情报研究

考虑信任损益的健康大数据开放利用演化博弈分析

  • 王丹丹 ,
  • 解世程 ,
  • 程英英
展开
  • 河南科技大学商学院 洛阳 471023
王丹丹,副院长,教授,博士生导师,确定论文选题与整体研究框架,撰写论文,修改论文,E-mail:wangdan430806@163.com;解世程,博士研究生,撰写论文,修改论文;程英英,讲师,博士,修改论文

收稿日期: 2024-04-08

  修回日期: 2024-05-20

  网络出版日期: 2024-10-17

基金资助

本文系国家社会科学基金项目“健康大数据的开放利用与协同治理研究”(项目编号:23BTQ068)研究成果之一。

Evolutionary Game Analysis of Open Utilization of Healthcare Big Data Considering Trust Gains and Losses

  • Wang Dandan ,
  • Xie Shicheng ,
  • Cheng Yingying
Expand
  • Business School of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471023

Received date: 2024-04-08

  Revised date: 2024-05-20

  Online published: 2024-10-17

Supported by

This work is supported by the National Social Science Fund of China project titled “Research on the Open Utilization and Collaborative Governance of Healthcare Big Data” (Grant No. 23BTQ068).

摘要

[目的/意义] 相关主体之间的信任已成为决定健康大数据开放利用成效的关键因素。基于健康大数据开放利用过程,考虑信任损益因素,研究信任对各方主体行为的影响机制,为提升我国健康大数据开放利用成效提供前瞻性参考。[方法/过程] 聚焦于数据平台、使用方、患者在考虑信任损益因素情况下的决策行为,基于开放利用过程分析,建立三方演化博弈模型,并通过MATLAB进行仿真分析,最后根据均衡点分析与仿真结果提出对策建议。[结果/结论] 获取患者信任是使用方透明使用数据的根本动力;提升研究环境的安全性可以从根本上解决信任问题;加强监管与增大使用方的信任损益有助于实现良性的开放利用状态;提升患者对数据平台信任水平的同时,加强对使用方行为的制约更为重要。我国可考虑由国家主导建设健康大数据开放利用平台,加强可信研究环境建设并积极推广应用,推行数据使用登记制度并建立标准体系,有效引导公众参与健康大数据协同治理过程。

本文引用格式

王丹丹 , 解世程 , 程英英 . 考虑信任损益的健康大数据开放利用演化博弈分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2024 , 68(19) : 54 -65 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2024.19.005

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] Trust among relevant stakeholders has become a key factor in determining the successful open utilization of healthcare big data. This study investigates the impact mechanism of trust on the stakeholder behavior, considering the factors of trust gains and losses, providing forward-looking references for improving the effectiveness of healthcare big data open use in China. [Method/Process] Focusing on the decision-making behavior of the data platform, users, and patients, and considering factors of trust gains and losses, this study established a tripartite evolutionary game model based on the analysis of the open utilization process. Simulation analysis was conducted using MATLAB, and countermeasure suggestions were proposed based on the equilibrium point analysis and simulation results. [Result/Conclusion] Gaining the trust of patients is fundamental for users to transparently use data. Enhancing the security of the research environment can fundamentally solve trust issues. Strengthening regulation and increasing the trust gains and losses for users contribute to a positive state of open utilization. While raising the trust level of patients in data platforms, it is more crucial to intensify constraints on user behavior. China may consider building a nationally-led platform for the open utilization of healthcare big data, strengthening the construction of a trusted research environment and actively promoting its application, implementing a data use registration system, and establishing a standard system, for effectively guiding the public to participate the collaborative governance of healthcare big data.

