工作研究

共享图书馆服务平台:国外图书馆联盟重构的实践路径与启示

  • 王怡 ,
  • 邵波
展开
  • 1 南京大学信息管理学院 南京 210046;
    2 南京大学图书馆 南京 210046
王怡,博士研究生。

收稿日期: 2023-06-09

  修回日期: 2023-07-23

  网络出版日期: 2024-02-23

基金资助

本文系国家社会科学基金项目“基于下一代服务平台的图书馆联盟重构研究”(项目编号:23BTO005)研究成果之一。

Shared Library Service Platform: Practical Path and Enlightenment for the Reconstruction of Foreign Library Consortia

  • Wang Yi ,
  • Shao Bo
Expand
  • 1 School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210046;
    2 Nanjing University Libraries, Nanjing 210046

Received date: 2023-06-09

  Revised date: 2023-07-23

  Online published: 2024-02-23

Supported by

This work is supported by the National Social Science Fund of China titled "Reconstruction of Library Consortium Based on Next Generation Library Service Platform" (Grant No. 23BTO005).

摘要

[目的/意义] 梳理国外图书馆联盟共享平台项目的趋势和案例,为国内图书馆联盟提供更清晰的发展思路。[方法/过程] 采集Library Technology Guides数据库中联盟相关数据,分析联盟共享平台的增长趋势、迁移趋势、平台类型等;通过文献调研和网络调研方法,从案例角度总结国外图书馆联盟的实施方案、组织方式、项目成效等内容。[结果/结论] 研究结果表明,国外图书馆联盟已经分3个时期进行了平台迁移,联盟共享平台呈现出集中化、趋同化的情况。根据国外联盟经验,合适的平台产品、严密的项目规划、技术化的联盟结构是联盟重构能够成功的主要因素。

本文引用格式

王怡 , 邵波 . 共享图书馆服务平台:国外图书馆联盟重构的实践路径与启示[J]. 图书情报工作, 2024 , 68(3) : 40 -48 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2024.03.004

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] Reviewing the trends and cases of shared library service platform in foreign library consortia can provide clearer development ideas for domestic library consortia. [Method/Process] By collecting consortium related data from the Library Technology Guides database, the article analyzed the growth trend, migration trend, and platform type of the consortium shared library service platform. Then, through literature and online research, it summarized the implementation plans, organizational methods, and project effectiveness of foreign library consortia from a case perspective. [Results/Conclusions] The results indicate that foreign library consortia have undergone large-scale migration over three periods. It has shown a trend of centralization and assimilation. The experience of foreign consortia indicates that suitable platform products, rigorous project planning, and a technical consortium structure are the main factors for the success of consortium reconstruction.

