图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2024 , Vol. 68 >Issue 9: 89 - 97

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2024.09.009

情报研究

基于学科势能的跨学科知识来源识别——以图书情报学为例

  • 徐卫杰 ,
  • 李长玲 ,
  • 王浩 ,
  • 荣国阳 ,
  • 范晴晴 ,
  • 高峰
展开
  • 1 山东理工大学信息管理学院 淄博 255049;
    2 武汉大学信息管理学院 武汉 430072;
    3 南京农业大学信息管理学院 南京 210095;
    4 山东理工大学淄博发展研究院 淄博 255049
徐卫杰,硕士研究生;王浩,硕士研究生;荣国阳,博士研究生;范晴晴,博士研究生;高峰,教授,博士,硕士生导师。

收稿日期: 2023-08-24

  修回日期: 2023-12-21

  网络出版日期: 2024-05-16

基金资助

本文系国家社会科学基金项目“跨学科知识流动中学科势能动能对学科发展的影响研究”(项目编号:23BTQ053)研究成果之一。

收起

Identification of Interdisciplinary Knowledge Sources Based on Disciplinary Potential Energy: Taking Library and Information Science as an Example

  • Xu Weijie ,
  • Li Changling ,
  • Wang Hao ,
  • Rong Guoyang ,
  • Fan Qingqing ,
  • Gao Feng
Expand
  • 1 School of Information Management, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255049;
    2 School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072;
    3 College of Information Management, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095;
    4 Zibo Development Research Institute, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255049

Received date: 2023-08-24

  Revised date: 2023-12-21

  Online published: 2024-05-16

Supported by

This work is supported by the National Social Science Fund of China project titled“Research on the Influence of Discipline Potential Energy and Kinetic Energy on Discipline Development in Interdisciplinary Knowledge Flow”(Grant No.23BTQ053).

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义] 在我国加快构建中国特色哲学社会科学学科体系、学术体系、话语体系的背景下,探究目标学科主要的知识来源学科,对促进其与其他学科交叉融合,加速其知识理论体系完善具有重要意义。[方法/过程] 跨学科引文网络中的知识流动类似于理想流体的流动——由势能高处向低处流动,促进低势能学科的势能增加。引用物理学中的重力势能定理,从引用质量指数和学科地位高度指数两方面构建学科势能模型。以图书情报学为例,计算2012-2016年和2017-2021年两个时间段图书情报学引用跨学科文献所拥有的学科势能及势能差。根据学科势能和势能差的大小,识别图书情报学主要知识来源学科,并探讨知识输入程度的变化趋势。[结果/结论] 实证研究发现:管理科学与工程、计算机科学与技术一直是图书情报学主要的知识来源学科;新闻传播学、教育学、应用与理论经济学对图书情报学的知识输入呈增长趋势;自然科学各学科对图书情报学的知识输入相对较少。

关键词： 学科势能; 跨学科知识流动; 知识来源; 图书情报学

本文引用格式

徐卫杰 , 李长玲 , 王浩 , 荣国阳 , 范晴晴 , 高峰 . 基于学科势能的跨学科知识来源识别——以图书情报学为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2024 , 68(9) : 89 -97 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2024.09.009

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] In the development of the discipline system, academic system, and discourse system of philosophy and social sciences with Chinese characteristics, it is of great significance to explore the main knowledge source of the target discipline to promote the cross-fertilization of that with other disciplines and to accelerate its improvement of the knowledge and theory system.[Method/Process] The flow of knowledge in interdisciplinary citation networks is analogous to the flow of an ideal liquid, that is, the potential energy flows from high to low, which can promote an increase of the potential energy in low-potential disciplines. This study invoked the gravitational potential energy theorem in physics to construct the disciplinary potential energy model from two aspects, citation quality index and disciplinary status height index. Taking library and information science as an example, this study calculated the disciplinary potential energy and the potential energy difference after citing interdisciplinary literature in the two periods of 2012-2016 and 2017-2021. Based on the magnitude of disciplinary potential energy and potential energy difference, this study identified the main knowledge source of library and information science and explored the trends in the extent of their knowledge output in it.[Result/Conclusion] The empirical study finds that the disciplines in management science and engineering, and the computer science and technology have been the main knowledge source for library and information science. There is a growing trend in the knowledge input of the disciplines, such as journalism and communication, education, applied and theoretical economics. The disciplines in the natural sciences have relatively little knowledge contribution to library and information science.

