[Purpose/Significance] In the context of interdisciplinary integration, analyzing and grasping the current situation and future direction of interdisciplinary output influence of disciplinary knowledge is conducive to promoting the development of discipline and improving the academic discourse power. [Method/Process] The interdisciplinary citation sentence is the intermediary “bridge” connecting the output knowledge with the received knowledge. On one hand, their semantic expression can reflect the closeness of the relationship between the two disciplines. On the other hand, their location and emotional tendency can reflect the different stimulating effect and the discipline knowledge value on interdisciplinary knowledge innovation. This paper constructs an influence model of a target discipline knowledge on interdisciplinary knowledge from two aspects: knowledge relevance and knowledge innovation efficiency. The output of one knowledge has an impact on multiple interdisciplinary knowledge, so the overall influence is calculated by summing, simultaneously identifying the output knowledge of the target discipline and the influenced interdisciplinary knowledge. [Result/Conclusion] Taking the data of Information Resource Management discipline from 2017 to 2022 as an example, the validity of the model is verified. It finds that knowledge of this discipline mainly influences the knowledge innovation in social sciences, with less impact on natural sciences. The influence of mature cross-knowledge is stronger than that of professional core knowledge. It mainly affects interdisciplinary knowledge, being less effective in influencing the core knowledge innovation of other disciplines.
[1] PORTER A L, COHEN A S, ROESSNER J D, et al. Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity[J]. Scientometrics, 2007, 72(1): 117-147.
[2] 朱红, 朱敬. 情报学科对相关学科影响力的实证分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2005(10): 71-74. (ZHU H, ZHU J. Impact power analysis of intelligence science to its related subjects[J]. Library and information service, 2005(10): 71-74.)
[3] LARIVIÈRE V, SUGIMOTO R, CRONIN B. A bibliometric chronicling of library and information science’s first hundred years[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2012, 63(5): 997-1016.
[4] 王旻霞, 赵丙军. 中国图书情报学跨学科知识交流特征研究——基于CCD数据库的分析[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2015, 38(5): 94-99. (WANG M X，ZHAO B J. Research on the characteristics of interdisciplinary knowledge exchange of Library and Information Science in China——Based on the analysis of CCD database[J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2015, 38(5): 94-99.)
[5] SO C Y. Citation patterns of core communication journals: an assessment of the developmental status of communication[J]. Human communication research, 1988, 15(2): 236-255.
[6] MEYER T, SPENCER J. A citation analysis study of library science: who cites librarians?[J]. College & research libraries, 1996, 57(1): 23-33.
[7] ODELL J, GABBARD R. The interdisciplinary influence of library and information science 1996–2004: a journal-to-journal citation analysis[J]. College & research libraries, 2008, 69(6): 546-565.
[8] FRANCESCHET M, COLAVIZZA G. Quantifying the higher-order influence of scientific publications[J]. Scientometrics, 2020, 2(125): 951-963.
[9] 冯业栋, 丁宁, 周松. 跨学科影响力的分析方法与实证研究——以管理学为例[J]. 图书与情报, 2024(3): 124-131. (FENG Y D, DING N, ZHOU S. Analytical methods and empirical research on interdisciplinary influence: An example from management studies[J]. Library and information service, 2024(3): 124-131.)
[10] CRONIN B, MEHO I. The shifting balance of intellectual trade in information studies[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008, 59(4): 551-564.
[11] 李樵. 外部引用视角下的中国图书情报学知识影响力研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2019, 45(6): 65-83. (LI Q. The impact of Chinese library and information science knowledge from the perspective of external citations[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2019, 45(6): 65-83.)
[12] 刘盛博, 丁堃, 张春博. 引文分析的新阶段:从引文著录分析到引用内容分析[J]. 图书情报知识, 2015(3): 25-34. (LIU S B, DING K, ZHANG C B. New stage of citation analysis: from citation description analysis to citation context analysis[J]. Document, information & knowledge, 2015(3): 25-34.)
[13] 黄如花, 赵洋, 黄雨婷. 国际开放科学研究进展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(1): 140-149. (HUANG R H, ZHAO Y, HUANG Y T. Research progress in the international research of open science[J]. Library and information service, 2021, 65(1): 140-149.)
[14] 刘运梅, 马费成. 面向全文本内容分析的文献三角引用现象研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2021, 47(3): 84-99. (LIU Y M, MA F C. Research on the phenomenon of literature triangular citation facing full text content analysis[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2021, 47(3): 84-99.)
[15] MARI I S A, SPAVENTI J, PAVI I L, et al. Citation context versus the frequency counts of citation histories[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1998, 49(6): 530-540.
[16] 徐琳宏, 丁堃, 孙晓玲, 等. 施引文献视角下正面引用论文的影响力及其影响因素的研究——以自然语言处理领域为例[J]. 情报学报, 2021, 40(4): 354-363. (XU L H, DING K, SUN X L, et al. Research on the influencing factors and the influence of positive citation papers from the perspective of citing papers: using natural language processing as an example[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2021, 40(4): 354-363.)
[17] 耿树青, 杨建林. 基于引用情感的论文学术影响力评价方法研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2018, 41(12): 93-98. (GENG S Q, YANG J L. A method to evaluate the academic influence of papers based on citation sentiment[J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2018, 41(12): 93-98.)
[18] 李铮, 邓三鸿, 孔嘉, 等. 学者学术影响力识别研究——基于引文全数据的视角[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(12): 87-94. (LI Z, DENG S H, KONG J, et al. Research on scholar’s academic influence: from the perspective of full citation data[J]. Library and information service, 2020, 64(12): 87-94.)
[19] EISINGA R, GROTENHUIS M T, PELZER B. The reliability of a two-item scale: pearson, cronbach, or spearman-brown?[J]. International journal of public health, 2013, 58(4): 637-642.
[20] 王欣欣, 李长玲, 栾锟, 等. 学科期刊影响力评价新视角: 期刊动能——以图书情报领域为例[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2023, 46(3): 24-29. (WANG X X, LI C L, LUAN K, et al. A new perspective of influence evaluation of discipline journals: journal kinetic energy: take LIS as an example[J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2023, 46(3): 24-29.)
[21] REIMERS N, GUREVYCH I. Sentence-BERT: sentence embeddings using siamese BERT-Networks[J]. Computation and language, 2019, 27(8): 3982-3992.
[22] 王浩, 李长玲, 高峰, 等. 学科知识输出影响力分析: 基于交叉知识的学科归属度测度[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2024, 47(8): 76-83. (WANG H, LI C L, GAO F, et al. Analyzing the influence of disciplinary knowledge output: measuring discipline affiliation[J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2024, 47(8): 76-83.)
[23] 王浩, 李长玲, 高峰, 等. 正交分解跨学科推动力识别学科对外输出热点——以图书情报学为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2024, 68(7): 69-78. (WANG H, LI C L, GAO F, et al. Using orthogonal decomposition of interdisciplinary driving force to identify discipline output hotspots: taking library and information science as an example[J]. Library and information service, 2024, 68(7): 69-78.)
[24] 叶鹰. 试论图书情报学的主干知识及有效方法: 兼论双证法和模本法之效用[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2021, 47(3): 58-66. (YE Y. Identifying backbone knowledge and effective methods in library and information science: useful methods as double-evidence and model-sample[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2021, 47(3): 58-66.)