参考文献

[1] 张慧, 叶鹰. 智能、智识、智见:智慧图书馆之特征解析[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2023, 49(3):67-74. (ZHANG H, YE Y. Intelligence, cognition and insight:characterizing smart library[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2023, 49(3):67-74.)
[2] BREEDING M. 2023 Library systems report[EB/OL].[2023-10-01]. https://americanlibrariesmagazine.org/2023/05/01/2023-library-systems-report/?continueFlag=407d506a7e76ce1b185a9a2faef09e43.
[3] 陈文娟, 叶继元. 危机与变革:美国图书馆联盟的生存与发展之路[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2022, 41(8):37-47. (CHEN W J, YE J Y. Crisis and innovation:the road to survival and development of the American library consortia[J]. Library journal, 2022, 41(8):37-47.)
[4] HIRSHON A. Library strategic alliances and the digital library in the 1990s:the OhioLINK experience[J]. Journal of academic librarianship, 1995, 21(5):383-386.
[5] PAYNE L. The Washington Research Library Consortium:a real organization for a virtual library[J]. Information technology & libraries, 1998, 17(1):13-17.
[6] VAUGHAN J.A library's integrated online library system:assessment and new hardware implementation[J]. Information technology & libraries, 2004, 23(2):50-57.
[7] WEECH T L. Back to the future-when resource sharing seemed to work. the rise and fall of a successful consortial resource sharing network[J]. Interlending & document supply, 2002, 30(2):80-86.
[8] MCGILLIVRAY S, GREENBERG A, FRASER L, et al. Key factors for consortial success:realizing a shared vision for interlibrary loan in a consortium of Canadian libraries[J]. Interlending & document supply, 2009, 37(1):11-19.
[9] PENNELL C, SOMMERVILLE N, RODRIGUEZ D A. Shared resources, shared records:letting go of local metadata hosting within a consortium environment[J]. Library resources & technical services, 2013, 57(4):227-238.
[10] WILEY L, CHRZASTOWSKI T E, BAKER S. A domestic monograph collection assessment in Illinois academic libraries:what are we buying and how is it used?[J]. Interlending & document supply, 2011, 39(4):167-175.
[11] TAOLE N, DICK A L. Implementing a common library system for the Lesotho Library Consortium[J]. Electronic library, 2009, 27(1):5-19.
[12] MAHER S, MAGID A, FRENKEL M. Think global, act global:collection development in STEM across an international academic institution[J]. Collection management, 2019, 44(2/4):154-163.
[13] SHAW J N, SARKAR T D. A cloud-based approach to library management solution for college libraries[J]. Information discovery and delivery, 2020, 49(4):308-318.
[14] BREEDING M. New library collections, new technologies:new workflows[J]. Computers in libraries, 2012, 32(5):23-25.
[15] 钱国富. 新一代图书馆服务平台在学术图书馆联盟的应用研究[J]. 现代情报, 2017, 37(8):80-84. (QIAN G F. Research on application of next-generation library service platform in academic library consortium[J]. Journal of modern information, 2017, 37(8):80-84.)
[16] LIU G, FU P. Shared next generation ILSs and academic library consortia:trends, opportunities and challenges[J]. International journal of librarianship, 2018, 3(2):53-71.
[17] 肖婵. 图书馆联盟开展技术合作的实践研究[J]. 图书馆建设, 2021(2):168-174. (XIAO C. Practice and thinking of technology cooperation in library consortium[J]. Library development, 2021(2):168-174.)
[18] MA L, BUSTOS R, BANDY S, et al. Preserve local and institution-specific data during migration to a network cataloging environment[EB/OL].[2023-10-01]. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/charleston/2016/cddiscol/6/.
[19] STANLEY T, OWEN G. National collaboration:the shared library management system in Wales[C]//ATKINSON J. Collaboration and the academic library. Kidlington:Chandos Publishing, 2018:173-181.
[20] 王文清, 陈凌, 关涛. 融合发展的CALIS新一代图书馆服务平台[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2020(1):2-10. (WANG W Q, CHEN L, GUAN T. Integrated development of CALIS new-generation library service platform[J]. Digital library forum, 2020(1):2-10.)
[21] 蒋继平, 刘涛. 新一代图书馆服务平台比较分析[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2022(4):34-39. (JIANG J P, LIU T.A comparative analysis on the new generation library services platform[J]. Research on library science, 2022, (4):34-39.)
[22] 邵晶, 李佳, 南希. " 大学图书馆发展趋势与服务创新论坛" 综述[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2016, 34(4):13-16. (SHAO J, LI J, NAN X. Review on forum for development, trends, and innovative service of academic libraries[J]. Journal of academic libraries, 2016, 34(4):13-16.)
