[Purpose/Significance] The policy system serves as the institutional guarantee for strengthening the construction of the literature information resources guarantee system. The analysis of China’s policies in this area can provide insights for the future development and improvement. [Method/Process] A two-dimensional analytical framework, “policy tools - literature value chain”, was constructed to analyze 95 relevant policy texts released in China over the years. And the framework was used to compare the differences in the application of the policy tools and the various links in the literature value chain, as well as their cross-effects. [Result/Conclusion] The distribution of policy tools is more obviously differentiated, mainly focusing on two types, supply-type and environment-type. The combination ratio of policy tools is imbalanced. The coverage of relevant policies for each segment of the literature value chain is relatively balanced, while the application of various types of policy tools in each segment of the value chain has obvious differences. For this reason, a multi-level policy system should be constructed, the configuration structure of policy tools should be optimized, and the balanced coverage of each link of the literature value chain should be emphasized, so as to establish a policy system for the guarantee of literature information resources in China.
[1] 张玉礼. 文献资源建设概要[M]. 北京: 北京图书馆出版社, 1997: 91. (ZHANG Y L. Outline of literature resource construction [M]. Beijing: Beijing Library Press, 1997: 91.)
[2] OWEN J M. The new dissemination of knowledge: digital libraries and institutional roles in scholarly publishing[J]. Journal of economic methodology, 2002, 9(3): 275-288.
[3] 卢文辉. 国内文献信息资源保障质量评价研究述评[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2023, 42(5): 44-54. (LU W H. A review of research on quality evaluation of the supporting activities of literature information resource in China[J]. Library journal, 2023, 42(5): 44-54.)
[4] 肖希明, 张新鹤. 构建国家级人文社科文献资源保障与服务体系——《北京宣言》的理念与CASHL的实践[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2009, 27(1): 8-12. (XIAO X M, ZHANG X H. The building of a national humanities and social sciences document guarantee and service system: the idea of Beijing declaration and the practice of CASHL[J]. Journal of academic libraries, 2009, 27(1): 8-12.)
[5] 肖珑. 高校图书馆数字资源引进回顾与前瞻——写在CALIS项目建设20周年之际[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2019, 37(3): 18-27, 66. (XIAO L. Retrospect and prospect of digital resource development in academic libraries: for 20th anniversary of CALIS project construction[J]. Journal of academic libraries, 2019, 37(3): 18-27, 66.)
[6] 朱强. 新时代高校图书馆文献资源建设的挑战[J]. 图书情报知识, 2018(6): 4-9. (ZHU Q. Challenges to literature resources construction of university library in a new era[J]. Documentation, information & knowledge, 2018(6): 4-9.)
[7] 庞馨悦, 李德昌. 信息资源整合与集成服务的保障体系研究[J]. 情报科学, 2014, 32(6): 47-50. (PANG X Y, LI D C. Study of the security system of the integration of information resources and integrated services[J]. Information science, 2014, 32(6): 47-50.)
[8] 杨薇, 曾丽军. 从“快传”(RapidILL)和“立借”(Borrow Direct)看馆际互借与文献传递服务体系的发展[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2018, 36(4): 18-23, 44. (YANG W, ZENG L J. From the perspectives of RapidlLL and Borrow Direct to speculate the development of interlibrary loan and document delivery service[J]. Journal of academic libraries, 2018, 36(4): 18-23, 44.)
[9] 吉汉强, 李丽舒, 黄超云, 等. 文献资源建设绩效评价指标体系构建的实践研究[J]. 图书馆建设, 2011(4): 26-30. (JI H Q, LI L S, HUANG C Y, et al. Practical study on the construction of performance evaluation indicator system of literature resources development[J]. Library development, 2011(4): 26-30.)
[10] 肖希明, 李卓卓. 信息资源共享系统绩效评估研究[M]. 北京: 学习出版社, 2013:1-319. (XIAO X M, LI Z Z. Research on performance evaluation of information resource sharing system [M]. Beijing: Study Press, 2013:1-319.)
[11] 许天才, 潘雨亭, 杨新涯, 等. 基于元数据管理的数字资源保障评估研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(2): 84-90. (XU T C, PAN Y T, YANG X Y, et al. Research on digital resource support evaluation based on metadata management[J]. Library and information service, 2019, 63(2): 84-90.)
[12] 卢文辉, 叶继元. 国内文献信息资源保障体系研究现状分析与展望[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2022, 41(4): 10-21. (LU W H, YE J Y. Analysis of current situation and future development of research on the supporting system of literature information resource in China[J]. Library journal, 2022, 41(4): 10-21.)
