图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2024 , Vol. 68 >Issue 10: 109 - 122

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2024.10.010

情报研究

多维视角下学科交叉全过程测度与动态演进研究——以“五计学”研究为例

  • 赵鸿玉 ,
  • 王旭
展开
  • 1 中国民航大学图书馆 天津 300300;
    2 燕山大学经济管理学院 秦皇岛 066004;
    3 武汉大学中国科学评价研究中心 武汉 430072
赵鸿玉，馆员，硕士；王旭，讲师，博士后，硕士生导师，通信作者，E-mail：1542746344@qq.com。

收稿日期: 2023-08-09

  修回日期: 2023-11-24

  网络出版日期: 2024-06-04

基金资助

本文系天津市哲学社会科学规划课题青年项目“开放科学背景下交叉学科知识单元动态扩散规律研究”（项目编号：TJTQQN22-002）研究成果之一。

收起

Research on the Whole Process Measurement of Interdisciplinarity and Its Dynamic Evolution from Multidimensional Perspectives: Taking the Study of “Five-Metrics” as an Example

  • Zhao Hongyu ,
  • Wang Xu
Expand
  • 1 Library of Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300;
    2 School of Economics and Management of Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004;
    3 Research Center for Chinese Science Evaluation of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072

Received date: 2023-08-09

  Revised date: 2023-11-24

  Online published: 2024-06-04

Supported by

This work is supported by the Youth Project of Tianjin Philosophy and Social Science Planning Subjects titled “Research on dynamic diffusion laws of interdisciplinary knowledge units under the background of open science” (Grant No. TJTQQN22-002).

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义]聚焦多维视角下学科交叉全过程测度，有助于揭示知识流动过程中学科交叉程度的变化，掌握学科交叉模式及规律，丰富交叉科学知识体系。[方法/过程]依据交叉科学理论，将布里渊指数运用到学科交叉全过程测度，提出并计算学科交叉散度。以“五计学”研究为例，综合运用引文分析法、数学模型分析法等，使用python、MATLAB、Origin等工具，基于30 970条目标文献记录及对应的292 990条参考文献记录、188 473条引证文献记录，从知识集成、会聚与扩散全过程测度学科交叉，并从宏观、中观、微观视角揭示学科交叉规律，探索“五计学”学科交叉模式。[结果/结论]①“五计学”知识体系能较大程度融合与扩散知识，参考文献集的学科交叉水平增长更快；②“五计学”科学产出增长趋势明显，学科基础愈加雄厚，具有广阔的发展前景；③“五计学”研究经历了快速发展与成熟稳定，目前处于变革突破期；④不同一级学科跨一级学科的知识集成与扩散分布不平衡；⑤识别出4种学科交叉模式，分别为高集成高扩散、低集成高扩散、低集成低扩散、高集成低扩散，并凝练了不同模式的特征与演进趋势；⑥通过不同维度下学科交叉模式的比较，掌握学科与邻近学科、疏离学科知识融合扩散情况。

关键词： 开放科学; 学科交叉; 全过程测度; 动态演进; “五计学”; 学科交叉散度

本文引用格式

赵鸿玉 , 王旭 . 多维视角下学科交叉全过程测度与动态演进研究——以“五计学”研究为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2024 , 68(10) : 109 -122 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2024.10.010

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] This study focuses on the whole process of interdisciplinarity from multidimensional perspective, which helps to reveal the changes in the knowledge flow, grasp the patterns and laws, and enrich the knowledge system. [Method/Process] Based on the interdisciplinary theory, this paper applied the Brillouin index in the whole process measurement, so as to calculate the disciplinary divergence. Taking the study of “Five-Metrics” as an example, it combined citation analysis and mathematical model analysis, with python, MATLAB and Origin, to measure the interdisciplinary degree from the whole process of knowledge integration, convergence and diffusion, based on 30,970 target literature records, 292,990 reference literature records and 188,473 citation literature records. It revealed the laws of interdisciplinarity from macro, meso and micro perspectives, and explored the whole process model of interdisciplinarity of “Five-Metrics”. [Result/Conclusion] ① The “Five-Metrics” knowledge system can promote the fusion and diffusion of knowledge to a greater extent. The reference collection has a higher interdisciplinary level. ② The growth trend of scientific output of “Five-Metrics” is obvious with a stronger disciplinary foundation, and a broad prospects.③ The study of “Five-Metrics” has experienced rapid development and maturity, and is now in a period of innovation and breakthrough. ④ With regard to different first-level disciplines, uneven distribution of knowledge integration and diffusion are observed for interdisciplinarity.⑤ It identifies four interdisciplinary knowledge diffusion patterns, namely high integration/high diffusion, low integration/high diffusion, low integration/low diffusion and high integration/low diffusion, and condenses the characteristics and evolutionary trends of different patterns. ⑥ It compares interdisciplinary patterns under different dimensions to capture the integration and diffusion of knowledge between disciplines and neighboring and alienated disciplines.

