图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2025 , Vol. 69 >Issue 9: 78 - 89

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2025.09.007

研究论文

中文Altmetrics发展困境：基于信息行为视角的数据生成过程剖析

  • 岑汪慧 ,
  • 韩毅
展开
  • 1 西南大学商贸学院, 重庆 402460;
    2 西南大学新闻传媒学院, 重庆 400715
岑汪慧，硕士研究生；韩毅，教授，博士，通信作者，E-mail: hanyi72@swu.edu.cn。

收稿日期: 2024-10-21

  修回日期: 2024-12-08

  网络出版日期: 2025-04-22

基金资助

本文系国家社会科学基金项目“开放科学视域下中文Altmetrics数据的生成机制与可用性评估研究”（项目编号：22BTQ059）研究成果之一。

收起

Chinese Altmetrics Development Dilemma:Analysis of the Data Generation Process Based on the Information Behavior Perspective

  • Cen Wanghui ,
  • Han Yi
Expand
  • 1 Business College of Southwest University, Chongqing 402460;
    2 School of Journalism and Commnication of Southwest University, Chongqing 400715
Cen Wanghui, master candidate; Han Yi, professor, PhD, corresponding author, E-mail: hanyi72@swu.edu.cn.

Received date: 2024-10-21

  Revised date: 2024-12-08

  Online published: 2025-04-22

Supported by

This work is supported by the project of National Social Science Fund of China,titled “Researches on the Generation Mechanism and Usability Evaluation of Chinese Altmetrics Data from the Perspective of Open Science”(Grant No.22BTQ059).

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义] 从信息行为视角阐释Altmetrics数据生成过程，并基于此发现、识别并挖掘中文Altmetrics发展存在的主要困境，为培育中文学术生态的Altmetrics应用场景提供重要参考和实践指导。[方法/过程] 以Altmetrics提出过程及内涵嬗变为研究逻辑起点，从用户信息行为视角剖析Altmetrics数据的生成过程，结合中文网络社交平台环境的特殊性，总结中文Altmetrics的发展困境并提出相应对策建议。[结果/结论] Altmetrics数据是各利益相关方依赖网络平台的信息行为结果，一方面体现为单个用户的信息行为生命周期各阶段数据累积，另一方面体现为众多利益相关方以网络平台为中心的信息行为协同与交叠涌现过程；科学交流功能异化是中文Altmetrics发展困境的主要原因，集中表现为：Altmetrics发展的内生性动力不足，Altmetrics发展的相关利益方共识欠缺，Altmetrics发展的数据聚合性工具缺失。可通过构建多元激励与协同机制、加强共识与协作、构建智能数据集成与分析平台等对策突破Altmetrics发展困境。

关键词： 非正式信息交流; 用户信息行为; Altmetrics数据; 中文Altmetrics

本文引用格式

岑汪慧 , 韩毅 . 中文Altmetrics发展困境：基于信息行为视角的数据生成过程剖析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2025 , 69(9) : 78 -89 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2025.09.007

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] The Altmetrics data generation process is explained from the perspective of information behavior. Based on this, discovering, identifying and digging out the main dilemmas in the development of Chinese Altmetrics can provide important references and practical guidance for fostering the application scenarios of Altmetrics in Chinese academic ecology. [Method/Process] Taking the process of Altmetrics proposal and connotation transmutation as the logical starting point of the research, this paper analyzed the generation process of Altmetrics data from the perspective of user information behavior, and combined the special characteristics of Chinese online social platform environment. It summarized the development dilemmas of Chinese Altmetrics and put forward corresponding countermeasure suggestions. [Result/Conclusion] Altmetrics data is the result of the information behavior of various stakeholders relying on network platforms. On the one hand, it reflects the accumulation of data in each stage of the life cycle of a single user’s information behavior, and on the other hand, it reflects the synergistic and overlapping emergence process of the information behavior of a large number of stakeholders centered on the network platform. The alienation of scientific communication function is the main reason for the predicament of Chinese Altmetrics development, which is centrally manifested in: the lack of endogenous motivation for Altmetrics development, the lack of consensus among the relevant stakeholders for Altmetrics development, and the lack of data aggregation tools for Altmetrics development. Countermeasures can be taken to break through the Altmetrics development dilemma by building multiple incentives and synergistic mechanisms, strengthening consensus and collaboration, and building an intelligent data integration and analysis platform.

