图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2024 , Vol. 68 >Issue 24: 92 - 103

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2024.24.008

情报研究

学习型搜索中用户的信息处理行为特征及效果研究

  • 宋筱璇 ,
  • 陈丹 ,
  • 贾绍奇 ,
  • 魏宇凡 ,
  • 任寒啸
展开
  • 南京农业大学信息管理学院, 南京 210095
宋筱璇，讲师，博士，E-mail：songxiaoxuan@njau.edu.cn；陈丹，本科生；贾绍奇，本科生；魏宇凡，本科生；任寒啸，本科生。

收稿日期: 2024-05-06

  修回日期: 2024-08-26

  网络出版日期: 2024-12-23

基金资助

本文系江苏省社会科学基金青年项目“基于元认知的用户搜索交互行为研究”（项目编号：22TQC004）研究成果之一。

收起

Research on the Characteristics and Performance of Users’ Information Processing Behaviors in Learning-related Search

  • Song Xiaoxuan ,
  • Chen Dan ,
  • Jia Shaoqi ,
  • Wei Yufan ,
  • Ren Hanxiao
Expand
  • School of Information Management, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095
Song Xiaoxuan, lecturer, PhD, E-mail:songxiaoxuan@njau.edu.cn;Chen Dan, undergraduate;Jia Shaoqi, undergraduate;Wei Yufan, undergraduate;Ren Hanxiao, undergraduate.

Received date: 2024-05-06

  Revised date: 2024-08-26

  Online published: 2024-12-23

Supported by

This work is supported by the Social Science Fund of Jiangsu Province project titled “Research on User Search Interaction Behavior from the metacognition perspective” (Grant No. 22TQC004).

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义] 信息处理通常被认为是学习型搜索过程中不可或缺的阶段，直接影响搜索任务的完成和学习目标的高效实现。研究围绕学习型搜索过程中的信息处理行为的类型、动机、发生特征、作用效果展开分析。[方法/过程] 通过实验方法收集用户在完成学习型搜索任务过程中的各类信息处理行为数据，采用主题分析方法与日志分析方法抽取并分析信息处理行为特征变量，最后检验各类信息处理行为特征对搜索效果的作用。[结果/结论] 研究识别信息回溯、信息存贮、信息抽取、信息转化、格式调整、组织结构、标记重点在内的7类信息处理行为，及驱动这些处理行为的任务特征意识、个人特征意识、行为调控、成果优化4类动机，并剖析信息处理动机及其行为间的对应关系。同时，研究发现信息抽取行为发生的次数最多，发生的时间最早，并且对搜索效果存在显著的正向作用。此外，信息回溯、组织结构、信息转化、格式调整等行为的发生也不同程度地提高了学习型搜索的效果。研究发现有助于全面理解用户的信息处理行为特征，为支持信息处理活动的搜索系统功能的拓展与完善提供思路。

关键词： 信息处理行为; 行为动机; 搜索效果; 学习型搜索

本文引用格式

宋筱璇 , 陈丹 , 贾绍奇 , 魏宇凡 , 任寒啸 . 学习型搜索中用户的信息处理行为特征及效果研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2024 , 68(24) : 92 -103 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2024.24.008

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] Information processing is usually considered as the indispensable phase in learning-related search process, directly influencing search task completion and learning goal achievement efficiently. This study focuses on the types, motivations, occurrence characteristics, and search performance of information processing behavior during the learning-related search process. [Method/Process] This study collected various information processing behavior data exhibited by users while searching for learning-related tasks, and extracted and analyzed the characteristic variables of information processing behaviors using thematic analysis and log analysis methods. Finally, the study also examined the effects of various information processing behavior characteristics on search performance. [Result/Conclusion] This study identifies seven types of information processing behaviors, including information backtracking, information storing, information extracting, information transforming, format setting, structuring and emphasizing, as well as four types of motivations driving processing behaviors: task feature perception, individual feature perception, behavior regulation and outcome optimization. The study also analyzes the correspondence between information processing motivations and their behaviors. At the same time, the study finds that the information extracting behavior occurs most frequently and earliest, and has a significant positive effect on search performance. In addition, the occurrence of behaviors such as information backtracking, structuring, information transforming, and format setting also improves search performance to varying degrees. The findings contribute to a comprehensive understanding of users’ information processing behavior characteristics and provide insights for expanding and improving the functionality of search systems that support information processing activities.

