研究论文

突发公共卫生事件公众信息公开获取行为中信息茧房形成机理研究

  • 刘冰 ,
  • 刘禹宏 ,
  • 李鑫 ,
  • 江鸿
展开
  • 天津师范大学管理学院 天津 300387
刘冰,教授,博士,博士生导师,E-mail:brother_lb@126.com;刘禹宏,博士研究生;李鑫,硕士研究生;江鸿,硕士研究生。

收稿日期: 2025-02-11

  修回日期: 2025-06-06

  网络出版日期: 2026-04-08

基金资助

本文系国家社会科学基金重大项目“国家重大突发事件信息公开质量研究”(项目编号:20&ZD141)研究成果之一。

Formation Mechanism of the Information Cocoon Effect in Public Information Disclosure Acquisition Behavior During Public Health Emergencies

  • Liu Bing ,
  • Liu Yuhong ,
  • Li Xin ,
  • Jiang Hong
Expand
  • Management School of Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387
Liu Bing, Professor, PhD, Doctoral Supervisor, E-mail: brother_lb@126.com;Liu Yuhong, Doctoral Candidate;Li Xin, Master’s Candidate;Jiang Hong, Master’s Candidate.

Received date: 2025-02-11

  Revised date: 2025-06-06

  Online published: 2026-04-08

Supported by

This work is supported by the major project of the National Social Science Fund of China, titled “Research on the Quality of Information Disclosure for Major National Emergencies” (Grant No. 20&ZD141).

摘要

[目的/意义] 旨在探究突发公共卫生事件背景下,公众信息公开获取过程中信息茧房效应的内在形成机制及其作用机理,以期为各级政府提供决策参考,助力有效“破茧”,提升公众信息公开获取与利用效能。[方法/过程] 基于S-O-R理论,从公众的内外部刺激及其行为反应维度提取信息茧房效应的影响因素,构建理论模型,在此基础上设计问卷并回收341份有效样本,利用结构方程模型并结合bootstrap方法进行实证分析,以揭示信息茧房效应的形成机理及作用路径。[结果/结论] 突发公共卫生事件特殊情景下,公众信息公开获取行为中的信息茧房效应是由内外因素相互作用形成的复杂系统,其本质是公众个体在内外主客观因素共同刺激下而产生的一种偏差行为结果,此外,信息素养在此间发挥调节作用,是破解突发公共卫生事件公众信息公开获取过程中信息茧房效应的关键。

本文引用格式

刘冰 , 刘禹宏 , 李鑫 , 江鸿 . 突发公共卫生事件公众信息公开获取行为中信息茧房形成机理研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2026 , 70(8) : 45 -56 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2026.08.004

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] This study aims to explore the intrinsic formation mechanism and influencing factors of the information cocoon effect in the process of public information disclosure acquisition during public health emergencies. The findings are expected to provide decision-making references for governments at all levels, facilitate the effective “breaking of the cocoon”, and enhance the efficiency of public information acquisition and utilization. [Method/Process] Based on the S-O-R theory, this study identified the influencing factors of the information cocoon effect from the dimensions of internal and external stimuli and their behavioral responses to construct a theoretical model. A questionnaire was designed, and 341 valid responses were collected. Structural equation modeling and the bootstrap method were employed to analyze the data, revealing the formation mechanism and operational pathways of the information cocoon effect. [Result/Conclusion] In the specific context of public health emergencies, the information cocoon effect in public information disclosure acquisition behavior is a complex system formed by the interaction of internal and external factors. Essentially, it is a biased behavioral outcome driven by the combined stimulation of subjective and objective factors. Furthermore, information literacy plays a moderating role and serves as a key factor in mitigating the information cocoon effect in the process of public information acquisition in public health emergencies.

