图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2025 , Vol. 69 >Issue 8: 107 - 116

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2025.08.010

研究论文

科研人员学术合作特征的性别差异研究

  • 崔林蔚 ,
  • 胡卉 ,
  • 董坤
展开
  • 1 辽宁大学信息资源管理学院 沈阳 110136;
    2 中国科学院文献情报中心 北京 100190;
    3 山东理工大学信息管理研究院 淄博 255049
崔林蔚，讲师，博士，硕士生导师；胡卉，馆员，博士；董坤，副教授，博士，硕士生导师，通信作者，E-mail:dongkun@sdut.edu.cn。

收稿日期: 2024-04-24

  修回日期: 2024-09-03

  网络出版日期: 2025-04-10

基金资助

本文系国家自然科学基金青年项目“技术科学家的社会功能及成长机理研究”（项目编号：72404115）和辽宁省“十四五”教育科学规划一般项目“辽宁省‘T型’复合型创新人才培养研究”（项目编号：JG21DB113）研究成果之一。

收起

Research on Gender Differences in Researchers’ Academic Collaboration Characteristics

  • Cui Linwei ,
  • Hu Hui ,
  • Dong Kun
Expand
  • 1 College of information resource management, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110036;
    2 National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190;
    3 Institute of Information Management, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255049
Cui Linwei,lecturer,PhD,master supervisor;Hu Hui,librarian,PhD;Dong Kun,associate professor,PhD,master supervisor,corresponding author,E-mail:dongkun@sdut.edu.cn.

Received date: 2024-04-24

  Revised date: 2024-09-03

  Online published: 2025-04-10

Supported by

The work is supported by the project of National Natural Science Foundation of China, titled “Research on the Social Function and Growth Mechanism of Engineering Scientists” (Grant No.72404115), and the project of “14th Five-Year Plan” Education Science Planning in Liaoning Province, titled “Research on the Cultivation of ‘T-Type’ Compound Innovative Talents in Liaoning Province”(Grant No. JG21DB113).

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义] 性别差异问题在科学界普遍存在，从微观层面上分析相似学术背景的科研人员在学术合作中的性别差异，可为学术合作促进政策和科研人员性别差异研究提供新的研究视角与政策启示。[方法/过程] 基于ORCID国际科研人员履历数据和Web of Science学术论文数据，应用倾向值匹配（PSM）及文献计量学方法，探究具备相似学术背景的科研人员在学术合作特征上所表现出的性别差异。[结果/结论] 研究发现，相较于个人特征和环境因素等变量相似的女性科研人员，男性科研人员具有更大的合作规模、更高的合作稳定性，在学术合作中具有更高的中介中心性，也更多地参与到国际合作中，但在跨学科合作方面没有发现显著的性别差异。

关键词： 性别; 科研人员; 学术合作; 国际合作; 跨学科合作

本文引用格式

崔林蔚 , 胡卉 , 董坤 . 科研人员学术合作特征的性别差异研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2025 , 69(8) : 107 -116 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2025.08.010

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] Gender differences are a common issue in the scientific community. Examining gender differences in academic collaboration among researchers with similar academic backgrounds at a micro level can offer fresh research perspectives and policy implications for promoting academic collaboration and studying gender differences among researchers. [Method/Process] Using data from the resumes of international researchers in the ORCID database and papers from Web of Science, this article utilized propensity score matching and bibliometric methods to investigate gender differences in academic collaboration characteristics among researchers with similar academic backgrounds. [Result/Conclusion] The study discovers that, after accounting for personal characteristics and environmental factors, male scientific researchers exhibit a larger scale of collaboration, greater stability in collaboration, higher dominance in academic collaboration, and greater participation in international cooperation. No significant gender differences are found in interdisciplinary collaboration.

Key words： gender; researchers; academic collaboration; international collaboration; interdisciplinary collaboration

