专题:迎接ChatGPT对信息资源管理的挑战

面向生成式人工智能(AIGC)的图书馆信息资源建设优化策略研究

  • 丁遒劲 ,
  • 苏静
展开
  • 1 中国人民大学图书馆 北京 100872;
    2 陕西师范大学新闻与传播学院 西安 710069
丁遒劲,副研究馆员,博士,提出论文选题,设计研究结构,收集资料并撰写

收稿日期: 2023-11-02

  修回日期: 2024-02-02

  网络出版日期: 2024-10-08

基金资助

本文系国家社会科学基金青年项目“基于媒体融合的图书馆知识服务优化机制研究”(项目编号:19CTQ008)研究成果之一。

Research on the Optimization Strategies for Library Information Resources Construction Oriented to the Development of AIGC

  • Ding Qiujing ,
  • Su Jing
Expand
  • 1 Renmin University of China Libraries, Beijing 100872;
    2 School of Journalism and Communication, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710069

Received date: 2023-11-02

  Revised date: 2024-02-02

  Online published: 2024-10-08

Supported by

This work is supported by the youth program of the National Social Science Fund of China titled “Research on the Optimization Mechanism of Library Knowledge Service Based on Media Convergence” (Grant No. 19CTQ008).

摘要

[目的/意义] 以ChatGPT为代表的生成式人工智能(Artificial Intelligence Generated Content,AIGC)对知识生产和服务方式带来巨大变革,图书馆不可避免地受到影响进而面临挑战,亟待充分审视现有信息资源建设模式存在的局限性,通过优化信息资源建设推动实现图书馆的智慧服务。[方法/过程] 从AIGC的典型应用入手,分析AIGC对图书馆服务产生的影响,进而结合图书馆信息资源建设现状和存在问题,探讨相应的资源建设优化策略。[结果/结论] 图书馆在适应AIGC发展推动服务变革的过程中,亟待加大开源信息资源建设力度、重视馆藏数字资源权益管理、探索知识库嵌入大语言模型(Large Language Model,LLM)的融合应用路径、重塑数据治理体系,以及加强与技术公司的协同合作。

本文引用格式

丁遒劲 , 苏静 . 面向生成式人工智能(AIGC)的图书馆信息资源建设优化策略研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2024 , 68(18) : 23 -31 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2024.18.003

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] The rise of generative AI, represented by ChatGPT, has significantly transformed the model of knowledge production and knowledge service. Libraries are also affected by the transformation and face significant challenges. It is urgent to examine the limitations of the information resource construction and to support the realization of smart services in libraries. [Method/Process] From the typical applications of AIGC, this article analyzed its impact on library services. It then explored strategies for optimizing information resource construction in libraries, based on the current situation and existing problems of information resource construction.[Result/Conclusion] To adapt to the development of AIGC and promote service change, libraries urgently need to strengthen the construction of open-source information resources, manage the rights and interests of digital collections, explore the path of embedding the knowledge base into LLM, reshape the library data governance system, and strengthen cooperation with technology companies.

