图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2024 , Vol. 68 >Issue 5: 87 - 96

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2024.05.009

情报研究

文献颠覆性创新测度——权重颠覆性指数

  • 杨文霞 ,
  • 孔嘉 ,
  • 闫晓慧 ,
  • 邓三鸿
展开
  • 1 南京大学信息管理学院 南京 210023;
    2 江苏省数据工程和知识服务重点实验室 南京 210023
杨文霞,博士研究生,E-mail:2639393845@qq.com;孔嘉,博士研究生;闫晓慧,博士研究生;邓三鸿,教授,博士,博士生导师。

收稿日期: 2023-07-20

  修回日期: 2023-10-12

  网络出版日期: 2024-03-27

基金资助

本文系国家社会科学基金项目“大数据环境下学术成果真实价值与影响的实时预测及长期评价研究”（项目编号：19BTQ062）和江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划项目“专利‘科学—技术’知识融合模式及其对专利质量的影响研究”（项目编号：KYCX23_0076）研究成果之一。

收起

Measurement of Disruptive Innovation in Academic Papers: Weighted Disruption Index

  • Yang Wenxia ,
  • Kong Jia ,
  • Yan Xiaohui ,
  • Deng Sanhong
Expand
  • 1 School of information management, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023;
    2 Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Data Engineering and Knowledge Service, Nanjing 210023

Received date: 2023-07-20

  Revised date: 2023-10-12

  Online published: 2024-03-27

Supported by

This work is supported by National Social Science Fund of China project titled “Real-time prediction and long-term evaluation of the true value and impact of academic achievements in the big data environment” (Grant No. 19BTQ062) and Jiangsu Provincial Graduate Research and Practice Innovation project titled “Research on the ‘science-technology’ knowledge fusion model of patents and its impact on the quality of patents” (Grant No. KYCX23_0076).

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义]为解决传统颠覆性指数计算过程中不考虑焦点文献的参考文献数量的问题，提出权重颠覆性指数（权重D指数），有助于更加合理有效地评估文献的创新性。[方法/过程]提出一种针对焦点文献的参考文献数量的调整方法——权重颠覆性指数，以1950—2023年获得化学诺奖及其对照组的论文为数据来源，一方面，从合理性与有效性两方面对比颠覆性指数与权重D指数；另一方面，针对一篇焦点文献的参考文献被其引证文献多次引用的情况，具体分析焦点文献的创新性、焦点文献的影响力、焦点文献的参考文献的影响力与焦点文献的参考文献收到引用数量的相关性。[结果/结论]权重D指数具有合理性，且比传统颠覆性指数更能有效识别论文的创新性；当焦点文献的创新程度和影响力越高时，引证文献越倾向于引用其参考文献；当焦点文献的参考文献影响力越高时，引证文献也倾向于引用其参考文献。

关键词： 颠覆性指数; D指数; 权重D指数; 创新性

本文引用格式

杨文霞 , 孔嘉 , 闫晓慧 , 邓三鸿 . 文献颠覆性创新测度——权重颠覆性指数[J]. 图书情报工作, 2024 , 68(5) : 87 -96 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2024.05.009

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] Since the traditional disruption index calculation does not consider the number of references in the focus paper, this study proposes the weighted disruption index (the weighted D index) to evaluate the innovation of the papers more reasonably and effectively. [Method/Process] This study adopted a method for adjusting the number of references in focus papers, the weighted disruption index. It took the papers that won the Nobel Prize in chemistry from 1950 to 2023 and their control groups as data sources. On the one hand, it compared the disruption index and weight D index from the rationality and effectiveness. On the other hand, in view of the fact that the reference of a focus paper was cited several times by its citing papers, it specifically analyzed the innovation and the influence of the focus paper, the correlation between the reference influence and the number of reference citations. [Results/Conclusion] The weighted D index is reasonable and can identify the innovation of a paper more effectively than the traditional disruption index. When the innovation degree and influence of the focus paper are higher, the citing papers are more likely to cite its references. When the reference influence of the focus paper is higher, the citing papers also tend to cite its references.

