图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2024 , Vol. 68 >Issue 6: 30 - 47

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2024.06.004

情报研究

合著关系与研究主题双重视角下的师承合作模式研究

  • 魏雅慧 ,
  • 张琳 ,
  • 黄颖
展开
  • 1 武汉大学信息管理学院 武汉 400072;
    2 武汉大学科教管理与评价中心 武汉 400072;
    3 比利时鲁汶大学ECOOM研究中心 鲁汶B3000
魏雅慧，博士研究生；黄颖，副教授，博士，博士生导师。

收稿日期: 2023-08-14

  修回日期: 2023-10-30

  网络出版日期: 2024-03-28

基金资助

本文系国家自然科学基金面上项目“科研人员职业生涯的性别差异和影响机理研究：合作、流动与学术表现”(项目编号：71974150)研究成果之一。

收起

Research on the Mentorship Collaboration Patterns from the Dual Perspectives of Co-authorship Relationships and Research Themes

  • Wei Yahui ,
  • Zhang Lin ,
  • Huang Ying
Expand
  • 1 School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 400072;
    2 Center for Science, Technology & Education Assessment, Wuhan University, Wuhan 400072;
    3 Centre for R&D Monitoring, Catholic University of Leuven, LeuvenB-3000

Received date: 2023-08-14

  Revised date: 2023-10-30

  Online published: 2024-03-28

Supported by

This work is supported by the project of Natural Science Foundation of China titled “Gender Differences and Influence Mechanism in Researchers’ Career Development: Collaboration, Mobility and Academic Performance” (Grant No. 71974150).

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义] 师承关系普遍存在于科研人员之间，研究科研人员的师承合作模式对于深入理解科研人员与其导师之间的科研合作行为特征及规律具有重要意义。[方法/过程] 基于科研人员所发表学术成果的合著关系与研究主题，提出科研人员师承合作模式的概念模型和识别方法，在合著关系视角下，将师承合作模式划分为“引领成长型”“助力发展型”“自由合作型”和“各行其是型”四种；在研究主题视角下，将师承合作模式划分为“传承延续型”“协同发展型”和“自主探索型”三种；并以情报学领域的博士为研究对象，研究了双重视角下的科研人员师承合作模式特征。[结果/结论] 研究发现，在博士的学术生涯中，无论哪种研究视角下的师承合作模式均是不断变化的，且具有多种演变路径与演变模式。此外，导师对博士学术成长中基于研究内容层面的隐性影响时间显著长于基于合著论文层面的显性影响，博士对导师在研究主题层面的传承性更强。研究丰富了科研人员师承合作模式研究的方法体系，对后续相关研究的开展具有重要的参考价值。

关键词： 合著关系; 研究主题; 师承关系; 合作模式

本文引用格式

魏雅慧 , 张琳 , 黄颖 . 合著关系与研究主题双重视角下的师承合作模式研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2024 , 68(6) : 30 -47 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2024.06.004

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] Mentoring relationship generally exists among researchers, analyzing the mentorship collaboration patterns of researcher holds significant importance in gaining a deeper understanding of the characteristics and patterns of research collaboration between researchers and their mentors.[Methods/Process] Based on the co-authorship relationships and research themes of the academic publications, a conceptual model and identification method for mentorship collaboration patterns of researcher were proposed. From the perspective of co-authorship relationships, mentorship collaboration patterns were classified into four types, that is, guiding growth supportive development collaborative freedom and independent paths. When considering research themes, these patterns were categorized into three types, that is, heritage and continuation, collaborative development and independent exploration. Then, this study focused on doctors in the field of information science and investigated the characteristics of the mentorship collaboration patterns among researchers from a dual perspective.[Result/Conclusion] The study reveals that throughout a doctoral candidate’s academic career, mentorship collaboration patterns, regardless of the research perspective considered, undergo continuous changes and exhibit a variety of evolutionary paths and patterns. Furthermore, it finds that mentors’ implicit influence on the doctoral candidates’ academic growth based on the research content aspect significantly outweighs the explicit influence based on co-authorship of articles. On the other hand, doctoral candidates exhibit a stronger inheritance of themes from their mentors in the context of research topics. This study enriches the methodological framework for investigating mentorship collaboration patterns among researchers, providing crucial reference value for future relevant research endeavors.