Key words： informal communication; users’ information behavior; Altmetrics data; Chinese Altmetrics

参考文献

[1] 黄国彬, 郑霞.注册式研究报告的出版机制研究[J].图书馆建设, 2022(1): 145-157.(HUANG G B, ZHENG X.Study on publishing mechanism of registered reports[J].Library development, 2022(1): 145-157.)
[2] 金贞燕, 侯景丽, 孙华丽.Altmetrics数据整合分析工具的现状特点及相关问题研究[J].情报理论与实践, 2019, 42(4): 89-95, 70.(JIN Z Y, HOU J L, SUN H L.A study on present status, feature and related issues of Altmetric data aggregated tools[J].Information studies: theory & application, 2019, 42(4): 89-95, 70.)
[3] O'NEILL J.NISO recommended practice: outputs of the alternative assessment metrics project[J].Collaborative librarianship, 2016, 8(3): 118-123.
[4] WILSON T D.Information behaviour: an interdisciplinary perspective[J].Information processing & management, 1997, 33(4): 551-572.
[5] KUHLTHAU C C.Inside the search process: information seeking from the user's perspective[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1991, 42(5): 361-371.
[6] 卢晓荣, 张树良.国内社交媒体用于学术成果Altmetrics评价存在问题及对策[J].图书情报工作, 2019, 63(21): 87-96.(LU X R, ZHANG S L.Existing problems and countermeasures of domestic social media for Altmetrics evaluation of academic achievements[J].Library and information service, 2019, 63(21): 87-96.)
[7] ROBINSON-GARCíA N, TORRES-SALINAS D, ZAHEDI Z, et al.New data, new possibilities: exploring the insides of Altmetric.com[J].EI profesional de la información, 2014, 23(4): 359-366.
[8] Wikipedia.Altmetrics[EB/OL].[2025-01-02].https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altmetrics.
[9] HAUSTEIN S, PETERS I, BAR-ILAN J, et al.Coverage and adoption of Altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community[J].Scientometrics, 2014, 101(2): 1145-1163.
[10] PRIEM J, HEMMINGER B H.Scientometrics 2.0: new metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web[J].First Monday, 2010, 15(7): 32-51.
[11] 刘晓娟, 王晨琳, 吴鑫梅.Altmetrics热点论文的利益相关者信息交互模式研究[J].情报杂志, 2022, 41(4): 186-192.(LIU X J, WANG C L, WU X M.Research on stakeholders' information interaction modes of Altmetrics hot papers[J].Journal of intelligence, 2022, 41(4): 186-192.)
[12] 方志超, 王贤文.科学论文首条推特的积累速度与用户类型分析[J].图书情报知识, 2019(2): 28-38.(FANG Z C, WANG X W.Study on the accumulation speed and user type of scientific publications’ first Tweets[J].Documentation, information & knowledge, 2019(2): 28-38.)
[13] 王鹏飞, 刘烜贞.基于内容分析的Altmetrics本质研究[J].图书情报工作, 2017, 61(2): 114-120.(WANG P F, LIU X Z.Research on Altmetrics' essence based on content analysis[J].Library and information service, 2017, 61(2): 114-120.)
[14] HAUSTEIN S, BOWMAN T D, COSTAS R.Interpreting “Altmetrics”: viewing acts on social media through the lens of citation and social theories[M]//CASSIDY R S.Theories of informetrics: a festschrift in honor of blaise cronin.Berlin: De Gruyter, 2016: 372-406.
[15] 刘晓娟, 王晨琳.用户动机视角下的Altmetrics指标研究[J].图书情报知识, 2020(3): 63-70, 96.(LIU X J, WANG C L.Research on Altmetrics indicators from the perspective of users’ motivation[J].Documentation, information & knowledge, 2020(3): 63-70, 96.)
[16] SAID A, BOWMAN T D, ABBASI R A, et al.Mining network-level properties of twitter Altmetrics data[J].Scientometrics, 2019, 120(1): 217-235.
[17] LUTZ C, HOFFMANN C P.Making academic social capital visible: relating SNS-based, alternative and traditional metrics of scientific impact[J].Social science computer review, 2018, 36(5): 632-643.
[18] HOFFMANN C P, LUTZ C, MECKEL M.A relational altmetric? Network centrality on research gate as an indicator of scientific impact[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2016, 67(4): 765-775.
