情报研究

社交媒体用户隐私管理策略的选择与影响:一项准实验研究

  • 耿瑞利 ,
  • 王一凡
展开
  • 1 郑州大学信息管理学院 郑州 450001;
    2 郑州市数据科学研究中心 郑州 450001
耿瑞利,副教授,博士,硕士生导师。

收稿日期: 2023-07-17

  修回日期: 2023-08-29

  网络出版日期: 2024-02-23

基金资助

本文系国家社会科学基金一般项目“突发公共事件衍生数据隐私风险的识别与消减机制研究”(项目编号:22BTQ074)和郑州大学人文社会科学优秀青年科研团队资助项目“政府开放数据隐私风险治理效能评估研究”(项目编号:2023-QNTD-07)研究成果之一。

Selection and Influence of Privacy Management Strategies for Social Media Users: A Quasi-experiment Study

  • Geng Ruili ,
  • Wang Yifan
Expand
  • 1 School of Information Management, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001;
    2 Zhengzhou Data Science Research Center, Zhengzhou, 450001

Received date: 2023-07-17

  Revised date: 2023-08-29

  Online published: 2024-02-23

Supported by

This work is supported by the National Social Science Fund of China titled "Research on the Identification and Mitigation Mechanism of Data Privacy Risks Derived from Public Emergencies" (Grant No. 22BTQ074) and the outstanding young scientific research team of humanities and social sciences of Zhengzhou University titled "Research on the Effectiveness Evaluation of Government Open Data Privacy Risk Management" (Grant No. 2023-QNTD-07).

摘要

[目的/意义] 探究社交媒体用户隐私策略的选择与影响,明晰信息披露不同阶段用户隐私管理策略选择的差异,为加强用户个人隐私保护及完善社交媒体平台隐私设置提供参考。[方法/过程] 基于沟通隐私管理理论,将社交媒体平台用户的隐私管理策略划分为披露前的预防策略、披露阶段的审查策略以及披露后的纠正策略,通过准实验方法采集数据,采用2×2析因设计方法分析探究隐私管理策略的选择差异与影响机制,并结合路径分析方法对社交意识、隐私关注、自我披露和隐私管理策略之间的关系进行实证检验。[结果/结论] 实验结果表明,感知隐私风险和感知隐私控制对隐私管理策略的选择存在显著的主效应和交互效应,隐私关注程度高的用户,倾向于披露较少的个人信息,而自我披露经历较丰富的用户,则采取较为宽松的隐私管理策略。研究结果可为社交媒体平台依据用户的心理和认知特征提供灵活丰富的隐私管理策略与加强隐私保护提供理论参考和实践启示。

本文引用格式

耿瑞利 , 王一凡 . 社交媒体用户隐私管理策略的选择与影响:一项准实验研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2024 , 68(3) : 94 -104 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2024.03.009

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] This paper aims to explore the selection and influence of privacy strategies for social media users, and clarify the differences in user privacy management strategy choices at different periods, to provide reference for strengthening user personal privacy protection and improving privacy settings on social media platforms. [Method/Process] Based on the communication privacy management theory (CPM), the paper divided privacy management strategies on social media platform into prevention strategies before disclosure, review strategies during disclosure, and correction strategies after disclosure. Through quasi-experimental method, it explored the influence of different perceived privacy risk levels and perceived privacy control degrees on users’ privacy management policy selection. With path analysis, it empirically tested the relations between social awareness, privacy concerns, self-disclosure, and privacy management strategies. [Result/Conclusion] The results show that perceived privacy risk and perceived privacy control have a significant effect and interaction effect on the selection of privacy management strategies. Users with a high level of privacy concern tend to disclose less personal information, while users with more self-disclosure experience adopt more lenient privacy management strategies. It provides theoretical references and practical implications for how social media platforms can provide flexible and rich privacy management strategies based on users’ psychological and cognitive characteristics, thereby strengthening privacy protection.