Key words： co-authorship relationships; research theme; mentoring relationship; collaboration pattern

参考文献

[1] LEE S, BOZEMAN B. The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity[J]. Social studies of science, 2005, 35(5): 673-702.
[2] PAO M L. Global and local collaborators: a study of scientific collaboration[J]. Information processing & management, 1992, 28(1): 99-109.
[3] 孙熊兰, 滕广青, 王思茗, 等. 科研合作状态与学术表现的相关性及影响研究[J]. 情报资料工作, 2019, 40(4): 6-14. (SUN X L, TENG G Q, WANG S M, et al. Scientific research cooperation status and academic performance: correlation and influence[J]. Information and documentation services, 2019, 40(4): 6-14.)
[4] 李文文, 刘丹. 科研合作模式的元综合研究[J]. 江苏科技信息, 2021, 38(17): 76-80. (LI W W, LIU D. Meta-synthesis study on cooperation mode of scientific research[J]. Jiangsu science and technology information, 2021, 38(17): 76-80.)
[5] 岳洪江, 梁立明, 刘思峰, 等. 中国管理科学研究队伍的年龄结构研究[J]. 科研管理, 2011, 32(4): 120-127. (YUE H J, LIANG L M, LIU S F. et al. Age structure of research personnel for Chinese management science[J]. Science research management, 2011, 32(4): 120-127.)
[6] GHIASI G, LARIVIèRE V, SUGIMOTO C R. On the compliance of women engineers with a gendered scientific system[J]. PLoS one, 2015, 10(12): e0145931.
[7] 王新明, 丁敬达. 科研论文的著者合作模式研究综述[J]. 现代情报, 2018, 38(8): 172-177. (WANG X M, DING J D. The review of author's collaboration patterns of scientific papers[J]. Journal of modern information, 2018, 38(8): 172-177.)
[8] SHUKLA R, YADAV S K, VERMA M K. International journal of information dissemination and technology (IJIDT) from 2011–2017: a bibliometric analysis[J]. Gyankosh-the journal of library and information management, 2018, 9(1): 42-57.
[9] 刘蓓, 袁毅. 社会网络分析法在论文合作网中的应用研究[J]. 情报学报, 2008, 27(3): 407-417. (LIU B, YUAN Y. Research on the application of social network analysis method in paper collaboration network[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2008, 27(3): 407-417.)
[10] 中国人民共和国教育部. 教育部国家发展改革委财政部关于深化研究生教育改革的意见[EB/OL].[2023-12-16]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A22/s7065/201304/t20130419_154118.html. (Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. Opinions of the ministry of education, the national development and reform commission and the ministry of finance on deepening the reform of postgraduate education[EB/OL].[2013-12-16]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A22/s7065/201304/t20130419_154118.html.)
[11] LIU J, TANG T, KONG X, et al. Understanding the advisor–advisee relationship via scholarly data analysis[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 116(1): 161-180.
[12] 仇鹏飞, 孙建军, 闵超. 科学研究中的师承关系评述与思考[J]. 图书与情报, 2018(5): 50-55, 118. (QIU P F, SUN J J, MIN C. Review of and thoughts on mentor-ship in scientific research[J]. Library & information, 2018(5): 50-55, 118.)
[13] KRAM K E. Mentoring at work: developmental relationships in organizational life[M]. Lanham: University Press of America, 1988.
[14] AUSTIN A E. Preparing the next generation of faculty: graduate school as socialization to the academic career[J]. The journal of higher education, 2002, 73(1): 94-122.
[15] 梁立明, 刘俊婉. 师生合作发表科技论文署名模式的研究与思考[J]. 自然辩证法通讯, 2003, 25(5): 47-53. (LIANG L M, LIU J W. Pattern of authors' name ordering in S&T papers co-authored by graduate students and their tutors[J]. Journal of dialectics of nature, 2003, 25(5): 47-53.)
[16] GAULE P, PIACENTINI M. An advisor like me? advisor gender and post-graduate careers in science[J]. Research policy, 2018, 47(4): 805-813.
[17] KRAM K E. Phases of the mentor relationship[J]. Academy of management journal, 1983, 26(4): 608-625.
[18] RHEINECK J E, ROLAND C B. The developmental mentoring relationship between academic women[J]. Adultspan journal, 2008, 7(2): 80-93.
[19] 黄明福, 陈佳丽. 从日本诺奖的师承关系看研究生教育的师生关系[J]. 教师教育论坛, 2019, 32(11): 69-73. (HUANG M F, CHEN J L. Comparison and reference: an analysis of the relationship between supervisors and graduate students in the “blowout in Nobel Prize” phenomenon in Japan[J]. Teacher education forum, 2019, 32(11): 69-73.)
[20] 牟冬梅, 琚沅红, 郑晓月, 等. 基于学科内容的科研人员隐性合作关系研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2017, 40(7): 17-22. (MOU D M, QU Y H. ZHENG X Y, et al. Research on tacit cooperation relationship of researchers based ondiscipline content[J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2017, 40(7): 17-22.)