参考文献

[1] 国家卫生健康委员会. 关于印发国家健康医疗大数据标准、安全和服务管理办法(试行)的通知[EB/OL]. [2024-07-22]. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/mohwsbwstjxxzx/s8553/201809/f346909ef17e41499ab766890a34bff7.shtml. (National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. Notice on printing and distributing the “National healthcare big data standards, security, and service management measures (trial)”[EB/OL]. [2024-07-22]. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/mohwsbwstjxxzx/s8553/201809/f346909ef17e41499ab766890a34bff7.shtml.)
[2] HDR UK. Our strategy[EB/OL]. [2024-07-25]. https://www.hdruk.ac.uk/about-us/our-strategy/.
[3] 高富平. 论医疗数据权利配置——医疗数据开放利用法律框架[J]. 现代法学, 2020, 42(4): 52-68. (GAO F P. An entitlement of clinical data: the legal framework of clinical data sharing[J]. Modern law science, 2020, 42(4): 52-68.)
[4] 李雅琴. 数字治理视域下健康数据利用权益制度构建[J]. 湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024, 51(2): 163-173. (LI Y Q. Construction of the rights and interests system for the use of health data from the perspective of digital governance[J]. Journal of Hubei University (philosophy and social science), 2024, 51(2): 163-173.)
[5] 任颖. 医疗数据使用权的私法保障与边界厘定[J]. 政法论丛, 2023(6): 99-110. (REN Y. Private law protection of the right to use medical data[J]. Journal of political science and law, 2023(6): 99-110.)
[6] 汤建华. 健康医疗大数据共享风险及法治因应[J]. 学习与实践, 2023(8): 54-60. (TANG J H. Risks and legal responses to healthcare big data sharing[J]. Study and practice, 2023(8): 54-60.)
[7] 李嘉兴, 王雷, 宋士杰, 等. 重大突发公共卫生事件驱动的医疗数据开放治理模式研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(4): 23-32. (LI J X, WANG L, SONG S J, et al. Research on open governance model for healthcare data driven by major public health emergencies[J]. Library and information service, 2022, 66(4): 23-32.)
[8] 翟运开, 郭瑞芳, 王宇, 等. 数据生命周期视角下的医疗健康大数据质量评价研究[J]. 现代情报, 2024, 44(1): 116-129. (ZHAI Y K, GUO R F, WANG Y, et al. Research on quality evaluation of medical and health big data from the perspective of data life cycle[J]. Journal of modern information, 2024, 44(1): 116-129.)
[9] 郭宇, 张传洋, 刘梦婷, 等. 用户信息焦虑纾解驱动医疗健康大数据价值实现影响因素与路径研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(15): 25-34. (GUO Y, ZHANG C Y, LIU M T, et al. Research on influencing factors and paths for the reduction of users’ information anxiety drives the realization of the value of medical and health big data[J]. Library and information service, 2023, 67(15): 25-34.)
[10] 翟运开, 宋欣, 王宇. 医疗健康大数据资产价值实现路径分析——基于信息生态系统理论[J]. 技术经济, 2023, 42(11): 178-190. (ZHAI Y K, SONG X, WANG Y. Analysis of the value realization path of medical and health big data assets: based on information ecosystem theory[J]. Journal of technology economics, 2023, 42(11): 178-190.)
[11] SINGH K, LI S, JAHNKE I, et al. Improving big data governance in healthcare institutions: user experience research for honest broker based application to access healthcare big data[J]. Behaviour & information technology, 2023, 43(6): 1067-1095.
[12] JIANG R, CHEN X, YU Y, et al. Risk and UCON-based access control model for healthcare big data[J]. Journal of big data, 2023, 10(1): 1-28.
[13] CHEN H, SONG Z, YANG F. Storage method for medical and health big data based on distributed sensor network[J]. Journal of sensors, 2023, 2(3): 1-10.
[14] SAROSH P, PARAH S A, MALIK B A, et al. Real-time medical data security solution for smart healthcare[J]. IEEE transactions on industrial informatics, 2022, 19(7): 8137-8147.
[15] ZHU L, ZHOU Y, FAN Q, et al. Enabling efficient and secure health data sharing for healthcare IoT systems[J]. Future generation computer systems, 2023, 149: 304-316.
[16] MAHAJAN B, JUNNARKAR A. Smart healthcare system using integrated and lightweight ECC with private blockchain for multimedia medical data processing[J]. Multimedia tools and applications, 2023, 82(28): 44335-44358.
[17] ALMALAWI A, KHAN A I, ALSOLAMI F, et al. Managing security of healthcare data for a modern healthcare system[J]. Sensors, 2023, 23(7): 3612.
[18] SARANYA K, PREMALATHA K. Multi attribute case based privacy-preserving for healthcare transactional data using cryptography[J]. Intelligent automation & soft computing, 2023, 35(2): 2029-2042.
[19] KERASIDOU X, MALONE M, DALY A, et al. Machine learning models, trusted research environments and UK health data: ensuring a safe and beneficial future for AI development in healthcare[J]. Journal of medical ethics, 2023, 49: 838-843.
[20] BRAUNACK-MAYER A, CAROLAN L, STREET J, et al. Ethical issues in big data: a qualitative study comparing responses in the health and higher education sectors[J]. Plos one, 2023, 18(4): e0282285.
