[Purpose/Significance] Service effectiveness evaluation is a difficult point in the field of public culture. Building a scientific system and exploring corresponding models are the basic paths for it. [Method/Process] First, the paper determined the basic idea on the service effectiveness evaluation of public cultural resource services. Then, it constructed a multi-level composite evaluation theoretical framework from three perspectives: economic perspective, social value perspective, and economic and social symbiosis, and analyzed its core functions in detail. Finally, taking group cultural services as an example, it explored the effectiveness evaluation from comprehensive level, module level, and dimension level. [Result/Conclusion] The multi-level composite effectiveness evaluation has changed the traditional model of single numerical service. On the basis of comprehensive evaluation, it takes module index and dimension index to complete the evaluation in different levels and dimensions so as to make it a complete and multi-level composite evaluation system to achieve its refinement and concretization.
[1] 只莹莹. 新时代公共文化服务共建共享推进策略探析[J]. 图书馆, 2021(2):8-14. (ZHI Y Y. Analysis on advancing strategy of public cultural services co-construction and sharing in the new era[J]. Library, 2021(2):8-14.)
[2] 圣章红. 中国公共文化服务体系的现代性解读与建设路径[J]. 湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2016, 43(4):137-142. (SHENG Z H. Interpretation and construction of the modernity of China's public cultural service system[J]. Journal of Hubei University (philosophy and social sciences), 2016, 43(4):137-142.)
[3] 王雪丽, 王瑞文. 基层公共文化服务效能困境:成因与破局——基于" 三圈理论" 的阐释[J]. 图书馆工作与研究, 2020(2):19-28. (WANG X L, WANG R W. Dilemma of public cultural service efficiency at grass-roots level:causes and solutions-based on the three circles theory[J]. Library work and study, 2020(2):19-28.)
[4] 邱冠华. 公共图书馆提升服务效能的途径[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2015, 41(4):14-24. (QIU G H. Approaches to improve service effectiveness of the public library[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2015, 41(4):14-24.)
[5] 范子艾, 东晓. 地方公共文化服务效能的构成要素与影响机制研究[J]. 领导科学论坛, 2020(15):30-44. (FAN Z A, DONG X. Research on the constituent elements and influence mechanism of local public cultural services efficiency[J]. The forum of leadership science, 2020(15):30-44.)
[6] 刘宇薇, 任慧玲, 付敏君. 大英图书馆经济价值评估理论方法体系解读[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2017, 37(10):131-135. (LIU Y W, REN H L, FU M J. An interpretation of theoretical and methodology system in the economic valuation of the British library[J]. Library tribune, 2017, 37(10):131-135.)
[7] CRONIN B. Taking the measure of service[J]. Aslib proceedings, 1982, 34(6):273-294.
[8] ORR R H. Measuring the goodness of library services:a general framework for considering quantitative measures[J]. Journal of documentation, 1973(3):315-352.
[9] 朱庆芳, 吴寒光. 社会指标体系[M]. 北京:中国社会科学出版社, 2001:57. (ZHU Q F, WU H G. Social indicator system[M]. Beijing:China Social Science Press, 2001:57.)
[10] 蒋建梅. 政府公共文化服务体系绩效评价研究[J]. 上海行政学院学报, 2008(4):60-65. (JIANG J M. A study on the performance evaluation of government common culture service system[J]. Journal of Shanghai Administration Institute, 2008(4):60-65.)
[11] 李少惠, 袁硕. 文旅融合对公共图书馆服务能力的影响:本地效应与空间溢出[J]. 图书馆建设, 2023(2):1-16. (LI S H, YUAN S. The impact of cultural tourism integration on the service capacity of public libraries:local effects and spatial spillovers[J]. Library construction, 2023(2):1-16.)
[12] 孔进. 我国政府公共文化服务提供能力研究[J]. 山东社会科学, 2010(3):122-128. (KONG J. Research on the ability of Chinese government to provide public cultural services[J]. Shandong social sciences, 2010(3):122-128.)
[13] 李少惠, 尹丹. 公共文化建设评估体系的建构及其应用研究[J]. 科学经济社会, 2010, 28(4):73-78. (LI S H, YIN D. Research on evaluation index system of public culture construction and its application[J]. Science economy society, 2010, 28(4):73-78.)
[14] 焦德武. 公共文化服务体系的绩效评价[J]. 安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2011, 20(1):47-52. (JIAO D W. Performance evaluation:the basis of public culture service system[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural University (social sciences edition), 2011, 20(1):47-52.)
[15] 中华人民共和国公共图书馆法[EB/OL].[2023-12-13]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2017-11/05/content_5237326.htm. (Law of the People's Republic of China on Public Libraries[EB/OL].[2023-12-13]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2017-11/05/content_5237326.htm.)
[16] 范并思. 公共图书馆精神的时代辩护[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2004(2):7-13. (FAN B S. A modern defense of the spirit of public libraries[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2004(2):7-13.)
[17] 徐享王. 基于" 效率" 与" 公平" 共生的图书馆服务能力提升战略取向[J]. 图书情报工作, 2010, 54(7):108-110. (XU X W. Based on "efficiency" and "fairness" symbiotic ability to enhance the strategic direction of library services[J]. Library and information service, 2010, 54(7):108-110.)
[18] 张军华. 图书馆绩效管理述略[J]. 中国科技信息, 2007(18):184-185, 187. (ZHANG J H. Review on the library performance management[J]. China science and technology information, 2007(18):184-185, 187.)
