专题:领域知识组织理论与实践

大语言模型背景下文献的跨学科知识组织和可视化研究

  • 姜霖 ,
  • 顾继光
展开
  • 1 南通大学商学院 南通 226019;
    2 江苏省数据工程与知识服务重点实验室 南京 210023
姜霖,讲师,博士,E-mail:jianglin@ntu.edu.cn;顾继光,讲师,博士。

收稿日期: 2024-03-27

  修回日期: 2024-08-16

  网络出版日期: 2024-12-04

基金资助

本文系国家社会科学基金项目"全文本引文分析视角下的交叉学科融合和演化机制研究"(项目编号:21CTQ040)研究成果之一。

Research on the Interdisciplinary Knowledge Organization and Visualization of Literatures Under the Background of Large Language Model

  • Jiang Lin ,
  • Gu Jiguang
Expand
  • 1 Business School of Nantong University, Nantong 226019;
    2 Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Data Engineering and Knowledge Service, Nanjing 210023

Received date: 2024-03-27

  Revised date: 2024-08-16

  Online published: 2024-12-04

Supported by

This work is supported by the National Social Science Fund of China project titled “Research on the Mechanism of Interdisciplinary Integration and Evolution from the Perspective of Full Text Citation Analysis”(Grant No.21CTQ040).

摘要

[目的/意义] 大科学时代,跨学科知识的融合成为科学发展的重要方向,也给跨学科知识组织和服务带来了巨大机遇和挑战。为提供跨学科知识服务,图书情报人员需对不同学科知识进行跨学科组织。[方法/过程] 通过运用大语言模型中的命名实体识别技术、情感分析方法等对引文内容中隐藏的跨学科概念和跨学科知识关联进行识别和量化,并结合RDF数据格式和Virtuoso数据库对文献中的跨学科知识进行知识组织,最终以我国图情领域为例结合可视化方式对领域内跨学科知识的组合路径、被接纳程度等进行呈现,以便从多维度对跨学科知识的结合和演化过程进行分析。[结果/结论] 研究从引用情感角度衡量跨学科知识组合被学科知识体系接纳的程度并进行知识组织,从而实现跨学科知识结合过程、路径以及效果的可视化呈现,为跨学科知识组织研究提供一定程度的参考。

本文引用格式

姜霖 , 顾继光 . 大语言模型背景下文献的跨学科知识组织和可视化研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2024 , 68(23) : 17 -29 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2024.23.002

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] In the big science era, the integration of interdisciplinary knowledge has become an important direction for scientific development, bringing both opportunities and challenges to the knowledge services.To provide effective interdisciplinary knowledge services, library and information researchers need to organize knowledge from different disciplines.[Method/Process] By using named entity recognition techniques and sentiment analysis methods in large language models, this paper identified and quantified hidden interdisciplinary concepts and knowledge connections in citation content.By combining RDF data format and Virtuoso database, it organized the interdisciplinary knowledge in literatures.Taking domestic library and information science as an example, it visualized the combination paths and acceptance levels of interdisciplinary knowledge, so as to analyze the integration process and evolution of interdisciplinary knowledge from multiple dimensions.[Result/Conclusion] The study adopts a new method to measure the acceptance of interdisciplinary knowledge combinations in the disciplinary by analyzing citation sentiment, and carries out the knowledge organization.By visualizing the process, path, and effects of interdisciplinary knowledge integration, this study provides some references for further exploration in the field of the interdisciplinary knowledge organization.