参考文献

[1] 中国科学院文献情报中心. 文献情报中心发布中国首份女性科 研 人 员 生 态 报 告[EB/OL]. [2024-10-23]. http://www.las.cas.cn/news/fwcx/202212/t20221202_6566059.html. (National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences. National Science Library released China’s first report on the ecology of female researchers [EB/OL]. [2024-10-23]. http://www.las.cas.cn/news/fwcx/202212/t20221202_6566059.html.)
[2] 逯万辉, 田丰. 我国人文社会科学领域学者性别结构研究[J]. 江 苏大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 25(5): 113-124. (LU W H, TIAN F. On the gender structure of scholars in humanities and social sciences in China[J]. Journal of Jiangsu University (social science edition), 2023, 25(5): 113-124.)
[3] 谭春辉, 汪红信, 王仪雯, 等. 图情档学科高校教师科研论文 产出的性别差异[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2023, 43(9): 65-75. (TAN C H, WANG H X, WANG Y W, et al. Gender differences in research output of university teachers in library, information and archives management[J]. Library tribune, 2023, 43(9): 65-75.)
[4] 崔林蔚. 科研人员科研产出及影响力性别分层的研究进展[J]. 科学学研究, 2021, 39(7): 1239-1247. (CUI L W. Review of the researchers’ gender stratification of scientific research output and influence[J]. Studies in science of science, 2021, 39(7): 1239-1247.)
[5] COLE J R, ZUCKERMAN H. The productivity puzzle: persistence and change in patterns of publication of men and women scientists[M]//STEINKAMP M W, MAEHR M L. Advances in motivation and achievement. London: JAI Press Inc., 1984: 217-258.
[6] 朱依娜, 何光喜. 学术产出的性别差异: 一个社会网络分析的视 角[J]. 社 会, 2016, 36(4): 76-102. (ZHU Y N, HE G X. Gender difference in scientific productivity: an explanation from the perspective of social network analysis[J]. Chinese journal of sociology, 2016, 36(4): 76-102.)
[7] 秦佩恒. 强化社会网络支持,提升女性专利产出[N]. 中国妇女报, 2019-11-19(5). (QIN P H. Strengthening social network support to increase women’s patent output[N]. China women’s daily, 2019-11-19(5).)
[8] KYVIK S, TEIGEN M. Child care, research collaboration, and gender differences in scientific productivity[J]. Science, technology, & human values, 1996, 21(1): 54-71.
[9] LEE S, BOZEMAN B. The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity[J]. Social studies of science, 2005, 35(5): 673-702.
[10] GAZNI A, DIDEGAH F. Investigating different types of research collaboration and citation impact: a case study of Harvard University’s publications[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 87(2): 251-265.
[11] LEE S, BOZEMAN B. The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity[J]. Social studies of science, 2005, 35(5): 673-702.
[12] 张丽华, 田丹, 曲建升. 科研合作模式与科研人员角色的变化 规律分析——以病毒学领域职业生涯至少为 30 年的作者为例 [J]. 情报学报, 2020, 39(7): 719-730. (ZHANG L H, TIAN D, QU J S. Analysis of change in research collaboration patterns and the role of scientific researchers: authors in virology with a career period of at least 30 years[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2020, 39(7): 719-730.)
[13] Elsevier. The researcher journey through a gender lens(2020)[EB/OL]. [2024-10-23]. https://www.elsevier.com/connect/gender-report.
[14] CALVO N, FERNÁNDEZ-LÓPEZ S, RODEIRO-PAZOS D. Is university-industry collaboration biased by sex criteria?[J]. Knowledge management research & practice, 2019, 17(4): 408-420.
[15] Elsevier. Gender in the global research landscape (2017)[EB/OL]. [2024-10-23]. https://www.elsevier.com/connect/elseviers-reports-ongender-in-research.
[16] JADIDI M, KARIMI F, LIETZ H, et al. Gender disparities in science? Dropout, productivity, collaborations and success of male and female computer scientists[J]. Advances in complex systems, 2017(20): 1750011.
[17] LAWANI S M. Quality, collaboration and citations in cancer research: a bibliometric study[D]. Florida: Florida State University, 1980.
[18] 朱丽娟, 李丽娜. 科研合作计量指标研究述评[J]. 情报杂志, 2013, 32(6): 76-79, 52. (ZHU L J, LI L N. Study of research collaborative measures[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2013, 32(6): 76-79, 52.)
[19] SCHUBERT A. Jazz discometrics: a network approach[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2012, 6(4): 480-484.
[20] 秦梓韬, 马卫华, 许治, 等. 人力资本和社会资本对学者科研绩 效的影响路径——基于模糊集定性比较分析[J]. 科技管理研究, 2020, 40(24): 159-167. (QIN Z T, MA W H, XU Z, et al. Impact path of human capital and social capital on scholars’ research performance: a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis[J]. Science and technology management research, 2020, 40(24): 159-167.)
[21] HUANG J, GATES A J, SINATRA R, et al. Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines[J]. PNAS, 2020, 117(9): 4609-4616.
[22] FELL C B, KONIG C J. Is there a gender difference in scientific collaboration? A scientometric examination of co-authorships among industrial–organizational psychologists[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 108(1): 113-141.
