姗. 在线健康社区用户信息服务使用意愿研究[J]. 情报科学, 2017, 35(4):119-125. (WU J, LI S S. The research on users' willingness to use information service in the online health community[J]. Information science, 2017, 35(4):119-125.)
[3] ZHANG C, LIAO W F, MA Y M, et al. Research on older people's health information search behavior based on risk perception in social networks:a case study in China during COVID-19[J]. Frontiers in public health, 2022, 10:946742.
[4] 顾东晓, 索菲亚·莎诺娃, 杨雪洁, 等. 在线健康社区中的信息持续搜索研究[J]. 情报科学, 2020, 38(11):92-97. (GU D X, SHAANOVA S, YANG X J, et al. A study on user's continuous searching of online health community[J]. Information science, 2020, 38(11):92-97.)
[5] ZHANG Y. A qualitative investigation of factors enabling sustained use of online health communities[J]. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2014, 51(1):1-3.
[6] 陈明红, 李思婷, 曾贝欣. 老年人网络健康信息替代搜索行为影响因素及关联路径研究——从被替代搜索者视角[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2022, 12(5):41-52. (CHEN M H, LI S T, ZENG B X. Research on factors and association paths of online health information surrogate search behavior of the elderly:a perspective of surrogated searchers[J]. Journal of information resources management, 2022, 12(5):41-52.)
[7] JÄRVELIN K, SAVOLAINEN R, SORMUNEN E, et al. Taskbased information interaction evaluation:the viewpoint of program theory[J]. ACM transactions on information systems, 2015, 33(1):1-30.
[8] 王文韬, 谢阳群, 刘坤锋. 基于扎根理论的虚拟健康社区用户使用意愿研究[J]. 情报资料工作, 2017, 216(3):75-82. (WANG W T, XIE Y Q, LIU K F. Research on virtual health community users willingness based on grounded theory[J]. Information and documentation services, 2017, 216(3):75-82.)
[9] LITCHMAN M L, ROTHWELL E, EDELMAN L S. The diabetes online community:older adults supporting self-care through peer health[J]. Patient education and counseling, 2018, 101(3):518-523.
[10] 董庆兴, 周欣, 毛凤华, 等. 在线健康社区用户持续使用意愿研究——基于感知价值理论[J]. 现代情报, 2019, 39(3):3-14, 156. (DONG Q X, ZHOU X, MAO F H, et al. An investigation on the users' continuance intention in online health community:based on perceived value theory[J]. Journal of modern information, 2019, 39(3):3-14, 156.)
[11] IMLAWI J, GREGG D. Understanding the satisfaction and continuance intention of knowledge contribution by health professionals in online health communities[J]. Informatics for health and social care, 2020, 45(2):151-167.
[12] 张坤, 陈千, 王文韬. 影响电子健康网站用户使用意愿的感知因素分析[J]. 情报杂志, 2021, 40(7):195-200. (ZHANG K, CHEN Q, WANG W T. Analysis of perceived factors affecting the users' intention to use electronic health websites[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2021, 40(7):195-200.)
[13] 张星, 陈星, 夏火松, 等. 在线健康社区中用户忠诚度的影响因素研究:从信息系统成功与社会支持的角度[J]. 情报科学, 2016, 34(3):133-138, 160. (ZHANG X, CHEN X, XIA H S, et al. A study on factors affecting online health communities members' loyalty from a perspective of is success and social support[J]. Information science, 2016, 34(3):133-138, 160.)
[14] 陈星, 张星, 肖泉. 在线健康社区的用户持续知识分享意愿研究——一个集成社会支持与承诺-信任理论的模型[J]. 现代情报, 2019, 39(11):55-68. (CHEN X, ZHANG X, XIAO Q. Understanding continuous knowledge sharing in the online health communities:an integrated model of social support theory and commitment-trust theory[J]. Journal of modern information, 2019, 39(11):55-68.)
[15] 张帅, 王文韬, 谢阳群. 在线健康社区用户持续参与行为的演化规律及动力机制[J]. 现代情报, 2021, 41(5):59-66. (ZHANG S, WANG W T, XIE Y Q. Evolutionary regularity and dynamic mechanism of online health community users' continuous participation behavior[J]. Journal of modern information, 2021, 41(5):59-66.)
[16] CHEN W, ZHENG Q, LIANG C, et al. Factors influencing college students' mental health promotion:the mediating effect of online mental health information seeking[J/OL]. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020, 17(13):1-17[2023-12-15]. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/13/4783.
[17] 金燕, 韩永丽, 邓胜利. 基于移动终端的大学生健康信息搜寻行为研究[J]. 图书馆理论与实践, 2018(6):72-76. (JIN Y, HAN Y L, DENG S L. Research on mobile-based health information search behavior of university students[J]. Library theory and practice, 2018(6):72-76.)
