图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2024 , Vol. 68 >Issue 3: 85 - 93

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2024.03.008

情报研究

学科高学术声望论文跨年遴选——月均加权被引指标（wTCm）的研究与应用

  • 王立学 ,
  • 袁军鹏 ,
  • 李斌 ,
  • 铁春雷 ,
  • 郭一涵
展开
  • 1 中国科学院文献情报中心 北京 100190;
    2 中国科学院大学经济与管理学院信息资源管理系 北京 100190;
    3 北京市科学技术协会 北京 100101;
    4 北京科技社团服务中心 北京 100101
王立学,副研究馆员,博士;李斌,科学技术普及部副部长;铁春雷,主任科员,硕士;郭一涵,副主任,硕士。

收稿日期: 2023-08-15

  修回日期: 2023-10-27

  网络出版日期: 2024-02-23

基金资助

本文系国家社会科学基金一般项目“中外同学科期刊跨遴选体系联合排序方法研究”（项目编号：19BTQ190）研究成果之一。

收起

Weighted Times Cited per Month(wTCm): A Paper Ranking Indicator for Prestigious Article Selection in Subject Across Years

  • Wang Lixue ,
  • Yuan Junpeng ,
  • Li Bin ,
  • Tie Chunlei ,
  • Guo Yihan
Expand
  • 1 National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190;
    2 Department of Information Resources Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190;
    3 Beijing Association of Science and Technology, Beijing 100101;
    4 Beijing Service Center for Science and Technology Societies, Beijing 100101

Received date: 2023-08-15

  Revised date: 2023-10-27

  Online published: 2024-02-23

Supported by

This work is supported by the National Social Science Fund of China titled "Research on Joint Ranking Method of Chinese and Foreign Journals in the Same Subject Across the Selection System" (Grant No. 19BTQ190).

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义] 遴选论文是引文分析的一种普遍且广泛的应用。传统被引次数无差别地看待每一次被引，在有效性和区分度等方面受到了先天的限制；而根据某些特征或指标来赋权的加权被引，凭借引入新变量所带来的强化，常常会表现出更好的实用性。[方法/过程] 以论文间的引用关系数据为基础，逐篇将施引文献所在期刊的影响因子转换后用作其施引的基础权重，提出可反映论文学术声望的加权被引算法，再叠加按月计算出版时长以解决出版年份差异、引入被引时长调节因子以解决学科差异，形成最终的月均加权被引指标。[结果/结论] 从试验结果看，新指标计算的学术声望在学科论文遴选上具有良好的区分度和可解释性，按月的时长粒度也比以往按年设阈值的做法更具适用性和一致性。

关键词： 引文分析; 加权被引; 影响因子; 学术声望; 论文遴选; 文献计量

本文引用格式

王立学 , 袁军鹏 , 李斌 , 铁春雷 , 郭一涵 . 学科高学术声望论文跨年遴选——月均加权被引指标（wTCm）的研究与应用[J]. 图书情报工作, 2024 , 68(3) : 85 -93 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2024.03.008

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] Outstanding paper selection in subject is a common application of citation analysis. The traditional approach of treating each citation equally is inherently limited in terms of its effectiveness and discrimination. However, weighted citation indicators often show better practicality due to the reinforcement by the new variable introduced. [Method/Process] This paper proposed a journal impact factor (JIF) based scheme named weighted times cited per month (wTCm) for prestigious paper selection across years. This new indicator employed converted JIF as citation weight, timing published interval monthly with an adjustment factor to eliminate consequences of yearly counting. [Result/Conclusion] Experiments show that, with prestige accumulation, it has better discrimination and interpretability in paper selection, and has more applicable and consistent than the approach of yearly thresholds.

Key words： citation analysis; weighted times cited; impact factor; academic prestige; paper selection; bibliometrics