[23] LARIVIÈRE V, NI C, GINGRAS Y, et al. Bibliometrics: global gender disparities in science[J]. Nature news, 2013, 504(7479): 211-213.
[24] 郭洋, 谭春辉, 何文瑾, 等. 科研人员间科研合作意愿的影响因 素组态分析[J]. 情报科学, 2021, 39(8): 139-148. (GUO Y, TAN C H, HE W J, et al. Configuration analysis of influencing factors of scientific researchers’ cooperative consensus[J]. Information science, 2021, 39(8): 139-148.)
[25] ZHAO Z, BU Y, KANG L, et al. An investigation of the relationship between scientists’ mobility to/from China and their research performance[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2020(14): 1-8.
[26] 胡安宁. 倾向值匹配与因果推论: 方法论述评[J]. 社会学研究, 2012, 27(1): 221-242, 246. (HU A N. Propensity score matching and causal inference: A methodological review[J]. Sociological studies, 2012, 27(1): 221-242, 246.)
[27] 陈强. 高级计量经济学及 Stata 应用[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2013. (CHEN Q. Advanced econometrics and Stata applications[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2013.)
[28] CULLEN Z, PEREZ-TRUGLIA R. The old boys’ club: schmoozing and the gender gap[J]. American economic review, 2023, 113(7): 1703-1740.
[29] HOWE-WALSH L, TURNBULL S. Barriers to women leaders in academia: tales from science and technology[J]. Studies in higher education, 2016, 41(3): 415-428.
[30] FU F, NOWAK M A, CHRISTAKIS N A, et al. The evolution of homophily[J]. Scientific reports, 2012, 2(1): 845.
[31] 秦佩恒, 洪志生, 赵兰香. 跨界合作网络与专利产出: 基于性 别差异的研究[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(10): 258-267. (QIN P H, HONG Z S, ZHAO L X. Boundary-spanning collaboration and patent productivity: a study based on gender differences[J]. Science research management, 2020, 41(10): 258-267.)
[32] 赵延东, 周婵. 我国科研人员的科研合作网络分析——基于个体 中心网视角的研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2011, 29(7): 999-1006. (ZHAO Y D, ZHOU C. The cooperation network of Chinese researchers: a perspective of ego-centered social network analysis[J]. Studies in science of science, 2011, 29(7): 999-1006.)
[33] BADAR K, HITE J M, BADIR Y F. Examining the relationship of co-authorship network centrality and gender on academic research performance: the case of chemistry researchers in Pakistan[J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 94(2): 755-775.
[34] UHLY K M, VISSER L M, ZIPPEL K S. Gendered patterns in international research collaborations in academia[J]. Studies in higher education, 2017, 42(4): 760-782.
[35] ABRAMO G, D’ANGELO C A, DI COSTA F. A gender analysis of top scientists’ collaboration behavior: evidence from Italy[J]. Scientometrics, 2019, 120(2): 405-418.
[36] 张琳, 杜会英, 尚媛媛, 等. 性别视角下国家自然科学基金项 目负责人的成果产出与影响研究[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2021, 11(3): 110-120. (ZHANG L, DU H Y, SHANG Y Y, et al. Gender differences in academic performance and impact: an analysis of the NSFC project principal investigator[J]. Journal of information resources management, 2021, 11(3): 110-120.)
[37] ABRAMO G, D’ANGELO C A, MURGIA G. Gender differences in research collaboration[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2013, 7(4): 811-822.
[38] ARAÚJO E B, ARAÚJO N A M, MOREIRA A A, et al. Gender differences in scientific collaborations: women are more egalitarian than men[J]. PloS one, 2017, 12(5): e0176791.
[39] VAN RIJNSOEVER F J, HESSELS L K. Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration[J]. Research policy, 2011, 40(3): 463-472.
[40] 中国新闻网. 鲜为人知的诺贝尔奖大数据:女性得奖仅为 5.44%[EB/OL]. [2024-10-23]. http://backend.chinanews.com/business/2015/12-26/7689160.shtml. (China News Network. Littleknown Nobel Prize data: women only account for 5.44% of the prizes[EB/OL]. [2024-10-23]. http://backend.chinanews.com/business/2015/12-26/7689160.shtml.)
[41] 石燕青, 孙建军. 我国图书情报领域学者科研绩效与国际合作 程度的关系研究[J]. 情报科学, 2017, 35(11): 114-120. (SHI Y Q, SUN J J. The relationship between research performance and international collaboration in library and information science[J]. Information science, 2017, 35(11): 114-120.)
[42] ZIPPEL K. Women in global science: advancing careers through international collaboration[M]. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2017.
[43] 崔林蔚. 学术影响力的性别差异:学者跨学科性的视角[J]. 科学学 研究, 2023, 41(5): 777-786. (CUI L W. Gender difference in academic influence: an explanation from the perspective of interdisciplinary[J]. Studies in science of science, 2023, 41(5): 777-786.
[44] 谭春辉, 李明磊, 王仪雯, 等. 科研人员职业生涯成长轨迹的性 别差异研究——以图情档学科国家社科基金一般项目获批者为 例[J]. 现代情报, 2024, 44(7): 125-134. (TAN C H, LI M L, WANG Y W. Study on gender differences in the career growth trajectory of scientific researchers: taking the general project approved by the National Social Science Foundation of China as an example[J]. Journal of modern information, 2024, 44(7): 125-134.)
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