参考文献

[1] 张雪, 张志强. 学科交叉研究系统综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(14): 112-125. (ZHANG X, ZHANG Z Q. Review on interdisciplinary research [J]. Library and information service, 2020, 64(14): 112-125.)
[2] WAGNER C S, ROESSNER J D, BOBB K, et al. Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): a review of the literature[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2011, 5(1): 14-26.
[3] 赵玉林.交叉科学的崛起及其形成机制[J]. 自然杂志, 1995, 17(3): 157-159. (ZHAO Y L. The emergence of interdisciplines[J]. Chinese journal of nature, 1995, 17(3): 157-159.)
[4] CARLINI N, TRAMER F, WALLACE E, et al. Extracting training data from large language models[C]//30th USENIX security symposium. Vancouver: arXiv, 2020: 2633-2650.
[5] 马建红, 张亚梅, 姚爽, 等. 基于BLSTM_ attention_ CRF模型的新能源汽车领域术语抽取[J]. 计算机应用研究, 2019(5): 1385-1389. (MA J H, ZHANG Y M, YAO S, et al. Terminology extraction for new energy vehicle based on BLSTM_attention_CRF model[J]. Application research of computers, 2019(5): 1385-1389.)
[6] 赵洪, 王芳. 理论术语抽取的深度学习模型及自训练算法研究[J]. 情报学报, 2018, 37(9): 16. (ZHAO H, WANG F. A deep learning model and self-training algorithm for theoretical terms extraction[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2018, 37(9): 16.)
[7] HUANG Q, SUN Y, XING Z, et al. API entity and relation joint extraction from text via dynamic prompt-tuned language model[J]. ACM transactions on software engineering and methodology, 2023(1): 1-25.
[8] WADHWA S, AMIR S, WALLACE B. Revisiting relation extraction in the era of large language models[C]//Proceedings of the conference of Association for Computational Linguistics. Toronto: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2023: 15566-15589.
[9] DOS S C, GATTI M. Deep convolutional neural networks for sentiment analysis of short texts [C]//Proceedings of the 25th international conference on computational linguistics. Dublin: Dublin City University and Association for Computational Linguistics, 2014: 69-78.
[10] YANG L, LI Y, WANG J, et al. Sentiment analysis for E-commerce product reviews in Chinese based on sentiment lexicon and deep learning[J]. IEEE access, 2020(8): 23522-23530.
[11] AINAPURE B S, PISE R N, REDDY P, et al. Sentiment analysis of COVID-19 Tweets using deep learning and lexicon-based approaches[J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15(3): 1-21.
[12] XU G, MENG Y, QIU X, et al. Sentiment analysis of comment texts based on Bi-LSTM[J]. IEEE access, 2019(7): 51522-51532.
[13] 叶鹰, 金更达. 基于元数据的信息组织与基于本体论的知识组织[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2004(4): 43-47. (YE Y, JING G D. Metadata-based information organization and ontology-based knowledge organization[J]. Journal of academic libraries, 2004(4): 43-47.)
[14] 马费成. 情报学发展的历史回顾及前沿课题[J]图书情报知识, 2013(2): 4-12. (MA F C. Historical review of the developmen of information science with proposing frontier topics[J]. Documentation, information & knowledge, 2013(2): 4-12.)
[15] 陈涛, 刘炜, 单蓉蓉, 等. 知识图谱在数字人文中的应用研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2019, 45(6): 1-19. (CHEN T, LIU W, SHAN R R, et al. Application of knowledge graph in digital humanities[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2019, 45(6): 1-19.)
[16] VAHDATI S, PALMA G, NATH R J, et al. Unveiling scholarly communities over knowledge graphs [C]//International conference on theory and practice of digital libraries. Porto: Springer, 2018: 103-115.
[17] XU R, LI L, WANG Q Q. A large-scale disease-disease risk relationship knowledge base constructed from biomedical text[J]. BMC bioinformatics, 2014, 15(1): 105-117.
[18] 钟将, 尹红, 张剑. 基于学术知识图谱的辅助创新技术研究[J]. 计算机科学, 2022, 49(5): 194-199. (ZHONG J, YIN H, ZHANG J. Academic knowledge graph-based research for auxiliary innovation technology[J]. Computer science, 2022, 49(5): 194-199.)
[19] 张云中, 祝蕊. 面向知识问答系统的图情学术领域知识图谱构建: 多源数据整合视角[J]. 情报科学, 2021, 39(5): 115-123. (ZHANG Y Z, ZHU R. The construction of knowledge graph in the LIS academic field of knowledge question answering system: a multi-source data integration perspective[J]. Information science, 2021, 39(5): 115-123.)