参考文献

[1] YAN E J, DING Y. Weighted citation:An indicator of an article's prestige[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 61(8):1635-1643.
[2] CAI L W, TIAN J H, LIU J Y, et al. Scholarly impact assessment:a survey of citation weighting solutions[J]. Scientometrics, 2019, 118(2):453-478.
[3] 李超. 引用质量加权影响因子评价学术期刊研究——以CSSCI图书情报学期刊评价为例[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2012, 30(1):29-34. (LI C. Research on journal evaluation using the weighted impact factors considering cited quality:taking CSSCI source journals of LIS as an example[J]. Journal of academic libraries, 2012, 30(1):29-34.)
[4] ERREN T C, GROß J V. Research metrics:what about weighted citations?[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 107(1):315-316.
[5] 臧志栋, 李秀霞, 李兴保. 基于PageRank算法的期刊影响因子修正研究[J]. 图书情报导刊, 2021, 6(9):58-65. (ZANG Z D, LI X X, LI X B. Research on modified impact factor of journal based on PageRank algorithm[J]. Journal of library and information science, 2021, 6(9):58-65.)
[6] PINSKI G, NARIN F. Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications:theory, with application to the literature of physics[J]. Information processing and management, 1976, 12(5):297-312.
[7] BERGSTROM C. Eigenfactor:measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals[J]. College & research libraries news, 2007, 68(5):314-316.
[8] ZITT M, SMALL H. Modifying the journal impact factor by fractional citation weighting:the audience factor[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008, 59(11):1856-1860.
[9] GONZáLEZ-PEREIRA B, GUERRERO-BOTE V P, MOYAANEGóN F. A new approach to the metric of journals' scientific prestige:the SJR indicator[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2010, 4(3):379-391.
[10] PAGE L, BRIN S, MOTWANI R, et al. The PageRank citation ranking:bringing order to the Web[C]//Proceedings of the 7th international world wide Web conference. Brisbane:Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., 1998:161-172.
[11] ZYCZKOWSKI K. Citation graph, weighted impact factors and performance indices[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 85(1):301-315.
[12] 马瑞敏, 张慧, 杨雨华. 加权引用视角下的作者学术影响力评价研究[J]. 情报学报, 2017, 36(8):790-797. (MA R M, ZHANG H, YANG Y H. Evaluation of author academic influence from the perspective of weighted citation[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2017, 36(8):790-797.)
[13] 邓启平, 王小梅. 利用LeaderRank识别有影响力的作者[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2015(9):60-67. (DENG Q P, WANG X M. Identifying influential authors based on LeaderRank[J]. New technology of library and information service, 2015(9):60-67.)
[14] FIALA D. Time-aware PageRank for bibliographic networks[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2012, 6(3):370-388.
[15] 李栎, 陈豪, 姚勤, 等. 基于期刊加权被引次数的期刊评价方法[J]. 中华医学图书情报杂志, 2014, 23(10):70-74. (LI L, CHEN H, YAO Q, et al. Assessment of journals according to their weighted citations[J]. Chinese journal of medical library and information science, 2014, 23(10):70-74.)
[16] PERSSON O. Identifying research themes with weighted direct citation links[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2010, 4(3):415-422.
[17] ZHU X D, TURNEY P, LEMIRE D, et al. Measuring academic influence:not all citations are equal[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015, 66(2):408-427.
[18] ZHAO D Z, CAPPELLO A, JOHNSTON L. Functions of uniand multi-citations:implications for weighted citation analysis[J]. Journal of data and information science, 2017, 2(1):51-69.
[19] 高英莲, 李秀霞, 刘金星. 被引数量、被引质量和被引离散度结合的学术期刊影响力评价研究[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2019, 9(4):19-23. (GAO Y L, LI X X, LIU J X. The analysis of academic journals impact evaluation based on cited quantity, cited quality and cited dispersion[J]. Journal of information resources management, 2019, 9(4):19-23.)
[20] VINKLER P. Evaluation of some methods for the relative assessment of scientific publications[J]. Scientometrics, 1986, 10(2-4):157-177.
[21] LUNDBERG J. Lifting the crown-citation z-score[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2007, 1(2):145-154.
[22] QIU J P, MA R M, CHENG N. New exploratory work of evaluating a researcher's output[J]. Scientometrics, 2008, 77(2):335-344.
[23] LIU Y Y, WU Q, WU S J, et al. Weighted citation based on ranking-related contribution:a new index for evaluating article impact[J]. Scientometrics, 2021, 126(10):8653-8672.
[24] GIUFFRIDA C, ABRAMO G, D'ANGELO C A. Are all citations worth the same? valuing citations by the value of the citing items[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2019, 13(2):500-514.
[25] ZANOTTO E D,CARVALHO V.Article age- and field-normalized tools to evaluate scientific impact and momentum[J]. Scientometrics, 2021, 126(4):2865-2883.
[26] MOED H F, DE BRUIN R E, VAN LEEUWEN T N. New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance:database description, overview of indicators and first applications[J]. Scientometrics, 1995, 33(3):381-422.
[27] MOED H F. Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2010, 4(2):265-277.
[28] LEYDESDORFF L, BORNMANN L. How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor:normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011, 62(2):217-229.
[29] ABRAMO G, CICERO T, D'ANGELO C A. Revisiting the scaling of citations for research assessment[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2012, 6(4):470-479.
[30] GARFIELD E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation[J]. Science, 1972, 178(4060):471.
[31] ELSEVIER. How are CiteScore metrics used in Scopus?[EB/OL]. (2022-10-11)[2023-10-27]. https://service.elsevier.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/14880/supporthub/scopus/.
[32] 谢瑞霞, 李秀霞, 韩霞, 等. 基于加权被引频次与署名顺序的作者影响力评价指标构建[J]. 情报科学, 2018, 36(8):90-94. (XIE R X, LI X X, HAN X. Evaluation index of author influence based on weighted cited frequency and signature order[J]. Information science, 2018, 36(8):90-94.)
[33] 刘昌来, 李燕文, 王国栋, 等. 加权被引频次——科技期刊单篇论文短期的一种评价方法[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2014, 25(7):958-962. (LIU C L, LI Y W, WANG G D, et al. Weighted cited frequency:a way for assessing the articles published in recent years[J]. Chinese journal of scientific and technical periodicals, 2014, 25(7):958-962.)
[34] DAVIS P M. Eigenfactor:does the principle of repeated improvement result in better estimates than raw citation counts?[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008, 59(13):2186-2188.
[35] MADDI A, BESANCENOT D. Should citations be weighted to assess the influence of an academic article?[J]. Economics bulletin, 2019, 39(1):A44.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