研究论文

基于引用代分析的专利标准化阶段识别——以手术机器人为例

  • 陈实 ,
  • 黄雯雯 ,
  • 姜宜欣
展开
  • 北京师范大学政府管理学院 北京 100875
陈实,教授级高工,博士,硕士生导师,E-mail:kjchensh@bnu.edu.cn;黄雯雯,硕士研究生;姜宜欣,硕士研究生。

收稿日期: 2025-05-06

  修回日期: 2025-09-04

  网络出版日期: 2026-06-23

基金资助

北京市自然科学基金项目“面向创新贡献的科学基金动态绩效评估--基于政府参与下的知识进化视角”(项目编号:9232013)研究成果之一。

Identifying the Standardization Phases of Patents by Citation Generation Analysis: A Case Study of Surgical Robots

  • Chen Shi ,
  • Huang Wenwen ,
  • Jiang Yixin
Expand
  • School of Government, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875
Chen Shi, Professor-level Senior Engineer, PhD, Master's Supervisor, E-mail:kjchensh@bnu.edu.cn; Huang Wenwen, Master's Candidate; Jiang Yixin, Master's Candidate.

Received date: 2025-05-06

  Revised date: 2025-09-04

  Online published: 2026-06-23

Supported by

This work is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality project titled “Dynamic Performance Evaluation of Science Funds for Innovation Contribution: from the Perspective of Knowledge Evolution with Government Participation” (Grant No. 9232013).

摘要

[目的/意义] 旨在构建一套聚焦技术标准化阶段识别的评估方法框架,结合高价值专利的案例分析,为政府动态优化专利资助策略提供理论依据与实践支撑。[方法/过程] 基于Abernathy-Utterback模型和发散—收敛模式,通过构建腔镜手术机器人核心专利的引用代结构,刻画技术扩散与收敛过程,动态呈现技术演化路径,识别其处于全球标准化关键阶段的证据。[结果/结论] 引用代方法具备动态识别能力与前瞻分析优势,强调从收敛性趋势中识别标准化信号,能够有效刻画技术集群内部的演化趋势与标准化进程,为高价值专利的战略评估提供新的分析工具。

本文引用格式

陈实 , 黄雯雯 , 姜宜欣 . 基于引用代分析的专利标准化阶段识别——以手术机器人为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2026 , 70(13) : 80 -91 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2026.13.007

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] This study develops an evaluation framework for identifying the standardization phases of technologies by analyzing high-value patents. The goal is to provide theoretical support and practical guidance for governments to dynamically optimize their patent funding strategies. [Method/Process] Drawing on the Abernathy–Utterback model and the divergence-convergence pattern, the study constructs a citation generation structure for core patents in laparoscopic surgical robotics. It captures the dynamics of technological diffusion, convergence, and integration, dynamically visualizes the evolutionary path, and provides evidence for identifying its current phase of global standardization. [Result/Conclusion] The citation generation method demonstrates strong capabilities in dynamic identification and prospective analysis. By detecting convergence trends within citation generations, it enables the recognition of emerging standardization signals. This approach offers a novel analytical tool for the strategic assessment of high-value patents, particularly in identifying internal evolutionary trends and standardization progress within technology clusters.