Key words： information processing behaviors; motivations of behaviors; search performance; learning-related search

参考文献

[1] SIMON H A. Information-processing theory of human problem solving[J]. Handbook of learning and cognitive processes, 1978, 5: 271-295.
[2] RIEH S Y, COLLINS-THOMPSON K, HANSEN P, et al. Towards searching as a learning process: a review of current perspectives and future directions[J]. Journal of information science, 2016, 42(1): 19-34.
[3] JÄRVELIN K, VAKKARI P, ARVOLA P, et al. Task-based information interaction evaluation: the viewpoint of program theory[J]. ACM transactions on information systems, 2015, 33(1): 1-30.
[4] HAGEN M, POTTHAST M, VÖLSKE M, et al. How writers search: analyzing the search and writing logs of non-fictional essays[C]//Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on conference on human information interaction and retrieval. New York: ACM, 2016: 193-202.
[5] SONG X, LIU C, LIU H. Characterizing and exploring users' task completion process at different stages in learning related tasks[J]. Proceedings of the association for information science and technology, 2018, 55(1): 460-469.
[6] 孟高慧, 宋筱璇, 张潇月, 等. 学习型搜索中的笔记记录行为与学习产出的关联探究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(8): 42-54. (MENG G H, SONG X X, ZHANG X Y, et al. Relationships between note-taking behavior and learning outcome in learning-related search[J]. Library and information service, 2022, 66(8): 42-54.)
[7] VAKKARI P, VÖLSKE M, POTTHAST M, et al. Modeling the usefulness of search results as measured by information use[J]. Information processing & management, 2019, 56(3): 879-894.
[8] KUHLTHAU C C. Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user's perspective[J]. Journal of the American society for information science, 1991, 42(5): 361-371.
[9] VAKKARI P, PENNANEN M. Sources, relevance and contributory information of documents in writing a research proposal: a longitudinal case study[J]. The new review of information behavior research, 2001, 2(11): 217-232.
[10] VAKKARI P. Cognition and changes of search terms and tactics during task performance: a longitudinal case study[C]// Content-based multimedia information access. Paris: Le Centre De Hautes Etudes Internationales D'informatique Documentaire, 2000: 894-907.
[11] VAKKARI P, HAKALA N. Changes in relevance criteria and problem stages in task performance[J]. Journal of documentation, 2000, 56(5): 540-562.
[12] ELLIS D. A behavioral model for information retrieval system design[J]. Journal of information science, 1989, 15(4/5): 237-247.
[13] FREUND L, HE J, GWIZDKA J, et al. Searching as learning (SAL) workshop 2014[C]//Proceedings of the 5th information interaction in context symposium. New York: ACM, 2014: 7.
[14] HANSEN P, RIEH S Y. Recent advances on searching as learning: an introduction to the special issue[J]. Journal of information science, 2016, 42(1): 3-6.
[15] 宋筱璇, 刘畅. 学习型搜索中用户信息源选择和使用策略研究[J]. 情报学报, 2019, 38(6): 655-666. (SONG X X, LIU C. Exploring users’ source selection and use strategies in learning related search [J]. Information science, 2019, 38(6): 655-666.)
[16] 宋筱璇, 刘畅, 陈建龙. 学习型搜索行为过程的元认知调控研究[J]. 情报资料工作, 2023, 44(6): 90-99. (SONG X X, LIU C, CHEN J L. Research on metacognitive regulation of learning-oriented search behavior process[J]. Information and documentation services, 2023, 44(6): 90-99.)
[17] 刘金亚, 王馨悦, 刘畅. 学习型搜索中的信息行为概念图构建与研究展望[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2023, 46(4): 44-52. (LIU J Y, WANG X Y, LIU C. Construction of the concept map and research prospect for the information behavior in learning-related search[J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2023, 46(4): 44-52.)
[18] 宋筱璇, 刘畅, 陈建龙. 搜索即学习主题的相关研究综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(10): 113-126. (SONG X X, LIU C, CHEN J L. A review of research from the perspective of searching as learning[J]. Library and information service, 2021, 65(10): 113-126.)
[19] WILSON T D. Models in information behavior research[J]. Journal of documentation, 1999, 55(3): 249-270.
[20] MARCHIONINI G. Information seeking in electronic environments[M]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
[21] LIU C, SONG X, HANSEN P. Characterizing users’ task completion process in learning-related tasks: a search pace model[J]. Journal of information science, 2023, 49(6): 1462-1480.