[23] 邵波, 王怡. 基于下一代图书馆服务平台的高校图书馆区域联盟重构研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(1):68-74. (SHAO B, WANG Y. Research on the reconstruction of regional consortiums of university libraries based on the next generation service platforms[J]. Library and information service, 2022, 66(1):68-74.)
[24] 金佳丽, 薛霏, 黄晨. 学术数字图书馆二十年:从数字化合作到数字知识服务联盟[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2022, 48(2):25-35. (JIN J L, XUE F, HUANG C. Academic digital libraries over 20 years:from digital collaboration to digital knowledge service alliance[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2022, 48(2):25-35.)
[25] BREEDING M. Library perceptions 2023:results of the sixteenth international survey of library automation[EB/OL].[2023-10-12]. https://librarytechnology.org/document/28785/libraryperceptions-2023-results-of-the-sixteenth-international-surveyof-library-automation.
[26] 梁莱歆, 熊艳. 基于研发项目生命周期的成本管理模式研究[J]. 科研管理, 2010, 31(1):170-176. (LIANG L X, XIONG Y. A R&D cost management model based on lifecycle[J]. Science research management, 2010, 31(1):170-176.)
[27] STEWART M, MORRISON C A. Notes on operations breaking ground consortial migration to a next-generation ILS and its impact on acquisitions workflows[J]. Library resources & technical services, 2016, 60(4):259-269.
[28] DIMITRIOS K, GEORGE V, ELENI P, et al. Operational and financial aspects for delivering a consortium shared LMS-the MITOS project[J]. Journal of library administration, 2018, 58(5):482-502.
[29] Cambridge econometrics. Evaluating the benefits of the WHELF consortial approach to a library management system (LMS):report prepared for JISC and WHELF[EB/OL].[2023-10-12]. http://whelf.ac.uk/sharedlms/benefits-report/.
[30] JACOBS W, DEMARS M, KIMMITT J M. A multi-campus usability testing study of the new Primo interface[J]. College & undergraduate libraries, 2019(34):1-16.
[31] BACON D. MOBIUS:a brief history[J]. Journal of library administration, 2022, 62(7):957-962.
[32] BACON D, MACHOVE G. Interconsortial cooperation for resource sharing:MOBIUS and prospector[J]. Journal of library administration, 54(3):251-260.
[33] SHADLE S, DAVIS S. Wrangling cats:a case study of a library consortium migration[J]. The serials librarian, 2016, 70(1/4):116-120.
[34] HENRY R L. Maintaining effective collaboration:supporting a shared library system across 39 academic institutions[C]//DIETIKER K. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM annual conference. New York:Association for Computing Machinery, 2017:45-50.
[35] 王怡, 邵波. 国内高校数字图书馆联盟发展现状:内涵缺失和结构重塑[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2020(4):87-93. (WANG Y, SHAO B. The status quo of the development of digital library federation in domestic universities:insufficient connotation and structural remodeling[J]. Research on library science, 2020(4):87-93.)
[36] KOUIS D, AGIORGITIS G. Library service platforms (LSPs) characteristics classification and importance ranking through Delphi method application[J]. The international information & library review, 2020(4):1-15.
[37] ROMAINE S, WANG J. When ERM met Alma:the intricacies of content management in a shared consortia landscape[J]. Serials review, 2017, 43(1):1-11.
[38] 邝婉玲, 高波. 国外图书馆联盟组织管理模式研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(9):116-126. (KUANG W L, GAO B. Research on the organizational management mode of library consortium abroad[J]. Library and information service, 2019, 63(9):116-126.)
[39] COCHRAN C, WANG Y. Migrating from a standalone Sierra to a shared alma:our journey to a unified system[EB/OL].[2023-10-01]. https://documents.el-una.org/id/eprint/1750/.
[40] ZHU L, SPIDAL D F. Shared integrated library system migration. From a technical services perspective[J]. Technical services quarterly, 2015, 32(3):253-273.
[41] KOUIS D, KYPRIANOS K, EFTHYMIOU F, et al. Migrating to a shared library management system:evaluation from the perspective of librarians and lessons learned[J]. Library management, 2021, 42(6/7):448-458.
[42] GALBREATH B L, JOHNSON C, HVIZDAK E. Primo new user interface:usability testing and local customizations implemented in response[J]. Information technology and libraries, 2018, 37(2):10-35.
文章导航

/