[21] RASHI T, YOM-TOV E. Ethics of medical archival internet research data[J]. Journal of medical internet research, 2023, 25: e43754.
[22] GIUFFRÈ M, SHUNG D L. Harnessing the power of synthetic data in healthcare: innovation, application, and privacy[J]. NPJ digital medicine, 2023, 6(1): 186.
[23] RENNIE S, ATUIRE C, MTANDE T, et al. Public health research using cell phone derived mobility data in Sub-Saharan Africa: ethical issues[J]. South African journal of science, 2023, 119(5-6): 1-7.
[24] TOMMEL J, KENIS D, LAMBRECHTS N, et al. Personal genomes in practice: exploring citizen and healthcare professionals’ perspectives on personalized genomic medicine and personal health data spaces using a mixed-methods design[J]. Genes, 2023, 14(4): 786.
[25] SCHICKHARDT C, WINKLER E, SAX U, et al. Data infrastructures for health research: ethical framework and legal implementation[J]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, gesundheitsforschung, gesundheitsschutz, 2023, 66(2): 160-167.
[26] VEZYRIDIS P, TIMMONS S. Understanding the care. data conundrum: new information flows for economic growth[J]. Big data & society, 2017, 4(1): 1-12.
[27] PRESSER L, HRUSKOVA M, ROWBOTTOM H, et al. Care. data and access to UK health records: patient privacy and public trust[J]. Technology science, 2015, 2015081103: 1-35.
[28] CARTER P, LAURIE G T, DIXON-WOODS M. The social licence for research: why care. data ran into trouble[J]. Journal of medical ethics, 2015, 41(5): 404-409.
[29] 苏强, 季荔. 基于随机演化博弈的医疗数据共享协调机制研究[J]. 情报科学, 2023, 41(9): 37-47. (SU Q, JI L. The coordination mechanism of medical data sharing based on stochastic evolutionary game[J]. Information science, 2023, 41(9): 37-47.)
[30] 韩普, 顾亮, 张嘉明. 隐私保护视角下医疗数据共享意愿研究——基于三方演化博弈分析[J]. 现代情报, 2021, 41(3): 148-158. (HAN P, GU L, ZHANG J M. Research on willingness to share medical data from perspective of privacy protection: based on tripartite evolutionary game analysis[J]. Journal of modern information, 2021, 41(3): 148-158.)
[31] 韩普, 张嘉明. 考虑隐私保护的医疗数据共享意愿研究——基于演化博弈的视角[J]. 现代情报, 2021, 41(1): 111-120. (HAN P, ZHANG J M. Research on the willingness of medical data sharing considering privacy protection: from the perspective of evolutionary games[J]. Journal of modern information, 2021, 41(1): 111-120.)
[32] BAIER A. Trust and antitrust[J]. Ethics, 1986, 96(2): 231-60.
[33] HAWLEY K. Trust, distrust and commitment[J]. Noûs, 2014, 48(1): 1-20.
[34] O’NEILL O. Trust, trustworthiness, and accountability[J]. Oxford University press, 2014: 172-190.
[35] LHOUSNI S, DAOUDI F, BELMOKHTAR I, et al. Patients' knowledge and attitude toward biobanks in Eastern Morocco[J]. Biopreservation and biobanking, 2020, 18(3): 189-195.
[36] GASKELL G, GOTTWEIS H. Biobanks need publicity[J]. Nature, 2011, 471(7337): 159-160.
[37] GASKELL G, ALLANSDOTTIR A, ALLUM N, et al. The 2010 Eurobarometer on the life sciences[J]. Nature biotechnology, 2011, 29(2): 113-114.
[38] PAWLIKOWSKI J, WIECHETEK M, MAJCHROWSKA A. Associations between the willingness to donate samples to biobanks and selected psychological variables[J]. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022, 19(5): 2552.
[39] SANDERSON S C, BROTHERS K B, MERCALDO N D, et al. Public attitudes toward consent and data sharing in biobank research: a large multi-site experimental survey in the US[J]. The American journal of human genetics, 2017, 100(3): 414-427.
[40] MILLS E J, SEELY D, RACHLIS B, et al. Barriers to participation in clinical trials of cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review of patient-reported factors[J]. The lancet oncology, 2006, 7(2): 141-148.
[41] MIDDLETON A, MILNE R, ALMARRI M A, et al. Global public perceptions of genomic data sharing: what shapes the willingness to donate DNA and health data?[J]. The American journal of human genetics, 2020, 107(4): 743-752.
[42] DIVE L, CRITCHLEY C, OTLOWSKI M, et al. Public trust and global biobank networks[J]. BMC medical ethics, 2020, 21(1): 1-9.
[43] MILNE R, MORLEY K I, ALMARRI M A, et al. Demonstrating trustworthiness when collecting and sharing genomic data: public views across 22 countries[J]. Genome medicine, 2021, 13(1): 92.
[44] AITKEN M, JORRE J, PAGLIARI C, et al. Public responses to the sharing and linkage of health data for research purposes: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies[J]. BMC medical ethics, 2016, 17(1): 1-24.
