[1] DWIVEDI Y K, KSHETRI N, HUGHES L, et al. “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy [J]. International journal of information management, 2023, 71: 102642.
[2] 陈永伟. 超越ChatGPT：生成式AI的机遇、风险与挑战[J]. 山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023(3): 127-143. (CHEN Y. Beyond ChatGPT: opportunities, risks, and challenges from Generative AI [J]. Journal of Shandong University (philosophy and social sciences), 2023(3): 127-143.)
[3] CHOUDHURY A, SHAMSZARE H. Investigating the impact of user trust on the adoption and use of ChatGPT: survey analysis [J]. Journal of medical internet research, 2023, 25: e47184.
[4] LIU K, TAO D. The roles of trust, personalization, loss of privacy, and anthropomorphism in public acceptance of smart healthcare services [J]. Computers in human behavior, 2022, 127(2): 107026.
[5] JAIN G, PAREEK S, CARLBRING P. Revealing the source: how awareness alters perceptions of AI and human-generated mental health responses [J]. Internet interventions, 2024, 36: 100745.
[6] RAHMAN M S, SABBIR M M, ZHANG J, et al. Examining students’ intention to use ChatGPT: does trust matter? [J]. Australasian journal of educational technology, 2023, 39(6): 51-71.
[7] MAHESHWARI G. Factors influencing students’ intention to adopt and use ChatGPT in higher education: a study in the Vietnamese context [J]. Education and information technologies, 2023: 1-29.
[8] POLYPORTIS A, PAHOS N. Understanding students’ adoption of the ChatGPT chatbot in higher education: the role of anthropomorphism, trust, design novelty and institutional policy [J]. Behaviour & information technology, 2024: 1-22.
[9] DAHRI N A, YAHAYA N, AL-RAHMI W M, et al. Extended TAM based acceptance of AI-powered ChatGPT for supporting metacognitive self-regulated learning in education: a mixed-methods study [J]. Heliyon, 2024, 10(8): e29317.
[10] HYUN BAEK T, KIM M. Is ChatGPT scary good? How user motivations affect creepiness and trust in generative artificial intelligence [J]. Telematics and informatics, 2023, 83: 102030.
[11] KIM J H, KIM J, KIM C, et al. Do you trust ChatGPTs? Effects of the ethical and quality issues of generative AI on travel decisions [J]. Journal of travel & tourism marketing, 2023, 40(9): 779-801.
[12] LI Y, LEE S O. Navigating the generative AI travel landscape: the influence of ChatGPT on the evolution from new users to loyal adopters [J]. International journal of contemporary hospitality management, 2024: 27.
[13] PHAM H C, DUONG C D, NGUYEN G K H. What drives tourists’ continuance intention to use ChatGPT for travel services? A stimulus-organism-response perspective [J]. Journal of retailing and consumer services, 2024, 78: 103758.
[14] 初彦伯, 王萍, 胡姝姝. 社交媒体健康信息用户信任形成机理研究[J]. 现代情报, 2025, 45(1): 97-111. (CHU Y, WANG P, HU S. Research on the mechanism of user trust formation in social media health information [J]. Journal of modern information, 2025, 45(1): 97-111.)
[15] 谭春辉, 李玥澎, 周一夫, 等. 虚拟学术社区用户间人际信任的影响因素[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2022, 42(6): 141-149. (TAN C, LI Y, ZHOU Y et al. Factors influencing interpersonal trust among users in virtual academic communities [J]. Library tribune, 2022, 42(6): 141-149.)
[16] 王晰巍, 罗然, 刘宇桐, 等. 智慧图书馆在线聊天机器人使用行为影响因素及实证研究[J]. 情报学报, 2023, 42(2): 217-230. (WANG X, LUO R, LIU Y et al. Influencing factors and empirical research on the usage behavior of smart library online chatbots [J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2023, 42(2): 217-230)
[17] 叶凤云, 常琳, 秦琴, 等. 基于虚假信息特征的社交媒体大学生用户感知信任研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2024, 47(10): 118-127. (YE F, CHANG L, QIN Q et al. Research of social media college students’ perceived trust on false information features [J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2024, 47(10): 118-127.)
[18] 张嵩, 孙鑫玥, 陈昊. APP隐私侵犯场景下的用户信任修复机制研究——基于公平理论的多重中介模型[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(13): 36-48. (ZHANG S, SUN X, CHEN H. Research on user trust repair mechanism in APP privacy violation scenarios: a multi-mediator model based on justice theory [J]. Library and information service, 2023, 67(13): 36-48.)
[19] PETTY R E, CACIOPPO J T, The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion in communication and persuasion: central and peripheral routes to attitude change [M]. New York: Springer, 1986.
[20] KITCHEN P, KERR G, E. SCHULTZ D, et al. The elaboration likelihood model: review, critique and research agenda [J]. European journal of marketing, 2014, 48(11/12): 2033-2050.
[21] BHATTACHERJEE A, SANFORD C. Influence processes for information technology acceptance: An elaboration likelihood model [J]. MIS quarterly, 2006, 30(4): 805-825.