Key words： open science; interdisciplinarity; measurement of the whole process; dynamic evolution; "Five-Metrics"; interdisciplinary divergence

参考文献

[1] HAK F, ABELHA A, SANTOS M. Open science in pandemic times: a literature review[J]. Procedia computer science, 2020, 177: 552-555.
[2] CIRIMINNA R, SCURRIA A, GANGADHAR S, et al. Reaping the benefits of open science in scholarly communication[J]. Heliyon, 2021, 7(12): e8638.
[3] AGUINIS H, BANKS G C, ROGELBERG S G, et al. Actionable recommendations for narrowing the science-practice gap in open science[J]. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 2020, 158: 27-35.
[4] 叶光辉, 彭泽, 毕崇武, 等. “数字人文”领域科研协作知识交流中的学科交叉与地域交叉测度分析[J]. 情报学报, 2022, 41(5): 512-524. (YE G H, PENG Z, BI C W, et al. Influence of subject and region intersection in the knowledge exchange of scientific academic collaboration in digital humanities[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2022, 41(5): 512-524.)
[5] XU J, BU Y, DING Y, et al. Understanding the formation of interdisciplinary research from the perspective of keyword evolution: a case study on joint attention[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 117(2): 973-995.
[6] ZHANG L, SUN B, JIANG L, et al. On the relationship between interdisciplinarity and impact: Distinct effects on academic and broader impact[J]. Research evaluation, 2021, 30(3): 256-268.
[7] 马费成, 张帅. 我国图书情报领域新兴交叉学科发展探析[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2023, 49(2): 4-14. (MA F C, ZHANG S. The development of emerging interdisciplines in library and information science in China[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2023, 49(2): 4-14.)
[8] LAURSEN B K, MOTZER N, ANDERSON K J. Pathways for assessing interdisciplinarity: a systematic review[J]. Research evaluation, 2022, 31(3): 326-343.
[9] CHEN S, SONG Y, SHU F, et al. Interdisciplinarity and impact: the effects of the citation time window[J]. Scientometrics, 2022, 127(5): 2621-2642.
[10] SONG Y, LEI L, WU L, et al. Studying domain structure: a comparative analysis of bibliographic coupling analysis and co-citation analysis considering all authors[J]. Online information review, 2023, 47(1): 123-137.
[11] 张琳, 孙蓓蓓, 黄颖. 交叉科学研究：内涵、测度与影响[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(7): 279-288. (ZHANG L, SUN B B, HUANG Y. Interdisciplinary research: connotation, measurement and impact[J]. Science research management, 2020, 41(7): 279-288.)
[12] 杨思洛, 张一鸣. iSchools院校研究的跨学科特征：文献计量分析的视角[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2020, 46(6): 55-74. (YANG S L, ZHANG Y M. The interdisciplinary characteristics of iSchools research: from the perspective of biblimetrics analysis[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2020, 46(6): 55-74.)
[13] 张雪, 张志强. 学科交叉研究系统综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(14): 112-125. (ZHANG X, ZHANG Z Q. Review on interdisciplinary research[J]. Library and information service, 2020, 64(14): 112-125.)
[14] 索传军, 肖玥. 学科交叉研究的现存问题与未来展望[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(1): 144-152. (SUO C J, XIAO Y. The implementation dilemmas and perspectives of interdisciplinary research[J]. Library and information service, 2023, 67(1): 144-152.)
[15] 叶鹰, 张家榕, 张慧. 知识流动与跨学科研究之关联[J]. 图书与情报, 2020(3): 29-33. (YE Y, ZHANG J R, ZHANG H. Study on the linkage between knowledge flow and interdisciplinary research[J]. Library and information, 2020(3): 29-33.)
[16] ZENG B, LYU H, ZHAO Z, et al. Exploring the direction and diversity of interdisciplinary knowledge diffusion: a case study of professor Zeyuan Liu’s scientific publications[J]. Scientometrics, 2021, 126(7): 6253-6272.
[17] LEYDESDORFF L. Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007, 58(9): 1303-1319.
[18] MUTZ R. Diversity and interdisciplinarity: should variety, balance and disparity be combined as a product or better as a sum? An information-theoretical and statistical estimation approach[J]. Scientometrics, 2022, 127(12): 7397-7414.