参考文献

[1] VIARDOT E, SHERIF M H, CHEN J. Managing innovation with standardization:an introduction to recent trends and new challenges[J]. Technovation, 2016, 48:1-3.
[2] ALLEN R H, SRIRAM R D. The role of standards in innovation[J]. Technological forecasting and social change, 2000,64(2/3):171-181.
[3] WIEGMANN P M, EGGERS F, DE VRIES H J, et al. Competing standard-setting organizations:a choice experiment[J]. Research policy, 2022, 51(2):104427.
[4] BESEN S M, FARRELL J. Choosing how to compete:strategies and tactics in standardization[J]. Journal of economic perspectives, 1994, 8(2):117-131.
[5] MALERBA F, NELSON R. Learning and catching up in different sectoral systems:evidence from six industries[J]. Industrial and corporate change, 2011, 20(6):1645-1675.
[6] UTTERBACK J M, ABERNATHY W J. A dynamic model of process and product innovation[M]. Organizational Innovation.London:Routledge, 2018:193-210.
[7] LI M, WU Z, WANG L, et al. Does firm's value matter with firm's patent quality in technology-intensive industries?[J]. IEEE transactions on engineering management, 2020, 70(4):1587-1604.
[8] ZHANG L, ZHANG T, LANG Y, et al. Research on patent quality evaluation based on rough set and cloud model[J]. Expert systems with applications, 2024, 235:121057.
[9] GRIMALDI M, CRICELLI L. Indexes of patent value:a systematic literature review and classification[J]. Knowledge management research&practice, 2020, 18(2):214-233.
[10] 刘洋.高价值专利指标探讨--基于中国金奖专利的实证分析[J].中国高校科技, 2021(8):80-84.(LIU Y. Discussion on high-value patent indicators:an empirical analysis based on China's gold award patents[J]. China university science&technology, 2020, 18(2):214-233.)
[11] MAGEE C L, BASNET S, FUNK J L, et al. Quantitative empirical trends in technical performance[J]. Technological forecasting and social change, 2016, 104:237-246.
[12] HAMMARFELT B. Linking science to technology:the"patent paper citation"and the rise of patentometrics in the 1980s[J].Journal of documentation, 2021, 77(6):1413-1429.
[13] STOFFELS M A, KLAUCK F J R, HAMADI T, et al.Technology trends of catalysts in hydrogenation reactions:a patent landscape analysis[J]. Advanced synthesis&catalysis,2020, 362(6):1258-1274.
[14] 孙笑明,滕若彤,苏屹,等.基于技术生命周期理论的专利价值评估研究[J].科技管理学报, 2024, 26(5):27-39.(SUN X M, TENG R T, SU Y, et al. Research on patent value evaluation based on the theory of technology lifecycle[J]. Journal of science and technology management, 2024, 26(5):27-39.)
[15] PARK J, HEO E. Patent quality determinants based on technology life cycle with special reference to solar-cell technology field[J]. Maejo international journal of science&technology, 2013, 7(2):315-328.
[16] YANG G, LU G, XU S, et al. Which type of dynamic indicators should be preferred to predict patent commercial potential?[J].Technological forecasting and social change, 2023, 193:122637.
[17] 吕璐成,赵亚娟.基于客观数据的专利价值评估指标进展与评述[J].图书情报工作, 2023, 67(18):129-139.(LV L C, ZHAO Y J. Progress and review of patent value evaluation indicators based on objective data[J]. Library and information service, 2023, 67(18):129-139.)
[18] SMOJVER V,ŠTORGA M, ZOVAK G. Exploring knowledge flow within a technology domain by conducting a dynamic analysis of a patent co-citation network[J]. Journal of knowledge management, 2020, 25(2):433-453.
[19] 黄鲁成,蒋林杉,吴菲菲.萌芽期颠覆性技术识别研究[J].科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(1):10-17.(HUANG L C, JIANG L S,WU F F. The identification of disruptive technology on emerging stage[J]. Science&Technology progress and policy, 2019, 36(1):10-17.)
[20] HUANG Y, LI R, ZOU F, et al. Technology life cycle analysis:from the dynamic perspective of patent citation networks[J].Technological forecasting and social change, 2022, 181:121760.
[21] 刘明信,李丹丹,李荣,等.专利视阈下产业技术创新合作网络演化分析--以肿瘤疫苗为例[J].图书情报工作,2022, 66(9):117-127.(LIU M X, LI D D, LI R, et al. Evolution analysis of industrial technology innovation cooperation network from the perspective of patents:taking tumor vaccines as an example[J]. Library and information service, 2022, 66(9):117-127.)
[22] STEK P E. Identifying spatial technology clusters from patenting concentrations using heat map kernel density estimation[J].Scientometrics, 2021, 126(2):911-930.
[23] SU H N. How to analyze technology lifecycle from the perspective of patent characteristics?The cases of DVDs and hard drives[J]. R&D management, 2018, 48(3):308-319.
[24] SUAREZ F F, UTTERBACK J M. Dominant designs and the survival of firms[J]. Strategic management journal, 1995, 16(6):415-430.
[25] WITTFOTH S, WUSTMANS M, MOEHRLE M G.The development of product and process claims in Bluray technology:indicators for the dynamics of innovation theory[C]//2017 Portland international conference on management of engineering and technology. Portland:IEEE,2017:1-8.
[26] CAVIGGIOLI F. Technology fusion:identification and analysis of the drivers of technology convergence using patent data[J].Technovation, 2016, 55:22-32.
[27] KIM E, CHO Y, KIM W. Dynamic patterns of technological convergence in printed electronics technologies:patent citation network[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 98(2):975-998.