[22] SANG W, JI S, PU B, et al. The effect of tourism live streaming information quality and source credibility on users’ continuous viewing intention: an application of elaboration likelihood model [J]. Asia pacific journal of tourism research, 2023, 28(3): 177-190.
[23] SHAO Z, ZHANG L, PAN Z, et al. Uncovering the dual influence processes for click-through intention in the mobile social platform: an elaboration likelihood model perspective [J]. Information & management, 2023, 60(5): 103799.
[24] WANG X, TANG J, LI Q, et al. Will you buy my books? Investigating influential factors for the sales of user-generated e-books on a social commerce platform [J]. Information technology and management, 2023, 11(1): 1-16.
[25] LIU Q, SU F, MU A, et al. Understanding social media information sharing in individuals with depression: insights from the elaboration likelihood model and schema activation theory [J]. Psychology research and behavior management, 2024, 4(2): 1587-1609.
[26] ZAWIAH M, AL-ASHWAL F Y, GHARAIBEH L, et al. ChatGPT and clinical training: perception, concerns, and practice of pharm-D students [J]. Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2023, 16: 4099-4110.
[27] CHOUDHURY A, CHAUDHRY Z. Large language models and user trust: consequence of self-referential learning loop and the deskilling of health care professionals [J]. Journal of medical internet research, 2024, 26: e56764.
[28] KUANG Y R, ZOU M X, NIU H Q, et al. ChatGPT encounters multiple opportunities and challenges in neurosurgery [J]. International journal of surgery, 2023, 109(10): 2886-2891.
[29] MORATH B, CHIRIAC U, JASZKOWSKI E, et al. Performance and risks of ChatGPT used in drug information: an exploratory real-world analysis [J]. European journal of hospital pharmacy, 2024, 10(1): 491-497.
[30] AMARO I, BARRA P, GRECA A D, et al. Believe in artificial intelligence? A user study on the ChatGPT’s fake information impact [J]. IEEE transactions on computational social systems, 2024, 11(4): 5168-5177.
[31] TOSSELL C C, TENHUNDFELD N L, MOMEN A, et al. Student perceptions of ChatGPT use in a college essay assignment: implications for learning, grading, and trust in artificial intelligence [J]. IEEE transactions on learning technologies, 2024, 17: 1069-1081.
[32] ALMAIAH M A, JALIL M A, MAN M. Extending the TAM to examine the effects of quality features on mobile learning acceptance [J]. Journal of computers in education, 2016, 3(4): 453-485.
[33] BALASUBRAMANIAM N, KAUPPINEN M, RANNISTO A, et al. Transparency and explainability of AI systems: From ethical guidelines to requirements [J]. Information and software technology, 2023, 159: 107197.
[34] SHIN D, KOERBER A, LIM J S. Impact of misinformation from generative AI on user information processing: how people understand misinformation from generative AI [J]. New media & society, 2024, 3(1): 1-12.
[35] SHIN D. The effects of explainability and causability on perception, trust, and acceptance: Implications for explainable AI [J]. International journal of human-computer studies, 2021, 146: 102551.
[36] WANG C, LIU S, YANG H, et al. Ethical considerations of using ChatGPT in health care [J]. Journal of medical internet research, 2023, 25: e48009.
[37] CHAZETTE L, BRUNOTTE W, SPEITH T. Exploring explainability: a definition, a model, and a knowledge catalogue [C]//MOREIRA A. Proceedings of the 29th international requirements engineering conference. Los Alamitos, California: IEEE Press, 2021:197-208.
[38] WANG P, DING H. The rationality of explanation or human capacity? Understanding the impact of explainable artificial intelligence on human-AI trust and decision performance [J]. Information processing & management, 2024, 61(4): 103732.
[39] SIAU K, WANG W. Building trust in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and robotics [J]. Cutter business technology journal, 2018, 31(2): 47-53.
[40] WANG N, PYNADATH D V, HILL S G. Trust calibration within a human-robot team: Comparing automatically generated explanations [C]//BARTNECK C, NAGAI Y. Proceedings of the 11th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction. Christchurch, New Zealand: IEEE Press, 2016: 109-116.
[41] BARTNECK C, KULIĆ D, CROFT E, et al. Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots [J]. International journal of social robotics, 2009, 1(2): 71-81.
[42] YE Y, YOU H, DU J. Improved trust in human-robot collaboration with ChatGPT [J]. IEEE access, 2023, 11(1): 55748-55754.
[43] HOU T-Y, TSENG Y-C, YUAN C W. Is this AI sexist? The effects of a biased AI’s anthropomorphic appearance and explainability on users’ bias perceptions and trust [J]. International journal of information management, 2024, 76(6): 102775.
[44] CHENG X, ZHANG X, COHEN J, et al. Human vs. AI: Understanding the impact of anthropomorphism on consumer response to chatbots from the perspective of trust and relationship norms [J]. Information processing & management, 2022, 59(3): 102940.
[45] KLEIN K, MARTINEZ L F. The impact of anthropomorphism on customer satisfaction in chatbot commerce: an experimental study in the food sector [J]. Electronic commerce research, 2023, 23(4): 2789-2825.