Key words： disruption index; D index; weight D index; innovation

参考文献

[1] GASTON J C.Originality and competition in science[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1973.
[2] SCHUMPPETER J A.The theory of economic development:an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle[M].Piscataway:Transaction Publishers, 1982.
[3] HENDERSON R M, CLARK K B.Architectural innovation:the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms[J].Administrative science quarterly, 1990, 35(1):9-30.
[4] BOWER J L, CHRISTENSEN C M.Disruptive technologies:catching the wave[J].Harvard business review, 1995, 73(1):75-76.
[5] H U A N G Y H, H S U C N, L E R M A N K.I d e n t i f y i n g transformative scientific research[C]//IEEE.2013 IEEE 13th international conference on data mining.Dallas:IEEE, 2013:291-300.
[6] FUNL R J, OWEN-SMITN J.A dynamic network measure of technological change[J].Management science, 2017, 63(3):791-817.
[7] WU L, WANG D, EVANS J A.Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology[J].Nature, 2019, 566(7744):378-382.
[8] BORNMANN L, TEKLES A.Disruptive papers published in Scientometrics[J].Scientometrics, 2019, 120(1):331-336.
[9] BORNMANN L, DEVARAKONDA S, TEKLES A, et al.Disruptive papers published in Scientometrics:meaningful results by using an improved variant of the disruption index originally proposed by Wu Wang and Evans[J].Scientometrics, 2020, 123(2):1149-1155.
[10] HOREN S R, HANSDORFER M A, KRONSHTAL R, et al.The most disruptive publications in craniofacial surgery (1954-2014)[J].Journal of craniofacial surgery, 2021, 32(7):2426-2430.
[11] SULLIVAN G A, SKERTICH N J, GULACK B C, et al.Shifting paradigms:the top 100 most disruptive papers in core pediatric surgery journals[J].Journal of pediatric surgery, 2021, 56:1263-1274.
[12] MEYER C, NAKAMURA Y, RASOR B J, et al.Analysis of the innovation trend in cell-free synthetic biology[J].Life, 2021, 11(6):551.
[13] JIANG Y, LIU X.A bibliometric analysis and disruptive innovation evaluation for the field of energy security[J].Sustainability, 2023, 15(2):969.
[14] BORNMANN L, DEVARAKONDA S, TEKLES A, et al.Are disruption index indicators convergently valid? the comparison of several indicator variants with assessments by peers[J].Quantitative science studies, 2020, 1(3):1242-1259.
[15] BORNMANN L, TEKLES A.Convergent validity of several indicators measuring disruptiveness with milestone assignments to physics papers by experts[J].Journal of informetrics, 2021, 15(3):101159.
[16] LIANG G, LOU Y, HOU H.Revisiting the disruptive index:evidence from the Nobel prize-winning articles.Scientometrics, 2022, 127, 5721-5730.
[17] BORNMANN L, TEKLES A.Disruption index depends on length of citation window[J].El professional de la información, 2019, 28(2):e280207.
[18] 刘小慧, 沈哲思, 廖宇, 等.颠覆性指数的稳定时间窗研究[J].图书情报工作, 2021, 65(18):49-57.(LIU X H, SHEN Z S, LIAO Y, et al.Research on the stable time window of disruption index[J].Library and information service, 2021, 65(18):49-57.)
[19] 刘小慧, 沈哲思, 廖宇, 等.科研论文颠覆性指数的改进及其影响因素研究[J].图书情报工作, 2020, 64(24):84-91.(LIU X H, SHEN Z S, LIAO Y, et al.The research about the improved disruption index and its influencing factor[J].Library and information service, 2020, 64(24):84-91.)
[20] WU S, WU Q.A confusing definition of disruption[EB/OL].[2023-04-20].https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/d3wpk/.
[21] LEYDESDORFF L, TEKLES A, BORNMANN L.A proposal to revise the disruption index[J].El professional de la información, 2021, 30(1):1-6.
[22] DENG N, ZENG A.Enhancing the robustness of the disruption metric against noise[J].Scientometrics, 2023, 128:2419-2428.