参考文献

[1] 杨一帆,田金吉.疫情信息公开的精准治理——一个基于“四阶段-敏感度-可用性”框架的分析[J].图书情报工作,2023, 67(7):35-43.(YANG Y F, TIAN J J. Precise governance of epidemic situation information disclosure:an analysis based on the“four stages-sensitivities-usability” framework[J]. Library and information service, 2023, 67(7):35-43.)
[2] 李月琳,张泰瑞,李嗣婕.基于系统性综述的政府信息公开影响因素及实践赋能[J].图书情报工作, 2022, 66(18):114-125.(LI Y L, ZHANG T R, LI S J. A systematic review for influential factors and practice empowerment of government information disclosure[J]. Library and information service, 2022,66(18):114-125.)
[3] PARISER E. The filter bubble:what the internet is hiding from you[M]. London:Penguin Group, 2011:6-7.
[4] 戴建华,韩孟昊.考虑信息茧房现象的网络舆情演化研究[J].情报理论与实践, 2023, 46(6):111-117.(DAI J H, HAN M H.The Evolution of network public opinion considering information cocoons[J]. Information studies:theory&application, 2023,46(6):111-117.)
[5] 曾润喜,杨璨.信息时代的政策茧房现象与政策传播效能提升路径研究[J].中国行政管理, 2023, 39(9):132-141.(ZENG R X, YANG C. Policy cocoon:the failure of policy communication of in the information age and its solution[J].Chinese public administration, 2023, 39(9):132-141.)
[6] 陈琼,宋士杰,赵宇翔.突发公共卫生事件中信息过载对用户信息规避行为的影响:基于COVID-19信息疫情的实证研究[J].情报资料工作, 2020, 41(3):76-88.(CHEN Q,SONG S J, ZHAO Y X. The impact of information overload on user information evasion in public health emergencies:An empirical study based on COVID-19 information prevalence[J].Information and documentation services, 2020, 41(3):76-88.)
[7] 杨云松,徐艺玲,谭春辉. WSR方法论视角下突发公共卫生事件中信息茧房成因的扎根分析[J].情报杂志, 2024, 43(3):190-197.(YANG Y S, XU Y L, TAN C H. Grounded analysis of the causes of information cocoon in public health emergencies from the perspective of WSR methodology[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2024, 43(3):190-197.)
[8] 徐向龙,许鑫.突发重大公共卫生事件初期公众信息关注与政府信任[J].图书馆杂志, 2020, 39(12):128-136.(XU X L, XU X. Public information concern and government trust in the early stage of major public health emergencies[J]. Library journal, 2020, 39(12):128-136.)
[9] GARRETT R K. Echo chambers online? Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users[J]. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 2009, 14(2):265-285.
[10] LIU W, ZHOU W. Research on solving path of negative effect of“information cocoon room” in emergency[J]. Discrete dynamics in nature and society, 2022(1):1326579.
[11] 段尧清,朱永迪,蔡启宾,等.突发公共卫生事件下公众持续使用政府信息行为影响因素研究——基于QCA的触发路径及演化分析[J].信息资源管理学报, 2022, 12(3):89-99.(DUAN Y Q, ZHU Y D, CAI Q B, et al. Research on influencing factors of government information public sustainable use behavior under public health emergency:trigger path and evolution analysis based on QCA[J]. Journal of information resources management, 2022, 12(3):89-99.)
[12] 柴会明,陈兰杰.国内外突发事件中公众应急信息行为研究述评[J].图书馆学研究, 2020(1):7-15.(CHAI H M, CHEN L J. A Review of the research on public emergency information behaviors in emergencies[J]. Research on library science,2020(1):7-15.)
[13] SPENCE P R, WESTERMAN D, SKALSKI P D, et al.Gender and age effects on information-seeking after 9/11[J].Communication research reports, 2006, 23(3):217-223.
[14] 王馨悦,刘畅.重大突发公共卫生事件中公众信息搜寻行为影响因素探究[J].图书情报工作, 2020, 64(21):77-89.(WANG X Y, LIU C. Research on the influencing factors of public information seeking behavior in major public health emergencies[J]. Library and information service, 2020, 64(21):77-89.)
[15] 耿瑞利,徐建国,金燕,等.重大突发公共卫生事件下公众信息获取行为与错失焦虑研究——以新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情为例[J].图书情报工作, 2020, 64(15):112-122.(GENG R L,XU J G, JIN Y. Research on individuals’ information acquisition behavior and fear of missing out during a major public health emergency:coronavirus disease 2019[J]. Library and information service, 2020, 64(15):112-122.)
[16] 李龙飞,张国良.算法时代“信息茧房”效应生成机理与治理路径——基于信息生态理论视角[J].电子政务, 2022(9):51-62.(LI L F, ZHANG G L. Mechanisms and governance pathways of the“Information Cocoon” effect in the algorithm era:an information ecology theory perspective[J]. E-government,2022(9):51-62.)
