[1] CHOU W Y S, OH A, KLEIN W M P. Addressing health-related misinformation on social media[J]. Jama, 2018, 320(23): 2417-2418.
[2] SCHERER L D, MCPHETRES J, PENNYCOOK G, et al. Who is susceptible to online health misinformation? A test of four psychosocial hypotheses[J]. Health psychology, 2021, 40(4): 274-284.
[3] CALVILLO D P, LEÓN A, RUTCHICK A M. Personality and misinformation[J]. Current opinion in psychology, 2023, 55:101752.
[4] ROOZENBEEK J, SCHNEIDER C R, DRYHURST S, et al. Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world[J]. Royal society open science, 2020, 7(10): 201199.
[5] PENNYCOOK G, RAND D G. Lazy, not biased: susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning[J]. Cognition, 2019, 188: 39-50.
[6] MAERTENS R, GÖTZ F M, GOLINO H F, et al. The misinformation susceptibility test (MIST): a psychometrically validated measure of news veracity discernment[J]. Behavior research methods, 2024, 56(3): 1863-1899.
[7] MAERTENS R, SAID N, BUDER J, et al. Misleading but not fake: measuring the difference between manipulativeness discernment and veracity discernment using psychometrically validated tests[EB/OL]. [2024-10-09]. https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/tckp4.
[8] MERRIAM-WEBSTER. Susceptibility[EB/OL]. [2024-12-05]. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/susceptibility.
[9] 王霈珊, 古若雷, 张亮. 急性应激与风险倾向：兴奋易感性的调节作用[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(1): 45-54. (WANG P S, GU R L, ZHANG L. The relationship between acute stress and risk taking: the moderating effect of ease of excitation [J]. Acta psychological sinica, 2023, 55(1): 45-54.)
[10] SMOLEWSKA K A, MCCABE S B, WOODY E Z. A psychometric evaluation of the highly sensitive person scale: the components of sensory-processing sensitivity and their relation to the BIS/BAS and “Big Five”[J]. Personality and individual differences, 2006, 40(6): 1269-1279.
[11] VALKENBURG P M, PETER J. The differential susceptibility to media effects model[J]. Journal of communication, 2013, 63(2): 221-243.
[12] GOSWAMI M, PADHI S R, BAKSHI S, et al. Susceptibility to fake news on social media: a study among Indian youth in the light of COVID-19[J]. Humanities and social science studies, 2021, 9(2): 1-15.
[13] GURGUN S, CEMILOGLU D, CLOSE E A, et al. Why do we not stand up to misinformation? Factors influencing the likelihood of challenging misinformation on social media and the role of demographics[J]. Technology in society, 2023, 76: 102444.
[14] UMANATH S, RIES F, HUFF M J. Reducing suggestibility to additive versus contradictory misinformation in younger and older adults via divided attention and/or explicit error detection[J]. Applied cognitive psychology, 2019, 33(5): 793-805.
[15] GEORGIOU N, DELFABBRO P, BALZAN R. COVID-19-related conspiracy beliefs and their relationship with perceived stress and pre-existing conspiracy beliefs[J]. Personality and individual differences, 2020, 166: 110201.
[16] VAN PROOIJEN J W. Why education predicts decreased belief in conspiracy theories[J]. Applied cognitive psychology, 2017, 31(1): 50-58.
[17] SALLAM M, DABABSEH D, YASEEN A, et al. Conspiracy beliefs are associated with lower knowledge and higher anxiety levels regarding COVID-19 among students at the University of Jordan[J]. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020, 17(14): 4915.
[18] PICKLES K, CVEJIC E, NICKEL B, et al. COVID-19 misinformation trends in Australia: prospective longitudinal national survey[J]. Journal of medical Internet research, 2021, 23(1): e23805.
[19] SHARMA P R, WADE K A, JOBSON L. A systematic review of the relationship between emotion and susceptibility to misinformation[J]. Memory, 2023, 31(1): 1-21.
[20] BAGO B, RAND D G, PENNYCOOK G. Fake news, fast and slow: deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines[J]. Journal of experimental psychology: general, 2020, 149(8): 1608-1613.
[21] CABRERA A, COLLINS W C, SALGADO J F. Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing[J]. The international journal of human resource management, 2006, 17(2): 245-264.
[22] LI X S, XU N, ZHANG J X, ET AL. The relationship between localized personality and knowledge sharing behavior: the mediating role of self-efficacy and social value[J]. Psychological exploration, 2015, 35(2): 153-157.