[19] BONACCORSI A, MELLUSO N, MASSUCCI F A. Exploring the antecedents of interdisciplinarity at the European Research Council: a topic modeling approach[J]. Scientometrics, 2022, 127(12): 6961-6991.
[20] LI X, ROUSSEAU R, LIANG L, et al. Is low interdisciplinarity of references an unexpected characteristic of Nobel Prize winning research?[J]. Scientometrics, 2022, 127(4): 2105-2122.
[21] 黄菡, 王晓光, 王依蒙. 复杂网络视角下的研究主题学科交叉测度研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(19): 99-109. (HUANG H, WANG X G, WANG Y M. Research on the interdisciplinary measurement of research topics from the perspective of complex networks[J]. Library and information service, 2022, 66(19): 99-109.)
[22] ÁVILA-ROBINSON A, MEJIA C, SENGOKU S. Are bibliometric measures consistent with scientists’ perceptions? The case of interdisciplinarity in research[J]. Scientometrics, 2021, 126(9): 7477-7502.
[23] 陈必坤, 刘钰馨, 白宽, 等. 基于科学建模的学科交叉测度研究综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(18): 126-139. (CHEN B K, LIU Y X, BAI K, et al. Literature review of interdisciplinary measurement based on modeling of science[J]. Library and information service, 2022, 66(18): 126-139.)
[24] ZHANG H H, WANG R W, ZHANG R J, et al. Characterizing interdisciplinarity of Nobel laureates’ key publications[J]. Current science (Bangalore), 2019, 117(7): 1148.
[25] BRILLOUIN L, HELLWARTH R W. Science and information theory[J]. Physics today, 1956, 9(12): 39-40.
[26] YE G, WANG C, WU C, et al. Research frontier detection and analysis based on research grants information: a case study on health informatics in the US[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2023, 17(3): 101421.
[27] 成心月, 刘逸云, 叶鹰. 物理学和化学热点论文的跨学科性分析[J]. 图书与情报, 2020(3): 55-60. (CHENG X Y, LIU Y Y, YE Y. An interdisciplinary analysis of hot papers in physics and chemistry[J]. Library and information, 2020(3): 55-60.)
[28] 马费成, 陈柏彤. 我国人文社会科学学科多样性研究[J]. 情报科学, 2015, 33(4): 3-8. (MA F C, CHEN B T. Study of discipline diversity in the field of Chinese humanities and social sciences[J]. Information science, 2015, 33(4): 3-8.)
[29] 翟羽佳, 周睿, 李岩, 等. 科研人员跨学科性与个体学术影响力的因果效应分析[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2023, 7(11): 140-157. (ZHAI Y J, ZHOU R, LI Y, et al. The causal effect analysis on interdisciplinarity of scientist and individual academic influence[J]. Data analysis and knowledge discovery, 2023, 7(11): 140-157.)
[30] 宋宜嘉, 楼雯, 赵星. 基于布里渊指数的期刊多维度影响力多样性测度[J]. 图书馆建设, 2023(1): 118-127. (SONG Y J, LOU W, ZHAO X. Diversity measurement of multi-dimensional impact in journal evaluation based on Brillouin index[J]. Library development, 2023(1): 118-127.)
[31] 李东, 童寿传, 李江. 学科交叉与科学家学术影响力之间的关系研究[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2018, 2(12): 1-11. (LI D, TONG S C, LI J. Analyzing interdisciplinarity and scientists’ academic impacts[J]. Data analysis and knowledge discovery, 2018, 2(12): 1-11.)
[32] 石丽, 秦萍, 李小涛. 高被引论文的跨学科性与altmetrics指标相关性分析[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(5): 60-65. (SHI L, QIN P, LI X T. Analysis on relationship between interdisciplinarity and altmetrics indicators of highly cited papers[J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2021, 44(5): 60-65.)
[33] DAMAR H T, BILIK O, OZDAGOGLU G, et al. Evaluating the nursing academicians in Turkey in the scope of Web of Science: scientometrics of original articles[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 115(1): 539-562.
[34] MILOJEVIĆ S, LEYDESDORFF L. Information metrics (iMetrics): a research specialty with a socio-cognitive identity?[J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 95(1): 141-157.
[35] VINKLER P. Core journals and elite subsets in scientometrics[J]. Scientometrics, 2019, 121(1): 241-259.
[36] PAPIĆ A. Informetrics: the development, conditions and perspectives[C]//2017 40th international convention on information and communication technology, electronics and microelectronics. Opatija: IEEE, 2017: 700-704.
