[Purpose/Significance] A scientific research project is usually carried out by the cooperation with several institutes. So it is urgent to construct a multi-dimensional contribution index of institute cooperation.[Method/Process] From the perspective of academic contribution, this study took academic papers as research cells for universities or institutes evaluation. After considering multi-dimensions such as productivity, influence, and intelligence, it constructed an integration contribution index model based on multiple evaluation elements. Taking 583 academic papers from the "human phenome project" in web of science core collection as a sample dataset, it made a quantitative study on the academic contribution of institutes.[Result/Conclusion] It draws the following conclusions. When the activeness of the evaluated institute (total number of publications) is significance enough, a single indicator can stably display its contribution. A multidimensional evaluation system can comprehensively and objectively display the contribution difference in each institute in different dimensions. The assessment in the intelligence level helps to identify some 'false contributions' with the confirmation of the first institute. As a composite evaluation indicator, compared with other scientometrics indicators, the integrated contribution index can not only stably reveal institutes with absolute advantage in contribution, but also screen out the seriously underestimated ones, and accurately identify some exaggerated ones. It provides some new ideas for multidimensional and objective evaluation of the actual contribution by academic institutes.
[1] 苏芳荔.科研合作对期刊论文被引频次的影响[J].图书情报工作, 2011, 55(10):144-148.(SU F L. Influence of scientific cooperation on the citation counts of journal articles[J]. Library and information service, 2011, 55(10):144-148.)
[2] 唐琳.基于ESI和Incites的北京大学学科竞争力分析[J].中国高校科技, 2020(8):26-29.(TANG L. Analysis of subject competitiveness of Peking University based on ESI and Incites[J]. China university science & technology, 2020(8):26-29.)
[3] 刘兵红.基于ESI数据的数学学科竞争力对比分析研究——以入选ESI前1%的5所高校为例[J].现代情报, 2020, 40(2):141-152.(LIU H B. Comparative analysis research on mathematical subject competitiveness based on ESI data[J]. Journal of modern information, 2020, 40(2):141-152.)
[4] 王璐,马峥.学术实体合作关系测度模型研究[J].情报科学, 2019, 37(2):14-18.(WANG L, MA Z. Research on the evaluation of cooperation for academic entities[J]. Information science, 2019, 37(2):14-18.)
[5] BEAVER D D, ROSEN R. Studies in scientific collaboration[J]. Scientometrics, 1978(1):65-84.
[6] BALES M E, DINE D C, MERRILL J A, et al. Associating coauthorship patterns with publications in high-impact journals[J]. Journal of biomedical informatics, 2014, 52:311-318.
[7] BISCARO C, GIUPPONI C. Co-authorship and bibliographic coupling network effects on citations[J]. Plos one, 2014, 9(6):e99502.
[8] HURTADO-MARÍN V A, AGUDELO-GIRALDO J D, ROBLEDO S, et al. Analysis of dynamic networks based on the Ising model for the case of study of co-authorship of scientific articles[J]. Scientific reports, 2021, 11(1):5721.
[9] CUGMAS M, FERLIGOJ A, KRONEGGER L. The stability of co-authorship structures[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 106(1):163-186.
[10] SUBRAMANYAM K. Bibliometric studies of research collaboration:a review[J]. Journal of information science, 1983, 6(1):33-38.
[11] AJIFERUKE I, BURELL Q, TAGUE J. Collaborative coefficient:a single measure of the degree of collaboration in research[J]. Scientometrics, 1988, 14(5/6):421-433.
[12] LU H, FENG Y. A measure of authors'centrality in coauthorship networks based on the distribution of collaborative relationships[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 81(2):499-511.
[13] 王立娜,陈云伟,徐婧,等.多因素协同视角下的科研合作能力测度指数构建及应用研究[J].情报探索, 2017(7):1-7.(WANG L N, CHEN Y W, XU J, et al. Study on construction and application of measurement index of research collaboration capability in the perspective of multiple factors compounded collaboration[J]. Information research, 2017(7):1-7.)
