工作研究

人文社科期刊编辑对预印本平台的认知特征、使用意愿与主要诉求

  • 徐拥军 ,
  • 陈晓婷 ,
  • 石晶 ,
  • 杨红艳
展开
  • 1 中国人民大学书报资料中心 北京 100872;
    2 中国人民大学信息资源管理学院 北京 100872
徐拥军,书报资料中心主任,教授,博士;陈晓婷,博士研究生;石晶,书报资料中心社会编辑部副主任,副编审,博士,通信作者,E-mail:365668762@qq.com;杨红艳,书报资料中心评价研究部主任,编审,博士。

收稿日期: 2023-09-07

  修回日期: 2023-12-26

  网络出版日期: 2024-08-24

基金资助

本文系中国人民大学科学研究基金重大项目“面向自主知识体系建构的学术代表作评价研究”(项目编号:23XNL018)研究成果之一。

Awareness Characteristics, Willingness to Use and Main Demands of Humanities and Social Science Journals Editors Towards Preprint Platforms

  • Xu Yongjun ,
  • Chen Xiaoting ,
  • Shi Jing ,
  • Yang Hongyan
Expand
  • 1 Information Center for Social Science, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872;
    2 School of Information Resource Management, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872

Received date: 2023-09-07

  Revised date: 2023-12-26

  Online published: 2024-08-24

Supported by

This work is supported by the major project of the Scientific Research Fund of Renmin University of China titled “Evaluation of Academic Representative Works Facing the Construction of Independent Knowledge Systems”(Grant No. 23XNL018).

摘要

[目的/意义] 加强人文社会科学参与预印本平台共建共享,有助于促进哲学社会科学全学科领域的知识生产,提升我国哲学社会科学学术话语权。[方法/过程] 依托中国人民大学书报资料中心开展问卷调查,了解人文社科期刊编辑对预印本平台的认知特征、使用意愿、主要诉求。[结果/结论] 我国人文社科期刊编辑高度认同预印本的学术交流价值,但对预印本平台的认知普遍较模糊,不同类型与领域的期刊认知差异较大;期刊编辑对预印本平台的使用意愿较强且有特点,不接受预印本投稿在于论文供过于求、抄袭风险高、质量无法保证等,引用预印本的关键在于其权威性与质量;期刊编辑对预印本平台的主要诉求为加强身份审查与学术伦理审查、解决版权问题与抄袭难题、健全著作权政策与规范。为此建议:我国应注重提升人文社科期刊编辑对预印本的认知水平和了解程度,优化预印本平台对期刊产生的负面影响因素,针对性提高期刊编辑的预印本平台使用意愿,构建有益期刊编辑的多层级预印本政策体系。

本文引用格式

徐拥军 , 陈晓婷 , 石晶 , 杨红艳 . 人文社科期刊编辑对预印本平台的认知特征、使用意愿与主要诉求[J]. 图书情报工作, 2024 , 68(16) : 27 -39 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2024.16.003

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] Strengthening the participation of humanities and social sciences journals in the co-construction and sharing of preprint platforms helps promote knowledge production in all disciplines of philosophy and social sciences and enhance the academic voice of Chinese philosophy and social sciences. [Method/Process] A survey was conducted by Information Center for Social Science of Renmin University of China, targeting editors of humanities and social science journals to understand their awareness, willingness to use, and main demands for preprint platforms. [Result/Conclusion] The survey finds that Chinese humanities and social sciences journal editors highly recognize the academic value of preprints, but their awareness of preprint platforms is generally vague, with significant differences in different types and fields of journals. The willingness of journal editors to use preprint platforms is strong and characterized by specific features. The reason why they do not accept preprint submissions is because of the oversupply of papers, high plagiarism risks, and unguaranteed quality. The key to citing preprints lies in their authority and quality. The main demands of journal editors for preprint platforms are to strengthen identity verification and academic ethics review, solve copyright and plagiarism issues, and improve copyright policies and norms. Therefore, it suggests that China should focus on improving the awareness and understanding of humanities and social sciences journal editors about preprints, optimize the negative impact factors of preprint platforms on journals, specifically enhance the willingness of journal editors to use preprint platforms, and build a multi-level preprint policy system beneficial to journal editors.