[21] LIU X, BOLLEN J, NELSON M L, et al. Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community[J]. Information processing & management, 2005, 41(6): 1462-1480.
[22] MILOJEVIĆ S, RADICCHI F, WALSH J P. Changing demographics of scientific careers: the rise of the temporary workforce[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2018, 115(50): 12616-12623.
[23] RAHMAN M T, REGENSTEIN J M, ABU KASSIM N L, et al. Contribution based author categorization to calculate author performance index[J]. Accountability in research, 2021, 28(8): 492-516.
[24] HU X, ROUSSEAU R, CHEN J. In those fields where multiple authorship is the rule, the h-index should be supplemented by role-based h-indices[J]. Journal of information science, 2010, 36(1): 73-85.
[25] COLE J R, COLE S. Social stratification in science[J]. American journal of physics, 1974, 42(10): 923-924.
[26] LINDSEY D. Production and citation measures in the sociology of science: the problem of multiple authorship[J]. Social studies of science, 1980, 10(2): 145-162.
[27] PRICE D D S. Multiple authorship[J]. Science, 1981, 212(4498): 986-986.
[28] TSCHARNTKE T, HOCHBERG M E, RAND T A, et al. Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications[J]. Plos biology, 2007, 5(1): e18.
[29] 陈立雪, 滕广青, 吕晶, 等. 科研人员职业高峰前后的研究主题转换特征识别[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(16): 81-89. (CHEN L X, TENG G Q, LV J, et al. Identification of characteristics of topic change before and after career peak of scientists[J]. Library and information service, 2021, 65(16): 81-89.)
[30] ROGERS A, KOVALEVA O, RUMSHISKY A. A primer in BERTology: what we know about how BERT works[J]. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2021(8): 842-866.
[31] GROOTENDORST M. BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedure[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2203.05794.
[32] 张清慧, 陈谊, 武彩霞. 基于词表示模型的领域文献数据可视分析方法[J]. 图学学报, 2022, 43(4): 685-694. (ZHANG Q H, CHEN Y, WU C X. A visual analysis approach for domain literature data based on word representation model[J]. Journal of graphics, 2022, 43(4): 685-694.)
[33] 张敏, 沈嘉裕. 突发公共卫生事件中政务短视频主题与用户行为的关联演化研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2023, 42(3): 685-694. (ZHANG M, SHEN J Y. Research on the evolution of the association between governmental short video themes and user behavior in public health emergency[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2023, 42(3): 685-694.)
[34] 陈翔, 黄璐, 倪兴兴, 等. 基于动态语义网络分析的主题演化路径识别研究[J]. 情报学报, 2021, 40(5): 500-512. (CHEN X, HUANG L, NI X X, et al. Identifying topic evolutionary pathways through dynamic semantic network analytics[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2021, 40(5): 500-512.)
[35] YAN X-S. Information science: its past, present and future[J]. Information, 2011, 2(3): 510-527.
[36] 徐晴. 图书情报学跨学科知识转移研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉大学, 2016. (XU Q. Study on interdisciplinary knowledge transfer in library and information science[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University, 2016.)
[37] 苏新宁. 大数据时代情报学学科崛起之思考[J]. 情报学报, 2018, 37(5): 451-459. (SU X N. The rise of intelligence studies in the age of big data[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2018, 37(5): 451-459.)
[38] 黄维, 张连, 杨文婷. 教育学博士学位获得者中师承效应的量化研究——基于历届高校科学研究优秀成果奖(人文社会科学)教育学获奖者的同期群分析[J]. 中国高教研究, 2015(12): 67-72. (HUANG W, ZHANG L, YANG W T. Quantitative research on the effects of accomplished teachers on doctor's degree gainers in pedagogy-: based on the cohort analysis of social science excellence achievement prize winners in college[J]. China higher education research, 2015(12): 67-72.)
[39] 刘晓婷, 黄颖, 李瑞婻, 等. 内聚—耦合视角下科研团队合作模式识别与对比研究[J]. 情报科学, 2022, 40(12): 170-180. (LIU X T, HUANG Y, LI R N, et al. The collaboration pattern and comparative analysis of research teams from the perspective of cohesion and coupling[J]. Information science, 2022, 40(12): 170-180.)
[40] 潘山. 中国博士学位授予制度的历史考察[D]. 昆明: 云南大学, 2013. (PAN S. A historical examination of China's doctoral degree conferment system[D]. Kunming: Yunnan University, 2013.)
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