[23] CALIGIURI P M. The big five personality characteristics as predictors of expatriate’s desire to terminate the assignment and supervisor‐rated performance[J]. Personnel psychology, 2000, 53(1): 67-88.
[24] GOODMAN E, KUNIAVSKY M, MOED A. Observing the user experience: a practitioner’s guide to user research[J]. IEEE transactions on professional communication, 2013, 56(3): 260-261.
[25] ZIMMERMANN F. The dynamics of motivated beliefs[J]. American economic review, 2020, 110(2): 337-363.
[26] NAN X, WANG Y, THIER K. Why people believe health misinformation and who are at risk? A systematic review of individual differences in susceptibility to health misinformation[J]. Social science & medicine, 2022, 314: 115398.
[27] LYONS B A, MONTGOMERY J M, GUESS A M, et al. Overconfidence in news judgments is associated with false news susceptibility[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2021, 118(23): e2019527118.
[28] MAYORGA M W, HESTER E B, HELSEL E, et al. Enhancing public resistance to “fake news”: a review of the problem and strategic solutions[J]. The handbook of applied communication research, 2020, 1:197-212.
[29] KAHAN D M, PETERS E, WITTLIN M, et al. The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks[J]. Nature climate change, 2012, 2(10): 732-735.
[30] BA S, STALLAERT J, WHINSTON A B. Research commentary: introducing a third dimension in information systems design: the case for incentive alignment[J]. Information systems research, 2001, 12(3): 225-239.
[31] VAN DER LINDEN S. Misinformation: susceptibility, spread, and interventions to immunize the public[J]. Nature medicine, 2022, 28(3): 460-467.
[32] CAPLIN A, DEAN M, MARTIN D. Search and satisficing[J]. American economic review, 2011, 101(7): 2899-2922.
[33] A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance[M]. New York: Psychology Press, 2014: 71-83.
[34] SALTOR J, BARBERIA I, RODRÍGUEZ-FERREIRO J. Thinking disposition, thinking style, and susceptibility to causal illusion predict fake news discriminability[J]. Applied cognitive psychology, 2023, 37(2): 360-368.
[35] BRASSIL M, O’MAHONY C, GREENE C M. Do cognitive abilities reduce eyewitness susceptibility to the misinformation effect? A systematic review[J]. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2024, 31(5): 1-27.
[36] SHAN Y, JI M, XING Z, et al. Susceptibility to breast cancer misinformation among Chinese patients: cross-sectional study[J]. JMIR formative research, 2023, 7(1): e42782.
[37] 曹雅宁, 柯青.为什么人们对虚假健康信息的易感性不同?——基于信息加工过程组态的分析[J]. 现代情报, 2023, 43(1): 40-54. (CAO Y N, KE Q. Why people show differences in their susceptibility to health misinformation? Research based on information processing configurations[J]. Journal of modern information, 2023, 43(1): 40-54.)
[38] TRABERG C S, HARJANI T, ROOZENBEEK J, et al. The persuasive effects of social cues and source effects on misinformation susceptibility[J]. Scientific reports, 2024, 14(1): 4205.
[39] DIAS N, PENNYCOOK G, RAND D G. Emphasizing publishers does not effectively reduce susceptibility to misinformation on social media[J]. Harvard kennedy school misinformation review, 2020, 1(1): 001.
[40] 宋士杰, 赵宇翔, 宋小康, 等. 互联网环境下失真健康信息可信度判断的影响因素研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2019, 45(4): 72-85. (SONG S J, ZHAO Y X, SONG X K, et al. Investigating the influential factors of consumer’s credibility judgment on health misinformation[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2019, 45(4): 72-85.)
[41] HENKE J, LEISSNER L, MÖHRING W. How can journalists promote news credibility? Effects of evidences on trust and credibility[J]. Journalism practice, 2019, 14(3): 299-318.
[42] PENNYCOOK G, EPSTEIN Z, MOSLEH M, et al. Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online[J]. Nature, 2021, 592(7855): 590-595.
[43] PENNYCOOK G, MCPHETRES J, ZHANG Y, et al. Fighting COVID-19 misinformation on social media: experimental evidence for a scalable accuracy-nudge intervention[J]. Psychological science, 2020, 31(7): 770-780.
[44] FOGG B J. A behavior model for persuasive design[C]//Proceedings of the 4th international conference on persuasive technology. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2009: 1-7.
[45] BARRADA J R, CASTRO Á. Tinder users: sociodemographic, psychological, and psychosexual characteristics[J]. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020, 17(21): 8047.