[14] 孙竹梅,汪志兵,韩文民,等.考虑合作对象差异的科研产出多元聚合测度指标构建研究[J].现代情报, 2021, 41(11):130-139, 177.(SUN Z M, WANG Z B, HAN W M, et al. Research on the construction of multi-aggregate scientific research output measurement indicators considering the difference of collaborators[J]. Journal of modern information, 2021, 41(11):130-139, 177.)
[15] 但琼洁.不同计数方法在国际合作论文中分析机构贡献度的应用[J].情报工程, 2021, 7(3):32-40.(DAN Q J. The application of different counting methods in analyzing institution's publishing of international collaboration[J]. Technology intelligence engineering, 2021, 7(3):32-40.)
[16] 王申罡,秦顺,郭鑫,等.国际图书情报学期刊发文的学术实体贡献测度研究[J].图书馆论坛, 2022, 42(6):64-76.(WANG S G, QIN S, GUO X, et al. Measuring contributions of academic entities to five top-tier library and information science (LIS) journals[J]. Library tribune, 2022, 42(6):64-76.)
[17] 何开煦,潘云涛,赵筱媛.国际大科学工程中的国家贡献评价体系构建与实证[J].中国科技论坛. 2018(6):14-24.(HE K X, PAN Y T, ZHAO X Y. Construction and demonstration of national contribution evaluation system of international big science projects[J]. Forum on science and technology in China. 2018(6):14-24.)
[18] 郝治翰,陈阳,王蒲生.科研合作网络中心性与学术影响力——以Science (2000-2018)为样本[J].图书馆论坛, 2020, 40(4):79-88.(HAO Z H, CHEN Y, WANG P S. The relationship between scientific collaboration network centrality and research impact:using the journal Science (2000-2018) as an example[J]. Library tribune, 2020, 40(4):79-88.)
[19] 贺德方.中国高影响力论文产出状况的国际比较研究[J].中国软科学, 2011(9):94-99.(HE D F. International comparative study on output conditions of China's high-impact papers[J]. China soft science, 2011(9):94-99.)
[20] 徐晨.多场景下单个科研成果合著贡献度研究[J].图书情报工作, 2015(59):93-99.(XU C. Research on authorship contribution for the singular scientific research achievement in multiple scenarios[J]. Library and information service, 2015(59):93-99.)
[21] XU J, DING Y, SONG M, et al. Author credit-assignment schemas:a comparison and analysis[J]. Journal of the association for information science and technology, 2016, 67(8):1973-1989.
[22] ALLEN L, SCOTT J, BRAND A, et al. Publishing:Credit where credit is due[J]. Nature, 2014, 508(7496):312-313.
[23] RAHMAN M T, REGENSTEIN J M, KASSIM N L A, et al. The need to quantify authors'relative intellectual contributions in a multi-author paper[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2017, 11(1):275-281.
[24] 丁敬达,王新明.基于作者贡献声明的合著者贡献率测度方法[J].图书情报工作, 2019(63):95-102.(DING J D, WANG X M. The measurement method of coauthor contribution rate based on the author's contribution statement[J]. Library and information service, 2019(63):95-102.)
[25] 吴希.三种权重赋权法的比较分析[J].中国集体经济,2016(34):73-74.(WU X. Comparative analysis of three weighting methods[J]. China collective economy, 2016(34):73-74.)
[26] 林聚任.社会网络分析:理论、方法与应用[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社, 2009.(LIN J R. Social network analysis:theory, methods, and applications[M]. Beijing:Beijing Normal University Press, 2009.)
[27] 刘承良,桂钦昌,段德忠,等.全球科研论文合作网络的结构异质性及其邻近性机理[J].地理学报, 2017, 72(4):737-752.(LIU C L, GUI Q C. DUAN D Z, et al. Structural heterogeneity and proximity mechanism of global scientific collaboration network based on co-authored papers[J]. Acta geographica sinica, 2017, 72(4):737-752.)
[28] 刘军.整体网分析:UCINET软件实用指南[M].上海:格致出版社, 2019.(LIU J. Lectures on whole network approach:a practice guide to UCINET[M]. Shanghai:Truth & Wisdom Press, 2019.)