参考文献

[1] 王飞跃, 缪青海. 人工智能驱动的科学研究新范式: 从AI4S到智能科学[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2023, 38(4): 536-540. (WANG F Y, MIAO Q H. Novel paradigm of AI-driven scientific research: from AI4S to intelligent science[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2023, 38(4): 536-540.)
[2] 李白杨, 白云, 詹希旎, 等. 人工智能生成内容(AIGC)的技术特征与形态演进[J]. 图书情报知识, 2023, 40(1): 66-74. (LI B Y, BAI Y, ZHAN X N, et al. The technical features and aromorphosis of artificial intelligence generated content[J]. Documentation, information & knowledge, 2023, 40(1): 66-74.)
[3] 陆伟, 刘家伟, 马永强, 等. ChatGPT为代表的大模型对信息资源管理的影响[J]. 图书情报知识, 2023, 40(2): 6-9, 70. (LU W, LIU J W, MA Y Q, et al. The influence of large language models represented by ChatGPT on information resources management[J]. Documentation, information & knowledge, 2023, 40(2): 6-9, 70.)
[4] 赵杨, 张雪, 范圣悦. AIGC驱动的智慧图书馆转型:框架、路径与挑战[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2023, 46(7): 9-16. (ZHAO Y, ZHANG X, FAN S Y. AIGC-driven intelligent library transformation: framework, pathways and challenges[J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2023, 46(7): 9-16.)
[5] 王鹏涛, 徐润婕. AIGC介入知识生产下学术出版信任机制的重构研究[J]. 图书情报知识, 2023, 40(5): 87-96. (WANG P T, XU R J. Reconstruction of trust mechanism in academic publishing under the intervention of AIGC in knowledge production[J]. Documentation, information & knowledge, 2023, 40(5): 87-96.)
[6] 方卿, 丁靖佳. 人工智能生成内容(AIGC)的三个出版学议题[J]. 出版科学, 2023, 31(2): 5-10. (FANG Q, DING J J. Three publishing topics concerning artificial intelligence generated content[J]. Publishing journal, 2023, 31(2): 5-10.)
[7] CHEN X. ChatGPT and its possible impact on library reference services[J]. Internet reference services quarterly, 2023(27): 121-129.
[8] ZOU X Z, SU P, LI L X, et al. AI-generated content tools and students' critical thinking: insights from a Chinese university[J]. IFLA journal-international federation of library associations, 2023(1): 1-14.
[9] 郭亚军, 郭一若, 李帅, 等. ChatGPT赋能图书馆智慧服务:特征、场景与路径[J]. 图书馆建设, 2023(2): 30-39, 78. (GUO Y J, GUO Y R, LI S, et al. ChatGPT empowers library smart service: characteristics, scenarios and realization paths[J]. Library development, 2023(2): 30-39, 78.)
[10] 莫祖英, 盘大清, 刘欢, 等. 信息质量视角下AIGC虚假信息问题及根源分析[J]. 图书情报知识, 2023, 40(4): 32-40. (MO Z Y, PAN D Q, LIU H, et al. Analysis on AIGC false information problem and root cause from the perspective of information quality[J]. Documentation, information & knowledge, 2023, 40(4): 32-40.)
[11] 宋士杰, 赵宇翔, 朱庆华. 从ELIZA到ChatGPT:人智交互体验中的AI生成内容(AIGC)可信度评价[J]. 情报资料工作, 2023, 44(4): 35-42. (SONG S J, ZHAO Y X, ZHU Q H. From ELIZA to ChatGPT: AI-generated content (AIGC) credibility evaluation in human-intelligent interactive experience[J]. Information and documentation services, 2023, 44(4): 35-42.)
[12] 朱禹, 陈关泽, 陆泳溶, 等. 生成式人工智能治理行动框架:基于AIGC事故报道文本的内容分析[J]. 图书情报知识, 2023, 40(4): 41-51. (ZHU Y, CHEN G Z, LU Y R, et al. Generative artificial intelligence governance action framework: content analysis based on AIGC incident report texts[J]. Documentation, information & knowledge, 2023, 40(4): 41-51.)
[13] LUND B D, KHAN D, YUVARAJ M. ChatGPT in medical libraries, possibilities and future directions: an integrative review[J]. Health information & libraries journal, 2024(1): 1-12.
[14] 张智雄, 于改红, 刘熠, 等. ChatGPT对文献情报工作的影响[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2023, 7(3): 36-42. (ZHANG Z X, YU G H, LIU Y, et al. The influence of ChatGPT on library& information services[J]. Data analysis and knowledge discovery, 2023, 7(3): 36-42.)
[15] 赵瑞雪, 黄永文, 马玮璐, 等. ChatGPT对图书馆智能知识服务的启示与思考[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2023, 35(1): 29-38. (ZHAO R X, HUANG Y W, MA W L, et al. Insights and reflections of the impact of ChatGPT on intelligent knowledge services in libraries[J]. Library and information science in agriculture, 2023, 35(1): 29-38.)
[16] LAPPALAINEN Y, NARAYANAN N. Aisha: a custom AI library chatbot using the ChatGPT API[J]. Journal of web librarianship, 2023, 17(3): 37-58.
[17] STEPANOV V K, MADZHUMDER M, BEGUNOVA D D. Exploring the potential of applying the artificial intelligence language model ChatGPT-3.5 in library and bibliographic activities[J]. Scientific and technical information processing, 2023, 50(3): 166-175.
[18] ADETAYO A J. Artificial intelligence chatbots in academic libraries: the rise of ChatGPT [J]. Library hi tech news, 2023, 40(3): 18-21.