[20] TANG H, LIU B S, QIAN J B. Content-based and knowledge graph-based paper recommendation: exploring user preferences with the knowledge graphs for scientific paper recommendation[J]. Concurrency and computation practice and experience, 2021, 33(13): 1-11
[21] AYALA G, DAROCZY B, BENCZUR A, et al. Global citation recommendation using knowledge graphs[J]. Journal of intelligent & fuzzy systems, 2018, 34(5): 3089-3100.
[22] 中国科学技术信息研究所. 2023版中国科技期刊引证报告(核心版社会科学卷)[M]. 北京: 科学技术文献出版社, 2023. (Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China. 2023 Chinese S&T journal citation reports(social science)[M]. Beijing: Scientific and Technical Documentation Press, 2023.)
[23] 中国科学技术信息研究所. 2023版中国科技期刊引证报告(核心版自然科学卷)[M]. 北京: 科学技术文献出版社, 2023. (Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China. 2023 Chinese S&T journal citation reports(natural science)[M]. Beijing: Scientific and Technical Documentation Press, 2023.)
[24] 王芳, 陈锋, 祝娜, 等. 我国情报学理论的来源、应用及学科专属度研究[J]. 情报学报, 2016, 35(11): 1148-1164. (WANG F, CHEN F, ZHU N, et al. Theories of information science in China: sources, uses and discipline exclusive degrees[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2016, 35(11): 1148-1164.)
[25] 陈锋, 翟羽佳, 王芳. 基于条件随机场的学术期刊中理论的自动识别方法[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016, 60(2): 122-128. (CHEN F, ZHAI Y J, WANG F. Automatic theory recognition in academic journals based on CRF[J]. Library and information service, 2016(2): 122-128.)
[26] 拉维昌迪兰. BERT基础教程Transformer大模型实战[M]. 北京: 人民邮电出版社, 2023. (SUDHARSAN R. Getting started with Google BERT[M]. Beijing: The People’s Posts and Telecommunications Press, 2023.)
[27] 徐晨飞, 包平, 张惠敏, 等. 基于关联数据的方志物产史料语义化知识组织研究[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2020, 38(6): 78-88. (XU C F, BAO P, ZHANG H M, et al. Research on linked data based semantic knowledge management of produce literature materials from local chronicles[J]. Journal of academic libraries, 2020, 38(6): 78-88.)
[28] 郝婷, 王薇. 融合Bert和BiLSTM的中文短文本分类研究[J]. 软件工程, 2023, 26(3): 58-62. (HAO T, WANG W, Research on Chinese short text classification model based on Bert and Bi-LSTM[J]. Software engineering, 2023, 26(3): 58-62)
[29] RONDEAU M A, SU Y. LSTM-based neuro CRFs for named entity recognition[C]// Proceedings of the 17th annual conference of the International Speech Communication Association. San Francisco: Interspeech, 2016: 665-669
[30] 赵洪, 王芳. 理论术语抽取的深度学习模型及自训练算法研究[J]. 情报学报, 2018, 37(9): 923-938. (ZHAO H, WANG F. A deep learning model and self-training algorithm for theoretical terms extraction[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2018, 37(9): 923-938.)
[31] CHERRY C, GUO H Y. The unreasonable effectiveness of word representations for Twitter named entity recognition[C]// Proceedings of the annual conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2015: 735-745.
[32] 姜霖, 张麒麟. 基于引文细粒度情感量化的学术评价研究[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2020, 4(6): 129-138. (JIANG L, ZHANG Q L. Research on academic evaluation based on fine-grain citation sentimental quantification[J]. Data analysis and knowledge discovery, 2020, 4(6): 129-138.)
[33] 苏丽敏, 何慧爽. 基于区间数的Spearman秩相关系数的多属性决策方法[J]. 统计与决策, 2019, 35(6): 51-53. (SU L M, HE H S. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient based on interval numbers for Multi-attribute decision-making method[J]. Statistics and decision, 2019, 35(6): 51-53.)
[34] 耿树青, 杨建林. 基于引用情感的论文学术影响力评价方法研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2018, 41(12): 93-98. (GENG S Q, YANG J L. A method to evaluate the academic influence of papers based on citation sentiment[J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2018, 41(12): 93-98.)
[35] STUDER R, BENJAMINS V R, FENSEL D. Knowledge engineering: principles and methods[J]. Data & knowledge engineering, 1998, 25(1-2): 161-197.
[36] 李涛, 王次臣, 李华康. 知识图谱的发展与构建[J]. 南京理工大学学报, 2017, 41(1): 22-34. (LI T, WANG C C, LI H K. Development and construction of knowledge graph[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 2017, 41(1): 22-34.)
文章导航

/

〈 〉