Key words： disciplinary potential energy; interdisciplinary knowledge flow; knowledge source; library and information science

参考文献

[1] 2021年度中国图情档学界十大学术热点[J].情报资料工作, 2022, 43(1):5-12.(Top 10 academic hotspots of library, information and archives science academic circles in 2021[J]. Information and documentation services, 2022, 43(1):5-12.)
[2] 马费成,张帅.我国图书情报领域新兴交叉学科发展探析[J].中国图书馆学报, 2023, 49(2):4-14.(MA F C, ZHANG S. The development of emerging interdisciplines in library and information science in China[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2023, 49(2):4-14.)
[3] 马费成,李志元.新文科背景下我国图书情报学科的发展前景[J].中国图书馆学报, 2020, 46(6):4-15.(MA F C, LI Z Y. Future prospect of library and information science in China in the context of new liberal arts[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2020, 46(6):4-15.)
[4] AMJAD T, ALI A. Uncovering diffusion trends in computer science and physics publications[J]. Library hi tech, 2019, 37(4):794-810.
[5] 彭泽,叶光辉,毕崇武,等.引文内容视角下的引文网络知识流动路径分析[J].情报理论与实践, 2020, 43(12):19-25.(PENG Z, YE G H, BI C W, et al. Analysis of citation network's knowledge flow path from the perspective of citation content[J]. Information studies:theory&application, 2020, 43(12):19-25.)
[6] 毕崇武,贠婕,周静虹,等.引文内容视角下的引文网络知识流动网络分析[J].情报科学, 2022, 40(1):79-87.(BI C W, YUN J, ZHOU J H, et al. The effect of knowledge flow in citation network from the perspective of citation content[J]. Information science, 2022, 40(1):79-87.)
[7] YUE Z, XU H, YUAN G, et al. Modeling knowledge diffusion in the disciplinary citation network based on differential dynamics[J]. Scientometrics, 2022, 127(12):7593-7613.
[8] 张家榕,张慧,叶鹰. CSCD体现的我国理工农医跨学科知识流动探析[J].图书与情报, 2020(3):49-54.(ZHANG J R, ZHANG H, YE Y. Exploring the interdisciplinary knowledge flows of sciences and technologies via CSCD[J]. Library&Information, 2020(3):49-54.)
[9] 范晴晴,李长玲,荣国阳,等.跨学科输入知识对学科发展的影响力分析——以图书情报学科为例[J].情报科学, 2023, 41(2):79-85.(FAN Q Q, LI C L, RONG G Y, et al. Analysis on the influence of interdisciplinary input knowledge on discipline development:take LIS as an example[J]. Information science, 2023, 41(2):79-85.)
[10] 王旻霞,赵丙军.中国图书情报学跨学科知识交流特征研究——基于CCD数据库的分析[J].情报理论与实践, 2015, 38(5):94-99.(WANG M X, ZHAO B J. Research on the interdisciplinary knowledge exchange characteristics of library and information science in China[J]. Information studies:theory&application, 2015, 38(5):94-99.)
[11] 赵俊玲,刘尧.基于定量分析的我国图书情报学学科辐射力研究[J].情报理论与实践, 2014, 37(10):40-44.(ZHAO J L, LIU Y. Research on discipline radiation power of library and information science in China based on quantitative analysis[J]. Information studies:theory&application, 2014, 37(10):40-44.)
[12] 申力旭,魏绪秋,李长玲,等.引用动能视角下跨学科知识来源识别——以图书情报学为例[J].情报理论与实践, 2023, 46(3):30-35.(SHEN L X, WEI X Q, LI C L, et al. Identification of interdisciplinary sources of knowledge from the perspective of citation kinetic energy:take LIS as an example[J]. Information studies:theory&application, 2023, 46(3):30-35.)
[13] CHEN C, LI Q, CHIU K, et al. The impact of Chinese library and information science on outside disciplines:a citation analysis[J]. Journal of librarianship and information science, 2020, 52(2):493-508.
[14] 刘丽帆,张恒,章成志.基于学术文献引文内容的跨学科知识流动研究[J].情报理论与实践, 2022, 45(6):24-31.(LIU L F, ZHANG H, ZHANG C Z. Interdisciplinary knowledge flows based on citation contents of academic papers[J]. Information studies:theory&application, 2022, 45(6):24-31.)