[17] 张玥,庄碧琛,李青宇,等.同质化困境:信息茧房概念解析与理论框架构建[J].中国图书馆学报, 2023, 49(3):107-122.(ZHANG Y, ZHUANG B C, LI Q Y, et al. Homogenization dilemma:concept analysis and theoretical framework construction of information cocoons[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2023, 49(3):107-122.)
[18] 张省,蔡永涛.算法时代“信息茧房”生成机制研究[J].情报理论与实践, 2023, 46(4):67-73.(ZHANG S, CAI Y T. Research on the generation mechanism of“Information Cocoon” in the algorithm Era[J]. Information studies:theory&application, 2023, 46(4):67-73.)
[19] KARLSEN R, STEEN-JOHNSEN K, WOLLEBEAK D, et al.Echo chamber and trench warfare dynamics in online debates[J].European journal of communication, 2017, 32(3):257-273.
[20] NAGULENDRA S, VASSILEVA J. Providing awareness,explanation and control of personalized filtering in a social networking site[J]. Information systems frontiers, 2016, 18(1):145-158.
[21] KNOBLOCH-WESTERWICK S, MENG J B. Reinforcement of the political self through selective exposure to political messages[J]. Journal of communication, 2011, 61(2):349-368.
[22] 袁顺波.网络环境下科研人员信息茧房的成因要素研究[J].情报理论与实践, 2022, 45(2):43-48.(YUAN S B.Causative factors of information cocoon towards researchers under the internet environment[J]. Information studies:theory&application, 2022, 45(2):43-48.)
[23] 姜婷婷,许艳闰.窄化的信息世界:国外信息茧房、选择性接触与回音室研究进展[J].图书情报知识, 2021,38(5):134-144.(JIANG T T, XU Y R. Narrowed information universe:a review of research on information cocoons, selective exposure, and echo chambers[J]. Documentation, information&knowledge, 2021, 38(5):134-144.)
[24] BEAM A M, HUTCHENS J M, HMIELOWSKI D J. Facebook news and(de)polarization:reinforcing spirals in the 2016 US election[J]. Information, communication&society, 2018, 21(7):940-958.
[25] 卢智增,高翔.社交媒体平台群体极化的形成机理与引导策略研究[J].情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(8):51-58.(LU Z Z,GAO X. The study on the formation mechanism and guiding strategies of group polarization in social media platforms[J].Information studies:theory&application, 2021, 44(8):51-58.)
[26] 王晰巍,刘宇桐,李玥琪.突发公共卫生事件中公民隐私泄露舆情的情感演化图谱研究[J].情报理论与实践, 2022,45(3):19-27.(WANG X W, LIU Y T, LI Y Q. A study on the emotional evolutionary mapping of public opinion on citizens’privacy leakage in public health emergencies[J]. Information studies:theory&application, 2022, 45(3):19-27.)
[27] 龚栩,邓胜利.突发公共卫生事件下多元主体信息披露内容及特征演化研究[J].情报资料工作, 2022, 43(4):16-26.(GONG X, DENG S L. Research on the content and characteristic evolution of information disclosure of multiple subjects under public health emergencies[J]. Information and documentation services, 2022, 43(4):16-26.)
[28] MEHRABIAN A, RUSSELL J A. An approach to environmental psychology[M]. Cambridge:The MIT Press, 1974.
[29] 王萍,文晴,初彦伯,等.信息疫情背景下健康谣言分享意愿影响因素研究——基于S-O-R与ELM整合模型[J].图书情报工作, 2023, 67(22):114-127.(WANG P, WEN Q, CHU Y B, et al. Factors affecting users’ intention to share online health rumor in the context of infodemic:based on the integrated model of S-O-R and ELM[J]. Library and information service, 2023,67(22):114-127.)
[30] KUMAR A A. Semantic memory:a review of methods, models,and current challenges[J]. Psychonomic bulletin&review, 2021,28(1):40-80.
[31] 喻国明,方可人.算法推荐必然导致“信息茧房”效应吗——兼论算法的媒介本质与技术伦理[J].新闻论坛, 2019(6):14-18.(YU G M, FANG K R. Does algorithmic recommendation inevitably result in the‘Information Cocoon’ effect? An analysis of the media nature and ethical implications of algorithms[J].News tribune, 2019(6):14-18.)
[32] SIEBENHAAR K U, KÖTHER A K, ALPERS G W. Dealing with the COVID-19 infodemic:distress by information,information avoidance, and compliance with preventive measures[J]. Frontiers in psychology, 2020, 11:567905.
[33] 李嘉兴,王晰巍,李师萌,等.信息生态视角下老年用户群体微信使用行为影响因素研究[J].图书情报工作, 2017,61(15):25-33.(LI J X, WANG X W, LI S M, et al. Research on influencing factors of the elderly WeChat users’ willingness[J].Library and information service, 2017, 61(15):25-33.)