[19] LIU X C. Smart library transformation research empowered by AIGC technology[J]. The frontiers of society, science and technology, 2023, 5(8): 34-38.
[20] 李荣, 吴晨生, 董洁, 等. ChatGPT对开源情报工作的影响及对策[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2023, 46(5): 1-5. (LI R, WU C S, DONG J, et al. Study on the impact of ChatGPT on open source intelligence work and countermeasures[J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2023, 46(5): 1-5.)
[21] 陈超. 基于大语言模型的生成式AI如何赋能CI[J]. 竞争情报, 2023, 19(4): 1. (CHEN C. How generative AI based on large language models empowers CI[J]. Competitive intelligence, 2023, 19(4): 1.)
[22] 叶鹰, 朱秀珠, 魏雪迎, 等. 从ChatGPT爆发到GPT技术革命的启示[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2023, 46(6): 33-37. (YE Y, ZHU X Z, WEI X Y, et al. Enlightenment from the explosion of ChatGPT to the technological revolution of GPT[J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2023, 46(6): 33-37.)
[23] 张晓林. 从猿到人:探索知识服务的凤凰涅槃之路[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2023, 7(3): 1-4. (ZHANG X L. From ape to man: exploring the challenges and possible responses of knowledge service[J]. Data analysis and knowledge discovery, 2023, 7(3): 1-4.)
[24] 陈博立, 鲜国建, 赵瑞雪, 等. 科技文献问答式智能检索总体设计与关键技术探析[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2023, 49(3): 92-106. (CHEN B L. XIAN G J, ZHAO R X, et al. Overall design and key technology of Q&A style intelligent retrieval for scientific and technical literature[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2023, 49(3): 92-106.)
[25] 张新新, 丁靖佳. 生成式智能出版的技术原理与流程革新[J]. 图书情报知识, 2023, 40(5): 68-76. (ZHANG X X, DING J J. Technical principles and process innovations of generative intelligent publishing[J]. Documentation, information & knowledge, 2023, 40(5): 68-76.)
[26] ChatGPT-like AIs are coming to major science search engines[EB/OL]. [2024-06-25]. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-02470-3.
[27] 马浩, 崔运鹏. 基于混合深度学习模型的科技文献自动综述模型构建研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(9): 176-182, 168. (MA H, CUI Y P. Research on the construction of model for automatic review of scientific literatures based on hybrid deep learning[J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2021, 44(9): 176-182, 168.)
[28] NANBA H, KANDO N, OKUMURA M. Classification of research papers using citation links and citation types: towards automatic review article generation[J]. Advances in classification research online, 2011, 11(1): 117-134.
[29] A new way of exploring dimensions data[EB/OL]. [2024-06-25]. https://www.dimensions.ai/discover-dimensions-ai-assistant/.
[30] Scopus AI: trusted content. powered by responsible AI[EB/OL]. [2024-06-25]. https://www.elsevier.com/products/scopus/scopus-ai.
[31] Elsevier introduces authoritative scientific datasets to fuel innovation and business-critical decisions in life sciences, chemicals and other research-intensive industries [EB/OL]. [2024-06-25]. https://www.elsevier.com/about/press-releases/.
[32] 《ChatGPT对文献情报工作的影响》研究报告(简版)公开发布[EB/OL]. [2024-06-25]. http://www.las.cas.cn/zhxw/202302/t20230228_6685890.html. (The research report on “the impact of ChatGPT on documentary information work”(short version) was publicly released[EB/OL]. [2024-06-25]. http://www.las.cas.cn/zhxw/202302/t20230228_6685890.html.)
[33] BROWN T B, MANN B, RYDER N, et al. Language models are few-shot learners[EB/OL]. [2024-06-25]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14165.
[34] CORE-GPT: combining open access research and AI for credible, trustworthy question answering[EB/OL]. [2024-06-25]. https://blog.core.ac.uk/2023/03/17/core-gpt-combining-open-access-research-and-ai-for-credible-trustworthy-question-answering/.
[35] SHUSTER K, POFF S, CHEN M, et al. Retrieval augmentation reduces hallucination in conversation[C]// Findings of the association for computational linguistics: EMNLP 2021. Punta Cana: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2021: 3784-3803.
[36] HONOVICH O, CHOSHEN L, AHARONI R, et al. Q2: evaluating factual consistency in knowledge-grounded dialogues via question generation and question answering[C]// Proceedings of the 2021 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing. Online and punta cana: association for computational linguistics, 2021: 7856-7870.
[37] LEE N, PING W, XU P, et al. Factuality enhanced language models for open-ended text generation [EB/OL]. [2024-06-25]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.04624.
文章导航

/

〈 〉