[1] 徐芳, 李晓轩.跨越科技评价的“马拉河”[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2017, 32(8): 879-886. (XU F, LI X X. Crossing the Mara River of research evaluation[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2017, 32(8): 879-886.)
[2] 汪雪锋, 张硕, 刘玉琴, 等. 中国科技评价研究40年:历史演进及主题演化[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2018, 39(12): 67-80. (WANG X F, ZHANG S, LIU Y Q, et al. Forty years of research on science and technology evaluation in China: historical and theme evolution[J]. Science of science and management of S.&T., 2018, 39(12): 67-80.)
[3] BOUDREAU K J. The novelty paradox & bias for normal science: evidence from randomized medical grant proposal evaluations[J]. Harvard business school working paper, 2012: 13-53.
[4] CHAI S, MENON A. Breakthrough recognition: bias against novelty and competition for attention[J]. Research policy, 2019, 48(3): 733-747.
[5] MISHRA S, TORVIK V. Quantifying conceptual novelty in the biomedical literature[J]. D-Lib magazine: the magazine of the Digital Library Forum, 2016, 22(9/10): 1-21.
[6] UZZI B, MUKHERJEE S, STRINGER M, et al. A typical combinations and scientific impact[J]. Science, 2013, 342(6157): 468-472.
[7] WANG J, VEUGELERS R, STEPHAN P. Bias against novelty in science: a cautionary tale for users of bibliometric indicators[J]. Research policy, 2017, 46(8): 1416-1436.
[8] SAVOV P, JATOWT A, NIELEK R. Identifying breakthrough scientific papers[J]. Information processing & management, 2020, 57(2): 1-17.
[9] XU H, LUO R, WINNINK J, et al. A methodology for identifying breakthrough topics using structural entropy[J]. Information processing & management, 2022, 59(2): 1-20.
[10] CHEN C. Predictive effects of structural variation on citation counts[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2012, 63(3): 431-449.
[11] MIN C, BU Y, WU D, et al. Identifying citation patterns of scientific breakthroughs: a perspective of dynamic citation process[J]. Information processing & management, 2021, 58(1): 1-21.
[12] MIN C, BU Y, SUN J. Predicting scientific breakthroughs based on knowledge structure variations[J]. Technological forecasting and social change, 2021, 164: 1-10.
[13] HUANG Y, HSU C, LERMAN K. Identifying transformative scientific research[C]//IEEE. 2013 IEEE 13th international conference on data mining. Dallas: IEEE, 2013: 291-300.
[14] FUNK R J, OWEN-SMITH J. A dynamic network measure of technological change[J]. Management science, 2017, 63(3): 791-817.
[15] WU L, WANG D, EVANS J. Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology[J]. Nature, 2019, 566(7744): 378-382.
[16] 刘小慧, 沈哲思, 廖宇, 等. 科研论文颠覆性指数的改进及其影响因素研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(24): 84-91. (LIU X H, SHENG Z S, LIAO Y, et al. The research about the improved disruption index and its influencing factors[J]. Library and information service, 2020, 64(24): 84-91.)
[17] 刘小慧, 廖宇, 朱曼曼.颠覆性指数用于科研评价初探[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(12): 34-40. (LIU X H, LIAO Y, ZHU M M. A preliminary study on the application of disruption index to scientific research evaluation[J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2021, 44(12): 34-40.)
[18] 刘小慧, 沈哲思, 廖宇, 等.颠覆性指数的稳定时间窗研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(18): 49-57. (LIU X H, SHEN Z S, LIAO Y, et al. Research on the stable time window of disruption index[J]. Library and information service, 2021, 65(18): 49-57.)
[19] RUAN X, LYU D, GONG K, et al. Rethinking the disruption index as a measure of scientific and technological advances[J]. Technological forecasting and social change, 2021, 172: 1-10.
[20] BORNMANN L, TEKLES A. Disruptive papers published in Scientometrics[J]. Scientometrics, 2019, 120(1): 331-336.
[21] BORNMANN L, TEKLES A. Disruption index depends on length of citation window[J]. Profesional de la información, 2019, 28(2): 1-2.
[22] 宋培彦, 冯超慧, 龙晨翔, 等. 基于颠覆性指数优化的细分领域优秀科技人才发现研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2022, 41(5): 61-65. (SONG P Y, FENG C H, LONG C X, et al. Study on discovery of outstanding scientific and technological talents in specific domains based on optimized disruptive index[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2022, 41(5): 61-65.)
[23] 姜育彦, 刘雪立. 科技期刊的创新性评价指标——期刊颠覆性指数(JDI)及其实证研究[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2022, 33(7): 965-972. (JIANG Y Y, LIU X L. An innovative evaluation index of scientific journals：journal disruption index (JDI) and its empirical research[J]. Chinese journal of scientific and technical periodicals, 2022, 33(7): 965-972.)
[24] BORNMANN L, DEVARAKONDA S, TEKLES A, et al. Are disruption index indicators convergently valid? the comparison of several indicator variants with assessments by peers[J]. Quantitative science studies, 2020, 1(4): 1-31.
[25] LEYDESDORFF L, BORNMANN L. Disruption indices and their calculation using web-of-science data: indicators of historical developments or evolutionary dynamics?[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2021, 15(4): 1-11.
[26] 姜育彦, 刘雪立. 绝对颠覆性指数与同行评议指标及CNCI的关系：基于病毒学论文的研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(3): 96-105. (JIANG Y Y, LIU X L. The relationship between peer review index, CNCI and absolute disruption index: a study based on virology papers[J]. Library and information service, 2023, 67(3): 96-105.)
[27] WU Q, YAN Z. Solo citations, duet citations, and prelude citations: new measures of the disruption of academic papers[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.03461, 2019: 1-9.
[28] HUANG H, ZHU D and WANG X. Evaluating scientific impact of publications: combining citation polarity and purpose[J]. Scientometrics, 2021, 127(9): 5257-5281.
[29] LI J, YIN Y, FORTUNATO S, et al. A dataset of publication records for Nobel laureates[J]. Scientific data, 2019, 6(1): 1-10.
[30] 梁国强. 变革性研究的引文特征分析与早期识别模型构建[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2021. (LIANG G Q. Citation patterns analysis and the early identification model construction of transformative research[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2021.)
[31] 方开泰, 彭小令. 现代基础统计学[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2014. (FANG K T, PENG X L. Modern basic statistics[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2014.)
[32] 王琳, 岳卫平. 基于引文分析的诺贝尔奖级科学家遴选——科睿唯安“引文桂冠奖”详解[J]. 世界科技研究与发展, 2020, 41(5): 447-454. (WANG L, YUE W P. Selection of Nobel prize level scientists based on citation analysis: an overview of Clarivate analytics citation laureates[J]. World sci-tech R&D, 2020, 41(5): 447-454.)
[33] 任晓亚, 张志强. 主要科技领域国际权威奖项规律及其驱动因素分析[J]. 情报学报, 2019, 38(9): 881-893. (REN X Y, ZHANG Z Q. Analysis of the laws of international authoritative awards in main science and technology fields and their driving factors[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2019, 38(9): 881-893.)