[15] 徐迎迎.基于引文分析的图书情报学学科交叉研究[D].蚌埠:安徽财经大学, 2015.(XU Y Y. LIS citation analysis based on cross-disciplinary research[D]. Bengbu:Anhui University of Finance and Economics, 2015.)
[16] 冯志刚,李长玲,刘小慧,等.基于引用与被引用文献信息的图书情报学跨学科性分析[J].情报科学, 2018, 36(3):105-111.(FENG Z G, LI C L, LIU X H, et al. Interdisciplinary analysis of library and information science based on citing and cited reference information[J]. Information science, 2018, 36(3):105-111.)
[17] 黄颖,虞逸飞,陈婧涵,等.跨学科视角下图情档的外部学科融合与内部知识流动[J].图书情报工作, 2023, 67(1):117-130.(HUANG Y, YU Y F, CHEN J H, et al. The external discipline integration and internal knowledge flow of Library, information and archives management (LIAM) from an interdisciplinary perspective[J]. Library and information service, 2023, 67(1):117-130.)
[18] 赵国辉,陈万中.科技情报势能之遐想[J].情报知识, 1988(5):7-8.(ZHAO G H, CHEN W Z. The reverie of technology intelligence potential[J]. Journal of modern information, 1988(5):7-8.)
[19] 陈武.知识传播机理的物理学视角探讨——从知识势差的角度来解释知识流动[J].科技和产业, 2010, 10(1):110-113.(CHEN W. A discussing on the mechanism of knowledge transfer from physics perspective:to interpret knowledge flow from the viewpoint of knowledge potential difference[J]. Science technology and industry, 2010, 10(1):110-113.)
[20] ZENG B, LYU H, ZHAO Z, et al. Exploring the direction and diversity of interdisciplinary knowledge diffusion:a case study of professor Zeyuan Liu's scientific publications[J]. Scientometrics, 2021, 126(7):6253-6272.
[21] 吕海华,李江. 1987-2016年跨学科知识流动的规律:一个新的视角"学科势能"[J].图书情报知识, 2021, 38(4):125-135.(LYU H H, LI J. An investigation of interdisciplinary knowledge flow from 1987 to 2016:a new perspective of "disciplinary potential energy"[J]. Document, information&knowledge, 2021, 38(4):125-135.)
[22] 蒋颖,逯万辉.来源学科视角下的交叉学科发展机制研究——基于计算语言学的考察与分析[J].图书情报知识, 2022, 39(4):114-125.(JIANG Y, LU W H. Interdisciplinary development mechanism from the perspective of source disciplines:investigation and analysis based on computational linguistics[J]. Document, information&knowledge, 2022, 39(4):114-125.)
[23] 黄如花,赵洋,黄雨婷.国际开放科学研究进展[J].图书情报工作, 2021, 65(1):140-149.(HUANG R H, ZHAO Y, HUANG Y T. Research progress in the international research of open science[J]. Library and information service, 2021, 65(1):140-149.)
[24] 徐璐,李长玲,荣国阳.期刊的跨学科引用对跨学科知识输出的影响研究——以图书情报领域为例[J].情报杂志, 2021, 40(7):182-188.(XU L, LI C L, RONG G Y. Research on the impact of periodical interdisciplinary citation on interdisciplinary knowledge output:taking library and information science for example[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2021, 40(7):182-188.)
[25] 王知津,卞丹,王文爽.论情报学研究中的跨学科思维[J].情报科学, 2010, 28(5):641-647, 651.(WANG Z J, BIAN D, WANG W S. The cross-disciplinary thinking in information science research[J]. Information science, 2010, 28(5):641-647, 651.)
[26] 王连喜,曹树金.学科交叉视角下的网络舆情研究主题比较分析——以国内图书情报学和新闻传播学为例[J].情报学报, 2017, 36(2):159-169.(WANG L X, CAO S J. Comparative analysis on the hot topics of network public opinion from the research of cross-disciplinary perspective:an example of library&information science and journalism&communication[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2017, 36(2):159-169.)
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