[46] 刘艳丽, 刘勇, 陆桂芝, 等. 尴尬易感性量表中文版用于大学生样本的效度和信度[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2015, 23(3): 401-405, 462. (LIU Y L, LIU Y, LU G Z, et al. Validity and reliability of the susceptibility to embarrassment scale in Chinese college students[J]. Chinese journal of clinical psychology, 2015, 23(3): 401-405, 462.)
[47] BUCHANAN T. Why do people spread false information online? The effects of message and viewer characteristics on self-reported likelihood of sharing social media disinformation[J]. Plos one, 2020, 15(10): e0239666.
[48] BARMAN D, CONLAN O. Exploring the links between personality traits and susceptibility to disinformation[C]//Proceedings of the 32nd ACM conference on hypertext and social media. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2021: 291-294.
[49] 张笑仪, 郑宇, 黄洗墨. 大学生心理危机易感性量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 心理月刊, 2023, 18(10): 58-61. (ZHANG X Y, ZHENG Y, HUANG X M. Development and reliability and validity testing of the psychological crisis susceptibility scale for college students[J]. Psychologies magazine, 2023, 18(10): 58-61.)
[50] HU J, PAN X, ZHONG M. On effects of personality traits on travelers’ heterogeneous preferences: insights from a case study in Urumqi, China[J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15(10): 8186.
[51] GOLDBERG L R. An alternative “description of personality”: the Big-Five factor structure[J]. Journal of personality and social psychology, 1990, 59(6): 1216-1229.
[52] WANG X, YUE T, MO P K. The associations among cognitive social factors, eHealth literacy and health-promoting behaviors in Chinese adolescents[J]. Health promotion international, 2022, 37(6): daac143.
[53] GREENE C M, MURPHY G. Individual differences in susceptibility to false memories for COVID-19 fake news[J]. Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2020, 5(1): 1-8.
[54] MOTOWIDLO S J, BORMAN W C, SCHMIT M J. A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance[M]//Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Contextual Performance. New York: Psychology Press, 2014: 71-83.
[55] 邓胜利, 孙瑾杰. 图书馆参与虚假健康信息治理的价值、阻滞因素和实现路径[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(9): 14-22. (DENG S L, SUN J J. The value, barriers and practical routes of libraries participating in health misinformation governance[J]. Library and information service, 2022, 66(9): 14-22.)
[56] 朱梦蝶, 付少雄, 郑德俊, 等. 文献视角下的社交媒体健康谣言研究：特征、传播与治理[J]. 图书情报知识, 2022, 39(5): 131-143. (ZHU M D, FU S X, ZHENG D J, et al. Research on social media health rumors from the perspective of literature: characteristics, dissemination and governance[J]. Information & knowledge, 2022, 39(5): 131-143.)
[57] FANG C, ZHANG J. Users’ continued participation behavior in social Q&A communities: A motivation perspective[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2019, 92: 87-109.
[58] PAI P, TSAI H T. Reciprocity norms and information-sharing behavior in online consumption communities: an empirical investigation of antecedents and moderators[J]. Information & management, 2016, 53(1): 38-52.
[59] 彭晓哲, 崔芳, 焦璨, 等.谣言传播的情境、内容、传播者与受众特征及相关认知神经科学研究[J]. 心理科学, 2018, 41(4): 916-921. (PENG X Z, CUI F, JIAO C, et al. Factors influencing rumor transmission: characteristics of circumstances, contents, transmitters and recipients[J]. Psychological science, 2018, 41(4): 916-921.)
[60] 刘健, 王小菲. 基于层次分析法的高校图书馆网站用户同意度评价指标体系构建研究[J]. 情报科学, 2022, 40(12): 80-87. (LIU J, WANG X F. The construction of evaluation index system of user satisfaction of university library websites based on analytic hierarchy process[J]. Information science, 2022, 40(12): 80-87.)
[61] ASSENZA T, CARDACI A, HUBER S J. Fake news: susceptibility, awareness and solutions[R]. ECONtribute Discussion Paper, 2024.
[62] ORCHINIK R, MARTEL C, RAND D G, et al. Uncommon errors: adaptive intuitions in high-quality media environments increase susceptibility to misinformation[EB/OL]. [2024-12-05]. https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/q7r58.
[63] AHMED S, RASUL M E. Social media news use and COVID-19 misinformation engagement: survey study[J]. Journal of medical Internet research, 2022, 24(9): e38944.