[34] 任秋菊,赵昕,韩毅.用户视角下信息茧房的成因分析[J].图书情报工作, 2021, 65(1):120-127.(REN Q J, ZHAO X, HAN Y. Analysis on the causes of the information cocoons under user perspectives[J]. Library and information service, 2021, 65(1):120-127.)
[35] SUNSTEIN C R. Infotopia:how many minds produce knowledge[M]. New York:Oxford University Press, 2006.
[36] 闻心玥,程慧平.面向突发公共卫生事件的大学生社交媒体用户信息规避行为影响因素研究[J].信息资源管理学报,2022, 12(2):25-38.(WEN X Y, CHENG H P. Research on the influencing factors of information avoidance behavior of college students as social media users in public health emergencies[J].Journal of information resources management, 2022, 12(2):25-38.)
[37] 杨雨娇,袁勤俭.个性化推荐的隐忧:基于扎根理论的信息茧房及其前因后果探析[J].情报理论与实践, 2023, 46(3):117-126.(YANG Y J, YUAN Q J. The threat of personalized recommendation:a study based on grounded theory about the information cocoons and its antecedents and outcomes[J].Information studies:theory&application, 2023, 46(3):117-126.)
[38] 陈媛.作茧与破茧:算法时代学术传播的价值重塑与权力规制[J].数字出版研究, 2024, 3(1):51-59.(CHEN Y. Cocoon and cocoon-break:value reshaping and power regulating of academic communication in algorithm era[J]. Digital publishing research,2024, 3(1):51-59.)
[39] ZUIDERVEEN-BORGESIUS F J, TRILLING D, MÖLLER J,et al. Should we worry about filter bubbles?[J]. Internet policy review, 2016, 5(1):1-16.
[40] 喻国明,方可人.算法型内容推送会导致信息茧房吗?——基于媒介多样性和信源信任的一项实证分析[J].山东社会科学, 2020(11):170-174, 169.(YU G M, FANG K R. Will algorithmic content delivery result in information cocoons? A positive analysis based on media diversity and trust in information source[J]. Shandong social sciences, 2020(11):170-174, 169.)
[41] CLAY R, BARBER J M, SHOOK N J. Techniques for measuring selective exposure:a critical review[J]. Communication methods&measures, 2013, 7(3-4):147-171.
[42] PARMELEE J H, ROMAN N. Insta-echoes:selective exposure and selective avoidance on Instagram[J]. Telematics and informatics, 2020, 52:101432.
[43] 叶莎莎,杜婉鹏,杜杏叶.信息茧房视域下移动知识服务使用影响因素研究[J].图书情报工作, 2022, 66(16):117-124.(YE S S, DU W P, DU X Y. Research on influencing factors of mobile knowledge service usage from the perspective of information cocoons[J]. Library and information service, 2022,66(16):117-124.)
[44] 杨芳芳,宋雪雁.自媒体平台信息传播中信息茧房形成的演化博弈研究[J].情报科学, 2023, 41(12):48-56.(YANG F F,SONG X Y. Evolutionary game of the formation of information cocoon in the information dissemination of We-media platform[J]. Information science, 2023, 41(12):48-56.)
[45] 秦燕,李卓.突发公共卫生事件中的基层数字治理及其关系优化——基于治理关系中的基层避责与信息茧房视角[J].理论探讨, 2020(6):167-175.(QIN Y, LI Z. Grassroots digital governance and relationship optimization in public health emergencies:a study based on accountability avoidance and the information cocoon perspective in governance relationships[J].Theoretical investigation, 2020(6):167-175.)
[46] EKSTRÖM A G, NIEHORSTER D C, OLSSON E J. Selfimposed filter bubbles:selective attention and exposure in online search[J]. Computers in human behavior reports, 2022(7):100226.
[47] MIN Y, JIANG T, JIN C, et al. Endogenetic structure of filter bubble in social networks[J]. Royal society open science, 2019,6(11):160-168.
[48] 傅诗婷,姜婷婷,田慧溢.平衡信息接触能否帮助人们打破信息茧房?信息感知与态度变化的关系研究[J].信息资源管理学报, 2023, 13(1):41-51.(FU S T, JIANG T T, TIAN H Y. Can balanced information exposure help people break the information cocoons? the relationship between information perception and attitude change[J]. Journal of information resources management, 2023, 13(1):41-51.)
[49] COMREY A L, LEE H B. A first course in factor analysis[M].Hillsdale:Psychology press, 2013:243.
[50] HAYES A F. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis:a regression-based approach[M].London:Guilford Publications, 2017.
[51] AIKEN L S, WEST S G. Multiple regression:testing and interpreting interactions[M]. Thousand Oaks:Sage Publications,1991.
文章导航

/

〈 〉