[19] 刘晓娟, 孙镘莉.中文社交媒体中学术论文的使用行为研究——以知乎为例[J].图书情报知识, 2022, 39(1): 84-94.(LIU X J, SUN M L.Research on the usage behavior of academic papers in Chinese social media: a case study of Zhihu[J].Documentation, information & knowledge, 2022, 39(1): 84-94.)
[20] 王玥, 张东鑫, 韩毅.时间心理账户视角下中文Altmetrics数据的生成机制研究[J].图书情报工作, 2024, 68(20): 118-130.(WANG Y, ZHANG D X, HAN Y.Research on the Chinese Altmetrics data generation mechanism from the perspective of mental accounting of time[J].Library and information service, 2024, 68(20): 118-130.)
[21] 余厚强, 傅坦, 张啸鸣, 等.学术论文社交媒体提及的跨平台比较研究——以脸书和推特为例[J].情报理论与实践, 2022, 45(10): 188-194, 187.(YU H Q, FU T, ZHANG X M, et al.Cross-platform comparative study of social media mention to scholarly papers: a study of Facebook and Twitter[J].Information studies: theory & application, 2022, 45(10): 188-194, 187.)
[22] NA J C.User motivations for Tweeting research articles: a content analysis approach[M].Cham: Springer, 2015:197-208.
[23] THELWALL M, TSOU A, WEINGARTS S, et al.Tweeting links to academic articles[J].Cybermetrics, 2013, 17(1): 1-8.
[24] NA J C, YE Y E.Content analysis of scholarly discussions of psychological academic articles on Facebook[J].Online information review, 2017, 41(3): 337-353.
[25] 余佳潞, 岑汪慧, 韩毅.中文学术期刊论文的微博提及行为及Altmetrics融合评价研究[J].图书情报工作, 2024, 68(19): 90-104.(YU J L, CEN W H, HAN Y.A study on Weibo mentions and Altmetrics-based evaluation of Chinese academic journal articles[J].Library and information service, 2024, 68(19): 90-104.)
[26] HOLMBERG K, BOWMAN T D, HAUSTEIN S, et al.Astrophysicists’ conversational connections on Twitter[J].PloS one, 2014, 9(8): e106086.
[27] PRIEM J, TARABORELLI D, GROTH P, et al.Altmetrics: a manifesto[EB/OL].[2025-01-02].http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/.
[28] COSTAS R, ZAHEDI Z, WOUTERS P.Do "Altmetrics" correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015, 66(10): 2003-2019.
[29] THELWALL M, HAUSTEIN S, LARIVIèRE V, et al.Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services[J].PloS one, 2013, 8(5): e64841.
[30] WOUTERS P, COSTAS R.Users, narcissism, and control: tracking the impact of scholarly publications in the 21st century[J].Aslib journal of information management, 2012, 34(3): 147-151.
[31] 王宜鸿, 叶鹰.DIKW概念链上数据科学的理论与技术基础简论[J].图书馆杂志, 2020, 39(12): 20-28.(WANG Y H, YE Y.A concise discussion on the theoretical and technical foundations of data science from the view of information science[J].Library journal, 2020, 39(12): 20-28.)
[32] National Information Standards Organization(NISO).NISO RP-25-2016 outputs of the NISO alternative assessment metrics project[R].Baltimore: National Information Standards Organization, 2016: 2-6.
[33] 刘晓娟, 吴鑫梅.Altmetrics指标的利益相关者行为研究——以2019年AAS TOP100论文的推文数据为例[J].图书情报知识, 2021, 38(3): 111-120.(LIU X J, WU X M.Research on stakeholders' behavior for Altmetrics indicators: taking the Tweet data of the 2019 AAS TOP100 papers for example[J].Document, information & knowledge, 2021, 38(3): 111-120.)
[34] 张雪蕾, 邵晶, 尹飞, 等.替代计量视角下学术成果影响力评估：NISO AMMP项目剖析[J].图书情报工作, 2020, 64(2): 94-104.(ZHANG X L, SHAO J, YIN F, et al.The impact assessment of academic output in the Altmetrics perspective: NISO AMMP analysis[J].Library and information service, 2020, 64(2): 94-104.)
[35] 陈铭, 叶继元.中文Altmetrics数据整合分析平台的建立研究[J].大学图书馆学报, 2022, 40(4): 110-119.(CHEN M, YE J Y.Research on establishing Chinese Altmetrics data integration and analysis platform[J].Journal of academic libraries, 2022, 40(4): 110-119.)
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