[13] 肖希明. 推进我国信息资源共享政策体系建设[J]. 情报资料工作, 2005(6): 6-8. (XIAO X M. Promoting the construction of China’s information resource sharing policy system[J]. Information and documentation services, 2005(6): 6-8.)
[14] 黄如花, 胡文琴. 开放存取资源长期保存政策的调查与分析[J]. 图书与情报, 2009(5): 70-74. (HUANG R H, HU W Q. A survey and analysis of long-term preservation policies for open access resources[J]. Library & information, 2009(5): 70-74.)
[15] 叶光辉, 夏彦彦, 李梓奇. 我国文献信息资源保障体系政策文本分析与演化规律研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(2): 117-126. (YE G H, XIA Y Y, LI Z Q. Research on policy text analysis and evolution law of the document information resource guarantee system in China[J]. Library and information service, 2022, 66(2): 117-126.)
[16] 赵筱媛, 苏竣.基于政策工具的公共科技政策分析框架研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2007(1): 52-56. (ZHAO X Y, SU J. An analysis framework for public S&T policies: the perspective of policy tools[J]. Studies in science of science, 2007(1): 52-56.)
[17] 潘禹辰, 郭若涵, 宋奕洵, 等. 政策工具视角下的科技人才政策文本量化研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(15): 105-117. (PAN Y C, GUO R H, SONG Y X, et al. Quantitative research on science and technology talent policy texts from the perspective of policy tools[J]. Library and information service, 2023, 67(15): 105-117.)
[18] ROTHWELL R, ZEGVELD W. Reindusdalization and technology[M]. London: Logman Group, 1985: 83-104.
[19] 彭雷霆, 牛蓉, 刘锦. 我国老年读者权利保障政策研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2023, 49(5): 77-92. (PENG L T, NIU R, LIU J. The rights protection policy of elderly readers in China[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2023, 49(5): 77-92.)
[20] 谭春辉, 王一夫, 王红武. 政策工具视角下的图书馆读者权益保护分析[J]. 图书情报知识, 2019(1): 50-59. (TAN C H, WANG Y F, WANG H W. Analysis of the protection on library readers’ rights and interests from the perspective of policy instruments[J]. Documentation, information & knowledge, 2019(1): 50-59.)
[21] 陈世香, 张静静. 基于“价值链-政策工具”框架的我国公共文化服务政策分析[J]. 吉首大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 42(2): 14-22. (CHEN S X, ZHANG J J. Policy analysis of China’s public cultural services based on the framework of “value chain policy tools”[J]. Journal of Jishou University (social sciences), 2021, 42(2): 14-22.)
[22] 谢青, 田志龙. 创新政策如何推动我国新能源汽车产业的发展——基于政策工具与创新价值链的政策文本分析[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2015, 36(6): 3-14. (XIE Q, TIAN Z L. How innovation policy promotes China’s new energy vehicle industry: a text research from policy tools and innovation value chain[J]. Science of science and management of S.&T., 2015, 36(6): 3-14.)
[23] 刘细文, 熊瑞. 图书馆跨界服务的内涵、模式和实践[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2008(6): 32-37. (LIU X W, XIONG R. Crossover library services: implications, patterns and practices[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2008(6): 32-37.)
[24] 倪道敏, 俞国琴. 图书馆文献配置价值链优化研究[J]. 图书馆理论与实践, 2014(3): 8-11. (NI D M, YU G Q. Research on optimization of value chain of library document allocation[J]. Library theory and practice, 2014(3): 8-11.)
[25] 王辉, 陈丹, 刘炳胜. 地方新基建政策文本量化研究——基于政策工具与创新价值链的二维框架[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2023(12): 38-50. (WANG H, CHEN D, LIU B S. Quantitative research on local new infrastructure policy texts: a two-dimensional analytical framework based on policy tools and innovation value chain[J]. Forum on science and technology in China, 2023(12): 38-50.)
[26] 王石番. 传播内容分析法:理论与实证[M]. 台北: 幼狮文化事业公司, 1989: 312-313. (WANG S F. Communication content analysis: theory and empirical evidence[M]. Taibei: Young Lion Culture Corporation, 1989: 312-313.)
[27] VINEY L L. The assessment of psychological states through content analysis of verbal communications[J]. Psychological bulletin, 1983, 94(3): 542-563.