[18] ASIBEY B O, AGYEMANG S, BOAKYE DANKWAH A. The internet use for health information seeking among Ghanaian university students:a cross-sectional study[J/OL]. International journal of telemedicine and applications, 2017:1-9[2023-12-15]. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijta/2017/1756473/.
[19] PANG H, LIU Y. Untangling the effect of cognitive trust and perceived value on health-related information seeking, sharing and psychological well-being:motivations sought perspective[J]. Telematics and informatics, 2023, 79:101964.
[20] ZHANG X, CHEN B, LI G, et al. Exploring the health information seeking behavior of social media users under the background of COVID-19 pandemic:an empirical study based on social cognitive theory[J]. Frontiers in psychology, 2022, 13:1045914.
[21] 相甍甍, 孙畹婷, 王晰巍, 等. 在线健康社区用户复合信息行为的实证研究——信息共享和信息搜寻同步的视角[J]. 情报科学, 2022, 40(7):111-119, 135. (XIANG M M, SUN W T, WANG X W, et al. An empirical study on users' composite information behavior in online health community:from the perspective of information sharing and information search synchronization[J]. Information science, 2022, 40(7):111-119, 135.)
[22] DERVIN B. An overview of sense-making research:concepts, methods and results to date[EB/OL].[2023-12-06]. https://faculty.washington.edu/wpratt/MEBI598/Methods/An%20Overview%20of%20Sense-Making%20Research%201983a.htm.
[23] DERVIN B, DEWDNEY P. Neutral questioning:a new approach to the reference interview[J]. Research quarterly, 1986, 25(4):506-513.
[24] 周涛, 王盈颖, 邓胜利. 在线健康社区用户知识分享行为研究[J]. 情报科学, 2019, 37(4):72-78. (ZHOU T, WANG Y Y, DENG S L. Research on knowledge sharing behavior of online health community users[J]. Information science, 2019, 37(4):72-78.)
[25] CORBIN J M, STRAUSS A L. 质性研究的基础:形成扎根理论的程序与方法[M]. 朱光明, 译. 重庆:重庆大学出版社, 2015. (CORBIN J M, STRAUSS A L. The basics of qualitative research:procedures and methods for forming grounded theory[M]. ZHU G M, trans. Chongqing:Chongqing University Press, 2015.)
[26] COLE C. A theory of information need for information retrieval that connects information to knowledge[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011, 62(7):1216-1231.
[27] KOESKE G F, KOESKE R D. A preliminary test of a stressstrain-outcome model for reconceptualizing the burnout phenomenon[J]. Journal of social service research, 1993, 17(3/4):107-135.
[28] SAVOLAINEN R. Expectancy-value beliefs and information needs as motivators for task-based information seeking[J]. Journal of documentation, 2012, 68(4):492-511.
[29] WILSON T D. On user studies and information needs[J]. Journal of documentation, 1981, 37(1):3-15.
[30] ZHANG P, SOERGEL D. Towards a comprehensive model of the cognitive process and mechanisms of individual sensemaking[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, 65(9):1733-1756.
[31] FORD N. Introduction to information behaviour[M]. London:Facet Publishing, 2015.
[32] DUHACHEK A. Coping:a multidimensional, hierarchical framework of responses to stressful consumption episodes[J]. Journal of consumer research, 2005, 32(1):41-53.
[33] DERVIN B. From the mind's eye of the user:the sense-making qualitative-quantitative methodology[M]//GLAZIER J D, POWELL R R. Qualitative research in information management. Englewood:Libraries Unlimited, 1992:61-84.
[34] DAVIS F. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology[J]. Mis quarterly, 1989, 13(3):319-340.
[35] DERVIN B. Sense-making theory and practice:an overview of user interests in knowledge seeking and use[J]. Journal of knowledge management, 1998, 2(2):36-46.
[36] VENKATESH V, MORRIS M G, DAVIS G B, et al. User acceptance of information technology:toward a unified view[J]. MIS quarterly, 2003, 27(3):425-478.
[37] 张薇薇, 蒋雪. 在线健康社区用户持续参与动机的演变机理研究[J]. 管理学报, 2020, 17(8):1245-1253. (ZHANG W W, JIANG X. Research on motivational evolution mechanism of users' continuous participation in online health communities[J]. Chinese journal of management, 2020, 17(8):1245-1253.)
[38] UMEFJORD G, PETERSSON G, HAMBERG K. Reasons for consulting a doctor on the Internet:web survey of users of an Ask the Doctor service[J]. Journal of medical Internet research, 2003, 5(4):e899.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