[37] LEE J Y, CHOI S. Collaboration networks and document networks in informetrics research from 2001 to 2011: Finding influential nations, institutions, documents[J]. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 2013, 30(1): 179-191.
[38] ABRIZAH A, ERFANMANESH M, ROHANI V A, et al. Sixty-four years of informetrics research: productivity, impact and collaboration[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 101(1): 569-585.
[39] MALTSEVA D, BATAGELJ V. iMetrics: the development of the discipline with many names[J]. Scientometrics, 2020, 125(1): 313-359.
[40] 邱均平, 韩小林. 基于扎根理论的“五计学”理论融合与发展脉络研究[J]. 现代情报, 2022, 42(6): 132-137. (QIU J P, HAN X L. Research on the integration and development of the theory of “five metrics” based on grounded theory[J]. Journal of modern information, 2022, 42(6): 132-137.)
[41] MARTÍN-MARTÍN A, ORDUNA-MALEA E, AYLLÓN J M, et al. The counting house, measuring those who count: presence of bibliometrics, scientometrics, informetrics, Webometrics and altmetrics in the Google Scholar citations, ResearcherID, ResearchGate, Mendeley & Twitter[EB/OL]. [2024-01-26]. 2016: arXiv: 1602.02412. https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.02412.
[42] 邱均平, 魏开洋, 周子番. “五计学”的方法融合探究——对我国图书情报学方法体系创新的影响[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2022, 45(1): 11-16. (QIU J P, WEI K Y, ZHOU Z F. Exploring the methodological integration of the “Five-metrics”: the impact on the innovation of the methodological system of library intelligence in China[J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2022, 45(1): 11-16.)
[43] 李长玲, 荣国阳, 范晴晴, 等. 跨学科引用对知识生长的刺激作用与程度分析——以图书情报学为例[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2022, 45(6): 1-8. (LI C L, RONG G Y, FAN Q Q, et al. Analysis of the stimulating effect and degree of interdisciplinary citation on the growth of knowledge: take LIS as an example[J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2022, 45(6): 1-8.)
[44] 赵鸿玉, 王旭. 开放科学背景下跨学科研究的知识流动特征与演化趋势——以“五计学”研究为例[J]. 情报科学, 2022, 40(4): 107-117. (ZHAO H Y, WANG X. Characteristics and evolutionary trends of knowledge flow in interdisciplinary research under the background of open science: taking the study of “Five-Metrics” as an example[J]. Information science, 2022, 40(4): 107-117.)
[45] 杨思洛, 于永浩, 郑梦雪. 中国人文社科成果的国际影响力研究[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2022: 224. (YANG S L, YU Y H, ZHENG M X. On international impact of China’s humanities and social sciences outputs[M]. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press, 2022: 224.)
[46] 赵蓉英, 张心源, 张扬, 等. 我国“五计学”演化过程及其进展研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(13): 127-138. (ZHAO R Y, ZHANG X Y, ZHANG Y, et al. Study on evolution of “Five Metrics” in China and its progress[J]. Library and information service, 2018, 62(13): 127-138.)
[47] EYKENS J, GUNS R, VANDERSTRAETEN R. Subject specialties as interdisciplinary trading grounds: the case of the social sciences and humanities[J]. Scientometrics, 2022, 127(12): 7193-7213.
[48] SHI Y, WANG Y. Research on the rules of scientists’ knowledge sharing based on interdisciplinary measurement[J]. Procedia computer science, 2022, 199: 657-664.
[49] 龚花萍, 梅娇. 基于跨学科研究的图书情报学科知识交流态势研究[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2020(2): 2-11. (GONG H P, MEI J. A study on the situation of knowledge exchange of library and information science from the perspective of interdisciplinary research[J]. Research on library science, 2020(2): 2-11.)
[50] CHAKRABORTY T. Role of interdisciplinarity in computer sciences: quantification, impact and life trajectory[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 114(3): 1011-1029.
[51] WANG S, MAO J, CAO Y, et al. Integrated knowledge content in an interdisciplinary field: Identification, classification, and application[J]. Scientometrics, 2022, 127(11): 6581-6614.
[52] MAO J, LIANG Z, CAO Y, et al. Quantifying cross-disciplinary knowledge flow from the perspective of content: introducing an approach based on knowledge memes[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2020, 14(4): 101092.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