[23] WANG S, MA Y, MAO J, et al.Quantifying scientific breakthroughs by a novel disruption indicator based on knowledge entities[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2023, 74(2):150-167.
[24] WU Q, YAN Z.Solo citations, duet citations, and prelude citations:new measures of the disruption of academic papers[EB/OL].[2023-04-21].https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332977541.
[25] 唐旭丽, 李信.科研团队多样性对学术颠覆性创新的影响研究——以人工智能领域为例[J].情报学报, 2023, 42(1):43-58.(TANG X L, LI X.Effect of the diversity of scientific teams on disruptive innovation in academia:a case study in the field of artificial intelligence[J].Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2023, 42(1):43-58.)
[26] 姜育彦, 刘雪立.科技期刊的创新性评价指标——期刊颠覆性指数(JDI)及其实证研究[J].中国科技期刊研究, 2022, 33(7):965-972.(JIANG Y Y, LIU X L.An innovative evaluation index of scientific journals:journal disruption index (JDI) and its empirical research[J].Chinese journal of scientific and technical periodicals, 2022, 33(7):965-972.)
[27] 姜育彦, 刘雪立.绝对颠覆性指数与同行评议指标及CNCI的关系:基于病毒学论文的研究[J].图书情报工作, 2023, 67(3):96-105.(JIANG Y Y, LIU X L.The relationship between absolute disruption index, peer review index and CNCI:a study based on virology papers[J].Library and information service, 2023, 67(3):96-105.)
[28] 宋培彦, 冯超慧, 龙晨翔, 等.基于颠覆性指数优化的细分领域优秀科技人才发现研究[J].情报杂志, 2022, 41(5):61-65.(SONG P Y, FENG C H, LONG C X, et al.Study on discovery of outstanding scientific and technological talents in specific domains based on optimized disruption index[J].Journal on intelligence, 2022, 41(5):61-65.)
[29] YANG A J, HU H, ZHAO Y, et al.From consolidation to disruption:a novel way to measure the impact of scientists and identify laureates[J].Information processing & management, 2023, 60(5):103420.
[30] YANG A J, DENG S, WANG H, et al.Disruptive coefficient and 2-step disruptive coefficient:novel measures for identifying vital nodes in complex networks[J].Journal of informetrics, 2023, 17(3):101411.
[31] 吕冬晴, 阮选敏, 李江等.跨学科知识融合对D指数的影响[J].情报学报, 2022, 41(3):263-274.(LÜ D Q, RUAN X M, LI J, et al.Research on the relationship between the interdisciplinarity and radicalness of papers from the perspective of knowledge integration[J].Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2022, 41(3):263-274.)
[32] WANG R, ZHOU Y, ZENG A.Evaluating scientists by citation and disruption of their representative works[J].Scientometrics, 2023, 128(3):1689-1710.
[33] WEI C, LI J, SHI D.Quantifying revolutionary discoveries:evidence from Nobel Prize-winning papers[J].Information processing & management, 2023, 60(3):103252.
[34] RUAN X, LYU D, GONG K, CHENG Y, et al.Rethinking the disruption index as a measure of scientific and technological advances[J].Technological forecasting and social change, 2021, 172:121071.
[35] SHEN H W, BARABÁSI A L.Collective credit allocation in science[J].Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 2014, 111(34):12325-12330.
[36] YANG A J, WU L, ZHANG Q, et al.The k-step h-index in citation networks at the paper, author, and institution levels[J].Journal of informetrics, 2023, 17(4):101456.
[37] HUANG S, HUANG Y, BU Y, et al.Fine-grained citation count prediction via a transformer-based model with among-attention mechanism[J].Information processing & management, 2022, 59(2):102799.
[38] WALTMAN L.A review of the literature on citation impact indicators[J].Journal of informetrics, 2016, 10(2):365-391.
[39] CHARLTON B G.Scientometric identification of elite ‘revolutionary science’ research institutions by analysis of trends in Nobel prizes 1947-2006[J].Medical hypotheses, 2007, 68(5):931-934.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