[22] LIU J, BELKIN N J. Searching vs. writing: Factors affecting information use task performance[J]. Proceedings of the American society for information science and technology, 2012, 49(1): 1-10.
[23] 刘畅, 宋筱璇, 杨子傲. 用户信息搜索中的学习行为及过程探究[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2019, 37(4): 36-45. (LIU C, SONG X X, YANG Z A. Characterizing and exploring users' learning behaviors and process during information search[J]. Journal of academic libraries, 2019, 37(4): 36-45.)
[24] 孟高慧, 刘畅. 走出搜索迷航：复杂探索式搜索过程中笔记记录的认知导航功能探究[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2023, 13(4): 122-139. (MENG G H, LIU C. Avoiding search disorientation: A study on the cognitive orientation function of note-taking in the complex and exploratory search[J]. Journal of information resources management, 2023, 13(4): 122-139.)
[25] PONCE H R, MAYER R E. An eye movement analysis of highlighting and graphic organizer study aids for learning from expository text[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2014, 41: 21-32.
[26] ROY N, TORRE M V, GADIRAJU U, et al. Note the highlight: incorporating active reading tools in a search as learning environment[C]//Proceedings of the 2021 conference on human information interaction and retrieval. New York: ACM, 2021: 229-238.
[27] CHOI B, ARGUELLO J, CAPRA R, et al. The influences of a knowledge representation tool on searchers with varying cognitive abilities[J]. ACM transactions on information systems, 2023, 41(1): 1-35.
[28] TOYOKAWA Y, MAJUMDAR R, KONDO T, et al. Active reading dashboard in a learning analytics enhanced language-learning environment: effects on learning behavior and performance[J]. Journal of computers in education, 2024, 11(2): 495-522.
[29] CHAVULA C, CHOI Y, RIEH S Y. SearchIdea: An idea generation tool to support creativity in academic search[C]//Proceedings of the 2023 conference on human information interaction and retrieval. New York: ACM, 2023: 161-171.
[30] LEE H J, LEE J, MAKARA K A, et al. Does higher education foster critical and creative learners? An exploration of two universities in South Korea and the USA[J]. Higher education research & development, 2015, 34(1): 131-146.
[31] BRAUN V, CLARKE V. Using thematic analysis in psychology[J]. Qualitative research in psychology, 2008, 3(2): 77-101.
[32] COLLINS-THOMPSON K, RIEH S Y, HAYNES C C, et al. Assessing learning outcomes in web search: a comparison of tasks and query strategies[C]//Proceedings of the 2016 conference on human information interaction and retrieval. New York: ACM, 2016: 163-172.
[33] ANDERSON L W, KRATHWOHL D R. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives: complete edition[M]. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, 2001.
[34] FLAVELL J H. Metacognitive aspects of problem solving[M]// RESNICK L B (Ed.). The nature of intelligence. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1976: 231-235.
[35] 袁红, 张海潮. 基于搜索时间序列聚类的网络用户搜索策略识别[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016, 60(20): 94-103. (YUAN H, ZHANG H C. Network user search strategies recognition based on search time sequence clustering[J]. Library and information service, 2016, 60(20): 94-103.)
[36] 宋筱璇, 刘畅, 陆文宜. 元认知调控视角下用户信息搜索策略改变研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(23): 89-98. (SONG X X, LIU C, LU W Y. Study on the change of users' information search tactic from the perspective of metacognitive regulation[J]. Library and information service, 2023, 67(23): 89-98.)
[37] LIU J, MITSUI M, BELKIN N J, et al. Task, information seeking intentions, and user behavior: Toward a multi-level understanding of web search[C]//Proceedings of the 2019 conference on human information interaction and retrieval. New York: ACM, 2019: 123-132.
[38] URGO K, ARGUELLO J. Goal-setting in support of learning during search: An exploration of learning outcomes and searcher perceptions[J]. Information processing & management, 2023, 60(2): 103158.
[39] PALANI S, ZHOU Y, ZHU S, et al. InterWeave: Presenting search suggestions in context scaffolds information search and synthesis[C]//Proceedings of the 35th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology. New York: ACM, 2022: 1-16.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