[46] OOI K-B, TAN G W-H, AL-EMRAN M, et al. The potential of generative artificial intelligence across disciplines: Perspectives and future directions [J]. Journal of computer information systems, 2025, 65(1): 76-107
[47] HABBAL A, ALI M K, ABUZARAIDA M A. Artificial intelligence trust, risk and security management (AI TRiSM): frameworks, applications, challenges and future research directions [J]. Expert systems with applications, 2024, 240: 122442.
[48] KINNEY M, ANASTASIADOU M, NARANJO-ZOLOTOV M, et al. Expectation management in AI: a framework for understanding stakeholder trust and acceptance of artificial intelligence systems [J]. Heliyon, 2024, 10(7): e28562.
[49] FUREY E, BLUE J. Can I trust her? Intelligent personal assistants and GDPR [C]// CHEN S X. Proceedings of the international symposium on networks, computers and communications. Istanbul, Turkey: IEEE Press, 2019:1-6
[50] ZHOU C, LIU X, YU C, et al. Trust in AI-augmented design: Applying structural equation modeling to AI-augmented design acceptance [J]. Heliyon, 2024, 10(1): e23305.
[51] CHENG Y, JIANG H. How do AI-driven chatbots impact user experience? Examining gratifications, perceived privacy risk, satisfaction, loyalty, and continued use [J]. Journal of broadcasting & electronic media, 2020, 64(4): 592-614.
[52] FAST N J, JAGO A S. Privacy matters… or does it? Algorithms, rationalization, and the erosion of concern for privacy [J]. Current opinion in psychology, 2020, 31(2): 44-48.
[53] LEFKELI D, KARATAŞ M, GÜRHAN-CANLI Z. Sharing information with AI (versus a human) impairs brand trust: the role of audience size inferences and sense of exploitation [J]. International journal of research in marketing, 2024, 41(1): 138-155.
[54] RODRÍGUEZ CARDONA D, JANSSEN A, GUHR N, et al. A matter of trust? Examination of chatbot usage in insurance business [C]//BUI T. Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii international conference on system sciences. Hawaii: AIS Press, 2021:556-565. 55] MAYER R C, DAVIS J H, SCHOORMAN F D. An integrative model of organizational trust [J]. Academy of management review, 1995, 20(3): 709-734.
[56] HALLIKAINEN H, LAUKKANEN T. National culture and consumer trust in e-commerce [J]. International journal of information management, 2018, 38(1): 97-106.
[57] KIM G, SHIN B, LEE H G. Understanding dynamics between initial trust and usage intentions of mobile banking [J]. Information systems journal, 2009, 19(3): 283-311.
[58] DOGRUEL L, MASUR P, JOECKEL S. Development and validation of an algorithm literacy scale for internet users [J]. Communication methods and measures, 2022, 16(2): 115-133.
[59] 袁昀, 袁勤俭. 详尽可能性模型及其在信息系统研究领域的应用与展望[J]. 现代情报, 2023, 43(5): 156-167. (YUAN Y, YUAN Q. Elaboration likelihood model and its application and prospect in the field of information system research [J]. Journal of modern information, 2023, 43(5): 156-167)
[60] KIM H. The indirect effect of source information on psychological reactance against antismoking messages through perceived bias [J]. Health communication, 2017, 32(5): 650-656.
[61] WANG B, RAU P-L P, YUAN T. Measuring user competence in using artificial intelligence: validity and reliability of artificial intelligence literacy scale [J]. Behaviour & information technology, 2023, 42(9): 1324-1337.
[62] LI S, PENG K, ZHU B, et al. Research on users’ privacy-sharing intentions in the health data tracking system providing personalized services and public services [J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15(22): 15709.
[63] PAPPAS I O, WOODSIDE A G. Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA): guidelines for research practice in Information Systems and marketing [J]. International journal of information management, 2021, 58(6): 102310.
[64] MIKALEF P, PATELI A. Information technology-enabled dynamic capabilities and their indirect effect on competitive performance: findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA [J]. Journal of business research, 2017, 70(1): 1-16.
[65] VIMALKUMAR M, SHARMA S K, SINGH J B, et al. ‘Okay google, what about my privacy?’: user’s privacy perceptions and acceptance of voice based digital assistants [J]. Computers in human behavior, 2021, 120(7): 106763.
[66] CHUNG M. What’s in the black box? How algorithmic knowledge promotes corrective and restrictive actions to counter misinformation in the USA, the UK, South Korea and Mexico [J]. Internet research, 2023, 33(5): 1971-1989.
[67] 戴思源, 李珍珍. 人工智能素养的提升会增加个人的信息隐私忧虑吗?——基于保护意识和技术信任的中介效应研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023, 59(4): 46-57. (DAI S, LI Z. Will the improvement of artifical intelligence literacy bring about more concerns for personal information privacy? A research on mesomeric effect based on protection consciousness and technology trust [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University (philosophy and social sciences edition), 2023, 59(4): 46-57.)