[19] 张广钦. 图书馆评估概念与模型、发展史及方法研究述评[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2011, 29(3):5-10. (ZHANG G Q. Review on the concept, model, development history, and methods of library evaluation[J]. Journal of academic libraries, 2011, 29(3):5-10.)
[20] 李建霞. 图书馆绩效评价研究综述[J]. 图书情报知识, 2011(5):42-52. (LI J X. Literature survey of library performance measurement[J]. Document, information & knowledge, 2011(5):42-52.)
[21] 张红霞. 国际图书馆服务质量评价:绩效评估与成效评估两大体系的形成与发展[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2009, 35(1):78-85. (ZHANG H X. Evaluating quality of library services in international library community:formation and development of two systems of performance assessment and outcome[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2009, 35(1):78-85.)
[22] 查启森. 论图馆的本质属性和社会属性——评王嘉陵同志" 对图书馆有阶级性的一点否定意见"[J]. 四川图书馆学报, 1980(3):76-81. (ZHA Q S. On the essential and social attributes of library:a comment on Wang Jialing's "negative opinion on the class nature of library"[J]. Journal of the Library Science Society of Sichuan, 1980(3):76-81.)
[23] 于会萍, 刘丽斌. 从科学的社会属性反思图书馆学方法论体系的构建原则[J]. 图书馆, 2012(6):15-17. (YU H P, LIU L B. Reflections on the construction principle of methodology system inthe library science based on the scientific social attribute[J]. Library, 2012(6):15-17.)
[24] 许军林. 公共图书馆提高社会认同策略研究[J]. 图书馆, 2012(5):46-49. (XU J L. On strategies to improve the social recognition of public library[J]. Library, 2012(5):46-49.)
[25] 文化和旅游部关于群众艺术馆、文化馆管理办法[EB/OL].[2023-12-10]. http://www.gaozhou.gov.cn/mmgzwhgdj/gkmlpt/content/0/740/post_740895.html?jump=false#3204. (Measures for the management of mass art museums and cultural museums by the Ministry of Culture and Tourism[EB/OL].[2023-12-10]. http://www.gaozhou.gov.cn/mmgzwhgdj/gkmlpt/content/0/740/post_740895.html?jump=false#3204.)
[26] 中华人民共和国公共文化服务保障法[N]. 人民日报, 2017-02-03(14). (Law of the People's Republic of China on the protection of public cultural services[N]. People's daily, 2017-02-03(14).)
[27] 蒋永福. 信息能力平等、信息公平与公共图书馆制度[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2006(1):2-6. (JIANG Y F. Equality in information capability, information fairness, and public library system[J]. Researches on library science, 2006(1):2-6.)
[28] 杨永恒, 龚璞, 潘雅婷. 公共文化服务效能评估:理论与方法[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2018:66-67. (YANG Y H, GONG P, PAN Y T. Towards the evaluation of public cultural service efficacy:theory and methods[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2018:66-67.)
[29] 郝国英, 孔造杰. 群体决策环境下的一种供应商选择方法[J]. 统计与决策, 2016(15):49-51. (HAO G Y, KONG Z J. A supplier selection method in group decision-making environment[J]. Statistics & decision, 2016(15):49-51.)
[30] 胡兵. 企业绩效管理中定性指标定量化及应用探索[J]. 上海企业, 2021(2):85-89. (HU B. Exploration of quantification and application of qualitative indicators in enterprise performance management[J]. Shanghai enterprises, 2021(2):85-89.)
[31] 樊治平, 赵萱. 多属性决策中权重确定的主客观赋权法[J]. 决策与决策支持系统, 1997(4):89-93. (FAN Z P, ZHAO X. An objective and subjective synthetic approach to determine weights for multiple attribute decision making[J]. Journal of decision making and decision support systems, 1997(4):89-93.)
[32] 郭显光. 熵值法及其在综合评价中的应用[J]. 财贸研究, 1994(6):56-60. (GUO X G. Entropy method and its application in comprehensive evaluation[J]. Finance and trade research, 1994(6):56-60.)
[33] 陈伟, 夏建华. 综合主、客观权重信息的最优组合赋权方法[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2007(1):17-22. (CHEN W, XIA J H. An optimal weights combination method considering both subjective and objective weight information[J]. Journal of mathematics in practice and theory, 2007(1):17-22.)
[34] 李红, 朱建平. 综合评价方法研究进展评述[J]. 统计与决策, 2012(9):7-11. (LI H, ZHU J P. Review of research progress on comprehensive evaluation methods[J]. Statistics & decision, 2012(9):7-11.)
[35] 张宁. 公共文化资源服务效能评估中指标权重动态调整机制研究与设计[J]. 情报探索, 2023(6):8-14. (ZHANG N. Research and design of dynamic adjustment mechanism of index weight in the evaluation of service effectiveness of public cultural resources[J]. Information research, 2023(6):8-14.)
[36] 徐泽水, 赵华. 犹豫模糊集理论及应用[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2018:27. (XU Z S, ZHAO H. Theory and application of hesitative fuzzy sets[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2018:27.)
[37] 徐翠枚. 基本公共服务均等化水平评价指标体系研究——以海南为例[J]. 调研世界, 2014(3):48-52. (XU C M. Research on the evaluation index system for the equalization of basic public services:taking Hainan as an example[J]. The world of survey and research, 2014(3):48-52.)
[38] 杨青, 胡艳, 兰飞. 技术经济学[M]. 武汉:武汉理工大学出版社, 2016:126. (YANG Q, HU Y, LAN F. Technical economics[M]. Wuhan:Wuhan University of Technology Press, 2016:126.)