[28] HE C, SHI F, TAN R. A synthetical analysis method of measuring technology convergence[J]. Expert systems with applications,2022, 209:118262.
[29] ROUSSEAU R. The Gozinto theorem:using citations to determine influences on a scientific publication[J].Scientometrics, 1987, 11(3/4):217-229.
[30] HU X, ROUSSEAU R, CHEN J. On the definition of forward and backward citation generations[J]. Journal of informetrics,2011, 5(1):27-36.
[31] MIN C, CHEN Q, YAN E, et al. Citation cascade and the evolution of topic relevance[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2021, 72(1):110-127.
[32] DE RASSENFOSSE G, JAFFE A B. Are patent fees effective at weeding out low-quality patents?[J]. Journal of economics&management strategy, 2018, 27(1):134-148.
[33] DOSI G. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories:a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change[J]. Research policy, 1982, 11(3):147-162.
[34] NELSON R R, WINTER S G. An evolutionary theory of economic change[M]. Cambridge:Harvard University Press, 1985.
[35] SOOD A, TELLIS G J. Technological evolution and radical innovation[J]. Journal of marketing, 2005, 69(3):152-168.
[36] ZHAO Q, FENG X. Utilizing citation network structure to predict paper citation counts:a deep learning approach[J].Journal of informetrics, 2022, 16(1):101235.
[37] PARK Y N, LEE Y S, KIM J J, et al. The structure and knowledge flow of building information modeling based on patent citation network analysis[J]. Automation in construction,2018, 87:215-224.
[38] MICHEL J, BETTELS B. Patent citation analysis:a closer look at the basic input data from patent search reports[J].Scientometrics, 2001, 51(1):185-201.
[39] LIU J S, LU L Y Y, HO M H C. A few notes on main path analysis[J]. Scientometrics, 2019, 119(1):379-391.
[40] BRINN T, JONES M J, PENDLEBURY M. Measuring the research quality of accounting journals:the UK's research assessment exercise[J]. Accounting and business research, 2003,33(2):89-115.
[41] HE X, DONG Y, ZHEN Z, et al. Weighted meta paths and networking embedding for patent technology trade recommendations among subjects[J]. Knowledge-based systems,2019, 184:104899.
[42] HUANG Y, SU D, KIM Y. Timing choice and catch-up strategy for latecomers in emerging green technologies:an exploration study on China's high-speed rail industry[J]. Journal of cleaner production, 2020, 276:124257.
[43] CHO I, JU Y. Text mining method to identify artificial intelligence technologies for the semiconductor industry in Korea[J]. World patent information, 2023, 74:102212.
[44] KIM E H J, JEONG Y K, KIM Y H, et al. Exploring scientific trajectories of a large-scale dataset using topic-integrated path extraction[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2022, 16(1):101242.
[45] ÉRDI P, MAKOVI K, SOMOGYVÁRI Z, et al. Prediction of emerging technologies based on analysis of the US patent citation network[J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 95(1):225-242.
[46] D'AGOSTINO R, PEARSON E S. Tests for departure from normality. Empirical results for the distributions of b2 and√b1[J].Biometrika, 1973, 60(3):613-622.
[47] 沙利文.手术机器人市场研究[R/OL].[2025-10-22]. https://www.frostchina.com/content/insight/detail/66ebc283bd3cdfe88cee2a13.(Frost&Sullivan. Global surgical robotics market outlook[R/OL].[2025-10-22]. https://www.frostchina.com/content/insight/detail/66ebc283bd3cdfe88cee2a13.)
[48] IFR. World robotics 2025 report[R/OL].[2025-10-22]. https://ifr.org/.
[49] GUO Y, CHEN W, ZHAO J, et al. Medical robotics:opportunities in China[J]. Annual review of control, robotics, and autonomous systems, 2022, 5(1):361-383.
[50] 医装数胜. 2024年度中国腔镜手术机器人市场洞察[R/OL].[2025-10-22]. https://data.eastmoney.com/report/zw_industry.js html?infocode=AP202503061644111581.(YI ZHUANG SHU SHENG. China endoscopic surgery robot market insight report2024[R/OL].[2025-10-22]. https://data.eastmoney.com/report/zw_industry.jshtml?infocode=AP202503061644111581.)
[51] DE GROEN P C. History of the endoscope[scanning our past][J].Proceedings of the IEEE, 2017, 105(10):1987-1995.
[52] 陈冲,李永亮,冯海龙,等.光动力治疗内窥镜研究进展综述[J].激光杂志, 2025, 46(1):1-8.(CHEN C, LI Y L, FENG H L, et al. Review on the research progress of photodynamic endoscopic therapy[J]. Laser journal, 2025, 46(1):1-8.)
[53] DAGNINO G, KUNDRAT D. Robot-assistive minimally invasive surgery:trends and future directions[J]. International journal of intelligent robotics and applications, 2024, 8(4):812-826.
[54] GEORGE E I, BRAND C T C, MARESCAUX J. Origins of robotic surgery:from skepticism to standard of care[J]. Journal of the society of laparoendoscopic surgeons, 2018, 22(4):e2018.00039.
[55] ISO. ISO 19233-1:2017. Robotic systems for surgical applications-Part 1:General requirements for safety and performance[S]. Geneva:International Organization for Standardization, 2017.
[56] IEC. IEC 80601-2-77:2019. Medical electrical equipment-Part 2-77:Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of robotic medical electrically operated equipment[S]. Geneva:International Electrotechnical Commission, 2019.
[57] OMISORE O M, HAN S, XIONG J, et al. A review on flexible robotic systems for minimally invasive surgery[J]. IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics:systems, 2020,52(1):631-644.
文章导航

/

〈 〉