参考文献

[1] Hootsuite. The global state of digital 2022[EB/OL].[2023-11-10]. https://www.hootsuite.com/resources/digital-trends-q4-update.
[2] BOYD D, ELLISON N B. Social network sites:definition, history, and scholarship[J]. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 2008, 13(1):210-230.
[3] WISNIEWSKI P J, LIPFORD H R, WILSON D C. Fighting for my space:coping mechanisms for SNS boundary regulation[C]//ACM conference on human factors in computing systems. New York:ACM, 2012:609-618.
[4] SLEEPER M, BALEBAKO R, DAS S, et al. The post that wasn't:exploring self-censorship on Facebook[C]//Conference on computer supported cooperative work. New York:ACM, 2013:793-802.
[5] HOLLENBAUGH E E. Privacy management among social media natives:an exploratory study of Facebook and Snapchat[J]. Social media + society, 2019, 5(3):1-4.
[6] MANSOUR A, FRANCKE H. Collective privacy management practices:a study of privacy strategies and risks in a private Facebook group[J]. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction, 2021, 5(CSCW2):1-27.
[7] MCNEALY J, MULLIS MD. Tea and turbulence:communication privacy management theory and online celebrity gossip forums[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2019, 92(3):110-118.
[8] LIT E. Understanding social network site users' privacy tool use[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2013, 29(4):1649-1656.
[9] WOLF R D, WILLAERT K, PIERSON J. Managing privacy boundaries together:exploring individual and group privacy management strategies in Facebook[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2014, 35(6):444-454.
[10] BRANDTZ P B, LUDERS M, SKJETNE J H. Too many Facebook "friends"? content sharing and sociability versus the need for privacy in social network sites[J]. International journal of human computer interaction, 2010, 26(11/12):1006-1030.
[11] ANDRIYANI E, MANGUN F K, HENDIASTUTJIK H K, et al. Privacy management of Facebook users:a study on adolescents living in West Jakarta slums[J]. Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, 2020, 8(3):198-207.
[12] PAGE X, TANG K, STUTZMAN F, et al. Measuring networked social privacy[C]//Proceedings of the 2013 conference on computer supported cooperative work companion. New York:ACM, 2013:315-320.
[13] YONG J P. Digital literacy and privacy behavior online[J]. Communication research, 2013, 40(2):215-236.
[14] BERNHARD D, LOVEJOY J P, ANN-KATHRIN H, et al. Facebook and online privacy:attitudes, behaviors, and unintended consequences[J]. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 2010, 15(1):83-108.
[15] LI Y, CHO H, ANARAKY R G, et al. Antecedents of collective privacy management in social network sites:a cross-country analysis[J]. CCF transactions on pervasive computing and interaction, 2022, 4(2):106-123.
[16] LANKTON N K, MCKNIGHT D H, TRIPP J F. Facebook privacy management strategies:a cluster analysis of user privacy behaviors[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2017, 76(11):149-163.
[17] YOUNG A L, QUAN-HAASE A. Privacy protection strategies on Facebook:the Internet privacy paradox revisited[J]. Information communication & society, 2013, 16(4):479-500.
[18] CHEN H T. Revisiting the privacy paradox on social media with an extended privacy calculus model:the effect of privacy concerns, privacy self-efficacy, and social capital on privacy management[J]. American behavioral scientist, 2018, 62(10):1392-1412.
[19] RUI C. Living a private life in public social networks:an exploration of member self-disclosure[J]. Decision support systems, 2013, 55(3):661-668.
[20] XU H, DINEV T, SMITH J, et al. Information privacy concerns:linking individual perceptions with institutional privacy assurances[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2011, 12(12):798-824.
[21] PETRONIO S, ALTMAN I. Boundaries of privacy:dialectics of disclosure[M]. Albany:State University of New York Press, 2002.
[22] CAVUSOGLU H, PHAN T Q, CAVUSOGLU H, et al. Assessing the impact of granular privacy controls on content sharing and disclosure on Facebook[J]. Information systems research, 2016, 27(4):848-879.
[23] LOWRY P B, CAO J W, EVERARD A. Privacy concerns versus desire for interpersonal awareness in driving the use of selfdisclosure technologies:the case of instant messaging in two cultures[J]. Journal of management information systems, 2011, 27(4):163-200.
[24] LI P, CHO H, GOH Z H. Unpacking the process of privacy management and self-disclosure from the perspectives of regulatory focus and privacy calculus[J]. Telematics and informatics, 2019, 41:114-125.
[25] SMITH H J, BURKE S J, MILBERG S J. Information privacy:measuring individuals' concerns about organizational practices[J]. MIS quarterly, 1996, 20(2):167-196.
[26] CHUNG K C, CHEN C H, TSAI H H, et al. Social media privacy management strategies:a SEM analysis of user privacy behaviors[J]. Computer communications, 2021, 174(1):122-130.
[27] MIN J, KIM B. How are people enticed to disclose personal information despite privacy concerns in social network sites? the calculus between benefit and cost[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015, 66(4):839-857.
[28] 吴茜, 姚乐野. 互联网用户隐私披露行为影响因素研究[J]. 现代情报, 2022, 42(6):121-131. (WU X, TAO L Y. Study on influence factors of internet users'privacy disclosure behavior[J]. Journal of modern information, 2022, 42(6):121-131.)
[29] CHO H, FILIPPOVA A. Networked privacy management in Facebook:a mixed-methods and multinational study[C]//ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work & social computing. New York:ACM, 2016:502-513.
[30] CHANG Y, WONG S F, LIBAQUE-SAENZ C F, et al. The role of privacy policy on consumers' perceived privacy[J]. Government information quarterly, 2018, 35(3):445-459.
[31] 北青网. 微博发布财报:2022年净收入降两成用户活跃度提升[EB/OL].[2023-11-05]. https://www.sohu.com/a/648426244_255783. (YNET. Weibo released financial report:net income decreased by 20% in 2022, and user activity increased[EB/OL].[2023-11-05]. https://www.sohu.com/a/648426244_255783.)
[32] 钟佩君. 有影无隐? 影音传播隐私管理测量研究:以影音社交网站YouTube为例[D]. 台北:政治大学新闻研究所, 2010. (CHUNG P C. Tug of war, to vlog or not to vlog? an exploratory measure study of communication privacy management theory in video disclosure and privacy:take online social networking site YouTube for instance[D]. Taipei:Chengchi University, 2010.)
[33] CHILD J T, PEARSON J C, PETRONIO S. Blogging, communication, and privacy management:development of the blogging privacy management measure[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2009, 60(10):2079-2094.
[34] 新浪微博数据中心. 2020微博用户发展报告[EB/OL].[2023-11-05]. https://data.weibo.com/report/reportDetail?id=456. (Weibo Data Center. 2020 Weibo user development report[EB/OL].[2023-11-05]. https://data.weibo.com/report/reportDetail?id=456.)
文章导航

/