参考文献

[1] 刘敬仪, 杨恒, 伊惠芳, 等. 国际预印本平台发展态势研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(5): 15-25. (LIU J Y, YANG H, YI H F, et al. Research on the development trend of international preprint platform[J]. Library and information service, 2023, 67(5): 15-25.)
[2] 唐耕砚. 重构与再造:预印本平台对科学交流体系的影响[J]. 科学学研究, 2021, 39(10): 1729-1735, 1831. (TANG G Y. Reconstruction and reengineering: the impact of the preprint platforms on the scientific communication system[J]. Studies in science of science, 2021, 39(10): 1729-1735, 1831.)
[3] 张智雄, 黄金霞, 王颖, 等. 国际预印本平台的主要发展态势研究[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2017(10): 2-7. (ZHANG Z X, HUANG J X, WANG Y, et al. Study on the main trends of the international preprint servers[J]. Digital library forum, 2017(10): 2-7.)
[4] 和鸿鹏. 预印本可否替代学术期刊?——基于科学社会学的视角[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 2021, 37(7): 72-77. (HE H P. Can preprints replace journals? From the perspective of sociology of science[J]. Studies in dialectics of nature, 2021, 37(7): 72-77.)
[5] 丁筠. 预印本网站的兴起给学术期刊带来的启示[J]. 编辑学报, 2018, 30(2): 145-147. (DING Y. Flourishing development of preprint websites bringing enlightenments for academic journals[J]. Acta editologica, 2018, 30(2): 145-147.)
[6] 杨硕. 预印本库与传统期刊合作的典型模式研究[J]. 科技与出版, 2020(7): 130-136. (YANG S. Research on typical models of collaboration between preprint library and traditional journals[J]. Science-technology & publication, 2020(7): 130-136.)
[7] 边晓琳, 董海荣, 吴岳峰, 等. 科技期刊与预印本平台协同发展的典型模式探讨[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2023, 34(7): 834-840. (BIAN X L, DONG H R, WU Y F, et al. Typical cooperation models between scientific journals and preprint platforms[J]. Chinese journal of scientific and technical periodicals, 2023, 34(7): 834-840.)
[8] 郑昂, 曾建勋. 预印本平台与开放期刊协同发展机制研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(16): 13-21. (ZHENG A, ZENG J X. Research on synergistic development mechanism between preprint platform and open journal[J]. Library and information service, 2023, 67(16): 13-21.)
[9] 王凌峰, 程灵慧. 预印本与期刊:互补合作到优势融合[J]. 情报杂志, 2023, 42(11): 168-173, 167. (WANG L F, CHENG L H. Preprint and journal: complementary cooperation to advantage integration[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2023, 42(11): 168-173, 167.)
[10] ASAPbio. Why do people use preprints? What is their value?[EB/OL]. [2024-04-02]. https://asapbio.org/faq/why-do-people-use-preprints-what-is-their-value.
[11] TENOPIR C, LEVINE K, ALLARD S, et al. Trustworthiness and authority of scholarly information in a digital age: results of an international questionnaire[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2016, 67(10): 2344-2361.
[12] COURTNEY K, TIMOTHY M, BRIAN A. Credibility of preprints: an interdisciplinary survey of researchers[J]. Royal society open science, 2020, 7(10): 20152.
[13] 刘静羽, 刘敬仪, 杨恒, 等. 我国科研人员对预印本平台的认知与使用研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(5): 26-48. (LIU J Y, LIU J Y, YANG H, et al. Research on cognition and use of preprint servers by Chinese researchers[J]. Library and information service, 2023, 67(5): 26-48.)
[14] 陈晓婷, 杨英伦. 我国人文社会科学预印本平台建设的问题与对策分析[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2024, 35(4): 431-441. (CHEN X T, YANG Y L. Challenges and countermeasures in the construction of preprint platform for humanities and social sciences in China[J]. Chinese journal of scientific and technical periodicals, 2024, 35(4): 431-441.)
[15] 郑昂, 曾建勋. 国际预印本平台运行模式研究[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2023, 34(7): 817-825. (ZHENG A, ZENG J X. Operation mode of international preprint platforms[J]. Chinese journal of scientific and technical periodicals, 2023, 34(7): 817-825.)
[16] 罗娇, 刘晶晶. 预印本平台著作权政策内容的构建[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2020, 31(1): 24-31. (LUO J, LIU J J. Construction of copyright policy content of preprint platforms[J]. Chinese journal of scientific and technical periodicals, 2020, 31(1): 24-31.)
[17] 刘静羽, 张智雄, 黄金霞, 等. 预印本服务中的质量控制方法研究[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2017(10): 15-19. (LIU J Y, ZHANG Z X, HUANG J X, et al. Study on the quality control methods of preprint services[J]. Digital library forum, 2017(10): 15-19.)
[18] 王凌峰, 韩子晴. 知识创新加速器“预印本2.0”:概念、设计与实现路径[J]. 情报杂志, 2021, 40(6): 171-177. (WANG L F, HAN Z Q. Knowledge innovation accelerator “Preprint 2.0”: concept, realization and roadmap[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2021, 40(6): 171-177.)
[19] ChinaXiv.转载|心理学开放科学苏州倡议[EB/OL]. [2024-04-02]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/_-zXy3yVJJ4-dOhNY-LH8g. (ChinaXiv. Reproduction|Open Science Suzhou initiative in psychology[EB/OL]. [2024-04-02]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/_-zXy3yVJJ4-dOhNY-LH8g.)
[20] CSHL improves editorial efficiency and prepares to scale its submissions workflw[EB/OL]. [2024-04-10]. https://www.highwirepress.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Case_Study_Cold_Spring_Harbor_Laboratory__HighWire.pdf.
文章导航

/