[45] LEMKE A A, WOLF W A, HEBERT-BEIRNE J, et al. Public and biobank participant attitudes toward genetic research participation and data sharing[J]. Public health genomics, 2010, 13(6): 368-377.
[46] SHABANI M, BEZUIDENHOUT L, BORRY P. Attitudes of research participants and the general public towards genomic data sharing: a systematic literature review[J]. Expert review of molecular diagnostics, 2014, 14(8): 1053-1065.
[47] BALLANTYNE A. How should we think about clinical data ownership?[J]. Journal of medical ethics, 2020, 46(5): 289-294.
[48] 陈怡. 健康医疗数据共享与个人信息保护研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2023, 42(5): 192-199. (CHEN Y. Research on healthcare data sharing and personal information protection[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2023, 42(5): 192-199.)
[49] VOIGT P, BUSSCHE A. The EU general data protection regulation (GDPR), a practical guide[M]. Cham: Springer, 2017, 10(3152676): 10-5555.
[50] 高富平, 李群涛. “个人信息权益”的民法新定位[J]. 东岳论丛, 2023, 44(6): 166-176. (GAO F P, LI Q T. The new civil law positioning of “personal information rights and interests”[J]. Dongyue tribune, 2023, 44(6): 166-176.)
[51] WEITZMAN E R, KELEMEN S, KACI L, et al. Willingness to share personal health record data for care improvement and public health: a survey of experienced personal health record users[J]. BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2012, 12(1): 1-10.
[52] MEDFORD-DAVIS N, CHANG L, RHODES V. Health information exchange: what do patients want?[J]. Health informatics journal, 2017, 23(4): 268-278.
[53] ATHEY S, CATALINI C, TUCKER C. The digital privacy paradox: small money, small costs, small talk[R]. National Bureau of economic research, 2017.
[54] MÉJEAN C, EDELENYI F, TOUVIER M, et al. Motives for participating in a web-based nutrition cohort according to sociodemographic, lifestyle, and health characteristics: the NutriNet-Sante cohort study[J]. Journal of medical internet research, 2014, 16(8): e189.
[55] HOWE N, GILES E, NEWBURY-BIRCH D, et al. Systematic review of participants’ attitudes towards data sharing: a thematic synthesis[J]. Journal of health services research & policy, 2018, 23(2): 123-133.
[56] 邱均平, 徐中阳, 陈锡慧. 基于三方演化博弈的在线健康社区用户隐私披露行为研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2023, 46(1): 24-36. (QIU J P, XU Z Y, CHEN X H. Research on user privacy disclosure behavior in online health communities based on tripartite evolutionary game[J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2023, 46(1): 24-36.)
[57] RITZBERGER K, WEIBULL J W. Evolutionary selection in normal-form games[J]. Econometrica, 1995, 63(6): 1371-1399.
[58] FRIEDMAN D. Evolutionary games in economics[J]. Econometrica, 1991, 59(3): 637-666.
[59] 朱立龙, 荣俊美, 张思意. 政府奖惩机制下药品安全质量强监管三方演化博弈及仿真分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(11): 55-67. (ZHU L L, RONG J M, ZHANG S Y. Three-party evolutionary game and simulation analysis of drug quality supervision under the government reward and and punishment mechanism[J]. Chinese journal of management science, 2021, 29(11): 55-67.)
[60] 爱德曼国际公关公司与清华大学国家形象传播研究中心. 2023年爱德曼信任度调查中国报告[EB/OL]. [2024-08-06]. https://file.digitaling.com/eImg/uimages/20230403/1680510992119917.pdf. (Edelman Public Relations Worldwide, the National Image Communication and Research Center at Tsinghua University. 2023 Edelman trust barometer China report[EB/OL]. [2024-08-06]. https://file.digitaling.com/eImg/uimages/20230403/1680510992119917.pdf.)
[61] FANCOURT D, STEPTOE A, WRIGHT L. The cummings effect: politics, trust, and behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic[J]. The lancet, 2020, 396(10249): 464-465.
[62] KREPS S E, KRINER D L. Model uncertainty, political contestation, and public trust in science: evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic[J]. Science advances, 2020, 6(43): eabd4563.
[63] 吴思竹, 王安然, 修晓蕾, 等. 欧美生物医学科学数据中心建设及启示[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2022(4): 2-10. (WU S Z, WANG A R, XIU X L, et al. Construction and implications of biomedical scientific data centers in Europe and the United States[J]. Digital library forum, 2022(4): 2-10.)
[64] RUTH M. A pioneering programme to establish a national infrastructure for health data science[EB/OL]. [2024-08-02]. https://www.hdruk.ac.uk/news/a-pioneering-programme-to-establish-a-national-infrastructure-for-health-data-science/.
[65] KARRAR N, KHAN S K, MANOHAR S, et al. Improving transparency in the use of health data for research: recommendations for a data use register standard[EB/OL]. [2024-08-08]. https://zenodo.org/record/5902743#.Y19-A2DjzuE.
文章导航

/

〈 〉